Centrum Gelijke Kansen dient klacht in tegen **********
 

Bron gva:

29/05 Centrum Gelijke Kansen dient klacht in tegen **********
Het Centrum voor Gelijkheid van Kansen en Racismebestrijding heeft op donderdag 18 mei een klacht ingediend bij het federaal parket tegen de website www.********** wegens inbreuken tegen de antiracismewet.
Dat gebeurde nadat er klachten waren binnengekomen, zo verklaarde Lieve Staes van het Centrum maandag.

********** is een Nederlandstalige, extremistische moslimsite met heel wat schuttingtaal over de Belgen en Vlamingen. "Hartstochtelijk, fier en moedig strijden we voor de stichting en uitbreiding van de Arabische Imperium op Romeinse bodem. Vandaag roepen we aan de kinderen van onze natie de onafhankelijkheid uit van Al Jumhurriya Al Arabia AL Europia (Arabisch Europese Republiek)", luidt het op de homepage. Er wordt ook zwaar uitgehaald naar de stille optocht van afgelopen vrijdag in Antwerpen.
De agressieve taal die de site hanteert, is echter zo extreem dat een aantal mensen menen dat het om een hoax of vervalsing moet gaan. Uit de informatie op de website kan afgeleid worden dat de website reeds vanaf maart 2006 actief is.
Het Centrum voor Gelijke Kansen en Racismebestrijding kreeg lucht van de zaak via zijn meldpunt Cyberhate.be. Dat bestaat reeds enkele maanden en krijgt steeds meer meldingen binnen, aldus nog Staes.


Mvg,

Het is niet door het vebieden van zulk een websites dat men de fascistische islam stopt. Men kan de islam alleen maar stoppen door er voortdurend de waarheid over te blijven vertellen, en dit tegen de islampromotors in die het in dit land en onze omliggende landen steeds meer voor het zeggen krijgen dank zij de steun van de vooral links geinspireerde nuttige idioten die de islam met haar haatzaaiende rotkoran uit pure onwetendheid maar de hand boven het hoofd blijven houden.

"It is a mistake to count Islam as a religion and give it the same status as given to Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism or Buddhism. Wolfgang Bruno who is writing a book on the movement of ex-Muslims wrote: “Westerners view Islam as a religion currently beset by many problems and aggressive groups, but still one that can offer comfort and moral guidance to millions of people. That is a fundamental mistake. Islam is not an addition to the American or European diversity rainbow. In fact, it wants to scrap the diversity rainbow and replace it with an Islamic cave.”


http://www.faithfreedom.org/book2.htm

Niewaar! Het CGKR dat een klacht indient tégen moslims8O ?:twisted:

Die klacht is er enkel omdat ze denken dat het een hoax is, straks is't nen site van't vlaams belang...:roll:

Alsof er geen jihadis in dit land zouden rondlopen. Zij voeren uit wat er in hun rotkoran staat naar het grote voorbeeld van hun rotprofeet moordenaar mohammed.

Wablieft? Moet ik daar respect voor hebben? :roll:
Volgens de onnozele politiek correcten wel... en volgens de volgelingen van de religie van de "vrede" ook uiteraard. "Racist" en "islamofoob" is het enige wat ze ter verdediging op tafel kunnen werpen.

Zij die het Engels machtig zijn. Dit is wat een ex-moslim over het verzonnen woord islamofobie te vertellen heeft...

[SIZE=4]"Islamophobia" is ad hominem[/SIZE]

By Ali Sina
2006/05/26

One friend alerted me to a discussion going on in Wikipedia on the neologism “Islamophobia”. Someone has suggested that this category should be deleted because the term Islamophobia is divisive, inflammatory and it is frequently used to inhibit very valid criticism of Islam.


This suggestion, of course, as it is to be expected, has been rejected by Muslims who have Islamized everything including Wikipedia. This friend asked my opinion. Here is what I think:

Islam is an ideology. Rejection of an ideology cannot be classified as phobia. To call the opponents of an ideology phobic is a fallacy. All ideologies have their critics and opponents but we do not hear Christians calling the critics of Christianity Christianophobe, communists calling their critics communitophobe or Hindus calling theirs hinduphobe. The term "Islamophobia" is both technically and logically incorrect and misleading.


