[Akufen]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door parcifal

Dus de foto's en video's van de vervormingen en het kantelen van de bovenstructuur van de WTC torens vind jij niet relevant?

Een vervorming is nog altijd geen oorzaak. Het is een gevolg.
Het zou dus, volgens het officiële verhaal, een gevolg zijn van de temperatuur. Het bewijs zegt echter dat die temperatuur niet voldeed.

Veel simpeler kan het niet zijn denk ik hé?

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door parcifal

Dus de mensen van de Purdue Universiteit zijn prutsers?

En de mensen van Weidlinger ?

En de mensen van MIT en Kajima etc. etc.?

52 Nobelprijswinnaars (en vele andere wetenschappers) zouden tijdens de Bush-regering hun beklag gedaan over het politiseren van de wetenschap en het verdraaien van de feiten in het voordeel van de regering.

Bovendien is het een select clubje dat alle aanslagen onderzoekt.



Lees ook dit eens:
http://www.911blogger.com/node/6765

Fouten in de Weidlinger simulatie:
http://journalof911studies.com/lette...Weidlinger.pdf

1 voorbeeld ervan:

Questionable Collapse Initiation. What caused the failure of the columns? NIST did laboratory tests to see
how a fully loaded test floor would react to an office fire, but their test floor only showed minimal signs of
sagging and did not collapse [8]. They ended up having to use a computer simulation, which apparently did not
collapse without using "severe" parameter values as opposed to "realistic" parameter values [9]. How did
Weidlinger initiate this collapse? Their statements in the press indicate fire caused column failure, but this is
extremely questionable, as the core columns would have conducted and dispersed the heat along the height of
the structure. The NIST report, which tested some of the steel from the World Trade Center towers, says that
not a single column sample showed signs of the temperatures that are associated with significant weakening of
steel (600ºC is steel's half-strength temperature):

Over 170 areas associated with the 21 exterior panels were analyzed, and... only three locations showed
evidence of [the steel possibly exceeding 250ºC]. Four of the core columns with known as-built locations were
examined... for [two of the columns], sufficient paint for analysis was not available. For [the other two
columns, a] few areas of paint were observed, [showing] no indication indication of temperatures over 250ºC
[10].

In the several columns with known pre-collapse fire exposure, metallographic analysis provided no conclusive
evidence that the steel exceeded 625ºC [11].

Problemen met Purdue?

Weer 1 voorbeeld:

· NIST reported that 9 core columns were severed or heavily damaged by aircraft impact, and this was in their “more severe” case. Purdue now says that 52 core columns were “destroyed or heavily damaged” over a height six floors (see Irfanoglu and Hoffman, table 1). First note that there was a total of 47 core columns in the building. Even if several of these were “destroyed” at multiple levels, Purdue is now asking us to accept a level of damage that is far greater than years of government research could support.

http://visibility911.com/blog/?p=71#more-71

En voor de gezelligheid:

http://www.ae911truth.org/techarts.php

• Momentum Transfer Analysis of the Collapse of the Upper Stories of WTC 1
Gordon Ross Journal of 9/11 Studies

• Direct Evidence for Explosions: Flying Projectiles and Widespread Impact Damage
Dr. Crockett Grabbe

• Lies about the WTC by NIST and Underwriters Laboratories
Kevin Ryan - U.L. whistleblower - former Site Manager

• Physical Chemistry of Thermite, Thermate, Iron-Alum-Rich Microspheres at Demise of WTC 1 & 2
Jerry Lobdill 6/15/2007

• The Destruction of WTC 7
Vesa Raiskila

• The NIST WTC Investigation -- How Real Was The Simulation?
Eric Douglas, Architect

• Revisiting 9/11/2001 -- Applying the Scientific Method
Prof. Steven E. Jones, Ph.D., Physics

• DR. BAZANT - NIST's 911 FALL GUY
by Gordon Ross, ME [1], June 4, 2007*

• Open Letter to Purdue President France Córdova
Kevin Ryan, B.S. Chem.

