de UKR fake news draad

[brother paul]

de russen zijn toch kraks in het 'reverse engineeren 'van berichten

vermoedelijk als resultaat van berichten ivm Putin zijn nakend ontslag

https://english.pravda.ru/world/1562...aine_zelensky/
kijk eens hier het westen is klaar om zelensky te dumpen volgens de pravda..

[brother paul]

neem nu deze natobunker ?
een nato bunker in UKR ?
UKR is nog geen lid van de nato...

https://english.pravda.ru/news/hotsp...e_strike_nato/

[brother paul]

een verdiende plaats: de Drone aanval op het Kremlin door UKR..

https://www.kyivpost.com/opinion/16700

How could they instantly know that Ukraine was behind the attack?
How could they believe that anybody would be so dumb as to expect Putin in the Kremlin at night?
Why were two men on the dome of the Senate Building in the middle of the night?
Why were the buildings not damaged?
Why did they not seek and arrest any suspect culprits?
Why hasn’t any responsible air defense generals been sacked?

[Bach]

De 'War on fakes' groep op Telegram heeft dagelijks berichten over vermeende valse info vanwege voornamelijk Oekraïense bronnen. Te veel voor mij om op in te gaan allemaal op dit forum. Ga er maar van uit dat er veel gelogen wordt langs elke kanten. Maar voor wie geïnteresseerd is, veel info aldaar.

[brother paul]

wel kijk hier is een goed overzicht

https://www.maritderoij.com/2022/10/...handje-helpen/


De mythe van extreemrechts in Oekraïne

Russische propagandamachine die sinds 2014 keihard werkt aan het verspreiden van het narratief dat extreemrechts Oekraïne in zijn greep houdt. Rusland spuwt al acht jaar lang op al haar kanalen dagelijks artikelen over Oekraïense nazi’s de wereld in, en heeft op die manier nuttige idioten en opiniemakers met een stem in de Westerse media beïnvloed, die het narratief de gevestigde media in hielpen

aanval op Navalny

Russische oppositieleider Aleksej Navalny na het herstel van zijn vergiftiging terug naar Rusland. Hij werd op het vliegveld direct opgepakt, en een dag later volgde een klein showproces op een politiebureau in Moskou, waarbij hij werd veroordeeld voor het “schenden van zijn proeftijd” en achter slot en grendel verdween. Weer een dag later bracht Navalny’s team zijn film “Poetin’s paleis: een verhaal over de grootste steekpenning ter wereld” uit, die 124 miljoen keer bekeken zou worden. In drie dagen rees Navalny’s ster wereldwijd tot ongekende hoogte. Daar zat het Kremlin natuurlijk niet op te wachten. Een tegenaanval was nodig. Die volgde in de namiddag van dag drie, enkele uren na de publicatie van de film.

Pro-Russische separatisten

In 2014 stroomden Russische troepen en agenten deze gebieden binnen om ‘separatistische opstanden’ te organiseren en het te laten lijken alsof Oekraïners in deze gebieden niet bij Oekraïne wilden horen. Allemaal gefingeerd.

[brother paul]

https://meta.mk/en/it-is-not-true-th...member-states/

The post we fact-checked is falsely claiming that the EU has banned the imports of wheat from Ukraine in some Member-States. On the contrary, the EU opposed the unilateral decisions of Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, Romania and Bulgaria to temporarily ban the import of grain from Ukraine in order to protect their own farmers once a mutually acceptable agreement on 28th April. This Agreement preserves the export capacity of Ukraine to continue feeding the world, as well as the livelihood of the farmers in the EU, writes Truthmeter.mk.

Under the content-sharing agreement between Truthmeter.mk and Meta.mk, we republish the text below:



A Facebook post claims (screenshot here) that the EU banned the imports of Ukrainian wheat in five EU Member-States and alludes that the product was harmful, hence the ban. But this is not true. The EU has not banned imports, and the five Member-States did that upon their own initiative.

