Los bericht bekijken
Oud 7 november 2007, 14:14   #26
Firestone
Secretaris-Generaal VN
 
Firestone's schermafbeelding
 
Geregistreerd: 5 juni 2004
Locatie: Antwerpen
Berichten: 25.793
Standaard

Het "onderzoek" van Koestler (die overigens geen historicus was) over de Khazaren was alles behalve wetenschappelijk.

Wikipedia (met bronnen) is een goed vertrekpunt voor een serene analyse van dat Khazaren-verhaal.

Twee citaten (bronnen in het Wikipedia-artikel):

Citaat:
This theory… is supported by no evidence whatsoever. It has long since been abandoned by all serious scholars in the field, including those in Arab countries, where the Khazar theory is little used except in occasional political polemics.

Bernard Lewis
Citaat:
Recent DNA studies on the Y-Chromosome of Ashkenazi Jews showed they had an "extremely close affinity [with] non-Jewish Middle Eastern populations", indicating "a common Middle Eastern origin", as does the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) of at least 40% of the current Ashkenazi population. So although Khazars might have been absorbed into the Jewish population it is unlikely that they formed a large percentage of the ancestors of modern Ashkenazim.
Een gedetailleerde en recente bron: Are Russian Jews Descended from the Khazars?

De weinig verrassende conclusie:

Citaat:
East European Jewish ancestry originates substantially from ancient Judea, and the same is true of most other modern Jewish populations (with the exception of groups like Libyan Jews and Ethiopian Jews). But, it is rational to conclude that some Jews also have some Khazar ancestors.
__________________
The method of science is tried and true. It is not perfect, it's just the best we have. And to abandon it, with its skeptical protocols is the pathway to a dark age. -- Carl Sagan

Laatst gewijzigd door Firestone : 7 november 2007 om 14:29.
Firestone is offline   Met citaat antwoorden