[CUFI]

En zoneen, waarom hebben ouders via de rechtbanken dan al riante vergoedingen ontvangen omdat er een verband bewezen is?

De relatie tussen de proportie kinderen die tegen de leeftijd van 2 jaar alle aanbevolen vaccins hadden gekregen, en de frequentie van autisme en spraak- of taalproblemen (STP) toonde een duidelijk, statistisch significant verband aan. Hoe meer kinderen gevaccineerd waren, hoe meer autisme of taalproblemen. Voor elke stijging van 1% van de vaccinatiegraad werden er 680 extra kinderen gevonden met autisme of STP. Andere factoren dan kwik in vaccins linken vaccinatie aan autisme.

In aanvankelijk twee rechtszaken in de USA werd een schadevergoeding uitgekeerd aan autistische kinderen (Hannah Poling en Bailey Banks) omdat de rechtbank het verband tussen hun aandoening en vaccinatie bewezen achtte. Het spreekt voor zich dat een rechtbank niet lichtzinnig dergelijke beslissing neemt, zeker niet in het licht van de verhitte maatschappelijke discussie terzake. Nadien werden nog zeker 83 slachtoffers vergoed, waarbij de term ‘autisme’ zedig vervangen werd door een andere term, bijvoorbeeld “encephalitis”.
https://www.vaccinatieschade.be/cont...e-samenvatting

The Bailey Banks decision and the Hannah Poling settlement
Two vaccine court decisions involving injury claims related to the MMR vaccine generated particular concern about safety.
The case of Bailey Banks, decided in 2007, earned renewed media attention in February 2009 after the government reached a financial settlement with the child’s family. In its decision, the court found that 15-month-old Bailey had a seizure following administration of the MMR vaccine, and developed a neurological disorder known as acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. That condition, in turn, led to “pervasive developmental delay not otherwise specified.”
PDDNOS, according to the court, “is a subthreshold condition in which some — but not all —
features of autism ... are identified.”4
There was no evidence that Bailey Banks had an underlying medical condition prior to being vaccinated. The advocacy group Generation Rescue ran a full-page ad in USA Today about the case, quoting the vaccine court decision and calling on the government to tell “the truth about childhood vaccines.”16
In another case, settled in February 2008, the court had also acknowledged harm done by vaccines, ruling that the family of an injured girl named Hannah Poling was entitled to compen- sation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.17
After receiving five vaccinations during a single doctor’s visit, at 19 months of age, Hannah was diagnosed with a mitochondrial enzyme deficiency, characterized in part by regression in a child who had appeared to be developing normally. The court concluded that the case had met “the statutory criteria for demonstrating that the vaccinations [the] CHILD received on July
19, 2000 significantly aggravated an underlying mitochondrial disorder, which predisposed her to deficits in cellular energy metabolism, and manifested as a regressive encephalopathy with features of autism spectrum disorder.”18 The court’s observation that vaccines had aggravated an underlying mitrochondrial disorder was significantly different from concluding that vaccines had caused it.
Different parties interpreted the Poling settlement substantially differently. The Poling fam- ily and many advocacy groups believed it offered clear support for a link between vaccines and autism in vulnerable populations. Hannah’s father, Jon S. Poling, who is also a neurologist, wrote “Many in the autism community and their champions believe that the result in this case may well signify a landmark decision as it pertains to children developing autism following vaccinations. This still remains to be seen.” He called for “an immunization database for children with meta- bolic disorders to establish safety guidelines and improve vaccine safety for minority subgroups of children.”19
Others disagreed, arguing that the basis of the settlement was “poorly reasoned” and that “features of autism spectrum disorder” are evident in most children with profound cognitive im- pairment and can differ significantly from classic autism.20
But the bottom line in these cases appears to be that vaccines did cause severe adverse reac- tions, resulting in conditions with autism-like features.
https://publichealth.gwu.edu/departm...AECD66D20C.pdf

Als ze geen ASS veroorzaken, kunnen we toch minstens zeggen dat ze permanente afwijkingen kunnen veroorzaken met gelijkaardige symptomen dan ASS.
Dat was wellicht moedwillig, hoe anders kunt ge als bestuur met zoveel fouten en corruptie wegkomen? Volgens mij doet dat ook iets op het kortetermijngeheugen wat mensen zeer forgiving maakt tegen eerdere fouten/blunders/fraudezaken.