[Aarchzstvwqmrmbtvnpq]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door zonbron

Handige tools? Dat was reeds lang bekend, maar mocht niet gezegd worden. Ze doen alsof ze het warm water uitgevonden hebben...

Paper terzake, augustus 2016


http://besacenter.org/perspectives-p...tegic-mistake/

The Western distaste for IS brutality and immorality should not obfuscate strategic clarity. IS are truly bad guys, but few of their opponents are much better. Allowing bad guys to kill bad guys sounds very cynical, but it is useful and even moral to do so if it keeps the bad guys busy and less able to harm the good guys. The Hobbesian reality of the Middle East does not always present a neat moral choice.

The West yearns for stability, and holds out a naive hope that the military defeat of IS will be instrumental in reaching that goal. But stability is not a value in and of itself. It is desirable only if it serves our interests. The defeat of IS would encourage Iranian hegemony in the region, buttress Russia’s role, and prolong Assad’s tyranny. Tehran, Moscow, and Damascus do not share our democratic values and have little inclination to help America and the West.

Moreover, instability and crises sometimes contain portents of positive change. Unfortunately, the Obama administration fails to see that its main enemy is Iran. The Obama administration has inflated the threat from IS in order to legitimize Iran as a “responsible” actor that will, supposedly, fight IS in the Middle East. This was part of the Obama administration’s rationale for its nuclear deal with Iran and central to its “legacy,” which is likely to be ill-remembered.

The American administration does not appear capable of recognizing the fact that IS can be a useful tool in undermining Tehran’s ambitious plan for domination of the Middle East.

Een groot deel van de bevolking -en de politieke wereld- is nog steeds overtuigd dat de VS en Israël onze bondgenoten zijn in de strijd tegen IS dus het is echt wel nodig dat dit nog vermeld wordt!