Discussie: ChatGPT
Los bericht bekijken
Oud 4 februari 2023, 21:10   #40
vanderzapig
Europees Commissaris
 
vanderzapig's schermafbeelding
 
Geregistreerd: 15 juni 2013
Berichten: 6.937
Standaard

Citaat:
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door patrickve Bekijk bericht
But if we eliminate future generations, then they will not suffer a loss in well-being, as they don't exist, don't they ?

Eliminating future generations by neglecting the sustainability of the planet would not only entail a loss of potential well-being for those future individuals, but it would also be a disregard for the intrinsic value of preserving life and the biosphere as a whole. Moreover, actions that lead to the destruction of the planet's ability to sustain life would also have negative impacts on current and future generations, which would suffer the consequences of environmental degradation and loss of biodiversity.

In what way is a non-existing life form suffering loss of well-being ?

A non-existing life form cannot suffer a loss of well-being as it does not have the capacity for experiencing well-being or any other form of experience. However, preserving the possibility for future generations to exist and flourish is a value in itself and should be considered as such.
Ik heb de indruk dat ChatGPT anti-abortus is.
__________________
Citaat:
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Henri1 Bekijk bericht
Het kan ook in scène gezet zijn hé.
vanderzapig is offline   Met citaat antwoorden