|
-
|
Citaat:
Ze roepen dan altijd fake of gefotoshopt of gezwam of de analoge opsporingsradars met hun receivers met electronenbuizen werden besmet met sjoemelsoftware ofzo :lol: En al die piloten waren natuurlijk ook fake, straks beweren ze nog dat WO II fake of gezwam was. Want we kunnen het niet bewijzen zeker. LOL. De piloten of radarpersoneel of überhaupt luchtdoelartillerie die WO II en talrijke latere oorlogen overleefd hebben weten wel beter, natuurlijk kunnen we hier niet al die oorlogen effectief aantonen natuurlijk zijn die oorlogen en getuigenissen dan gezwam gelul gefakes gefotoshopt enz... LOOOOOOOOL |
Citaat:
Ik kan veel aantonen. Maar ervaar enorm verzet tegen mijn cultuur. Daarom toon ik dat hier niet aan. Al gaf ik wel tips. |
Citaat:
Jullie? Iedereen met gezond verstand doet dat. Geheimen documenten en manuals tonen aan dat men dit altijd zo verklaarde, zeker na WO II of denk je dat al die militare organisaties die men nadien opgezet heeft... nep fake gezwam zijn? http://www.stantonfriedman.com/index...04.04.15&prt=1 4 pages met talrijke copy-docs, Friedman maakt de debunkers belachelijk. UPDATE ON OPERATION MAJESTIC 12 DOCUMENTS (1/4) «1234» April 2004 By Stanton T. Friedman BACKGROUND It should be no surprise that the various highly classified Operation Majestic 12 or Majic-12 or MJ-12 documents have been attacked since their existence was first made public. Equally unsurprising is the fact that a number of phony or hoax or fraudulent MJ-12 documents have been released as well. Clearly if the original documents: The Eisenhower Briefing Document (EBD) of November 18, 1952; the Truman-Forrestal Memo (TFM) of Sept. 24, 1947 (page 8 of the EBD); and the Cutler-Twining Memo (CTM) of July 14, 1954 (found in July, 1985, in Box 189 of Entry 267 of Record Group 341 at the National Archives by Jaime Shandera and William Moore) are genuine, then the consequences are enormous. Aliens are visiting earth; the government has recovered at least one crashed saucer and several alien bodies; and a very significant group of outstanding American scientists and military leaders has collected, reviewed, evaluated, and kept secret all kinds of information about the visitors. Man is NOT alone and the government has covered up the biggest story of the millennium at least since 1947. Ten years after the 1984 receipt of a roll of exposed 35mm film by Jaime Shandera at his Burbank, California home and his efforts with William Moore and myself to evaluate them, a new roll of film showed up in the mailbox of aviation and science writer (and longtime ufologist) Don Berliner. This contained many pages of SOM 1-01: Majestic 12 Group SPECIAL OPERATIONS MANUAL: "Extraterrestrial Entities and Technology, Recovery and Disposal.” Meanwhile Tim Cooper, a researcher in Big Bear Lake, California, began receiving loads of supposedly related MJ-12 documents. There would appear to be no connection between the original three documents and the SOM 1.01 (Mailed from Wisconsin rather than Albuquerque, NM) or the mass of Tim Cooper documents which were usually in the form of Xerox copies, often only legible with difficulty and received by him by mail or dropped off at his PO Box. THE DEBUNKERS There seem to be several distinct groups attacking the documents: A. There are those who believe (despite all the evidence to the contrary) that no alien spacecraft have ever visited Earth. Therefore, any documents saying that they have must be false. No need to do a detailed investigation, to spend time in Archives, research the people involved, etc. THEY MUST BE FRAUDULENT!! B. There are those who are convinced that some UFOs are indeed alien spacecraft, but that no saucer crashed near Roswell because they haven’t found any other classified documents indicating any have. Karl Pflock in his book (Ref.1) epitomizes this approach. If no saucer crashed at Roswell, then the documents must be fake. C. There are several former military people who are convinced that the documents must be false because the style, format, details, etc. do not match what they would have expected them to be based on their military service from the 1960s onward. This ignores the many changes in office procedures (copy machines, word processors, etc.) and the fact that the White House is a civilian organization not a military one. D. There are a lot of armchair theorists who think they can make judgements without doing any homework at all. In much of the discussion one finds the use of the four basic rules for debunking of any controversial idea: 1. What the public doesn’t know, I won’t tell them. 2. Don’t bother me with the facts, my mind is made up. 3. If one can’t attack the data, attack the people; it is easier. 