Citaat:
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Wapper
Of dit misschien? 
 |
Gaap, vervalsingen kopieren is dat al wat je kan?
Wapper : taking incompetence to a whole new level?
http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2012/1...ole-new-level/
Citaat:
* IPCC ’90 has been re-labelled “IPCC 1990-2001″
* MBH99 has been relabelled “IPCC 2001-2003″
At least they managed to label Moberg correctly. Its hard to understand those other labels. “IPCC 1990-2001″ is intended to suggest it was first used in 1990, and continued until supplanted in 2001. But we all know that is wrong (apart from all the rest, they’ve airbrushed IPCC ’92 and ’95[*] out of their picture; ironically, the post at WUWT is ostensibly about IPCC rewriting history; but I suspect that they don’t do irony) and the author of the piece at WUWT knew it too, because he copied it from the wiki page Description of the Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age in IPCC reports which explains, with references, where it all comes from. So, he was deliberately lying to his audience. 2001-2003 makes no sense either.
But more amusingly, all his audience is so incompetent that they fail to realise they are being lied to.
|