Kleptocratische VS: De dood van ambassadeur Stevens, Obama gooit Hillary onder de bus
 

Naar aanleiding van een diepgaand onderzoek dat het Amerikaans Congres zal voeren maakt het Witte Huis schoon schip, juist een dag voor de hoorzitting...

De aanval op hun ambassadeur John Christopher Stevens en medewerkers was een goed geplande terroristische actie en op het moment van de aanval vond er geen protest plaats naar aanleiding van het anti-islamfilmpje genaamd "Innocence of Muslims".


Video - ABC: No Protest Outside Libya Consulate Before Attack

Shocking !! ??

In other words, absolutely everything we were told by our government -- by President Obama, Secretary of State Clinton, Ambassador Susan Rice. White House Spokesman Jay Carney, and any number of staffers and surrogates -- was 100% false.

There were no protests, no benign crowds exploited by local militias, and nothing had anything to do with a video. Our Ambassador, another diplomat, and two Navy SEALs were murdered in a brutally efficient and coordinated terrorist attack.

Period.

End of story.

Wat werd er door de V.S. in verband met dit incident zoal verteld ? Een samenvatting...

Kijk hier :

Let me google that for you (Nederlandstalige berichtgeving aangaande)

en hier :

Let me google that for you (Engelstalige berichtgeving aangaande)


Uit :peoplealliance - Again, How Did the ‘Ambassador’ Die in Benghazi?

US Ambassador Last Seen Alive in Burning Building in Libya

“U.S. ambassador to Libya, Christopher Stevens, disappeared in the smoke and fire of a building under attack in Benghazi, Libya, early Wednesday.” – Hispanicbusiness.com



U.S. Ambassador Killed in Benghazi Rocket Attack

“The US ambassador to Libya, Christopher Stevens, has been killed following a rocket attack on his car in the eastern city of Benghazi on Tuesday night.” – Telegraph.co.uk



Libya Doctor: US Ambassador Died of Severe Asphyxia from Smoke in ‘consulate’ Attack

“The Libyan doctor who treated U.S. ambassador Chris Stevens says the diplomat died of severe asphyxiation and that he tried for 90 minutes to revive him.” – Globalnews.ca (Associated Press)



U.S. Ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens Killed in Benghazi

“On Monday, Secretary Of State Hillary Clinton confirmed that a state department officer at the U.S. consulate was United States ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens. Later reports to CNN say the officer killed was United States ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens.” – Cnn.com



Al-Qaeda Murders U.S. Ambassador and Staff in Libya

“The American ambassador and three staff members were killed when gunmen fired rockets in their direction,” a Libyan official in Benghazi said.” – Infowars.com



The Lebanon Report on the Murdered U.S. Ambassador

“Rape of murdered U.S. ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens remains unconfirmed.” – Washingtontimes.com



U.S. Diplomats, Marine Rescue Team Were also Attacked at Safe House

“(The ambassador) died as a result of suffocation by the fumes of the fire inside the embassy and one was also killed by gunfire before around 37 people were moved to a place we thought was safe.” – Nbcnews.com



Chris Stevens, U.S. Ambassador to Libya, Killed in Benghazi Attack

“The U.S. ambassador in Libya and three other embassy staff were killed in a rocket attack after the diplomat’s car was targeted in the eastern city of Benghazi, it was confirmed on Wednesday.” – Guardian.co.uk



Libya Consulate Hit With Two Attacks That Lasted Nearly Five Hours

“The bloody offensive by extremists killed Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans. In addition, three more U.S. personnel were wounded. … The State Department said that some time between 10:15 p.m. and 11:20 p.m., Stevens left the main building and went to the hospital. Clinton said he was taken there by Libyans. Stevens was not seen by his colleagues until his body was brought later that evening to the Benghazi airport.” – Abcnews.go.com

http://www.peoplealliance.net/home/w...e-benghazi.jpg

Ambassadeur Stevens was op de hoogte van een mogelijke aanval en had bijstand gevraagd. Deze heeft hij NIET bekomen...

Wie is schuldig ? Niet het Witte Huis want zij werden niet op de hoogte gebracht, maar wel Sate Department... Hillary Clinton dus !

Examiner - VIDEO - Biden Libya debate claim throws Hillary Clinton under the bus

The initial read on the vice presidential debate was that the normally gaffe-prone Joe Biden escaped the 90-minute exchange without a forced error. On closer inspection, it appears that he may have had at least one potentially troublesome misstep. When moderator Martha Raddatz questioned him about the unanswered plea for an enhanced security presence at the Benghazi consulate, Biden responded, “we weren't told they wanted more security there.” His response, if it is to believed (big if), effectively shifts blame away from the White House—and toward the State Department.

