[Erw]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door patrickve

Maar nee. Apple gaat bijvoorbeeld ver in het imago van zijn veilige iphones, om niet willen mee te werken aan het analyseren van de telefoon van een terrorist, onder het motto "privacy". Er was geen enkele dreiging die boven het hoofd van Google hing, en geen enkele overheid zou dat gedurfd hebben om die daarvoor scheef te bekijken. Google zou zoals Apple kunnen gaan pleiten voor "vrije meningsuiting" maar dat doen ze helemaal niet omdat dat nu tegenwoordig niet "in" is.

Kijk, toen Facebook en Google de corona propaganda niet alleen volgden, maar vooral aanwakkerden, werden zij daar helemaal niet toe "gedwongen". Zij beslisten dat zelf, want voor hen was de corona hetse een goeie manier om "aan de goeie kant" te staan ten aanzien van de meute, en dus buzz te veroorzaken.

Jij denkt echt dat de overheid veel macht heeft he. Bedrijven als Google en zo spelen daarmee.

Ik denk dat jij twee negatieven gebruikt bij het ontwikkelen van je foto's.
https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.e...disinformation

the COVID-19 disinformation monitoring programme, carried out by signatories of the Code of Practice, acted as a transparency measure to ensure online platforms’ accountability in tackling disinformation.

the Strengthened Code of Practice on Disinformation, signed on 16th June 2022, brings together a wide range of players to commit to a broad set of voluntary commitments to counter disinformation

https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.e...disinformation
https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.e...disinformation

A broad range of actors have signed up to the 2022 Strengthened Code of Practice to fight disinformation by subscribing to commitments and measures relevant to their mission.

The 2022 Strengthened Code of Practice is signed by a broad range of actors, such as online platforms, players from the advertising ecosystem, fact-checkers, civil society, research, and other organisations, joining to fight disinformation by subscribing to commitments and measures relevant to their mission.

The 2022 Code of Practice is the result of the work carried out by the signatories. It is for the signatories to decide which commitments they sign up to and it is their responsibility to ensure the effectiveness of their commitments’ implementation. The Code is not endorsed by the Commission, while the Commission set out its expectations in the Guidance and considers that, as a whole, the Code fulfils these expectations.
The Signatories

Participation to the Strengthened Code of Practice has significantly broadened since 2018, with the possibility to welcome additional new signatories. The new Code joins diverse actors, including players from the advertising ecosystem, advertisers, ad-tech companies, fact-checkers, emerging or specialised platforms, civil society and third-party organisations with specific expertise on disinformation.

Each signatory signs the Code by filling in a subscription document subscribing to the commitments and measures relevant for its services.

You can consult the individual subscription documents below:

Adobe
Avaaz
Clubhouse
Crisp
Demagog
DOT Europe
European Association of Communication Agencies (EACA)
Faktograf
Globsec
Google
IAB Europe (Interactive Advertising Bureau Europe)
Kinzen
Kreativitet & Kommunikation
Logically
Maldita.es
MediaMath
Meta
Microsoft
Neeva
Newsback
NewsGuard
PagellaPoltica
Reporters without Borders (RSF)
Seznam
The Bright App
The GARM Initiative
TikTok
Twitch
Twitter
Vimeo
VOST Europe
WhoTargetsMe
World Federation of Advertisers (WFA)

Related topics
Media Disinformation

https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.e...disinformation

The new Code brings together a more diverse range of stakeholders than ever, empowering them to contribute to wide-ranging improvements by signing up to precise commitments relevant to their field. Such commitments include demonetising the dissemination of disinformation; guaranteeing transparency of political advertising; enhancing cooperation with fact-checkers; and facilitating researchers access to data.

https://ec.europa.eu/commission/pres.../en/IP_22_3664

Thierry Breton, Commissioner for Internal Market, said: “Disinformation is a form of invasion of our digital space, with tangible impact on our daily lives. Online platforms need to act much strongly, especially on the issue of funding. Spreading disinformation should not bring a single euro to anyone. To be credible, the new Code of Practice will be backed up by the DSA - including for heavy dissuasive sanctions. Very large platforms that repeatedly break the Code and do not carry out risk mitigation measures properly risk fines of up to 6% of their global turnover.”

En ik ga er je bewering nog eens achter zetten:

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door patrickve

De overheid heeft hier niks mee te maken. Google denkt dat het voor zijn imago veel beter is om een anti-russische positie in te nemen, en meer meegaat met wat door het gros van zijn klanten (en vooral, zijn goederen, ttz de gebruikers) geapprecieerd wordt.