Citaat:
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Jantje
Kan er niet direct opkomen het welke het was, maar laatst was er nog een ongeval veroorzaakt door AI van een vliegtuig op NG.
|
Ik geloof er niets van dat AI al in de luchtvaart aangewend wordt.
Zonder link zal dat dus niet waar zijn.
Dat foutieve of defecte meetinstrumenten tot vliegtuigongevallen kunnen leiden is heel wat anders.
In elk geval wordt AI gebruikt voor Attitude Indicator
Citaat:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_In...ence_of_events
The cockpit voice recorder recovered from the wreckage revealed the captain made a verbal comment about his Attitude indicator (AI) having "toppled", meaning that it was still showing the aircraft in a right bank. The first officer, whose presumably functional AI was now showing a left bank, said that his AI was also toppled, but there is some belief that the Captain mistakenly took this to mean that both primary AIs were indicating a right bank. It was after sunset and the aircraft was flying over a dark Arabian Sea, leaving the aircrew unable to visually cross-check their AI instrument readings with the actual horizon outside the cockpit windows.
The Boeing 747 had a third backup AI in the center instrument panel between the two pilots, and the transcripts of the cockpit conversation show that the flight engineer may have been attempting to direct the captain's attention to that third AI, or perhaps to another instrument called the turn and bank indicator, just five seconds before the aircraft impacted the sea.
The captain's mistaken perception of the aircraft's attitude resulted in his using the aircraft flight control system to add more left bank and left rudder, causing the Boeing 747 to rapidly lose altitude. Just 101 seconds after leaving the runway the jet hit the Arabian Sea at an estimated 35-degree nose-down angle. There were no survivors among the 190 passengers and 23 crew members.
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attitude_indicator