sodoirt
18 december 2006, 16:42
Van de fondsen die niet in de zakken van Oxfam zijn blijven steken ongeveer 33% is hier blijven "plakken") wordt de rest nu gebruikt om de sharia in te voeren. Wanneer komt er een cordon sanitaire tegen Oxfam?
Tsunami survivors given the lash
Michael Sheridan and Dewi Loveard, Banda Aceh
Disaster donations help Islamic vigilante force impose punishments on women
WHEN people around the world sent millions of pounds to help the stricken Indonesian province of Aceh after the Boxing Day tsunami of 2004, few could have imagined that their money would end up subsidising the lashing of women in public.
But militant Islamists have since imposed sharia law in Aceh and have cornered Indonesian government funds to organise a moral vigilante force that harasses women and stages frequent displays of humiliation and state-sanctioned violence.
International aid workers and Indonesian women's organisations are now expressing dismay that the flow of foreign cash for reconstruction has allowed the government to spend scarce money on a new bureaucracy and religious police to enforce puritan laws, such as the compulsory wearing of headscarves.
Some say there are more "sharia police" than regular police on the local government payroll and that many of them are aggressive young men.
"Who are these sharia police?" demanded Nurjannah Ismail, a lecturer at Aceh's Ar-Raniri University. "They are men who, most of the time, are trying to send the message that their position is higher than women."
In one town, Lhokseumawe, the authorities are even planning to impose a curfew on women — a move that social workers warn will force tsunami widows to quit night-time jobs as food sellers or waitresses and could drive them into prostitution.
None of that daunts the enthusiasts for sharia, who gather in droves whenever there is an opportunity to glory in its enforcement.
The scene is always the same, and it has been enacted at least 140 times in squares and market places in front of mosques, from the towering minarets of Banda Aceh, the provincial capital, to humble village places of worship.
The transgressor can be a man accused of gambling or drinking alcohol. But if it is a woman guilty of wearing "improper" clothing or being caught in proximity to a man, there is a particular ritual to the punishment.
She is dressed in white robes and veiled. Policemen escort her up on to a stage erected before a jeering crowd, which, witnesses say, is usually almost exclusively male.
Forced to kneel, the woman waits while a masked man ascends the platform. He is carrying a cane with a curved handle designed to give the inflictor of God's punishment a better grip. From the loudspeakers, a man's voice sonorously recites the appropriate religious chastisement. Then he begins to count. With each number, the cane descends with a vicious lash.
According to witnesses, male onlookers often roar in delight and hurl pious imprecations at the victims, working themselves up to a pitch of excitement.
In one collective punishment last summer, four women denounced for gambling were given between six and 10 lashes. One passed out as she was dragged off the stage.
The vast majority of Indonesia's 220m people oppose sharia law and practise a more tolerant version of the Islamic faith. The country's secular constitution enjoins harmony and voters have consistently rejected calls for an Islamic state.
But audiences throughout the Indonesian archipelago watched the televised flogging of a man convicted of drinking beer. He collapsed after seven of the 40 prescribed strokes and officials said he would receive the remaining 33 when he recovered.
The example of Aceh has attracted fundamentalists from elsewhere in Indonesia, who see it as a blueprint for their own localities.
The irony is that sharia was first introduced into Aceh as part of a package of measures that ultimately succeeded in making peace in the long-running guerrilla war between the conservative, independence-minded Acehnese and the Indonesian state.
The 2004 tsunami, which killed 170,000 Indonesians, devastated the whole northern coast of Sumatra and shocked both sides in the conflict into reaching a deal after 30 years of fighting that had claimed 15,000 lives. It is, so far, a success story. The separatist guerrillas, known as GAM, have decommissioned most of their weapons and the Indonesian army has withdrawn most of its combat troops.
Last Monday the province held the first democratic elections in its history and early returns suggested that voters had elected as governor Irwandi Yusuf, a former rebel spokesman who escaped from jail after the tsunami.
Last Thursday European peace monitors withdrew, leaving an uneasy air of political tension as all sides awaited the final results.
The former guerrillas accuse the government of bolstering the Islamists and using sharia as a method of weakening their consistent demand for a progressive, democratic Aceh, ruled by its own people. "They are exploiting the religious conviction of many Acehnese to manipulate them," wrote Aguswandi, a human rights activist, in The Jakarta Post.
Aguswandi, who like many Indonesians uses just one name, said the tactic could misfire. "The use of religion as a political tool to pacify the population or as political bribery is a dangerous move. It is like setting a timebomb. When it goes off it could unleash an era of harsh, intolerant and conservative Islam," he wrote.
For some women, that era is already here. Fatimah, a human rights worker, was arrested after a seminar at a hotel in Banda Aceh when sharia police burst in to find her without a proper headscarf while chatting in the corridor to a male colleague.
Accused of "khalwat", a vague term that covers proximity between unmarried men and women, she was dragged off to a police station, where she was detained, deprived of sleep and questioned for three days before being released without charge. "It was a nightmare that I will not be able to forget for the rest of my life," she said.
