Los bericht bekijken
Oud 16 november 2016, 19:40   #1
Karel Martel B
Perm. Vertegenwoordiger VN
 
Karel Martel B's schermafbeelding
 
Geregistreerd: 15 mei 2010
Berichten: 12.255
Standaard What a difference 4 years makes: linkse site Slate verdedigt electoral college

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_a...l_college.html

Citaat:
The Electoral College is widely regarded as an anachronism, a nondemocratic method of selecting a president that ought to be superseded by declaring the candidate who receives the most popular votes the winner. The advocates of this position are correct in arguing that the Electoral College method is not democratic in a modern sense. The Constitution provides that “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress.” And it is the electors who elect the president, not the people. When you vote for a presidential candidate you’re actually voting for a slate of electors.

...

There are five reasons for retaining the Electoral College despite its lack of democratic pedigree; all are practical reasons, not liberal or conservative reasons.
__________________
Heeft U ook SCHIJT aan de DIVERSITEIT?

Laatst gewijzigd door Karel Martel B : 16 november 2016 om 19:41.
Karel Martel B is offline   Met citaat antwoorden