Politics.be - Los bericht bekijken

gm10 · 12 juni 2004, 19:33

Citaat:

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Darwin

Citaat:

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door gm10

??????????????????????????
wat voor een zever is me dat? en hiermee motiveer je de uitspraak

"De moslims zorgen nu al voor de helft of meer van alle geboorten in het Brussels Gewest."

dit is van het Mein Kampf-niveau, ook Dolfie dacht van 1 tot 10 te kunnen gaan zonder te hoeven controleren of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 en 9 er wel effectief tussen in lagen

Als jij het NIS en de RVA met "Dolfie" wil vergelijken is dat jouw zaak.

Maar die houden zich wel bezig met dergelijk sociaal noodzakelijk onderzoek. In Nederland verricht men in tegenstelling tot België wel serieus onderzoek naar de etnische samenstelling van de bevolking. De moslimorganisaties gaan er trouwens prat op dat in Brussel 57% van de geboorten op rekening komt van de moslims :

Citaat:

Demographics

In the Maghrib between 1965 and 1990, the population rose from 29.8 million to 59 million. During the same period, the number of Egyptians increased from 29.4 million to 52.4 million. In Central Asia, between 1970 and 1993, populations grew at an annual rate of 2.9 percent in Tajikistan, 2.6 percent in Uzbekistan, 2.5 percent in Turkmenistan, and 1.9 percent in Kyrgyzia. In the 1970s, the demographic balance in the Soviet Union shifted drastically, with Muslims increasing by 24 percent while Russians increased by only 6.5 percent.

[size=5]The increase in the Muslim heartlands will have a significant impact in Muslim minority areas as well. In some countries, such as Tanzania and Macedonia, the Muslims will become a majority within twenty years. Largely through immigration, the Muslim population of the United States grew sixfold between 1972 and 1990. And even in countries where immigration has been suppressed, the growth continues. Last year, seven percent of babies born in European Union countries were Muslims. In Brussels, the figure was a staggering 57 percent. Islam is already the second religion of almost every European state - the only exceptions being those European countries such as Azerbaijan and Albania where it is the majority religion. If current trends continue, then an overall ten percent of European nationals will be Muslim by the year 2020.[/size]

Conclusion

If the west's population is top-heavy, (i.e., the ratio of youth to elderly is low) that of Muslim populations is the opposite. For example, today more than half the population of Algeria is under the age of twenty and this situation is similar elsewhere. [size=5]These young populations will reproduce and perpetuate the increase of Muslims on a percentage basis well into the next millennium[/size].

North America and Europe have increasingly aging populations and one of the most disturbing social issues of the new millennium will concern a more efficient means of disposing of the elderly. (For example, witness the new euthanasia laws in the Netherlands, and the ongoing debate in many countries about this issue.) Medical advances can assure an average life span in the high seventies, although active life spans have not grown as fast. In the early 1900s, a westerner could expect to spend an average of the last two years of life as an invalid. Today, that figure is seven years. As Ivan Illich has shown, medicine prolongs life, but can not prolong mobility nearly as well. Aging populations with their increased healthcare costs are considered a more extensive socio-economic burden to society. For example, the UK Department of Health recently announced that a new prescription drug for Alzheimer's Disease was available on the National Health Service - but its cost meant that it was only available to a small minority of patients.

An aging population tends to be introspective and sluggish, whereas a young population is more likely to be vibrant and energetic. This may or may not bode well for many countries and that will depend on whether their political structure is fragile or not.

http://muslim-canada.org/muslimstats.html

Jij doet alsof het geen maatschappelijke relevantie zou hebben als binnen dit en enkele decennia de bevolking van de hoofdstad van Europa overwegend uit moslims zou bestaan. Dat is natuurlijk niet zo.

jij doet alsof ik zei dat het een leugen was
maar natuurlijk heb ik enkel gezegd dat hij zijn conclusie niet kon trekken op basis van dat rapport, en dat is maar al te duidelijk
hiermee heb ik trouwens ook nog niet gezegd dat ik je cijfer aanvaard
het is verre van officieel