Onrust in Syrië

[Nr.10]

Sniper Bazaar Turkey: The New Land of Assassins?
_{10 mei 2015}

American built sniper rifles and specialized optics, thermal and light amplification, all very restricted, are flooding into Turkey. They are going to Al Qaeda. (...)

Are sniper rifles the only weapons being gathered for Al Qaeda? First of all, it should be a reasonable concern that weapons like these are going into the hands of terrorists. It might also be a concern that they are coming from the United States and flowing directly to the group that many Americans, those who believe our government, a smaller group every minute, believe was responsible for 9/11. Who are they going to kill with these things? (...)

(...) shoot 800 meters with deadly accuracy. A child can kill at extreme distances with one of these with almost no training at all. These weapons were what the US didn’t have in Afghanistan and why the US bought back a shipload of aging Garand style M14s from Korea, weapons that are primitive in comparison although excellent.

The partnership between Israel and Turkey is no surprise. The superiority of American weapons is a surprise to some but it shouldn’t be. What should be of note is that Al Qaeda feels totally free to come to the United States to gather needed hardware designed only to murder specific medium to high value targets and nobody seems to care. With a 24 inch Ar 10 with a thermal scope, a SWAT officer nearly a thousand yards away wearing extensive camouflage and obscured by smoke can be killed quickly and easily with a single shot. A skilled shooter with a Semi-Automatic Sniper System can erase an entire special operations team in 15 seconds. There are specialized optics available for these weapons that automatically track a chosen target and operate the trigger as well. We don’t even want to begin discussing remote sniper systems that work off an Ipad anywhere on earth. Someone has decided to “inoculate” themselves from American SEAL teams and Special Forces by flooding the battlefield with “low rent” amateur snipers. This is one weapon system, just one. How many others are getting the same “quick to market” promotion near Al Qaeda’s Hatay, Turkey training camps?

(fig.: het soort wapens dat naar de terroristen gaat)

[Nr.10]

Reportage op RT over Syrië. Duurtijd 27'40".

Syrian nightmare
_{15 mei 2015}

[zonbron]

Judicial Watch heeft documenten kunnen bemachtigen inzake Benghazi en wapentransport naar Syie via Libie.

.US Monitored Weapons Out of Libya Days Before Benghazi Attack © AP Photo/ Mohammad Hannon

04:12 19.05.2015(updated 10:29 19.05.2015) Get short URL
http://sputniknews.com/middleeast/20...022298251.html

A Defense Intelligence report recently obtained by a watchdog group has uncovered surprising new facts about the 2012 Benghazi attack. Despite claims from the Obama administration, senior officials had closely monitored the shipment of weapons to Syria through Libya – arms which could have directly aided in the attack.

Over 100 classified pages from the Department of Defense and the Department of State have been obtained by watchdog group Judicial Watch. The documents contain a number of reports from the Defense Intelligence Agency, which contradict statements made by the Obama administration.

“The attack was planned ten or more days prior on approximately 01 September 2012,” the documents read. “The intention was to attack the consulate and to kill as many Americans as possible to seek revenge for US killing of Aboyahiye ((ALALIBY)) in Pakistan and in memorial of the 11 September 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center buildings.”

That document was dated only one day after the attack on the American diplomatic compound in Benghazi, at a time when top US officials insisted that the attack was a spontaneous reaction to an anti-Muslim video which had been posted online.

This also contradicts the White House’s claims that the date of the attack was a coincidence.

“The Obama administration says it was a coincidence that it occurred on 9/11,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton told Fox News. “In fact, their intelligence said it wasn’t a coincidence and in fact the attack occurred because it was 9/11.”

But even more shocking is the fact that US officials were monitoring the shipment of weapons through Benghazi to Syrian rebels.

“Weapons from the former Libya military stockpiles were shipped from the port of Benghazi, Libya to the Port of Banias and the Port of Borj Islam, Syria. The weapons shipped during late-August 2012 were Sniper rifles, RPG’s, and 125 mm and 155 mm howitzer missiles,” reads a DOD document from October, 2012.

Questions about the US knowledge of weapons shipments through Libya have been consistently avoided by administration officials. During Hillary Clinton’s congressional testimony on Benghazi, Senator Rand Paul raised the question directly.

“It’s been in news reports that ships have been leaving from Libya and that they may have weapons,” Paul said. “And what I’d like to know is, that annex that was close by, were they involved with procuring, buying, selling, obtaining weapons and were any of these weapons being transferred to other countries?”

“I do not know,” Clinton said. “I don’t have any information on that.”

The new documents could prove problematic for Clinton as she moves forward with her presidential campaign.

The Benghazi attack occurred on September 11, 2012, when Islamic extremists attacked the US diplomatic compound. The attack left two dead, including US Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens. A second attack at a separate compound ended in the death of two CIA contractors.

Last week, investigative journalist Seymour Hersh wrote a piece for the London Review of Books, claiming that the US fabricated its account of the raid that killed Osama bin Laden. While his story has been viciously attacked by the mainstream media, major details of Hersh’s story were confirmed by various US and Pakistani officials.

