Ukraine - a tool and a springboard not only for the current geopolitical operations, but also the test of practice some of the ideas of the "new world order" (NMP) - unwritten programs western financial and political elite on total reconstruction of the world.

NRM ideology, the world need to bring uniformity to everyone in all walks of life. In totalitarian uniform controlled by electronic means the world will need in the sovereign nation-states - their functions and powers will implement regional and local authorities in the framework of global laws and regulations living arrangement. Rules will be set one world government formed by technocrats and leaders of business and finance. The material basis of the NRM will be a single system to issue money with the prospect of transformation in the unit of general cash-strapped system (monetary society). Since the NRM will not be of public interest and disappear threat of war and the need for the armed forces to resolve local conflicts will be enough local or, if necessary, delivered from outside the police force. In local governance increasingly important role will be played by representatives of big business. In the future, the NRM project involves eliminating all complex intangible fixed, values ​​and concepts of today's civilization and the transition to a totalitarian society electronically controlled biological objects. Path to the NRM is through many operations "hard" and "soft" power, war and regime change, global consciousness and reformatting rules and forms of life. According to an influential supporter in his time of NMP Dzh.Varburga American financier, "for world government, there is only one question - whether it is created by conquest or by obtaining consent" (7).

Ukraine in the field being tested following the NRM projects.

Elimination of the sovereignty of States. It seems that in addition to specific operational objectives, setting a formal and informal foreign control of key functions of the Ukrainian authorities may have the task of testing technologies erosion and disappearance of the sovereignty of independent States. Remaining formally independent state, Ukraine de facto embarked on desovereignization. In February 2014. Ukrainian opposition with the participation of the United States and some European countries made a power coup, then rushed to sign the fateful Association Agreement between Ukraine and the EU without asking the people whether he agrees with the real-life consequences arising for him from this agreement. The EU, for its part, has signed an agreement with the government and the legitimacy of negotiability which even after May 2014. presidential election raises questions. Achieved important - Agreement with the EU is the future life of the country under the control of a supranational structure, which will determine the compliance or noncompliance of the authorities of Ukraine and EU objectives in the case of inconsistencies require policy adjustments. This picture adds an agreement with the IMF that put finances and economy of Ukraine under the tight control of an additional fund, and grew up in times Ukrainian law enforcement agencies cooperate with relevant U.S. and NATO structures. Is of special interest such innovation, as the participation of foreign private military companies in military operations is not somewhere in Afghanistan or Iraq, and declared its pro-European choice of Ukraine. This phenomenon can be considered as a precedent or a prototype for future police NMP.

Does not go unnoticed and this experiment, as the arrival of a group of leading oligarchs to important posts in the government. Caused by pragmatic considerations ("these will"), the purpose of the oligarchs I.Kolomoyskogo (Dnipropetrovsk region), S. Taruta (Donetsk region) and a member of the Dnepropetrovsk business team I.Kolomoyskogo I.Palitsy (Odessa region) heads of regional state administrations (governors) pursued aim to raise funds and business experience oligarchs to perform tasks of crisis management in critical situations. The results of this remarkable solutions. I.Kolomoysky used his position to obtain large government contracts for military supplies-Ukrainian scale funding battalion "Dnepr" and "Donbass" natsgvardii, signing with the former leader of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatars M.Dzhemilev agreement on the establishment of the battalion "Crimea" for subversive activities in Crimea . I.Kolomoysky also was promoting the advantage of the expansion projects at the expense of Dnipropetrovsk adjacent areas and construction throughout the border of Ukraine with Russia (not without benefit to their business) metal fence with electric shocks and electronic surveillance for example wall built by Israel around the grounds Palestine. Position in the Dnipropetrovsk region until stable. But tycoon Governor is not satisfied with the influence of the area and the region - he went on player level on a national scale and has taken a tough stance against the peaceful settlement of the situation in the South-East. I.Kolomoysky uses its influence on aggressive paramilitary groups, security forces and Kiev politicians to resist attempts Poroshenko at least talk about a dialogue with representatives of the South-East. Less ambitious and more discreet S. Taruta marked mainly financing for its own account digging anti-tank ditches on the border with Russia. The decor in the Donetsk region known. In general, despite the brevity of the oligarchs stay in power, the test took place - a real experience obtained legally unthinkable before combining in one person at a time technocrat and financier, the great statesman and leader of an influential businessman.