4. Do one’s research by proclamation; investigation is too much trouble. Another important rule for some of the attackers is that “Absence of Evidence is Evidence for Absence.” Karl Pflock and others cite numerous documents, mostly only classified Secret, that say nothing about Roswell or MAJESTIC 12. This, of course, neglects the fact that there are still numerous documents from the Truman and Eisenhower eras 1945-1961 that are still classified, that we rarely see documents that have classification stamps of TOP SECRET Code Word (TSCW). I was told in November, 2003, by an archivist at the Ike Library that they still have about 300,000 pages of classified documents. We know that the NSA classified 156 UFO documents (found in response to a Judge’s directive) as TOP SECRET UMBRA when they finally released a highly expurgated version (about two lines per page are not covered with Wite-Out), supposedly because that information is about sources and methods. Why would it be listed under UFOs if only 5% is about UFOs? In addition, as a result of my spending a lot of time at twenty different Document Archives from coast to coast, I can say that almost never does one find TSCW documents about anything. The best documents for comparison with the EBD would be the four National Security Briefings for President-Elect Eisenhower presented by DCI Walter B. Smith in the time period between Ike’s election on November 4, 1952, and January 9, 1953, when Smith informed President Truman of his security briefings for Ike before and after the election. Unfortunately, despite my FOIA request to the CIA and a subsequent appeal to their response ("We have nothing in response to your request” even though I gave the dates and times of two of the briefings), we have no such documents for comparison. I won’t try to cover all the existent literature on the documents. There is my 1990 108-page “Final Report On Operation Majestic 12” (Ref. 2) and my 272-page 1996 book “TOP SECRET/MAJIC” (Ref. 3). There are several lengthy papers (Ref. 4-8) and Kevin Randle’s new book “Case MJ-12” (Ref. 9). There are also numerous statements on the Internet. Academics have found it necessary to jump into the fray as well, often without benefit of any research. For example, Carl Sagan (Ref.10) said “The Air Force says the documents are bogus. And UFO expert Philip J. Klass and others find lexicographic inconsistencies that suggest the whole thing is a hoax.” He seemed to be unaware of the fact that Klass had paid me $1000.00 for providing more than fourteen documents done in exactly the same Pica typeface as the Cutler-Twining Memo though Klass, on the basis of nine Elite Typeface documents (obtained by him by mail, he had never been to the Ike Library) of the 250,000 pages of NSC material at the Ike Library, had insisted the CTM should have been done in Elite! Some lexicographic research! Our correspondence and a copy of his check to me are in Ref. 2. Dr. Robert Alan Goldberg in the Roswell Chapter of his book “Enemies Within” (Ref. 11) stated Evidence of malfeasance was plentiful. Critics noted that the date format did not conform to governmental style, the papers carried no top secret registration number, military titles were improperly noted and signatures appeared to be grafted on to the document. Anachronistic usages like “media” and "impacted” further betrayed the find. Goldberg is a Professor of History at the University of Utah. Anybody spending much time at the Truman and Eisenhower Archives would find many different date formats in classified, limited distribution, old documents. In Ref. 2 I published three brief cover memos from CIA Director Allen Dulles to White House Staff Secretary Colonel Andrew Goodpaster, done within a ten-day period, using these three date formats: 12 November l956… November 20, 1956… And NOV 22 1956 (Rubber stamp) and even noted one file folder that had seven date formats and found examples of both Roscoe Hillenkoetter and W.B. Smith (DCIs and MJ-12 members) using the day, month, comma, year format of the EBD. Goldberg didn’t bother to check the Oxford Dictionary. Both “media” and “impacted” were in use at the time. I will discuss military titles below. TOP SECRET CONTROL NUMBERS The old military guys have persistently attacked the fact that the EBD, the TFM, and the CTM items all lacked a TOP SECRET CONTROL number. They vociferously insisted that all TS documents must have a TS control number. Ed Stewart made a truly strong claim on UFO UPDATES: For those who might not be aware, here is something that you will not hear from Stanton T. Friedman, even though he is well aware of the fact having visited the