![]() |
(rev 3.1) Destroying "science," Christ 'not allowed' to do miracles - Pre-introduction to Fine Particle Physics - {HRI 20070226-V3.1}
Destroying "science," Christ 'not allowed' to do miracles -
Pre-introduction to Fine Particle Physics 26 February 2007 {HRI 20070226-V3.1} (Version 3.1 on 5 March 2007) ' "Because these are 'scientifically' not possible," Jesus Christ is 'not allowed,' by film maker Paul Verhoeven, to perform miracles... *(1) ' Which "science" is lying "scientifically" nested, in his brain? Nested - according to a common, colloquial Dutch expression *(a) - just behind the hairs in his neck, from which he, Paul Verhoeven is talking? *(1) ' Obviously (he has) NOT (studied) Fine Particle Physics, *(2) by which "miracles," and any other "anomalies," that are well published nowadays in television documentaries, and demonstrated and reported with undeniable evidence, *(3) BUT THAT ARE distinctly LOATHED by Criminal Minds, and definitely constitute a HATED truth for such individuals, HATING any truth they can not actually deny, or "prove wrong," that they pretend and loudly claim "does not exist" or if they are forced to be less rude and "scientific," then that what happened, "exists only inside the brain of their victims," *(3)(6) as any Criminal Mind would want crimes "seen," any undeniable, "dangerous" truth - that Criminal Minds OF COURSE regard with disgust and with contempt (that they express secretly or openly, and make their life's work and their morbid but intense joy "to prove wrong") - the facts of life as it is and always has been, the simplest of demonstrable, everyday truth of perception and knowledge "proven not to exist" by any 'Richard Wiseman' and by any other "scientist" of his ilk and of equally Criminal mind set, and by any - actually, by ALL - "science" magazine editors or owners and - actually, by ALL - "science" reporters or "science" journalists or (associated) press "science" writers, and public-TV "science" staff and "science" program makers, "science" having been 'defined' - since some centuries now, as 'collecting and using and predicting that data,' that is however selected out for "not being involved with (but instead DENYING) the simple nature of life itself, and not occupying itself with (but instead) DENYING the even simpler mechanisms of what is perception and memory, itself" - "science" defined so by Criminal Minds who OF COURSE do not want to be perceived as they actually are, much less, understood, by you notorious as these are - with their very understandable purpose of keeping you (via the "scientists" that these report from) as stupid as they, the reporters and "science" magazines and "science" programs can get away with unopposed, your stupidity brought about and maintained - very simply - by keeping away from you any Rationality and Logic and Sanity, thus: by keeping AWAY from you any useful, vital data that OPPOSE THEIR "scientific" LIES, or simply by having their "science" claim, that all "perception" is done inside the brain of your body, so that "a dead person can not perceive, nor remember" - the Criminal Mind's greatest and deepest wish, of course - and, "that anything you DO see or that another DOES perceive, 'by definition' is a hallucination taking place inside the brain," *(6) - so, that the Criminal Mind can claim "rationally," that you and indeed they will claim, about anyone perceiving their past Crimes and their intentions, which are OF COURSE to claim, and so they will predictably claim, that you and that any person who saw and who knows and who does remember, "must be 'understood' to be hallucinating," as "not able to perceive what happened," or else as "insane" - and the only person "who is sane" of course, "is the Criminal Mind himself or herself," *(6) like Einstein, or Freud, or "TV- scientist" Carl Sagan, etc. etc., not to mention the lesser known "scientist," the sociopath Richard Wiseman, are claiming of themselves, to be, that is, contrary to any and all rationality and logic and sanity *(2)(3)(4)(5) ' ' - a massive "science" 'in-breeding,' you might say, which is accomplished by REVERSING the very definition of 'science' itself, in order to please and submit to, and to elevate and adore Criminal Minds, who indeed are fiercely, if not deadly, motivated (they are Criminal Minds, you know) to keep any Rationality and Logic and Sanity AWAY from you, AWAY from your children, AWAY from public servants, (they already succeeded with the American Food and Drug Enforcement Agency - the best ally al-Qaeda can have in severely undermining any free and healthy society, much like a severe virus, which the FDA - sociologically speaking - is) who then feel compelled to refuse to understand anything at all about life itself, doing what Criminal Minds compel them to think and do: to refuse to gain any actual understanding about the nature of life, about their own life and that of all others, a LACK OF UNDERSTANDING LIFE'S NATURE, that of course shows up as being unable to understand, to explain, to work with "anomalies" that one has to deal with daily, that are "anomalies" to anyone who DENIES the nature of life, of perception, of memory, of feeling, the nature of being alive, who denies the nature of the very process of thinking itself, the nature of personal interaction, and of joy of life, DENYING what THEY must then - not wanting to understand it - call ' ' "miracles and anomalies," that however have always been present, no matter how much