According to Dictionary.com Phobia is “a persistent, abnormal, and irrational fear of a specific thing or situation that compels one to avoid it, despite the awareness and reassurance that it is not dangerous.” Therefore the neologism "Islamophobia" implies that Islam is not dangerous and the fear of it is irrational.

This claim has not been established and it is not universally agreed upon. There are many who argue that Islam is indeed a dangerous ideology and they have their logical arguments to prove their claim. Irrespective of whether the critics of Islam are right or wrong about whether Islam is dangerous or not, calling them “phobic” implies that their criticism has been already refuted and the irrationality of their fear of Islamic threat has been established. Therefore their disagreement with Islam is not logical but a mental disorder.

All ideologies have their opponents. It is sheer arrogance to call criticism of any ideology, phobia. This implies that the truth of that ideology is already established and anyone opposing it is adopting an irrational position and is in need of psychological help.

Only Muslims are capable of this much irrationality and arrogance. We all recall Muhammad Abdullah, the Afghani man who converted to Christianity and who was facing execution. When the government of Afghanistan was pressured to release him, to save face they accused him of being insane and not fit to stand trial. In the mind of Muslims only an insane person would disagree with Islam. This is sheer arrogance.


Buddhism is by all accounts a peaceful religion as non-violence is the core of it. Despite that Buddhism has its critics and we never call then Buddhistphobes.


The neologism Islamophobia makes absolutely no sense. It is derogatory and is used in a pejorative way to discredit the critics of Islam from the outset.

Phobia is a disorder. Here is a short list of a few phobias: Achluophobia or Lygophobia (fear of darkness), Acrophobia, (fear of heights), Androphobia (fear of men), Aviatophobia (fear of flying), Chiraptophobia (fear of being touched), Claustrophobia (fear of confined spaces), Coitophobia (fear of coitus), Decidophobia (fear of making decisions), etc.

How can criticism of Islam fall into this category? These are all irrational fears that require therapy. Are Muslims suggesting that the critics of Islam should receive therapy? We can’t classify disagreement with Islam as phobia. Islam is an ideology. Phobia is irrational fear of things, people or situations but not beliefs. You can't be phobic of a belief system. Beliefs per se are not frightening. It's people who follow nefarious beliefs that become dangerous and frightening. As one can see, the very term "Islamophobia" is stupid because Islam is a belief system and it is not possible to be phobic of a belief. From whichever angle you look at Islam you find its stupidity glaring at you.

Muslims suffer from an irrational fear of the Jews. Muslim children are taught that the Jews are evil and that they eat Muslim children and make pastries with their blood. Jews are caricatured in derogatory and demonized ways, depicted as bloodsucking monsters. In a television show aired in Palestine a three year old child was interviewed and asked what she hates most, and she responded "the Jews" and the journalists praised Allah upon hearing this stupid remark. So the neologism Judeophobia (fear of Jews) is a correct lexicon, because the irrational fear of Jews is inculcated in all Muslims since childhood. Muslims gravely suffer from this disorder.

If children anywhere were taught to fear Muslims, the way Muslim children are taught to fear Jews, then the neologism Muslimphobia would have made sense. But that is not the case. Islam is a belief system. It is a human right to disagree with any belief. Calling that disagreement “phobia” is a logical fallacy. Islam is the only ideology, whose followers try to discredit its critics by calling their criticism "phobia".


The absurdity of the Muslim mind is such that they think it is okay for them to incite hate against the non-Muslims in general and the Jews in particular and yet it is not okay for others to criticize their ideology of hate.


What is behind this paranoia and phobia of criticism? It is the inability of Muslims to counter the valid criticism of Islam. Failing that, they resort to ad hominem and try to discredit its critics by undermining their character. By classifying the criticism of Islam as a disorder, Muslims absolve themselves from responding to valid criticisms against their faith.