archives on many times in his own words. RG 341 is a record group with nothing but declassified Top Secret documents. All documents in the group are filed by control numbers. If a document did not have a Top Secret control number, it would not have been able to be filed in RG 341. Repeat, every document in RG 341 is a Top Secret document that has been declassified and has a control number, the entire record group. This was a truly incredible proclamation and is totally false. One might be forgiven for thinking Ed was claiming to have reviewed all of RG 341. Record Group 341 has 9787 cubic feet of material (about 1000 4-drawer filling cabinets). I have, since 1985, had a 56-page Preliminary Inventory of the Records for RG 341 which lists various entries and how many feet of files are in each and how much of the total is TS: typically only a few percent. For example "Unclassified through Secret, Incoming and Outgoing messages 1946-Dec. 1957,” 1743 ft. Entry 21 of RG 341. “Top Secret Incoming and Outgoing Messages, Oct. 1947-Jan, 1958,” 51ft. Entry 23 of RG 341. In other words there were only 3% (51 of 1743) as many TS messages as those through SECRET. Furthermore many of the documents are still classified. I pointed this out on the UFO Updates Internet interest group. Ed’s response after a few days of silence was My apologies to Stanton Friedman. On attempting to verify the statements I made with the source of the information, it became apparent that much that I had posted related to RG 341 was misleading to false. I asked for clarification, which was promised, but after four days was undelivered. I felt a reply to Friedman’s last message needed to be time-sensitive to be of any value. Thus my apology to Stanton Friedman and readers of this mailing list for having posted the first paragraph of my last message which is not supported by facts. Unfortunately, I will not be available for further discussion on the UFO subject. I have decided there isn’t anyone in this field that I really care to associate with any longer regardless of what their opinions are. Like the kid who takes his marbles and goes home. Jan Aldrich who, like Ed, is quite knowledgeable about army classification procedures, later picked up the same argument even after I pointed out that I had been told by the Archivist Larry Bland at the General George Marshall holdings in Virginia, that if they had to use TS control numbers in Marshall’s day, on all TS documents, we would still be fighting WW 2. I noted that an archivist at the Ike Library said that often the White House didn’t use TS Control numbers. I had published two TS documents without control numbers in Ref. 2 in 1990. One would think they were relevant since they came from Robert Cutler and wound up in General Nathan Twining’s papers at the Library of Congress Manuscript Division. Jan said it would only count if the originals at the Ike Library had no TS Control numbers. Dr. Herbert Pankratz at the Ike Library graciously supplied me with a Xerox copy of the one memo he found (It indeed had no TS control number) and noted in writing on January 9, 2003, “We have numerous documents classified as 'TOP SECRET' which do not have control numbers on them.” I should stress that, of course, many TS documents do have TS control numbers — especially when there are multiple copies of a many-page document. The EBD says “Copy One of One.” bvb: https://americanbunker.files.wordpre...nual_19541.pdf >>  Bewijs maar eens dat al die copies onecht zijn. :-) |
Citaat:
Hoe lang is de lijst met valse positieven voor een standaard radar uit die tijd tijdens een week? Tientallen? En als het mistig weer is? Honderden? |
Citaat:
Citaat:
|
Citaat:
Maar je maakt het me niet gemakkelijk door keer op keer dergelijke zweverige nonsens neer te schrijven. |
Citaat:
"Bewijs maar eens dat mijn gezever een hoax is." |
Citaat:
|
Citaat:
|
/
|
Citaat:
Het Foo Fighters verhaal is algemeen bekend en steunt gewoon op feiten. Natuurlijk, mensen die het vertikken zich degelijk te informeren, vinden dit verhaal allemaal maar nonsens. Het zij zo. |
Citaat:
|
Citaat:
Bedacht en gespeeld door mensen. Komt geen alien in voor. Misschien kunnen andere ruimte wezens, mochten ze bestaan, niet eens tegen onze atmosfeer. |
Die hebben ook de atmosferische druk veranderd en ge zijt in Hun gelijkenis geschapen.
|
het is onmogelijk om beelden dus te maken over iets wat duidelijk, en in talrijke mate bestaat dus.
hmmm. en nu nog 3 pagina's verdere in deze draad over wazige documenten of getuigenissen tijdens oorlogssituaties over foo-fighters e.d. die niks zeggen over het bestaan van "aliens". |
747 pagina's waarvan meer dan de helft youtube films van sightings.