Einstein-cultists, and television "scientists" like Carl Sagan, and the film makers mentioned here, do demand, that "your perception 'is done with photons'," that recognizing your children and your friends - or also recognizing a hostile individual - is done "by means of photons," and that, by consequence, "because you perceive only with photons, YOU CAN NOT RECOGNIZE Criminal Minds," and other "scientists" are claiming, that "your, and your children's thinking 'is done with electrons'," so that when they put a magnet on top of your head, or around your head and body, as with an MRI-scan in hospital, "you should suddenly stop thinking," according to that "science," of course, which is utter nonsense as any five-year old child can tell you, but they are DENYING - as Criminal Minds indeed would desire you to do - they are denying the nature of yourself, of others, AND they are denying, and want you to deny, of course, the nature of Criminal Minds, of THEM - 'making Criminal Minds unrecognized, and instead admired and believed,' is the name of the whole game on Earth - while "science" can not understand, and does not know, how most people still CAN recognize Criminal Minds anyway, and how some people even can see, sense and feel - much better, than you can - those Energies (Life Energy Particles, Fine Particles) that contain the indestructible recording of Crimes, horrendous Crimes, what Criminal Minds exactly did in the past - simple perception, of which "science can not understand" how the perception of life occurs - things that are not only demonstrated, but nowadays are reported to everyone also, with evidence shown to every viewer as well, with evidence that can not be denied and will not be denied by a SANE, RATIONAL and LOGICAL person, (Criminal Minds and their followers are highly insane, irrational and illogical) *(6) because, any "miracles" and "anomalies" are perfectly understandable, even predictable, and are very simply and easily explained (with Fine Particle Physics). *(1) ' ' ' The actual question is, of course - for any person gifted with only a minor portion of intellect, a condition that is nevertheless very far ABOVE the basic instincts of film maker Paul Verhoeven's "logic" and "rationality," while all Criminal Minds like to consider themselves very "logical" and "rational," yes, above all others even - which is very easy for them to do, because they discard (or else they reverse) any actual facts that are "not fitting their 'logic' and their 'rationality,' their 'science'," that are not fitting their PURPOSE, actually - and the question of course, that any RATIONAL and LOGICAL, and SANE person wants to know the answer to: - 'Why did he - Christ, that is - NOT perform ENOUGH miracles?' Two thousand years ago not, and also not at other times? ' ' ' ' If you can - which is to anyone of good intent of greatest relevance - consider now THAT question, and that means NOT "answering" with 'justifications' for a lack of miracles performed, to make something right that obviously is not right, NOR does it mean the "explanations" of the Hindu and Buddhist and New Age philosophies, of immorality and spiritual death, of their PRETENDED "morality" and of their PRETENDED "understanding of life," of their PRETENSES about "eternal life," *(3) by which they "explain" (but can NOT REMEDY, and have NEVER remedied, let alone ever wanted to understand, not to mention ever DISCOVERED) the most horrific crimes committed on people, also NOT WANTING to have others see these, or understand these, *(3) "explaining" the most repulsive and the most unimaginable crimes, "explaining" these, IN ORDER NOT TO HAVE TO FACE the nature of actual, existing Criminal Minds past and present - yes, being (followers of) Criminal Minds themselves they have the utmost drive and motivation, to deny the existence of such (Crimes, and of Criminal Minds) altogether, *(3) but the question of course, that any RATIONAL and LOGICAL, any SANE *(4) person wants to know the answer to, is 'Why did he, Christ, NOT perform ENOUGH miracles?' and if you can consider THAT question, which I am sure you have not even dared to consider - if you thought of it at all - THEN you might begin to apply some logic and rationality to the matter. ' ' Which (logic and rationality) you can not at all expect from film maker Paul Verhoeven, or from film maker Steven Spielberg for that matter, as mentioned elsewhere, because they are mainly - if not wholly - interested in using the emotions of life in order to DENY the nature, to DENY the physics of life itself, to indeed "rivet" (fixate) your attention so you won't look further or deeper, let alone in the direction where you SHOULD look and SHOULD feel and SHOULD sense, *(b) if you would want to get an understanding of life and of people. ' ' So, if THEY - Criminal Minds - suddenly feel compelled PUBLICLY to claim, that "they know about life," then it would do well for us, to be able to understand also them, to be able to understand Criminal Minds ...THEM. *(7) ' ' ' ' The physics of life, which physics, logically of course, is called (should you be even vaguely educated about the nature of life itself, then you will see, that its physics is logically called) Fine Particle Physics, *(2) and is providing (giving you and others) Logic and Rationality - which (Logic and Rationality) is only possible with, and is therefore - based on the Trinity of Science, *(5) that consists of Love, Beauty, Truth. ' Koos Nolst Trenite 'Cause Trinity' human rights philosopher and poet 'Solomon's wisdom was greater than the wisdom of all the men of the East, and greater than all the wisdom of Egypt.' 