Discussie: De grote 9/11 topic
Los bericht bekijken
Oud 10 maart 2007, 22:55   #2174
IlluSionS667
Banneling
 
 
IlluSionS667's schermafbeelding
 
Geregistreerd: 15 juni 2004
Berichten: 2.922
Standaard

Citaat:
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Firestone Bekijk bericht
Jij zou toch eens moeten opzoeken wat een straw-man is, hoor.

Tipje: Alex Jones gebruikt de term verkeerd.
Hoezo?

Wikipedia :
Citaat:
A straw man argument is a logical fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position. To "set up a straw man" or "set up a straw-man argument" is to create a position that is easy to refute, then attribute that position to the opponent.

[...]

One can set up a straw man in the following ways:
  1. Present a misrepresentation of the opponent's position, refute it, and pretend that the opponent's actual position has been refuted.
  2. Quote an opponent's words out of context -- i.e., choose quotations that are not representative of the opponent's actual intentions (see contextomy)
  3. Present someone who defends a position poorly as the defender, refute that person's arguments, and pretend that every upholder of that position, and thus the position itself, has been defeated.
  4. Invent a fictitious persona with actions or beliefs that are criticized, and pretend that the person represents a group of whom the speaker is critical.
  5. Oversimplify a person's argument into a simple analogy, which can then be attacked.
(bron)
Conclusie : zowel Akufen als Alex Jones gebruiken de correcte definitie van de term. Jij gebruikt inderdaad straw-man arguments, net als Parcifal trouwens.

Laatst gewijzigd door IlluSionS667 : 10 maart 2007 om 22:55.
IlluSionS667 is offline   Met citaat antwoorden