Maar de alien wordt zelden besproken. Wanneer deze dan besproken wordt, wordt die overlapt door een youtube film. We are in a looping. |
Citaat:
ik moet blind zijn |
|
Citaat:
|
Citaat:
|
Citaat:
Citaat:
Citaat:
“De beelden die de vrouw ziet, worden willekeurig op het scherm gepresenteerd. Het gaat vooral om mooie en kalmerende beelden: een waterval, een boom, een schattig dier. Zo nu en dan wordt de serie onderbroken door een wreed, agressief beeld: een auto-ongeluk, een bebloed mes, een sissende slang. Wat blijkt? Steeds vijf tot zeven seconden voordat een ‘wreed’ beeld op het scherm verschijnt, slaat de grafiek die het hartritme aangeeft, uit – terwijl de verschijning van een ‘lief’ beeld zo’n uitslag n�*et laat zien. Maar ook: het hartritme laat eerst zien dat een negatief beeld op komst is; de hersengolven reageren een paar seconden later – maar nog steeds voordat het beeld daadwerkelijk op het scherm verschijnt.” lol indeed… :lol: |
Zelfs planten blijken toegang te hebben tot dit informatieveld, sure thing...
(Where are the trolls ??) |
Citaat:
Hier gaat het trouwens over UFO's, of wat er voor moet doorgaan. |
Citaat:
|
Citaat:
Het Akasha veld. https://nl.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ervin_L%C3%A1szl%C3%B3 Citaat:
|
Citaat:
Lol, je moet wel totaal wanhopig zijn als je dergelijke foute 'tests' aanhaalt als bewijs. 'tooth fairy science' noemen sommigen dat en die knakkers van Hearthmath zijn een perfect voorbeeld ervan. Pseudowetenschap voor dommen en goedgelovigen. Citaat:
|
Citaat:
|
Citaat:
|
Citaat:
En als je dat bullshit noemt, weerleggen graag. |
Citaat:
En dit mag ook eens ontkracht worden: Citaat:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fStmk7e9lJo Zo, nu ga ‘k m’n plantjes wat water geven. ;-) |
Citaat:
Deze laatste vaststelling is eigenlijk overbodig. Als eeneiige tweelingen gedachten kunnen overbrengen , dan impliceert dit dat in principe de menselijke potentie hiertoe bereikbaar is voor iedereen. Het probleem is gewoon hoe men deze vaardigheid kan uitlokken. En daar is men nog niet helemaal uit. Maar ook daar komt men vroeg of laat achter. |
Citaat:
Zelfs in de esoterie spreken ze van zo een veld. Het is een veld waarin alles gelijktijdig zich afspeelt en alle kennis in verzameld is. |
Citaat:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/heal...onalities.html Veel mensen krijgen talenten en karaktertrekken over van de doner (soms goede en soms minder goede). Maar de wetenschap accepteert het niet omdat ze het niet begrijpen, het wordt genegeerd. Alles is energie, en energie is informatie. Wat overgedragen wordt is de energie/informatie van de donor. Ach, wat heeft onze wetenschap nog veel te leren over de realiteit. |
Citaat:
Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research http://www.princeton.edu/~pear/ |
Citaat:
Er komt tevens (een deel) van de persoonlijkheid van de donor mee. Stel je maar eens voor dat je een hart krijgt getransplanteerd van een terdoodveroordeelde seriemoordenaar of een oorlogsmisdadiger... |
Citaat:
Moet best interessant zijn, zitten praten tegen een selder. |
Citaat:
Food for the mind & the soul. ;-) |
Citaat:
|
Citaat:
|
| Alle tijden zijn GMT +1. Het is nu 22:00. |
Forumsoftware: vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content copyright ©2002 - 2020, Politics.be