De theorie van remote control is maar een van de verklaringen, die ik zeer mogelijk acht. Je zou bijvoorbeeld nog kunnen denken dat ze fundamentalisten gerekruteerd hebben die dit wilden uitvoeren maar dan nog. De piloten onder de kapers waren zeer middelmatige piloten, volgens hun instructeurs. Als je dan de staaltjes ziet dat het vliegtuig in het pentagon gedaan heeft (perfecte bocht van 270° in dalende spiraal en recht in het pentagon) dan klopt dit toch niet.
De "kapers" waren dubbelagenten die het verhaal moesten vervolledigen en geloofwaardig maken. Men vindt dan op de grond van New York toevallig het bijna ongeschonden paspoort van Mohhamed Atta , het heeft zoegezegd die enorme vuurbal overleeft.. enz
Trouwens, de namen van de kapers waren zelfs niet op de originele passagierslijsten!
Hier kan je de originele zien:
http://www.public-action.com/911/uapassngerlist/
Dan heb je nog de transponders die afgezet werden. Op dat moment konden ze de vliegtuigen enkel nog volgen via radar. Maar er was verwarring ontstaan vanwege de vele vliegtuigen dat men niet meer wist welke vliegtuigen het waren. (Bovendien was NORAD beziggehouden door de drills waar we eerder al over gesproken hebben).
En trouwens , de kapers zouden toch moeten rekening gehouden hebben dat NORAD hun ging intercepten, of toch proberen... maar ze vliegen 30 tot 50 minuten zonder transponders aan. Ze geven hun tegenstanders alle tijd om met een vloot F16's errond te kunnen vliegen... niet logisch toch?
Citaat:
"To be able to make these attacks within an half hour [of each other] — that shows an incredible degree of organization or skill," says Stanley Bedlington, a retired senior analyst at the CIA counterterrorism center. (Quoted in The Christian Science Monitor, "The national reels," September 12, 2001.) Rubbish, Mr. Bedlington. Had there been real hijackers, they would have earned a "D" for this effort. Careful planners would have researched the expected reaction time of NORAD. The Payne Stewart example was already well-known, and the NTSB report was publicly available. Real hijackers would expect NORAD would be onto them in 19 minutes following detection of a problem. (Payne Stewart, above.) Surely this is Hijackology 101.
Look at the three diagrams again:
http://www.Public-Action.com/911/4flights.html
Real hijackers with "an incredible degree of organization or skill" would not have taken jets from Boston to hit New York, and given the NORAD 30 minutes and 50 minutes, respectively, to intercept them. Real hijackers would not have taken a jet from Dulles and meandered all the way to Ohio and back again before hitting the Pentagon.
Real hijackers with even a modicum of organization or skill would have hijacked planes from Kennedy or LaGuardia to hit the WTC towers shortly after take-off and struck like lightning while the planes were close to their targets, before anyone had a chance to react. Real hijackers would have hijacked a plane from National, Baltimore-Washington, or Dulles airports and hit the Pentagon shortly after take-off and struck like lightning while the plane was close to its target and before anyone had a chance to react.
Remember, real hijackers would have believed they had, at the very most, a 19-minute window of opportunity before NORAD interception, as proven by the Payne Stewart case. They would not have believe they had an 80-minute window of opportunity, as NORAD gave them on September 11 (Flight 11 went amiss at 8:15-8:20 a.m, Pentagon hit 80 minutes later at 9:40 a.m.).
No. "Real" hijackers did not pull off this caper. Believing that NORAD tried to protect us but was bested by superior hijacker strategy is akin to taking professional wrestling seriously. DC Dave (http://thebird.org/host/dcdave ) put it succinctly when he wrote "The Show Goes On,"
|