Los bericht bekijken
Oud 13 februari 2005, 21:10   #451
nadine
Parlementslid
 
nadine's schermafbeelding
 
Geregistreerd: 25 mei 2004
Locatie: mechelen
Berichten: 1.902
Standaard

Citaat:
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door 2004gun
One is guilty if it is proven beyond any reasonable doubt ...

Parts of the US administration? There's some doubt, there are some strong suspicious accurances that speak in its disadvantage of a certain involvement, but no prove ...

Non Islam extreme organisations? There's some doubt, there are some strong suspicious accurances that speak in its disadvantage of a certain involvement, but no prove ...

OBL? There's some doubt, there are NO strong suspicious accurances that speak in its disadvantage of a certain involvement, and no prove ...

...
2004gun = bruut geweld/liesl? There's some doubt, there are several strong suspicious occurences that speak in favor of this theory and no prove of the contrary yet...

Bruut geweld/Liesl = "spy" on other fora? There is no doubt left! 100% proof! ...

2004gun = strondfront-user Kaalkop? There's some doubt, there are several strong suspicious occurences that speak in favor of this theory and no prove of the contrary yet, but as Kaalkop posted the genuine 2004gun text before it was ever published and no counterargument or prove provided leaves this as the sole solution...
__________________

Laatst gewijzigd door nadine : 13 februari 2005 om 21:11.
nadine is offline   Met citaat antwoorden