Citaat:
|
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Sfax
Onze nucleaire installaties toch draaiende houden?
|
In het belang van onze toekomst...een afbouwplan voor deze gevaarlijke energie maken.
Citaat:
All nuclear power plants release radioactive contaminants to the air, soil and water during normal, daily operations. Regulatory guidelines have essentially been set to allow the industry to operate, rather than to protect public health. The airborne contaminants affect nearby crops, vegetation. Tritium, a radioactive isotope of hydrogen that is produced at all nuclear reactors, acts like water in the body and can pass across the placenta to affect a developing fetus.
* A catastrophic meltdown accident at a nuclear power plant in the United States could kill anywhere from 700 to 100,000 people, with economic losses in the high billions and varying with the size and location of the plant, according to a congressional study on the consequences of a severe accident at a nuclear reactor.
* There is NO safe level of radiation yet all nuclear power plants release radioactive contaminants to the air, soil and water during normal, daily operations.
* Nuclear power plants are terrorist targets.
|
http://www.cleanenergy.org/programs/...?ID=4#problems
Neem daarbij het verzekeringsprobleem van een ramp en het afvalprobleem en je komt tot de conclusie dat deze energievorm goedkoop noemen onwaar is, integendeel. Het is een onverantwoorde en dure energievorm.
Windenergie daarentegen...
Citaat:
|
Wind energy is the fastest growing energy source in the world, with thousands of new Megawatts going up every year in both Europe and in the United States.
|
http://www.cleanenergy.org/programs/...arent=3&ps=Yes
is de toekomst.