Naar aanleiding van de hevige polemieken tussen verschillende nationalistische websites (zie vorige post hierboven).
Een zéér goed en aanbevelenswaardig artikel in de
Occidental Observer vandaag (met de bespreking van een goed vb zoals de metamorphose van het Front National onder Marine Le Pen):
Vermijden van destructieve strijd onder nationalisten: maak het onderscheid tussen electorale politiek en metapolitiek
Citaat:
The issue is of the distinction between the political and the metapolitical in a particular régime. That régime today is characterized by two things: absolute liberal/antinational cultural hegemony and mass electoral politics. That means every nationalist party has a choice: either to contest the culture (in which case it will be boycotted/demonized by media) in the hopes of changing that culture or to respect the culture’s taboos (by engaging in self-censorship and crypsis) in the hopes of gaining political power.
|
Citaat:
We should not let up pressure on mainstream nationalists. But I believe everything which directly or indirectly promotes ethnic European interests, especially against immigration, should be supported, even if it means a party with plausible electoral goals has to overtly resort to a mere civic nationalism. More generally, I believe nationalists should stop attacking one another. The “anti-racist” groups and mainstream politico-media elites do more than enough of that for us. Criticism should be constructive, aimed towards reinforcing human networks of trust and mutual support, not breaking them. We should avoid that tendency – so common among principled dissidents – towards such an ideological purity that it leads to self-marginalization, and from there, isolation, burnout, impotence, and depression.
|