On Friday, Press Secretary Jay Carney found himself in the unenviable position of having to double down on this position, which he does in this video clip of the daily White House press briefing. When FOX News’s Ed Henry asked Carney whether he would say that “on Libya the buck stops with the State Department,” Carney argued, “There are countless [diplomatic] facilities around the world,” seeming to suggest that the job of keeping track of consular requests is simply too much for any one president. (For the record, the embassy page of the State Department’s website lists a total of 317 embassies, consulates, and diplomatic missions worldwide, but who’s counting?)

In essence, the administration is now throwing Secretary of State Hillary Clinton under the bus, prompting this speculation by Mickey Kaus:

Will Hillary now retaliate and protect herself by leaking word that the White House did too know? Will her husband continue to tour the country trying to pull Obama’s bacon out of the fire (as he did at the convention) even as Obama points a finger at his wife? Will they all cut some sort of deal in which Hillary agrees to take the fall and Bill soldiers on … in exchange for, what? Have they already cut a deal? Is the White House going to try to hang its hat on the idea that Obama and Biden didn’t know, but maybe their staffs knew? Will that really fly? Aren’t they responsible for their staffs? Will the staffs fight back?…

The question about Clinton loyalty is the most intriguing one. A number of analysts have observed that the president’s post-DNC bounce was in no small measure a function of Bill Clinton’s convention speech. But Bubba’s relationship with Obama is a troubled one. During this campaign season the former president has already given aid and comfort to the enemy by declaring at the height of the Obama campaign’s attack on Bain that Mitt Romney “had a sterling business career” and that he “crosses the qualification threshold” for president.

The overarching question is whether the cover the administration is receiving from the liberal media in re damning testimony before the House Oversight Committee will be sufficient to deflect criticism. Stay tuned.

Is het Witte Huis/State department verantwoordelijk voor het uit de hand lopen van de wereldwijde protesten ivm het anti-islamfilmpje door moedwillig te liegen over hoe Ambassadeur Stevens om het leven kwam.

Hebben ze daarbij onnodig bepaalde bevolkingsgroepen in gevaar gebracht ? (Zoals bvb. de Koptische gemeenschap in Egypte)

Zijn zulke praktijken in de wereld der diplomatiek aanvaardbaar ?

Kan deze vorm van desinformatie nog door de beugel ?

is dat leuk zo tegen jezelf praten in een topic :lol:
zou het niet handiger zijn een blog te beginnen...

De mensen die o.a. voor de veiligheid van ambassadeur Stevens instonden kregen nooit een antwoord vanuit de VS op de kabels die om meer veiligheidsmaatregelen voor hun mensen in Benghazi vroegen...


REUTERS - Video - U.S. officer got no reply to requests for more security in Benghazi
Tue, 9 Oct, 2012

Opzet in het spel ? False flag ?

Komt U hier weerom off topic zeveren en wat vuil spuiten ?

Trol het toch af en start in K&K of elders een draadje ofzo... *** zucht ****

Verdere off topic reacties zullen gemeld worden, bij deze bent U gewaarschuwd.

goed ik zal ontopic reageren, al wat jij hier plaatst is dikke onzin en praat nu maar wat verder tegen jezelf...

Gemeld.

Brandend aktueel : Het grote Amerikaanse buitenlands beleid schandaal in volle ontwikkeling

Video - Fox News Extensive Report On The Benghazi Cover-Up By The Obama Administration

Binnen de 24 uur na het overlijden van de ambassadeur waarschuwde de Amerikaanse intelligentie het Witte Huis dat 9/11/12-Benghazi een goed geplande terroristische aanslag was

CNS News - 'Within 24 Hours': When U.S. Intel in Libya Told Washington 9/11/12 Was Terror Attack

:lol: wat dat ik je blog heb verstoord door mijn mening te geven :-D

Grootse onenigheid tusssen het Witte Huis, de Department of State en de Amerikaanse inlichtingendiensten

Ondanks de dreiging van een terroristische aanslag en meerdere kabels die om meer veiligheid vroegen VERMINDERDE State department de veiligheidsmaatregelen voor hun faciliteiten in Bengahzi !

Daily Caller - State Dept. pushed back on White House’s Libya claims
15 oktober 2012

<sub>The Department of State is pushing back against top White House aides who have tried to blame it for not doing enough to defend the facility in Benghazi, Libya, prior to the Sept. 11 jihad attack.

On Friday, the department released an Oct. 9 background press briefing, during which a State Department official contradicted the White House’s claim about the video.

The move is unusual, because the transcripts of most background briefings are not released — especially if they involve a direct disagreement between the department and the White House.

The contradiction came late in the briefing, when a reporter asked the State Department official to explain “what in all of these [Benghazi] events … led officials to believe for the first several days that this was prompted by protests against the video?”

“That is a question that you would have to ask others. That was not our conclusion,” responded the official.

“The Ambassador walked guests out around 8:30 or so, there was no one on the street at approximately 9:40, then there was the noise and then we saw on the cameras the — a large number of armed men assaulting the compound.”

The press event was held the day prior to a House hearing, chaired by Rep. Darrell Issa, that showed how State Department officials actually reduced security measures at the Benghazi facility, despite increasing threats from nearby jihadi groups.

