Los bericht bekijken
Oud 30 mei 2024, 14:15   #62
dewanand
Minister-President
 
dewanand's schermafbeelding
 
Geregistreerd: 30 april 2005
Locatie: delft
Berichten: 5.281
Talking Vierde Wereldoorlog is totalitaire RASSENOORLOG op Karmische aardse hellewereld

KIJK Dit tactische korte afstand EMP wapen kan in theorie het veroveren van heel Rusland door EU en Navo USa, met UK, Canada, Mexico, Japan, INdia en zuid korea, en Brazilie in een nieuw Geallieerden OORLOGS Pact in principe behoorlijk versimpelen, piece of CAKE he.

Ja ik denk dat EU en Duitsland binnen drie jaar GEEN keus hebben dan met een groot invasie leger van minstens 3 MILJOEN grote sterke Arisch/ Duitse militairen Rusland dus keihard aan te vallen en totaal te veroveren. DEZE grote DERDE Wereldoorlog zal zeker ooit losbarsten ok, Totalitair heel EUROPA met bloedbaden, genocides, Holocausten binnen drie jaar. Nu al overal burgeroorlogjes en gewelds explosies.

En Ja hoor DEZE totalitaire DERDE Wereldoorlog zal heel Blank Arisch Europa op wonderbaarlijke wijze tot een massieve Arisch Duitse UNIE smeden met bloedig geweld, etnische massa moorden, harde nazisme binnen drie jaar verwacht ik deze uitbarsting en een hele harde diepgewortelde Arische Revolutie van de Boze Blanke Hetero mannen die nu hun Trotse, Grote HETERO NEUK LUL/ PIK dreigen kwijt te rakenj. Een HEtero TOP man op zijn PIK trappen betekent altijd dat je OORLOG zoekt of flinke afstraffing en elke STRAIGHT Hetero TOP kerel is hetzelfde. Mannen blijven Mannen en moeten Knokken voor hun kleine hetero pikkies.

WOKE, BLM, feminisme, TransGenders, LHBTIQ, en Islamisten willen dus de blanke hetero mannen allemaal naaien in hun witte REET maar echte sterke, potente, STRAIGHT, Trotse Hetero kerels met spieren en ballen laten zich NOOIT naaien en meppen terug met keiharde vuisten en harde pikkies.

WOIII Is enige wat resteert nu in White Aryan Europe denk ik. Alle Untermenschen van KLEUR zijn dus verdoemd nu in hele EU.



===============================================
=============================== van facebook:
Popular Science
·
By deploying pulsed bursts of microwave energy, military officials hope, this weapon can disable electronics without using physical force.

================================
https://www.popsci.com/technology/we...s-electronics/
The military is testing a weapon that aims to destroy electronics, not buildings
It's called HiJENKS, and it follows a similar project, called CHAMP. Here's how it's supposed to work.

By Kelsey D. Atherton

Posted on Jul 12, 2022 7:00 PM EDT

4 minute read


South of Death Valley and north of Los Angeles, the Air Force is testing a new weapon designed not to kill. Together with the Office of Naval Research, the Air Force Research Laboratory is conducting two months of testing on a device called the High-Powered Joint Electromagnetic Non-Kinetic Strike Weapon, or HiJENKS. It’s the culmination of a five-year project to create a machine that can destroy electronics in a targeted way.

HiJENKS is the successor to a similar weapon, the Counter-electronics High-Power Microwave Advanced Missile Project, or CHAMP. Both weapons were designed to disable electronics without using physical force, such as an explosive blast or the kinetic force from impact. Making a weapon that can disable electronics without causing physical damage to its target is hard, and it might be part of why the Air Force is open to new delivery systems, other than a missile, in this latest iteration.

In short, HiJENKS is a high-powered weapon that fries electronics with pulsed bursts of microwave energy. When it comes to targets, many weapon and sensor systems require smooth functioning of electronics to work, and a disruption that fries circuits could halt a threat while leaving the physical parts of the system untouched.

CHAMP, which HiJENKS is designed to improve upon, was built to fit in the case of a bomber-launched cruise missile. Little about the exact form of HiJENKS is known at present, though it could be mounted on a new cruise missile. Alternatively, HiJENKS might be carried in a weapon pod that draws power from a plane, or it could even become the primary weapon system of a drone flown as a wingmate to a crewed fighter.

“We’ll start looking at more service-specific applications once we’ve done this test that demonstrates the technology,” Jeffry Heggemeier, chief of AFRL’s high-power electromagnetics division, reportedly told press at Kirtland Air Force Base in Albuquerque.

