[Pieke]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Pindar

ok nou effe over de holle aarde dan:






Pindar

wat pindar er niet bij zegt:

The Environmental Science Administration satellite photo included in this article does indeed show a large hole at the north pole. There is also a similar photo of the south pole. However, the hole shown cannot possibly be the actual polar opening since this picture obviously is a composite of many photographs taken by this satellite. As the satellite orbited the earth, pictures taken did not extend all the way to the poles because the polar area was out of its line-of-sight from it's equator orbit. Therefore, when all the pictures taken are assembled into one mosaic composite picture, that area around the poles are left out of the assembled picture. Notice the overlay of the continents and that Greenland extends far up into the "hole." Proof that this photo was not taken above the pole, is the continent of India visible at 1 o'clock which is below the equator, which would not be visible to a satellite above the pole.

bron: http://seekers.100megs6.com/HoleinthePole.htm

en:

You knew this was coming sooner or later, right? This photograph is the only piece of anything that could be associated with proof for this bizarre chain of theories. Let's look closer, shall we?
This particular satellite photo was published in the SUN on February 25, 1992, "proving" there was a hole in the north pole. The SUN is a tabloid, for those of you who are not familiar with it.
What they didn't bother to explain was that this is a composite of many photos taken by weather satellites and that the hole was intentionally cut out of it. How do I know this?
There are two types of weather satellites, Geo-stationary (GEOS) and Polar Orbiting (PEOS). Geo-stationary satellites cannot view the poles because they are always directly above the equator, therefore, this picture must have been taken with a PEOS. Polar orbiting satellites, which circle the Earth from top to bottom, do image the poles, but have a very small angle of vision (around 1,700 miles) due to their low altitude of about 300-800 Miles. So in order to take images of the poles, one would have to composite many, many smaller images to get a full photo, which is exactly what weather imaging involves.

What usually happens is that the photos are stitched together and the pole areas are cut out. This is because there are, on average, 28 images required to get a complete snapshot of the planet (many PEOS circle the entire Earth around 14 times per day). Stitching these image swaths together closer to the equator is easier because it only requires merging two images. The closer to the poles you get the more images it may require and the more distorted they become. For this reason they are often cut out instead.

That confirms the image at top as a composite of many PEOS images that have intentionally had the pole cut out of them.
These final two pictures were on a website claiming to have finally found the proof of the hole in the north pole. Now, I'm no meteorologist, but these seem more like photographs of a hole in the cloud cover, not a hole in the surface of the planet. (Incidentally, these photos were taken by the crew of Apollo 11 on it's return trip to Earth. See the Apollo Hoax conspiracy theory for more.)
Besides, I don't see any sunlight coming out of the Earth up there (Please recall, this is why there appears to be an ice cap on Mars. It's the inner sun's reflecting light.) Wouldn't that big ol' inner sun be shining up through the hole? Well, maybe someone turned it off to save on the electric bill.

bron: http://www.seawana.com/conspiracy_ho...rth.php?page=3

Deze site is wel interessant: over de zon in het binnenste van onze aarde:

There is a sun about 600 miles in diameter inside the inner Earth which lights it.

Let's assume the Earth is hollow and the laws of gravity have been changed to allow people to walk around on the inside surface of it. It can't happen, I know, but let's just pretend for a while because it's fun.

It is still not possible to have a sun only 600 miles in diameter inside the Earth. Why? Let's start with a common misconception about Jupiter.

Many people think that we could be living in a dual star system if conditions had been right for Jupiter to "ignite" and begin nuclear fusion. What they do not know is that it has been calculated that the smallest "sun" possible would have to be at least 8% of the size of our current sun in order to begin fusion of hydrogen into helium. Jupiter is one order of magnitude smaller than that (.8% the size of the sun). So, Jupiter has a diameter 11 times that of Earth, but is still ten times too small to ignite and become a Star