• Jones vs. Robertson: A Physicist and a Structural Engineer Debate the Controlled Demolition of the World Trade Center
Gregg Roberts, Associate Editor, 911Research.com

• Another Structural Engineer Questions WTC Collapses
William Rice, P.E.

• Can Physics Rewrite History?
Chuck Thurston

• Reply to Protec's A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE COLLAPSE OF WTC TOWERS 1, 2 & 7 FROM AN EXPLOSIVES AND CONVENTIONAL DEMOLITION INDUSTRY VIEWPOINT
Jim Hoffman

• NIST's World Trade Center FAQ: A Reply to the National Institute for Standards and Technology's Answers to Frequently Asked Questions
Jim Hoffman

• Building a Better Mirage NIST's 3-Year $20,000,000 Cover-Up of the Crime of the Century
Jim Hoffman

• The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True
David Ray Griffin

• Another reason the 9/11 fire-mediated collapse theory is wrong
Joseph Smith

• Popular Mechanics' Assault on 9/11 Truth
Jim Hoffman

• Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse?
Dr. Steven E. Jones

• Proof That The Thermal and Gravitational Energy Available Were Insufficient to Melt Steel in the Twin Towers and 7 World Trade Center on 9/11/01
Terry Morrone

• Report on Weidlinger Simulation
Leaked WTC Blueprints contain 3D simulations from the Weidlinger report that contradict the NIST repoort of the Twin Tower's destruction

• Engineering News Record: The World Trade Center

• Bad Science: Keith Seffen And The WTC 'Collapse'
Winter Patriot blog 9/14/07

• UK Engineer: WTC 'Collapses' Were 'A Very Ordinary Thing'
Winter Patriot blog 9/11/07

• Explosions or Collapse? The Semantics of Deception and the Significance of Categories
C. Thurston

• My Response to Ryan Mackey and the Self-Crushing Building Theory, "On Debunking 9/11 Debunking"
by Chuck Thurston

• NIST Data Disproves Collapse Theories Based on Fire
Frank Legge (Ph D) Logical Systems Consulting Perth, Western Australia. [email protected]

• High Velocity Bursts of Debris from Point-Like Sources in the WTC Towers
Kevin Ryan

• Keith Seffen's WTC Collapse Folly: Not Even Wrong
Arkadiusz Jadczyk Nov. 10, 2007

• Analysis of the Mass and Potential Energy of WTC Tower 1
by Gregory Urich December, 2007

• How the Towers Were Demolished
by Gordon Ross

• Collapse of the North Tower of the World Trade Center
Crockett Grabbe © January 18, 2008 University of Iowa & SeaLane Consulting

• Response to NIST on Control Demolition Investigation Failure
Crockett Grabbe © January 13, 2008 University of Iowa & SeaLane Consulting

• Response to NIST on Energy and Momentum
Crockett Grabbe © January 18, 2008 University of Iowa & SeaLane Consulting

• Collapse of the South Tower of the World Trade Center
Crockett Grabbe © December 23, 2007 University of Iowa & SeaLane Consulting

• Science in the Bush: When Politics Displaces Physics
By Dr. Crockett Grabbe and Lenny Charles 9/08/07

• 9/11 and the Twin Towers: Sudden Collapse Initiation Was Impossible
Dec 23, 2007
by Frank Legge, PhD & Tony Szamboti, Mechanical Engineer

• Dr Seffen Paper Proven Ludicrous
by Mick Meany
Feb, 2008

• Extremely high temperatures during the World Trade Center destruction
Steven E. Jones, Jeffrey Farrer, Gregory S. Jenkins, Frank Legge, James Gourley, Kevin Ryan, Danial Farnsworth, and Crockett Grabbe
January 2007

• Engineer Sees Evidence of Extreme Temperatures in WTC Steel
Submitted by Shoestring on Mon, 02/25/2008

• The Sustainability of the Controlled Demolition Hypothesis for the Destruction of the Twin Towers
Tony Szamboti, ME --- May, 2007