The EU banned the imports of Ukrainian wheat into the Czech Republic, Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, Bulgaria… Be careful what you buy!!!…

The post on the social network Facebook falsely claims that the European Union banned the imports of Ukrainian wheat into the Czech Republic, Poland, Hungary, Slovakia and Bulgaria. The EU did not ban the imports, but on the contrary, it opposed the individual decisions of the five Member-States – Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, Romania and Bulgaria – to temporarily ban the import of Ukrainian grain in order to protect their own farmers.

With the sentence “be careful what you buy” the post insinuates that the import ban was imposed because the wheat was harmful, hence the majority of comments under the post, such as these:

MACEDONIA WILL BE THE ONLY ONE THAT WILL BUY UKRAINIAN WHEAT… NO MATTER THAT IT WILL BE RADIOACTIVE… FROM THE DEPLETED URANIUM USED BY THE UKRAINIANS
In the upcoming period, nobody will buy the Ukro-fascist wheat because the Brits have, allegedly, started helping them with depleted uranium missiles that will pollute the soil and water, everything.

However, this is not true. No ban was imposed due to the quality of the products.

Two months ago, five EU Member-States – Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, Romania and Bulgaria – requested, in writing, from the European Commission help for their farmers and food producers who had suffered because of the cheap imports from Ukraine. Consequently, end of March, the EU agreed an aid package worth 56 million Euros available to Member-States to compensate farmers.

Mid-April, first Poland and then the other four Member-States unilaterally banned cereals and other agricultural products imported from Ukraine, saying that they wanted to protect their own farmers.

After two weeks of intensive negotiations, Brussels announced an agreement on the Ukrainian grain that apparently protects Ukraine’s economy but also the livelihood of EU farmers.

Last Friday, the European Commission announced that it reached an agreement with five EU Member-States, including Poland and Hungary, to ensure Ukrainian grain transit following the import bans imposed by these countries which Brussels considered “unacceptable”.

This agreement also preserves Ukraine’s export capacity so that it will continue to feed the world, as well as the livelihood of our farmers in the EU, tweeted the President of the European Comission, Ursula von der Leyen.




The agreement foresees the end of the unilateral import bans in exchange for “exclusive safeguards” for four Ukrainian products: wheat, corn, beet seeds, and sunflower seeds.

The publication of this manipulative and untrue post was subject of a fact-check from 2nd May, which is four days after the EU reached an agreement with the five Member-States that temporarily banned the import of grain from Ukraine.

Due to the facts noted above, we assess the claim that the EU banned the import of wheat from Ukraine for some Member-States as untrue. Quite the opposite, the EU opposed such unilateral decisions of the government of these Member-States once they reached a mutually acceptable agreement.

hubeng

Download WordPress ThemesDownload WordPress Themes FreeDownload WordPress ThemesDownload Nulled WordPress Themesfree download udemy paid coursedownload micromax firmwareDownload Nulled WordPress Themesudemy free download
?????*Truthmeter.mk
??????Bulgariacrop farmersdisinformationEUexporthubenghubmkHungaryimp ortPolandRomaniaSlovakiaUkrainëwheat

Previous article
The social media as lever for spreading authoritarian propaganda
????
????
???????? ??????
Europe
The social media as lever for spreading authoritarian propaganda
Fact-checking
There is no billboard for donations with the image of Zelenskyy in Milan
Balkans
The influence of Bulgaria on back azimuth

?????? ????? ?? ?????? ???????
????? ??? ?? 17 ?. ????????? ?? ??????? ?? ?????????? ???????? ???? ???????? ?? ?????? ??????????? ??????.

??????? ?? ?????? email
???????
?? ?????? ???????? ?? ??? ????? ?????? ?? ???????? ?????????? ?? ???:
?????? ?? ?? ???????? ?? ???? ????? ????? ?????? ?? ?????? ?? ?????? ??????.