It turned out that being on public office, businessman official way faster than the power to direct their assets to address operational problems, provided the state return by his expenses with a corresponding profit. However, such a combination can create serious risks for the government. Received public office, the oligarch with other than a career politician, approach to problem solving, acquires power resource for their own purposes, which may conflict with policy officials gave him the power. However, political analysts believe that the experiment with assignments oligarchs in high positions in the state will continue.

The most significant results in the Ukrainian authorities in February and June 2014. achieved in the field of consciousness reformatting population. Different ways, including threats from the SS, was able to "convince" even firm supporters of freedom of speech in Ukrainian electronic and print media go to the position of supporting the policies of the central authorities. Total anti-Russian and introduction to propaganda against Russian terms for military enemy quickly and allowed to significantly increase the number of Ukrainians negatively disposed to Russia. The greatest impact of the anti-Russian propaganda and counter-insurgency has on young people. It should be emphasized, however, that information work - the sphere of "rapid deployment", where the change of state policy changes and content of propaganda.

Ukrainian crisis - an acute existential problem for Russia. U.S. and EU made in Ukraine is very tough, big and open events in Ukraine since the beginning acquired a distinctly anti-Russian meaning. Even if in the foreseeable future will be able to defuse the conflict, but the nature and politics of power in Ukraine will remain unchanged, political, informational, economic and geo-strategic impact of the U.S. and the EU on Russia to continue, and new crises climax in Ukraine and other countries will be inevitable. Outcome of the struggle for Ukraine will affect the fate of Russia, the former Soviet Union and all the countries and regions of the world, including Europe and the USA. The organizers Ukrainian project, their installation and methods of struggle for Ukraine provide a basis for conclusions about the threats to the Russian, European and international security, the foundations for world order and world civilization.

Mother Russia is a much different country from the Stalin gulags. With all the faults of a long tradition of authoritarian rule, it is natural for observers in the West to be suspect of the latest would be Czar.

The remnants of the cold war linger with concerns of the true motives and goals of a second Vladimir Putin era. By most reliable accounts, he never left the power circle prior to his return as President. Upon his latest election, The Guardian published an article Putin’s election victory is a headache for the west. “Nobody is any doubt that the Putin who returns to the Kremlin in May is the same Putin who has effectively run Russia for the past 12 years – prickly, uncompromising, suspicious and fond of snide remarks about western hypocrisy and double standards.”

The context for any serious discussion on foreign affairs must start with the admission that the New World Order is the dominant controller of political power, especially in western countries. The NeoCon/NeoLib cabal dictates worldwide compliance. Nations conform to the financial supremacy of banksters, administered by handpicked political stooges. Global governance is the end game destined for all states. Individual nations slated for extinction are doomed as long as the NWO advances their worldwide imperium.

Putin provided a vision that conflicted with the cabal. Eurasian Project a Threat to New World Order provides an alternative to the West.

“One might be tempted to regard Russian premier V. Putin’s paper “A new integration project for Eurasia: The future in the making”, which saw the light of day in Izvestia on October 3, 2011, as the presidential front-runner’s sketchily laid out program, but upon scrutiny that appears to be only one part of a wider picture. The opinion piece momentarily ignited wide-scale controversy in and outside of Russia and highlighted the ongoing clash of positions on global development…

Regardless of interpretation details, the reaction of the Western media to the integration project unveiled by the Russian premier was uniformly negative and reflected with utmost clarity an a priori hostility towards Russia and any initiatives it floats. Mao Zedong, though, used to say that facing pressure from your enemies is better than being in such a condition that they do not bother to keep you under pressure.”

The assessment for opposition and push back concludes:

“The West’s allergy to Putin’s plan is therefore explainable, but, regardless of the opposition the project is bound to run into, of the weakness of some of its elements, and of the potential difficulty of putting it into practice, the Eurasian integration project grew out of the life of the post-Soviet geopolitical and cultural space and is consonant with current global trends.”

The point is that much of the humanity recognizes that the New World Order is the ultimate demonic force. It is on the path to establish planetary unification of despotism. Look to the Pepo Escobar video for context in Putin not part of NWO, labelled evil by elites.


...