“Heggemeier said the program hasn’t yet designated a platform for the weapon, but noted HiJENKS’ smaller footprint means it could be integrated on a wider range of carrier systems,” reports C4ISRNET.



https://www.popsci.com/technology/we...s-electronics/
============================
-------------------------
James Burdett
The scenario you describe, where energy weapons or other means are used to take out the electric grid and communications to create chaos and division within a society, fits into a broader category of asymmetric warfare and societal destabilization strategies. There are several points to consider:
### Feasibility and Methods
1. **Energy Weapons and Cyber Attacks**: Modern technology has made it possible to disrupt critical infrastructure through various means, including electromagnetic pulse (EMP) attacks, cyber-attacks, and other forms of sabotage. These methods can cripple a nation's power grid, communication networks, and essential services.
2. **Impact on Society**: Disabling the electric grid and communication channels can lead to a rapid breakdown of societal norms. Without electricity, water supply, food distribution, healthcare, and other critical services fail. This can result in panic, resource hoarding, and violence as people struggle to survive.
### Historical Precedents
There are historical examples where societies have collapsed or been severely destabilized due to the disruption of essential services. The aftermath of natural disasters, such as hurricanes or earthquakes, often provides a glimpse into the chaos that can ensue when infrastructure fails.
### Intentional Versus Accidental
1. **Orchestrated Scenarios**: In some cases, destabilization may be part of a deliberate strategy by hostile entities. Countries or terrorist organizations might use these tactics to weaken an opponent from within, creating internal conflict and reducing the target's ability to respond to external threats.
2. **Unintentional Collapse**: Alternatively, societies can end up in such situations due to a combination of poor governance, neglect of infrastructure, and natural disasters. When essential systems are not maintained or are vulnerable, they can fail catastrophically under stress, leading to similar outcomes without any orchestrated effort.
### Strategic Implications
1. **Domestic Resilience**: Ensuring the resilience of critical infrastructure is a key aspect of national security. This includes hardening the electric grid against attacks, developing robust cybersecurity defenses, and having contingency plans for rapid restoration of services.
2. **Psychological Warfare**: The scenario also fits into psychological warfare tactics. By creating fear, uncertainty, and division, an adversary can undermine public trust in the government and its institutions, further destabilizing the society.
### Conclusion
Whether such scenarios are orchestrated or occur by chance, the results can be devastating. The importance of robust infrastructure, effective governance, and public preparedness cannot be overstated. While there is no definitive answer to whether current societal divisions and vulnerabilities are the result of intentional actions or a series of unfortunate events, the potential for exploitation by hostile actors remains a critical concern.
Understanding these dynamics helps in both preventing such scenarios and mitigating their effects if they do occur.

1 d

Beantwoorden




----------------------



============================================
============================== zie ook deze tekst he onderzoek Tactisch EMP wapen dat dus GERICHT kan worden ok op een object of levend wezen.


https://www.c4isrnet.com/battlefield...owave-missile/
Battlefield Tech
US Navy, Air Force running ‘capstone test’ of new high-power microwave missile
By Courtney Albon


ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — The U.S. Navy and Air Force research laboratories are wrapping up a five-year joint effort to advance high-power microwave technology this summer with two months of testing in California.

The High-Powered Joint Electromagnetic Non-Kinetic Strike Weapon, known as HiJENKS, uses microwave technology to disable an adversary’s electronic systems. The Air Force Research Laboratory and the Office of Naval Research are conducting the capstone tests at Naval Air Station China Lake.

HiJENKS is the successor to the AFRL’s Counter-electronics High-Power Microwave Advanced Missile Project, which completed testing a decade ago. Jeffry Heggemeier, chief of AFRL’s high-power electromagnetics division, told reporters during a June 24 visit to the lab’s Directed Energy Directorate at Kirtland Air Force Base in New Mexico the program builds on CHAMP, taking advantage of new technology that allows for a smaller system equipped for a more rugged environment.

Heggemeier said the program hasn’t yet designated a platform for the weapon, but noted HiJENKS’ smaller footprint means it could be integrated on a wider range of carrier systems.

“We’ll start looking at more service-specific applications once we’ve done this test that demonstrates the technology,” he said.

AFRL is also making progress on a more advanced version of its Tactical High Power Operational Responder (THOR), which uses HPM technology to disable drone swarms that pose a threat to military bases. The next-generation platform is named Mjölnir as an homage to the mythical god Thor’s hammer. AFRL awarded Leidos a $26 million contract in February to develop the Mjölnir prototype and deliver it in early 2024.

Adrian Lucero, THOR and Mjölnir program manager, told reporters during the same June 24 briefing that counter-drone systems are becoming increasingly relevant as unmanned aerial vehicle technology advances.

“There are other effectors out there that are intended to go against drone systems like guns, nets and laser systems,” he said. “But what Thor brings to the table is it has a larger range to affect and it has a decreased engagement time.”

The THOR prototype returned last month from a year of operational testing overseas. While the system was in use, the program team was hard at work developing the Mjolnir upgrades to extend THOR’s range, increase its power by about 50% and improve its usability — recommendations from the Air Force Security Forces who were using it during the deployment.

“We learned a lot of lessons from it being overseas, just working in that operational environment, having Air Force Security Forces airmen pulling the trigger and breaking it,” Heggemeier said.

Lucero and Heggemeier wouldn’t disclose where THOR was deployed, but Lucero said the system proved 94% reliable during its operational assessment, demonstrating its ability “in the real world.”

Once the prototype arrived back in New Mexico, the team disassembled and inspected it and then reassembled it for baseline testing to ensure it’s working as designed. Lucero said the program is now testing the Mjölnir upgrades.
About Courtney Albon

Courtney Albon is C4ISRNET’s space and emerging technology reporter. She has covered the U.S. military since 2012, with a focus on the Air Force and Space Force. She has reported on some of the Defense Department’s most significant acquisition, budget and policy challenges.




https://www.c4isrnet.com/battlefield...owave-missile/
=============================
__________________
Kritisch Podium Dewanand

http://www.dewanand.com
dewanand is offline   Met citaat antwoorden