| Micele |
11 oktober 2012 12:29 |
Citaat:
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door quercus
(Bericht 6362038)
Dat is de term die de arabieren en de Europese atisemitische meelopers erop kleven. In werkelijkheid is het doodeenvoudig een terugkeer naar hun joodse land.
|
Dus die website is plotseling " niet meer goed genoeg" omdat ze daar duidelijk van kolonisatie spreken en niet van terugkeren. ;-)
Je hebt zelfs de ganse zin in blauwvet gezet, ik onderlijn daarbij colonize ;-)
Citaat:
Citaat:
As for the region that Sourians called “the South,” the British established a separate state called Palestine, in preparation for the Zionists to establish their Jewish home. As early as 1919, the British had realized that subduing the south Sourian (i.e. Palestinian) resistance to the Zionist project was simply impossible. Thus, in 1920 a new plan was introduced, to split Palestine into two halves (one on either side of the Jordan river). The goal was to move the Arabs into the east, and let the European Jewish colonize the west side.
|
Citaat:
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door quercus
(Bericht 6361737)
Dat zou pas een voortreffelijke én logische oplossing zijn.
|
|
Deze is van 1932:
http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.230...21101135267253
Hier ook een interessante studie daar spreken ze van PICA´s waar de C Colonisatie betekend.
Citaat:
http://www.mises.org/journals/jls/5_4/5_4_2.pdf
In the latter part of the nineteenth century, while title to land traditionally
held by Arab peasants was being transferred to Arab and Turkish
landlords, another force emerged which was to have the most significant
influence on the distribution of land, namely, the Zionist movement which
began to support immigration of Jews to Palestine. While reliable statistics
do not exist, it has been estimated that Palestine in the second half of the
nineteenth century consisted of a population of more or less a half million,
of which some 80% were Muslims, 10% Christians, and 5 to 7% Jews. In
1882 Jews owned 22,500 dunums of land out of the 26,323,000 dunums
which were to make up Mandate Palestine, i.e., ,0970 of the land. By 1900
there were 50,000 Jews in Palestine, mostly in Jerusalem and Jaffa, although
twenty-two settlements existed by then, and Jews owned 218,000 dunums,
or .8% of the land.6
The increase in Jewish ownership was largely prompted by the founding
of the Palestine Jewish Colonization Association (PICA) by Baron Edmond
de Rothschild, the "Father of the Yishuv" (the Jewish settlement in Palestine)
who for decades was to be the largest Jewish landowner in Palestine
and Transjordan. Rothschild "bought land from the feudal Effendis, sometimes
by bribing the Ottoman administration, and drove the fellahin off the
land."' Some of the same fellaheen were hired to work the land they once
cultivated as their own.
|
Inleiding van de studie:
Citaat:
The Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol. V, No. 4 (Fall 1981)
The Alienation of a Homeland: How Palestine Became Israel*
by Stephen P. Halbrook
George Mason University / Virginia State Bar
Introduction
The crux of the Arab-Israeli conflict is the Palestinian question, and the
crux of the Palestinian question is: who justly owns the land of Israel or
Palestine? The parties involved in the Middle East struggle are cognizant of
the centrality of the land question. Though he denies the right of all Arabs
who were born in what is now Israel to return to their homeland, Polish
emigrant and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin defends the right of
non-indigenous Jews to settle anywhere in Eretz Israel, including the occupied
West Bank, which he calls liberated Judea and Samaria. While radical
Arab Rejectionists depicted his peace negotiations as de facto repudiation
of Palestinian liberation, the late Egyptian President Anwar Sadat, who like
other Arab leaders has called on Arab Jews to return to their homeland,
stated in his historic address to the Israeli Knesset on November 20, 1977:
We will not accept any talk about lasting and durable peace.. .while
you are occupying Arab land with military force.. . .
As for the Palestinian question, nobody denies that it's the essence of
the problem as a whole.. . .
There is no use not recognizing the Palestinian people and their own
right in establishing their homeland, and their right of return.
The U. S. Department of State concedes that the Palestinians are by any
definition a genuine national movement. Despite informal talks and contacts
between U. S. and Palestine Liberation Organization officials, the
U. S. refuses de jure recognition of the P.L.O. as the Palestinian
spokesman because the P.L.O. does not recognize Israel's right to exist as an exclusively Jewish state and calls instead for a secular democracy in Palestine wherein Moslems, Jews, and Christians have equal rights.
(This article was written before the Holocaust in Lebanon of Summer 1982. At the time of this writing, after weeks of indiscriminate massacres of many thousands of Lebanese and Palestinians by Israeli military forces, it is impossible to predict whether the Zionist occupation as far north as Beirut will result in a "North Bank"as militarized and permanently occupied as the West Bank. The invasion also has implications for the analysis included herein of the oppression of Oriental Jews by Arab states-the Jewish quarter in West Beirut has been subject to the same Israeli shelling and destruction as the dominant Moslem quarters of that part of Beirut).
|
|
