Los bericht bekijken
Oud 3 april 2014, 03:29   #154
Eliyahu
Banneling
 
 
Geregistreerd: 16 oktober 2008
Locatie: Judea
Berichten: 4.557
Standaard

Citaat:
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door koppijn Bekijk bericht
Carbon dating doesn't work -- debunked Nogmaals het bewijs dat creationisten pathologische manipulators zijn. Botten zijn opgebouwd uit twee fundamentele bestanddelen, calciumfosfaat en collageen. Collageen is een supramoleculair bindweefsel waar ook onder andere de huid uit bestaat. Om een c14 datering te kunnen doen moet er nog collageen in dat bot voorkomen. Collageen is een proteïne die uit aminozuren wordt samengesteld, die beurtelings van koolstof, zuurstof en waterstof worden gebouwd. Zo'n weefsel valt snel uit elkaar na overlijden.
Bs'd

Dan zijn we het er dus over eens dat die dino's waarin collageen gevonden is geen miljoenen jaren oud zijn, maar nog recent rondgewandeld hebben.

Citaat:
Een gefossiliseerd bot is een bot dat nog enkel uit calciumfosfaat bestaat. Men kan geen c14 datering doen op dinosaurus beenderen, niet omdat het miljoenen jaren oud is en geen spoor van c14 bevat maar het bevat geen enkel vorm van koolstof. Het bestaat zuiver uit calciumfosfaat.
Radiocarbon in dino bones
International conference result censored

http://creation.com/c14-dinos#txtRef1

A team of researchers gave a presentation at the 2012 Western Pacific Geophysics Meeting in Singapore, August 13–17, at which they gave 14C dating results from many bone samples from eight dinosaur specimens. All gave dates ranging from 22,000 to 39,000 years, right in the ‘ballpark’ predicted by creationists.1 But if dinosaurs really were millions of years old, there should not be one atom of 14C left in them.

Two of the report’s physicist co-authors … are urging colleagues to do their own carbon dating of dinosaur bones.

This was a joint event of the American Geophysical Union (AGU) and the Asia Oceania Geosciences Society (AOGS). It appears that the researchers approached the matter with considerable professionalism, including taking great pains to eliminate contamination with modern carbon as a source of the 14C signal in the bones. The lead presenter was Dr Thomas Seiler, a German physicist whose PhD is from the Technical University of Munich. The video of his presentation was up on YouTube at the time of writing this report.

The researchers seem to be associated with Catholic creationist groups, which have reported the conference earlier and more vocally than evangelical creationists. One of these reports states that afterwards, “the abstract was removed from the conference website by two chairmen because they could not accept the findings. Unwilling to challenge the data openly, they erased the report from public view without a word to the authors or even to the AOGS officers, until after an investigation. It won’t be restored.”2

Indeed, one can go online to see a screen shot of the original program. But going to the official conference site, the talk has clearly been removed. (Go to Wednesday, room Leo 2, double-click on BGO2, which is the session that had the presentation. The numbers go from 4 to 6, omitting 5, which was the one on 14C in dino bones.) So much for science’s alleged openness to the data. The ‘power of the paradigm’ can be clearly seen.

The public has the right to know the actual chronology of the dinosaurs, and indeed the history of the earth.

Two of the report’s physicist co-authors, Professor Dr Robert Bennett and Dr Jean de Pontcharra, till recently with the French Atomic Energy Commission’s Grenoble Research Centre, are urging colleagues to do their own carbon dating of dinosaur bones. They say that the media should be encouraging scientists to do this also, presenting the findings openly and honestly at similar conferences. This would certainly be in the interests of scientific truth—especially following the repeated findings of soft tissue in dinosaur bones, and now even seemingly irrefutable DNA in dinosaur specimens.3 The public has the right to know the actual chronology of the dinosaurs, and indeed the history of the earth.

Of course the people you know will generally not get to hear this powerful information from regular sources. We have been repeatedly surprised when on ministry tours how few people even know about the soft-tissue finds by secular scientists. This is an exciting time to be a creationist, both getting this sort of information, and being able to pass it on. So it’s more important than ever to be not just subscribing to but actively supporting reputable, non-sensationalistic creation organizations committed to this important task. Please, keep helping us defend and proclaim the real history of the Bible, on which the credibility of the Gospel itself depends.

Zoals je ziet, de "wetenschap" steekt de kop in het zand voor onwelgevallige feiten.

Laatst gewijzigd door Eliyahu : 3 april 2014 om 03:29.
Eliyahu is offline   Met citaat antwoorden