The neologism “Islamophobia”, is therefore the symptom of the intellectual bankruptcy of Muslim clerisy to come up with logical arguments and defend Islam against criticism in a rational way. "Islamophobia" is an ad hominen. It is a logical fallacy and an insult hurled at the critics of Islam. It highlights the fact that Islam is a lie, unable to withstand criticism. That is why Muslims need censorship and must eliminate the truth by brutal force (law suits or violence) to protect their lie.

The very existence of this neologism is a tacit confession of Muslims that Islam is a lie, which can't be defended logically and that ad hominem and censorship are the only ways to defend it.

Bron: http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/sina60526.htm

De site is blijkbaar al off-line gehaald... waarom zou dat nu zijn...:roll:

stom CGKR , met hunne censuur altijd ... trouwens, die server staat ergens in Indonesië (las ik ergens) wat gaan ze daar tegen aanvangen ?!

blijkbaar valt het toch niet in dovemansoren hé, aangezien de site al off-line is...

Het CGKR zouden ze moeten afschaffen die werkt de strijd tegen de islam immers tegen !

als ge het URL hebt, is dat heel vlug uit te vogelen wie eigenaar is van het URL en dus van de site, ...

Een Nederlandstalige extremistische moslim-site? dat kan niet, extreem-moslims gaan nooit de taal gebruiken van ongelovigen.

server was misschien niet schok proof ...

Wel als ze willen dat de Vlamingen dit ook lezen.

dan is het overduidelijk de bedoeling om te shoqueren, niets anders.

Inderdaad. Het spijtige is wel dat zij duidelijk haatgevoelens koesteren tegen ons en onze westerse maatschappij die zij willen vernietigen en willen vervangen zien door wat zij 'beschaving' noemen. Jong geleerd is oud gedaan....

Using 0 day old cached answer (or, you can get fresh results).
Hiding E-mail address (you can get results with the E-mail address).

=-=-=-=

Registration Service Provided By: LO-39482k
Contact: ********@anonymousmails.org

Domain name: **********

Registrant Contact:

Rwina D ********@hotmail.com)
+31.0093654712548
Fax: +.
Postbus 90701
Den Haag, Noord-Holland 2509LS
NL

Administrative Contact:

Rwina D ********@hotmail.com)
+31.0093654712548
Fax: +.
Postbus 90701
Den Haag, Noord-Holland 2509LS
NL

Technical Contact:

Rwina D ********@hotmail.com)
+31.0093654712548
Fax: +.
Postbus 90701
Den Haag, Noord-Holland 2509LS
NL

Status: Locked

Name Servers:
dns1.name-services.com
dns2.name-services.com
dns3.name-services.com
dns4.name-services.com
dns5.name-services.com

Creation date: 30 Jan 2006 10:07:09
Expiration date: 30 Jan 2007 10:07:09
=-=-=-=
Whois-Services: ************************************@whois-services.com

The data in this whois database is provided to you for information
purposes only, that is, to assist you in obtaining information about or
related to a domain name registration record. We make this information
available "as is," and do not guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a
whois query, you agree that you will use this data only for lawful
purposes and that, under no circumstances will you use this data to: (1)
enable high volume, automated, electronic processes that stress or load
this whois database system providing you this information; or (2) allow,
enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass unsolicited,
commercial advertising or solicitations via direct mail, electronic
mail, or by telephone. The compilation, repackaging, dissemination or
other use of this data is expressly prohibited without prior written
consent from us. The registrar of record is eNom. We reserve the right
to modify these terms at any time. By submitting this query, you agree
to abide by these terms.
Version 6.3 4/3/2002



Gerigistreerd vanuit Holland met een hotmail adres, nogal moeilijk te traceren dus, ge kunt dit soort info opvissen op :

www.dnsstuff.com

Site ligt inderdaad al plat, hoogstwaarschijnlijk zijn de hitrates ineens zo gestegen, dat ze heel de boel maar platgegooid hebben, of platgegaan zijn...

het kunnen trouwens ook blanken geweest zijn die de moslims in een slecht daglicht wilden brengen.

aja, dat kan niet, er bestaan geen slechte blanken :roll:

By the way, de server die het ding host staat in Hong-Kong...

Ik ben mer al te goe vertrouwt met whois ;-)