| ViveLaBelgique |
15 maart 2022 09:52 |
Groeperingen mag je niet NeoNazi noemen als ze dat zelf niet willen.
Citaat uit Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S14_(Ukrainian_group)
On 6 August 2019, the Commercial Court of Kyiv ruled in favour of S14 after a 4 May 2018 tweet from Hromadske, which appealed,[52] referred to the group as neo-Nazi.[41] After the ruling, Hromadske published "The Neo-Nazis Who Don't Want to Be Called Neo-Nazis", reporting: "The court noted that the information circulated by Hromadske back in May 2018 'harms the reputation' of C14 and ordered Hromadske to refute the information and pay 3,500 hryvnia ($136) in court fees to C14. Hromadske maintains that it has the right to use such terminology."[41][53] The ruling was criticized by human rights groups, journalists, and both national and international observers,[54] with the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe's Office of the Representative on Freedom of the Media expressing concern because it "goes against #mediafreedom and could discourage journalistic work" in Ukraine.[41] International news outlets like Al Jazeera,[55] Bellingcat,[36] La Croix,[56] The Economist,[11] The Guardian,[57] Haaretz,[58][59] The Nation,[60] Reuters,[61] RFERL,[62] and The Washington Post,[63] as well as the Parliament of the United Kingdom,[64] and human rights organizations like the European Roma Rights Centre,[65] Hope not Hate,[66] the Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group,[48][67][68] PEN Ukraine,[69] ROMEA [cs],[70] and the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum,[71] among others, have referred to S14 as a neo-Nazi group.[41][72] The ruling of the Commercial Court of Kyiv was upheld on 7 November 2019. The day prior, Matthew Schaaf, the director of Freedom House in Ukraine, said that the ruling "could seriously damage media coverage of important events in Ukraine in conditions where many media and journalists already apply self-censorship".[73] After the ruling, critics argued that it was not sufficient that neo-Nazi is offensive, it must also be false, which the court did not establish because it ignored the views of experts.[74] On 21 January 2020, the Supreme Court of Ukraine rejected Hromadske's appeal, and the case was taken to the European Court of Human Rights.[75]
Ik ben benieuwd naar het oordeel van het Europees mensenrechten hof. Hromadske, een lokaal radiostation mag van Oekraïense grondrechters S14 geen neonazi's noemen. Het radiostation gaat in beroep bij het Europees hof.
Rusland benoemt het nazistisch gevaar in de Oekraïnse gebieden, net zoals het Brits parlement en het Europees Romarechteninstituut.
Als het Europees mensenrechtenhof een duidelijke uitspraak doet zal het gedaan zijn met groeperingen ongewenst als neonazistisch af te schilderen. Tenzij het Europees hof experten erkend die legitiem groeperingen tegen hun eigen wens in kunnen bestempelen als neonazi's. |
