26 juli 2014, 20:27
|
#2
|
Perm. Vertegenwoordiger VN
Geregistreerd: 7 juni 2014
Locatie: 't Steen
Berichten: 15.456
|
Citaat:
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Karel Martel B
Wie herinnert zich Jenin nog?
De hysterische claims van honderden doden, die uiteindelijk verzonnen bleken?
|
Woehaa! Er is precies niet echt een consensus onder de editors
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Battle_of_Jenin
Citaat:
WARNING: ACTIVE ARBITRATION REMEDIES
The article Battle of Jenin, along with other articles relating to the Arab–Israeli conflict, is currently subject to active arbitration remedies, as laid out during a 2008 Arbitration case, and supplemented by community consensus in November 2010. The current restrictions are:
All articles related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, broadly construed, are under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24 hour period). When in doubt, assume it is related.
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Reverts of edits made by anonymous IP editors that are not vandalism are exempt from 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring.
Editors who otherwise violate this 1RR restriction may be blocked without warning by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
After being warned, discretionary sanctions can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. Discretionary sanctions can include blocks for up to one year, topic-bans or further revert-restrictions.
Reports of editors violating any of these restrictions should be made to either the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard. Violations of 1RR should be made to the edit warring noticeboards.
If you are a new editor, or an editor unfamiliar with the situation, please follow the above guidelines. You may also wish to review the arbitration case page. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!
|
|
|
|