[Micele]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Micele

Bij jouw beweringen ga ik alles met een zak zout nemen.
Is dat eigenbelang bij jou? FUD noem ik dat.

Uw "brandstoffen" blijken nog slechter voor het milieu dan "groene H2" in brandstofcelwagens. Of een ramp.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...5248471830266X
November 2019, Pages 555-569

A review of synthetic fuels for passenger vehicles

Abstract

Synthetic fuels produced with renewable surplus electricity depict an interesting solution for the decarbonization of mobility and transportation applications which are not suited for electrification. With the objective to compare various synthetic fuels, an analysis of all the energy conversion steps is conducted from the electricity source, i.e., wind-, solar-, or hydro-power, to the final application, i.e., a vehicle driving a certain number of miles. The investigated fuels are hydrogen, methane, methanol, dimethyl ether and Diesel. While their production process is analyzed based on literature, the usage of these fuels is analyzed based on chassis dynanometer measurement data of various EURO-6b passenger vehicles.
...

The direct use of electricity in an electric vehicle without any energy conversion in between of course leads to the lowest energy consumption.Even for the future scenario with charge sustaining hybridization, fuel cell vehicles consume approximately 3 times more energy. Cars fueled with methane, methanol or DME need about 4 times more energy and a vehicle fueled with FT Diesel has a 4.5 times higher energy consumption.