Los bericht bekijken
Oud 3 juli 2008, 23:07   #3
filosoof
Banneling
 
 
filosoof's schermafbeelding
 
Geregistreerd: 22 mei 2003
Locatie: Brussel
Berichten: 49.496
Standaard

Ik vind nog iets "interessant":

Citaat:
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door zdnet:
April 23rd, 2008
9th Circuit: Feds can search laptops without suspicion
Is your laptop your digital “home”? Um, no, the (”liberal” - that always makes me laugh) Ninth Circuit ruled Monday in US v Arnold. At least not at the border or at the international terminal of a US airport.

Michael Arnold arrived at LAX from the Philippines, where he was pulled aside by customs agents for a random laptop search. They found what they believed to be child pornography. Two weeks later they obtained a warrant and a grand jury charged him with breaking federal kiddie porn laws.

The issues in the case were two: Are customs officials at US airports required to have reasonable suspicion (not probable cause, btw) to search a laptop? If so, did they have it in this case?

The holding: International travelers arriving from overseas are subject to border rules. And those rules are very, very favorable to the government. There is no reasonable suspicion needed for searches of “closed containers,” such as

lees hier verder.

Laatst gewijzigd door filosoof : 3 juli 2008 om 23:10.
filosoof is offline