[Micele]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Vrijheideerst

Ja, want al wat Tesla zegt en doet is goud waard...

En jij hebt enkel die onnozele analist zijn glazen bol?

Maar jij gelooft blijkbaar wel die ene cheerleader-analist die zich al eerder onsterfeljk belachelijk gemaakt heeft. Je leest blijkbaar je links niet, en autoweek heeft ook geen benul van die Adam Jonas. Via Electrek-link kom je op de link van NY Times:

http://www.carscoops.com/2016/11/ana...eliveries.html

Additionally, the analyst says that the electric automaker will be producing around 60,000 Model 3s in 2019 and 130,000 units in 2020, well below Tesla’s objective of building 400,000 units in 2018, reports Electrek:

Best toch eens de link lezen en vooral de link van Cheerleader en fantast Adam Jones aanklikken.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/29/op...ader.html?_r=0

And guess what? Just like the Internet stocks of yore, Tesla has its own Wall Street cheerleader: Adam Jonas, Morgan Stanley’s auto analyst. Jonas could not be less interested in mundane factors like earnings per share; indeed, he has had to lower his 2015 earnings estimates several times; he now predicts the company will lose $2.70 a share. But never mind: In the future that he envisions, Tesla will be the most important car company on earth.

Just a few weeks ago, in fact, Jonas raised his share price target for Tesla from $280 to $465, which would make Tesla more valuable than General Motors or Ford. Had anything fundamental changed for Tesla? Of course not!

Jonas based his new target on something he labeled Tesla Mobility, which he describes as “an app based, on-demand mobility service.” Where did he learn about Tesla Mobility? Who knows? Tesla, a company hardly averse to hype, has never acknowledged its existence.

And that’s not the worst of it. No, the worst is the timing of his call. It came days after Tesla announced that it would be issuing stock to raise yet more money — and that Morgan Stanley was among the underwriters. (The company raised close to $800 million.)

Although Morgan Stanley insists that Jonas was in the process of changing his price target well before the equity offering — and that the Chinese wall between the firm’s analysts and its investment bankers is unbreachable — his call had to be pleasing to the underwriters. Doug Kass, the well-known market commentator, told me that Jonas’s call was “somewhere between tone deaf and borderline illegal.” In a note to his readers, he added that it was “a further reason why Wall Street is not trusted.”

One reason people like Kass have taken special notice of the timing of Jonas’s new price target is that this isn’t even the first time Jonas has changed his target at, shall we say, a fortuitous moment.

Back in February 2014, right around the time that Morgan Stanley was involved in a big convertible bond offering for Tesla, Jonas raised his price target from $153 a share to $320 a share. Again, his convenient “epiphany” — as Kass puts it — had nothing to do with Tesla’s fundamentals. That time he claimed Tesla could disrupt the auto industry by manufacturing its own batteries and making advances in autonomous driving. Well, maybe.

Jonas has hardly been the only reason Tesla’s stock remains in the stratosphere, but he is unquestionably helping to drive the stock up. And to be fair, however convenient his calls have been for Morgan Stanley’s investment bankers and customers, he believes what he is writing. Although the firm would not allow me to interview him on the record, it is clear from reading his reports that he believes in his heart that as driving becomes more autonomous and more about batteries than about gasoline, Tesla will be the big winner.

Still, belief is not the same as analysis. Just ask Henry Blodget.

Het is trouwens een mogelijkheid, niet 100% zeker.

Of 0% zeker. Het is gewoon ordinair bashen en desinfo op/over Tesla, gewoon BS.

Zo zijn er talrijke: (en de cheerleaders van Trump zijn nu ook begonnen op alles waar Musk voor staat)
http://teslamag.de/news/nach-trump-w...mus-elon-10787