Discussie: De grote 9/11 topic
Los bericht bekijken
Oud 25 mei 2015, 14:56   #23980
parcifal
Banneling
 
 
parcifal's schermafbeelding
 
Geregistreerd: 18 februari 2003
Berichten: 26.968
Standaard

Citaat:
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Akufen Bekijk bericht
Het feit dat het peer-reviewed is door experten in hun veld, dat vermeld je beter niet. Laat staan dat je probeert te weerleggen wat er in staat.
Tiens, wat vind ik nu :

Citaat:
In April 2009, Danish chemist and STJ member Niels H. Harrit, of the University of Copenhagen, and eight other authors, including some STJ members, published a paper in The Open Chemical Physics Journal, entitled Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe. The paper, which caused the editor and only peer-reviewer, Professor Pileni, to resign, claiming it was published without her knowledge,[104] concludes that chips consisting of unreacted and partially reacted nano-thermite ("super-thermite") appear to be present in samples of the dust
Daar sta je dan met je "peer-reviewed door experten ".
parcifal is offline   Met citaat antwoorden