During the hearing, senior State Department officials tried to blame intelligence agencies when they were asked why they denied multiple requests for extra security of diplomatic facilities in Libya.

Their focus on the intelligence agencies diverted blame away from senior officials — such as Clinton or White House officials. (RELATED: Axelrod blames State Dept. for security issues at Benghazi consulate)

In March 2011, President Barack Obama decided to overthrow the country’s dictator, Moammar Gadhafi.

However, Obama declined to deploy ground troops. Those decisions have left the new Libyan government divided, weak and dependent on cooperation from the various militia and jihadi groups formed during the civil war.

During the Issa hearing, two whistle-blowers said their request for extra security were denied because of top-level opposition in the State Department.

“His response to that was, you’re asking for the sun, moon and the stars,” former Department of State Libyan Regional Security Officer Eric Nordstrom told the hearing.

“My response to him … I said, ‘Jim, you know what makes — most frustrating about this assignment? … ‘It’s dealing and fighting against the people, programs and personnel who are supposed to be supporting me,’ and I added it by saying, ‘For me, the Taliban is on the inside of the building,’” Nordstrom said.

The White House’s election-season effort to focus the blame on Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is politically risky, partly because Clinton can use aides and allies to redirect the blame back to the White House during the final weeks of the campaign.

The finger-pointing helps keep the issue on the front-pages and it provides Gov. Mitt Romney numerous opportunities to criticize Obama’s ability to manage the nation’s foreign-affairs.

On Tuesday, the two candidates will face-off at a townhall event in New York, where Obama may be asked to explain why he repeatedly suggested that the attack was a unpredictable mob-reaction to a little known California video critical of Islam’s prophet, Mohammed.</sub>

Het is me allemaal niet vreemd.

Het plotselinge verbale falen van de anders o zo goed gebekte Obama deed bij mij een aantal (alarm)belletjes rinkelen.

Ondergronds rommelt er iets bij de Democraten (vergeet de eerste vier letters) want de Amerikaanse domheid / naiveteit is vrijwel grenzeloos, net zoals hun militaire exercities.

Ik heb me in Clinton (beter gezegd H. Rodham) ernstig vergist. 't is een feitelijke nitwit.
Ze heeft niets tot stand gebracht. De buitenlandse politiek is onder haar leiding ter ziele gegaan. Een zeer negatief mens met een zeer negatieve invloed.

Brzezinski is sowieso het brein achter Al Qaeda, nu nog. Onze poolse aristocraat gaat niet rusten voor de Angelsaksische suprematie nog 100 jaar kan blijven bestaan.

Zonbron: who fucking cares... Liever de Chinezen en Russen als sugar daddies? Neen dank u. Met de Arabieren hebben we het toch allemaal gehad. Leve de NWO.

Je hebt het over "kleptokratische VS", en vervolgens post je een hele draad vol met zaken die niets met een eventueel kleptokratisch karakter van de VS te maken hebben. Het lukt je dus al niet om in de draden die je zelf start "on topic" te blijven...

De ontwikkelingen die in deze draad worden besproken zijn een duidelijk gevolg van het kleptokratische karakter van de VS. Het is een staat in verval wegens corruptie, hebzucht van de steeds meer autoritaire regering waarvan de bevolking steeds minder verantwoording (zoals oa. simpelweg de waarheid) kan afdwingen.

Heden zien we dat de zij die door vriendjespolitiek hun postjes hebben kunnen pakken in geval van grote problemen elkaar beschuldigen en dat het land dat ze vertegenwoordigen niet op de eerste plaats komt, maar dat het eigenbelang voor hun veel belangrijker is.

De Department of State had trouwens voldoende middelen om alvorens (tijdens en nadat) het probleem in Benghazi zich voordeed in te grijpen door meer in de veiligeheid aldaar te investeren. Dat hebben ze ondanks alles niet gedaan...

Trouwens, nog steeds overtuigd dat wat er in Libie plaatsvond een humanitaire actie was ?

Maar goed, als U kleptocratische niet gepast vindt of simpelweg het verband niet ziet, mag U dat gerust door mythomane vervangen... doch verandert dit niets aan het feit dat de Amerikaanse overheid en de FED een bende kleptocraten zijn en dat dit soort voorvallen, zoals hier in de draad omschreven daar een duidelijk voorbeeld en gevolg van zijn, het geeft de "barometerstand" aangaande perfect weer.

Misschien toch eens eerst alle vernoemde elementen in deze draad rustig doornemen ?

Trouwens, het falende buitenlands beleid van de V.S. , waar ze rechtmatige leiders uit de weg ruimen om die dan te vervangen met hun vriendjes lievelings-kleptocraatjes (puppets) is de hoofdoorzaak van het overlijden van ambassadeur Stevens en zijn medewerkers.

:lol::lol::lol:

Stem dan op Romney ... ;-)