Los bericht bekijken
Oud 26 september 2019, 13:42   #4
Micele
Secretaris-Generaal VN
 
Micele's schermafbeelding
 
Geregistreerd: 18 mei 2005
Locatie: Limburg
Berichten: 52.533
Standaard

kzal het hier zetten...

Reeds 23 US-staten sluiten zich aan bij de strengere emissiewetten van Californië. Ze willen gewoon minder vuile ademlucht.

Ze verklagen daarmee ook de federale wetgever.

Citaat:
https://electrek.co/2019/09/26/epa-e...dopt-ca-rules/

While EPA expands fight against clean air, Minnesota and New Mexico adopt CA rules

Jameson Dow - Sep. 26th 2019

After last week’s moves to force more pollution and lower clean air standards on California, the Environmental “Protection” Agency threatened this week to pull California’s federal highway funding if California doesn’t bow to their pressure and allow more pollution in their state.

We’ve now learned that two states – Minnesota and New Mexico – will join California’s efforts to reduce tailpipe emissions in response to the EPA’s actions. Both states plan to adopt both California’s Zero Emission Vehicle mandate and its tailpipe emissions standards.

For more background on how this story has developed, look at Electrek‘s articles from last week. We show how the EPA will have a hard time ending California’s rules and how the EPA’s own analysis shows that their rollback will kill people and cost money.

Since then, California responded to the EPA’s likely illegal actions by filing a lawsuit with 23 states opposing the federal government’s attempt to revoke California’s Clean Air waiver. Minnesota and New Mexico are two of those states. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) also voted to stay the course and accept an agreement made between the state and the automakers to voluntarily exceed federal emissions standards, roughly meeting the pre-rollback federal standards.

But that wasn’t enough for the EPA, and they won’t drop their losing battle. On Tuesday they gave their reasoning for threatening California’s funding – a bizarre suggestion that the state hasn’t done enough to comply with the same federal clean air rules the EPA is currently trying to eliminate.

After arguing last week that California’s waiver should be revoked because the state does not have “particular or unique” clean air needs, the EPA paradoxically argued earlier this week that California actually has exceptionally poor air quality and, as a result, federal funds should be withheld from the state. So much for “no particular or unique environmental problems.”

California Governor Gavin Newsom responded to the threat, stating: “The White House has no interest in helping California comply with the Clean Air Act to improve the health and well-being of Californians. This letter is a threat of pure retaliation … We won’t relive entire summers when spending time outside amounted to a public health risk. We won’t be intimidated by this brazen political stunt.”
Het aantal CARB-States is dus opgelopen naar 23:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Califo...esources_Board

Laatst gewijzigd door Micele : 26 september 2019 om 13:58.
Micele is offline   Met citaat antwoorden