If Hersh’s report lent credibility to Americans’ distrust of their government, these new DIA documents may add more fuel to the fire.

Obama en Clinton liegen dat zwart zien. Sniperrifles...

[zonbron]

Judicial Watch heeft documenten kunnen bemachtigen inzake Benghazi en wapentransport naar Syie via Libie.

.US Monitored Weapons Out of Libya Days Before Benghazi Attack © AP Photo/ Mohammad Hannon

04:12 19.05.2015(updated 10:29 19.05.2015) Get short URL
http://sputniknews.com/middleeast/20...022298251.html

A Defense Intelligence report recently obtained by a watchdog group has uncovered surprising new facts about the 2012 Benghazi attack. Despite claims from the Obama administration, senior officials had closely monitored the shipment of weapons to Syria through Libya – arms which could have directly aided in the attack.

Over 100 classified pages from the Department of Defense and the Department of State have been obtained by watchdog group Judicial Watch. The documents contain a number of reports from the Defense Intelligence Agency, which contradict statements made by the Obama administration.

“The attack was planned ten or more days prior on approximately 01 September 2012,” the documents read. “The intention was to attack the consulate and to kill as many Americans as possible to seek revenge for US killing of Aboyahiye ((ALALIBY)) in Pakistan and in memorial of the 11 September 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center buildings.”

That document was dated only one day after the attack on the American diplomatic compound in Benghazi, at a time when top US officials insisted that the attack was a spontaneous reaction to an anti-Muslim video which had been posted online.

This also contradicts the White House’s claims that the date of the attack was a coincidence.

“The Obama administration says it was a coincidence that it occurred on 9/11,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton told Fox News. “In fact, their intelligence said it wasn’t a coincidence and in fact the attack occurred because it was 9/11.”

But even more shocking is the fact that US officials were monitoring the shipment of weapons through Benghazi to Syrian rebels.

“Weapons from the former Libya military stockpiles were shipped from the port of Benghazi, Libya to the Port of Banias and the Port of Borj Islam, Syria. The weapons shipped during late-August 2012 were Sniper rifles, RPG’s, and 125 mm and 155 mm howitzer missiles,” reads a DOD document from October, 2012.

Questions about the US knowledge of weapons shipments through Libya have been consistently avoided by administration officials. During Hillary Clinton’s congressional testimony on Benghazi, Senator Rand Paul raised the question directly.

“It’s been in news reports that ships have been leaving from Libya and that they may have weapons,” Paul said. “And what I’d like to know is, that annex that was close by, were they involved with procuring, buying, selling, obtaining weapons and were any of these weapons being transferred to other countries?”

“I do not know,” Clinton said. “I don’t have any information on that.”

The new documents could prove problematic for Clinton as she moves forward with her presidential campaign.

The Benghazi attack occurred on September 11, 2012, when Islamic extremists attacked the US diplomatic compound. The attack left two dead, including US Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens. A second attack at a separate compound ended in the death of two CIA contractors.

Last week, investigative journalist Seymour Hersh wrote a piece for the London Review of Books, claiming that the US fabricated its account of the raid that killed Osama bin Laden. While his story has been viciously attacked by the mainstream media, major details of Hersh’s story were confirmed by various US and Pakistani officials.

If Hersh’s report lent credibility to Americans’ distrust of their government, these new DIA documents may add more fuel to the fire.

Obama en Clinton liegen dat zwart zien. Sniperrifles...

[zonbron]

Judicial Watch heeft documenten inzake de toestand in Syrie en Irak bekomen:

http://www.judicialwatch.org/documen...tate-14-812-2/

Een aanrader.

[Nr.10]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door zonbron

Judicial Watch heeft documenten inzake de toestand in Syrie en Irak bekomen:

http://www.judicialwatch.org/documen...tate-14-812-2/

Een aanrader.

Over Judicial Watch :

Founded by conservative attorney Larry Klayman in 1994.

Wie is Larry Klayman ?

Klayman was born to Jewish parents.

Waar houdt de betrokkene zich mee bezig ? Een voorbeeld :

In April 2011, Klayman filed a lawsuit against Facebook, accusing the social media website of "negligence" for not responding quickly enough to calls to take down an anti-Israel "Third Intifada" page and demanding $1 billion in damages.

[Nr.10]

Een zoveelste zionistische bron gesitueerd in en rond Washington om de berichtgeving over Irak en Syrië de gewenste richting uit te sturen ?

[Nr.10]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Nr.10

Ik heb vandaag mijn Syrische vriend, afkomstig uit Damascus, kort gesproken.

Idlib werd ingenomen, meldde hij, omdat Turkije 12.000 terroristen de grens liet oversteken.

Ook een andere plaats werd ingenomen (de naam ontsnapt me) door de terroristen. Op deze plaats ging het om duizenden terroristen uit Tsjetsjenië en de Kaukasus.

Dit is mogelijk de stap te ver die Turkije ondernam in de agressie naar Syrië toe. Syrië en Iran hebben een onderling defensie pact, ondertekend in 2006. Dit betekent dat indien één van beide aangevallen wordt het een aanval is op beide tegelijk. Indien er duidelijke bewijzen zijn van de betrokkenheid van Turkije bij de inname van Idlib kan het onderlinge defensie-pact in werking treden. Vanuit Idlib ligt de weg naar Latakia open.