1 Kings 4:30 ________ Textnote: (a) A common, Dutch colloquial expression suggests, that, in particular, when they ("scientists" in other words) do think, that their soul has taken the form of a human body part called the brain, then (the colloquial expression indeed says, that) their source of reasoning lies just behind the hairs of the neck - from which, by consequence, they talk (and do) all kind of nonsense, due to their (in many cases intentional, often even maliciously enforced) LACK of connection to generally accessible data and experience and feeling and memory, a CONNECTION to life, by which some people even concluded, that the earth is not flat, actually, but a ball floating freely in space - which of course you would not believe, would you, as "you have never actually seen it." ' Another common, Dutch colloquial expression, now that we are at it, does assign the lack of Logic and the absence of Rationality *(4) - in film maker Paul Verhoeven, in this case, but equally in his mentioned colleague - to be (similar to) what a rational and logical, sane person *(4) would expect to be emanating in the form of thought, from that end of a pig, to which its curly tail is attached. ' (b) THEIR underlying motive being always, to PRETEND to inform and appeal to life, PRETENDING to expose or show crimes or hidden data, or appeal to "relevant" emotions, because - "these having been addressed now" (ONLY THEN) - people will think and believe, that "they have been understood, and are well-informed or 'enlightened,' and have their emotions appealed to, now," and by consequence, "they 'do not have to' look further, nor to feel, sense or recall deeper," not beyond what is offered and not beyond the emotions shown and being exited (kindled, stimulated), a mechanism of "successful" deceit, elaborately described elsewhere by me, in various contexts and to various depths - of which the attentive and faithful reader is well aware. ' _________ Footnotes: (1) Newspaper interview quote: "Summarizing the contents of his monograph, Mr. Verhoeven said: 'Thesis No. 1 is, that Jesus was a man. That's already a big thing, as opposed to what Christianity says, that he was the son of God.' The book will be based on a close reading of ancient texts, he said, 'eliminating everything that's not possible, in my opinion.' He added: 'It's impossible that Jesus would have multiplied all this bread, isn't it? And the resurrection. All these things, that are not possible, are not possible'." From the interview by Dennis Lim - published 7 January 2007, in the New York Times (I won't now quote the lies, the pretense, that Paul Verhoeven later gave to the journalist, to pacify his audience, into thinking, that he, Paul Verhoeven, "is a big fan of Jesus Christ and of Mozart." We do believe everything Paul Verhoeven says, of course, even if he passionately acts (does) the very opposite.) ' (2) Introduction to Fine Particle Physics, for instance at http://www.angelfire.com/space/platoworld http://www.geocities.com/plato_world or as listed in various Human Rights Issues. ' (3) 'Facing Having Been Made Spiritually Blind' {HRI 20070105-V3.3} (5 January 2007 - Version 3.3 on 4 Feb 2007) http://groups.google.com/group/alt.p...749a082023282d ' (4) 'Definition Of Insane - Relation To Humor' {HRI 20030205-V2.2.1} (5 Feb 2003 - Version 2.2.1 on 9 Aug 2006) http://groups.google.com/group/soc.m...3578e53ce9ea97 'Definition Of Sanity' {HRI 20040410-V1.2} (10 April 2004 - Version 1.2 on 16 Apr 2004) http://groups.google.com/group/soc.c...a9a92d555dfaa0 'Explaining The Scale Of Sanity' {HRI 20040619-V3.4} (19 June 2004 - Version 3.4 on 2 Sept 2004) http://groups.google.com/group/alt.e...e775b1a7d5b10f ' "Insane" "Defined" By Criminal Minds As 'Ability To Perceive Them' ' {HRI 20040422-V2.7} (22 April 2004 - Version 2.7 on 22 July 2006) http://groups.google.com/group/soc.c...99af659dba8392 ' (5) 'The Trinity Of Science - Truth, Love and Beauty' {HRI 20030307-pi-1-V2.1} (7 Mar 2003 - Version 2.1 on 17 Oct 2003) http://groups.google.com/group/soc.c...29fa4f1a67840e ' (6) ' "Insane" "Defined" By Criminal Minds As 'Ability To Perceive Them' ' {HRI 20040422-V2.7} (22 April 2004 - Version 2.7 on 22 July 2006) http://groups.google.com/group/soc.c...99af659dba8392 (7) 'The First Law of Human Rights' {HRI 20060601-V2.2.2} (1 June 2006 - Version 2.2.2 on 8 Sept 2006) http://groups.google.com/group/soc.c...9985c64f1287f1 ____________ Verification: http://www.angelfire.com/space/platoworld Copyright 2007 by Koos Nolst Trenite - human rights philosopher and poet This is 'learnware' - it may not be altered, and it is free for anyone who learns from it and (even if he can not learn from it) who passes it on unaltered, and with this message included, to others who might be able to learn from it. None of my writings may be used, ever, to support any political or religious or scientific agenda, but only to educate, and to encourage people to judge un-dominated and for themselves, about any organizations or individuals. Send free-of-Envy and free-of-Hate, Beautiful e-mails to: PlatoWorld at Lycos.com (address unreadable for Internet robots - replace ' at ' with the '@' symbol) |
| Alle tijden zijn GMT +1. Het is nu 14:27. |
Forumsoftware: vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content copyright ©2002 - 2020, Politics.be