Citaat:
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door willem1940NLD
(Bericht 2694714)
Ik vermoed hier iets cultureels/magisch, on-westers ....
|
Denk eerder iets hollands...condooms kosten poen...niet? :lol:
Background
Before the discovery of HIV/AIDS in the early
1980s, anal sex with and without condoms was not distinguished (in communication) among
men who have sex with men (MSMs).
STD prevention campaigns encouraged condom use once transmission of HIV/AIDS was somewhat understood (see
HIV for more information). Researchers encouraged condom usage as an effective way to reduce HIV transmission.
The gay male community, having been affected the most by this pandemic, mobilized quickly and the practice of unprotected anal sex quickly became
taboo within the community. This was the time when the need for a term to describe the difference between "protected" and "unprotected" sexual acts arose.
Barebacking as a practice is claimed to have become increasingly common again among MSMs in the mid-
1990s. Reasons for this belief are widespread, and include correlations based on: an "upswing" in the level of new HIV infections amongst gay men in younger age groups cited by the
CDC and
WHO, a more public presence of "bareback" literature, personal ads, and publicity of rebellious attitudes towards the practice.
Gay columnists and editorializers in
The Advocate,
Genre magazine and
Out magazine during the late 1990s and into the new millennium have made several claims as to why barebacking in first-world nation gay communities as a practice, re-surged in the 1990s. Some of these claims have been backed up by Academics and Researchers such as
Sexuality Research and Social Policy: Journal of NSRC.
- The advent and relatively noticeable success of protease inhibitors and other drugs for treating HIV infections has changed the perception of HIV infection from an untreatible terminal illness to a treatable chronic malady.
- Decreasing effectiveness of health education messages in the gay community fails to promote condom use (see condom fatigue).
- Methamphetamines have become akin to a "drug of choice" within gay male (and other) populations; individuals under the influence of meth are less likely to be concerned over potential hazards of their behaviour.
- Gay men with opposing beliefs about the practice of barebacking get "more publicity" about their feelings than in the past.
- Bareback pornography is available and contributes to the apathy and romanticization of the practice.
- Online solicitation services for bare-backing partners has led to an increase in the practice. [1]
[edit] Controversy
Bareback sex by gay men is controversial both inside and outside the gay community. Some condemn barebacking and barebackers because they believe that the practice has caused upsurges in of
STIs and
HIV infections among young people and has given bad publicity to the gay community.
[citation needed]
Other commentators say that the publicity that barebacking has received is disporportionate to its pervasiveness, and that any focus by news media or epidemiologists on barebacking has more to do with stereotypes of gay men as promiscuous and irresponsible, along with the larger culture's fear of gay male sexuality, instead of any real change in what gay men are doing. The latter group of commentators may also argue that adult men should be able to engage in the consensual acts of their choosing without permission or apology. This argument ignores the wider societal consequences of bare-backing in maintaining and spreading HIV.
Bareback has become a fetish among some in the gay community. In addition to bareback pornography (see below), there are websites and discussion boards on the Internet devoted exclusively to barebacking that feature pictures of men engaged in bareback sex, personal advertisements of men seeking bareback sex with other men and erotic short stories involving barebacking. This subculture has developed its own slang terms, such as "breeding" (ejaculation inside the rectum of the receptive participant), "charging up" (the same as breeding, but the male doing the ejaculating is HIV+), "Russian Roulette party" or "conversion party" (a group sex party attended by HIV positive persons and HIV negative persons, the latter taking the chance that they may become infected with HIV).
[edit] Bareback in popular culture
Bareback gay
pornography exists, with some bareback films portraying and glamorizing ejaculation in the rectum or on the anus of the models in the films. There are a number of gay pornography studios that produce bareback films.
Cobra Video, Hot Desert Knights and
Treasure Island Media are just a few of the studios located in the United States. A number of Eastern European studios supply the increasing demand from homosexual men in North America and Western Europe for bareback pornography, including SEVP and
Eurocreme and Czech producers who supply footage to Hot Desert Knights for their "international line". These studios and the stars of their films have often come under heavy criticism for showing, and perhaps romanticising, bareback sex, particularly to young gay men. However, proponents claim the films actually keep barebacking to a minimum in the gay community by providing men with a visual substitute for the actual act.
Some bareback pornography studios say that they do not inquire whether their models are HIV positive, but assume that they are infected.
[2] Other bareback studios claim that they test their models for HIV antibodies and only hire models who are HIV negative.
[2]
Bareback heterosexual
pornography in the US has long been the norm and only recently has slightly changed to reflect new restrictions by
OSHA that state that requiring models to have unsafe sex in films creates a hazardous working environment.
[edit] Heterosexual bareback
Condom use amongst heterosexual people has dramatically increased during the last 20 years as groups respond to health messages about HIV/AIDS prevention.
[citation needed] In some groups, the use of a condom has become the norm, and the use of the word "bareback" has gained utility as a way to describe sex without a condom, especially between anonymous or casual partners.
Heterosexual barebacking is arguably less dangerous than its counterpart. This is simply due to the nature of the act: anal intercourse is far more likely than vaginal intercourse to result in abrasion or bleeding. While STDs can be transmitted with any exchange of bodily fluid, open wounds allow direct access to the blood stream and greatly increase the likelihood of transmission. In fact, some heterosexual couple who do not find it necessary to use a condom for vaginal intercourse still do so during anal intercourse, for this and other sanitary reasons.
Regardless, anonymous or casual heterosexual sex without a condom has not created the
moral panic that gay barebacking has. This can be attributed to the fact that gay men have become more organized in STD prevention.
[citation needed]. Furthermore barebacking is gaining popularity amongst the swinging arena whereby organisers are offering a vetting service for members to ensure there is no risk of STD's.
[edit] Bareback and prostitution
In the sex trade, the willingness to bareback is a selling point for
sex workers to their clients despite the increased risks implied to the client. A "
girlfriend experience" may imply a lack of barriers. Many prostitutes are willing to perform a bareback
blowjob (BBBJ) because it is less risky than other forms of unprotected contact with body fluids.
