Discussie: De grote 9/11 topic
Los bericht bekijken
Oud 29 maart 2007, 12:34   #2512
Akufen
Staatssecretaris
 
Geregistreerd: 26 augustus 2006
Berichten: 2.872
Standaard

Citaat:
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door parcifal Bekijk bericht
Dat is al lang en breed bewezen. Onder meer door de analyse van Dr. Greening.
Maar ik weet wel dat cijfers of rapporten jou niets zeggen.

Jou kunnen ze alles wijsmaken, Steve.
http://www.teamliberty.net/id289.html (augustus 2006)

Citaat:
Dr. Frank R. Greening to argue in support of government account of the events of September 11, 2001 at the National 9/11 Debate

The National 9/11 Debate is pleased to announce that Frank R. Greening Ph.D. has agreed to participate in the National 9/11 Debate on March 10, 2007 in Charleston, South Carolina. Frank R. Greening will be part of a seven-member debate team that will support the U.S. government’s official account of 9/11 events.
http://www.teamliberty.net/id245.html (January 2007)

Citaat:
On January 31, 2007 the Muckraker Report canceled its effort to hold a National 9/11 Debate. We thank everyone who expressed interest in the event, particularly those patriotic Americans that were willing to publicly debate the government officials responsible for the “official” account of what happened on September 11, 2001. Jim Fetzer, George Nelson, Judy Wood, Philip Berg, Steven Jones, Morgan Reynolds, David Ray Griffin, and many others in the “Truth Movement” – the Muckraker Report salutes you and thanks you.

The reason for canceling this effort is simple. After hundreds of letters, e-mails, and phone calls, not one of the 9/11 Commissioners or the government scientists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology have agreed to debate their conclusions. In fact, they all have declined to debate. In addition, the corporate media has refused to report on the debate effort and declined to cover the event.

Laatst gewijzigd door Akufen : 29 maart 2007 om 12:36.
Akufen is offline   Met citaat antwoorden