For international donors, who gave generously to end the nightmare of the tsunami, the next few months will pose hard choices. "Nobody intended our aid to subsidise this," said one United Nations official.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2089-2508262,00.html (http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2089-2508262,00.html)
Tsunami survivors given the lash
Michael Sheridan and Dewi Loveard, Banda Aceh
Disaster donations help Islamic vigilante force impose punishments on women
WHEN people around the world sent millions of pounds to help the stricken Indonesian province of Aceh after the Boxing Day tsunami of 2004, few could have imagined that their money would end up subsidising the lashing of women in public.
But militant Islamists have since imposed sharia law in Aceh and have cornered Indonesian government funds to organise a moral vigilante force that harasses women and stages frequent displays of humiliation and state-sanctioned violence.
International aid workers and Indonesian women's organisations are now expressing dismay that the flow of foreign cash for reconstruction has allowed the government to spend scarce money on a new bureaucracy and religious police to enforce puritan laws, such as the compulsory wearing of headscarves.
Some say there are more "sharia police" than regular police on the local government payroll and that many of them are aggressive young men.
"Who are these sharia police?" demanded Nurjannah Ismail, a lecturer at Aceh's Ar-Raniri University. "They are men who, most of the time, are trying to send the message that their position is higher than women."
In one town, Lhokseumawe, the authorities are even planning to impose a curfew on women — a move that social workers warn will force tsunami widows to quit night-time jobs as food sellers or waitresses and could drive them into prostitution.
None of that daunts the enthusiasts for sharia, who gather in droves whenever there is an opportunity to glory in its enforcement.
The scene is always the same, and it has been enacted at least 140 times in squares and market places in front of mosques, from the towering minarets of Banda Aceh, the provincial capital, to humble village places of worship.
The transgressor can be a man accused of gambling or drinking alcohol. But if it is a woman guilty of wearing "improper" clothing or being caught in proximity to a man, there is a particular ritual to the punishment.
She is dressed in white robes and veiled. Policemen escort her up on to a stage erected before a jeering crowd, which, witnesses say, is usually almost exclusively male.
Forced to kneel, the woman waits while a masked man ascends the platform. He is carrying a cane with a curved handle designed to give the inflictor of God's punishment a better grip. From the loudspeakers, a man's voice sonorously recites the appropriate religious chastisement. Then he begins to count. With each number, the cane descends with a vicious lash.
According to witnesses, male onlookers often roar in delight and hurl pious imprecations at the victims, working themselves up to a pitch of excitement.
In one collective punishment last summer, four women denounced for gambling were given between six and 10 lashes. One passed out as she was dragged off the stage.
The vast majority of Indonesia's 220m people oppose sharia law and practise a more tolerant version of the Islamic faith. The country's secular constitution enjoins harmony and voters have consistently rejected calls for an Islamic state.
But audiences throughout the Indonesian archipelago watched the televised flogging of a man convicted of drinking beer. He collapsed after seven of the 40 prescribed strokes and officials said he would receive the remaining 33 when he recovered.
The example of Aceh has attracted fundamentalists from elsewhere in Indonesia, who see it as a blueprint for their own localities.
The irony is that sharia was first introduced into Aceh as part of a package of measures that ultimately succeeded in making peace in the long-running guerrilla war between the conservative, independence-minded Acehnese and the Indonesian state.
The 2004 tsunami, which killed 170,000 Indonesians, devastated the whole northern coast of Sumatra and shocked both sides in the conflict into reaching a deal after 30 years of fighting that had claimed 15,000 lives. It is, so far, a success story. The separatist guerrillas, known as GAM, have decommissioned most of their weapons and the Indonesian army has withdrawn most of its combat troops.
Last Monday the province held the first democratic elections in its history and early returns suggested that voters had elected as governor Irwandi Yusuf, a former rebel spokesman who escaped from jail after the tsunami.
Last Thursday European peace monitors withdrew, leaving an uneasy air of political tension as all sides awaited the final results.
The former guerrillas accuse the government of bolstering the Islamists and using sharia as a method of weakening their consistent demand for a progressive, democratic Aceh, ruled by its own people. "They are exploiting the religious conviction of many Acehnese to manipulate them," wrote Aguswandi, a human rights activist, in The Jakarta Post.
Aguswandi, who like many Indonesians uses just one name, said the tactic could misfire. "The use of religion as a political tool to pacify the population or as political bribery is a dangerous move. It is like setting a timebomb. When it goes off it could unleash an era of harsh, intolerant and conservative Islam," he wrote.
For some women, that era is already here. Fatimah, a human rights worker, was arrested after a seminar at a hotel in Banda Aceh when sharia police burst in to find her without a proper headscarf while chatting in the corridor to a male colleague.
Accused of "khalwat", a vague term that covers proximity between unmarried men and women, she was dragged off to a police station, where she was detained, deprived of sleep and questioned for three days before being released without charge. "It was a nightmare that I will not be able to forget for the rest of my life," she said.
For international donors, who gave generously to end the nightmare of the tsunami, the next few months will pose hard choices. "Nobody intended our aid to subsidise this," said one United Nations official.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2089-2508262,00.html (http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2089-2508262,00.html)