[Piero]

De coalitie steunt Koerden in de strijd tegen IS in Tel Abyad in Syrië.
Erdogan is furieus.

De Turkse regering is niet blij met de inzet van Koerdische strijders bij Tel Abyad. Correspondent Lucas Waagmeester zegt dat de strijd om de stad een splijtzwam kan worden tussen Turkije en de internationale coalitie tegen IS. De regering spreekt van Koerdische terroristen, die Arabisch gebied willen veroveren. NOS

[Tamam]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Piero

De coalitie steunt Koerden in de strijd tegen IS in Tel Abyad in Syrië.
Erdogan is furieus.

De Turkse regering is niet blij met de inzet van Koerdische strijders bij Tel Abyad. Correspondent Lucas Waagmeester zegt dat de strijd om de stad een splijtzwam kan worden tussen Turkije en de internationale coalitie tegen IS. De regering spreekt van Koerdische terroristen, die Arabisch gebied willen veroveren. NOS

Erdogan ziet liever IS terroristen dan Koerden.

[Nietzsche]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Tamam

Erdogan ziet liever IS terroristen dan Koerden.

Nogal logisch, he. Turkije heeft al jaren en jaren gedoe met PKK-terroristen.

[zonbron]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Nietzsche

Nogal logisch, he. Turkije heeft al jaren en jaren gedoe met PKK-terroristen.

Uw logica ontgaat me.

[Nietzsche]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door zonbron

Uw logica ontgaat me.

Vertel

[djoebidoebidoe]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Nietzsche

Vertel

ha nee, vertelt u eens waarom turkije liever IS terroristen ziet ipv koerden.

[Nietzsche]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door djoebidoebidoe

ha nee, vertelt u eens waarom turkije liever IS terroristen ziet ipv koerden.

Dat zei ik net he: Turkije heeft al jaren en jaren last van PKK-terroristen.

Dan willen ze niet dat een tweede Koerdische groepering zijn macht kan uitbreiden (de YPG).

Allemaal logica des zelve.

[Kallikles]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Nietzsche

Dat zei ik net he: Turkije heeft al jaren en jaren last van PKK-terroristen.

Dan willen ze niet dat een tweede Koerdische groepering zijn macht kan uitbreiden (de YPG).

Allemaal logica des zelve.

Dan moeten ze misschien zelf iets doen tegen Daech hé. Als YPG de enige groepering is die de wapens opneemt tegen Daech, dan zullen zij ook de sympathie van de publieke opinie naar zich toehalen en een gigantische politieke overwinning boeken voor de Koerdische zaak. De verkiezingsnederlaag van Erdogan heeft waarschijnlijk ook te maken met het falend buitenlands beleid.

De AKP was nochtans goed begonnen. Men had de "geen problemen met buren" doctrine nooit mogen verlaten. En men had ook de kans die men had op een vredesdeal met de PKK al lang moeten grijpen. Maar op een bepaald moment is het succes de AKP naar het hoofd gestegen.

[Nr.10]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door djoebidoebidoe

ha nee, vertelt u eens waarom turkije liever IS terroristen ziet ipv koerden.

Omdat de Syrische Koerden een akkoord hebben met de regering en ook omdat de Syrische Koerden ideologisch nauw aansluiten bij de PKK, dit in tegenstelling tot de Iraakse Koerden, die onder de leiding staan van de maffiaclan rond Barzani, dewelke kan gecatalogeerd worden als puppets van de Amerikanen en Israël. Binnen de clan Barzani bevinden zich 15 dollar-miljardairs plus duizenden miljonairs, dit zonder dat ze de oorsprong van hun vermogen kunnen toelichten. Ideologisch staat dit zeer ver van de PKK en YPG.

[Nietzsche]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Kallikles

Dan moeten ze misschien zelf iets doen tegen Daech hé. Als YPG de enige groepering is die de wapens opneemt tegen Daech, dan zullen zij ook de sympathie van de publieke opinie naar zich toehalen en een gigantische politieke overwinning boeken voor de Koerdische zaak. De verkiezingsnederlaag van Erdogan heeft waarschijnlijk ook te maken met het falend buitenlands beleid.

De AKP was nochtans goed begonnen. Men had de "geen problemen met buren" doctrine nooit mogen verlaten. En men had ook de kans die men had op een vredesdeal met de PKK al lang moeten grijpen. Maar op een bepaald moment is het succes de AKP naar het hoofd gestegen.

Turkije heeft ervoor gekozen om IS (indirect) te steunen (of ze in ieder geval niet tegen te werken) . En ik kan ze dat niet kwalijk nemen.

Turkije kan simpelweg niet een tweede Koerdische machtsblok gebruiken. Ze hebben het al lastig genoeg met de PKK en hun guerrillatactieken.

Dit is hoe internationale politiek/diplomatiek werkt. De rol van Turkije is misschien heel immoreel, maar het is wat het is.

[Nietzsche]

[Nietzsche]

Tal Abyad is weer van de YPG !

IS......