Los bericht bekijken
Oud 29 januari 2012, 01:37   #1835
Kasumi
Banneling
 
 
Geregistreerd: 18 maart 2011
Berichten: 2.460
Standaard

Citaat:
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door atmosphere Bekijk bericht
In R.A.D. kunnen we het antwoord op de vraag waarom Iran nu zo veel negatieve aandacht krijgt eigenlijk gewoon vinden:


Over the long term, Iran may well prove as large a threat to U.S. interests in the Gulf as Iraq has. And even should U.S.-Iranian relations improve, retaining forward-based forces in the region would still be an essential element in U.S. security strategy given the longstanding American interests in the region" (p. 17).

It is now commonly understood that information and other new technologies – as well as widespread technological and weapons proliferation – are creating a dynamic that may threaten America’s ability to exercise itsdominant military power. Potential rivals such as China are anxious to exploit these transformational technologies broadly, while adversaries like Iran, Iraq and North Korea are rushing to develop ballistic missiles and nuclear weapons as a deterrent to American intervention in regions they seek to dominate" (p. 4).

"The current American peace will be short-lived if the United States becomes vulnerable to rogue powers with small, inexpensive arsenals of ballistic missiles and nuclear warheads or other weapons of mass destruction. We cannot allow North Korea, Iran, Iraq or similar states to undermine American leadership, intimidate American allies or threaten the American homeland itself.
Irak kan beter Iran volgen en ook goud voor olie vragen.
Kasumi is offline   Met citaat antwoorden