100 voordelen van een libertarische samenleving

Dies · 15 december 2003, 18:42

http://henrysturman.com/dutch/artikelen/voordelen.html
100voordelen en ook wel enkele nadelen.

The Paulus Experience · 15 december 2003, 18:49

ik heb de indruk dat dit voor kinderen geschreven is..

Dies · 15 december 2003, 19:00

Waarom denk je dat ik dat dit hier zet? 8)

dejohan · 15 december 2003, 20:54

Eigenlijk wel ne te gekke site. Die gast is lachen. Vooral het lijstje 'uitvindingen'. Hij heeft een oplossing tegen ontvoeringen gevonden: Hij merkt op dat, als er nooit iemand losgeld zou betalen, kidnappers minder geneigd zouden zijn om te ontvoeren, en stelt de volgende oplossing voor:
"Perhaps this public good problem can be solved as follows. A company could offer rich individuals the following contract. They pay a monthly subscription fee to the company. In exchange the company promises to kill the individual if anybody pays ransom to a kidnapper in exchange for the release of the individual. This contract should be a good deterrent to a family to pay ransom if their loved one, who has such a contract, is kidnapped. For if they pay the ransom they can be sure their loved one will be killed, while they still have a chance if they don't. The company providing this service, or the individual using this service, must make this contract public beforehand. Perhaps someone could create a special website where people can publish the fact they've bought such a contract. The info can link to the website of the company they've enlisted with, whose site will confirm that that individual is a client of theirs. If it is a reputable company, this should be believable information. Kidnappers will then be able to first check the internet to make sure their potential victim doesn't have such a contract. This way, individuals determined not to have ransom money paid if they're kidnapped will reap the benefits of this decision by decreasing the chances of being kidnapped, thus solving the public good problem. Also, even if you are kidnapped despite the contract, because your kidnappers didn't bother to check for such a contract, you would still be protected. If your family explains to the kidnappers why they cannot pay ransom, the kidnappers might understand their kidnapping won't profit them and decide to release you. The best companies offering said service will take precautions to ensure that families do not pay ransom without their knowledge. Presumably competition and profit motive will drive them to perform this service better than the Italian government. They might arrange for periodic checks of the family's bank account to detect any large cash withdrawals. Or they might ask their client to call them regularly to make sure he isn't kidnapped, or whatever. And they must be adamant about actually following their contract. They must ensure that almost all their kidnapped clients whose family has paid ransom are actually tracked down and killed. Otherwise the protection of their clients against kidnapping will fail. "

15 december 2003, 18:42	#1
Dies Europees Commissaris Geregistreerd: 17 april 2003 Berichten: 6.621	http://henrysturman.com/dutch/artikelen/voordelen.html 100voordelen en ook wel enkele nadelen. __________________ Met dank aan: TomB, Supe®Staaf, Brabo, Sato, boer_bavo, @lpha, Knuppel, Raf, Antoon, Tantist, Distel, Pelgrim, Paulus, nou nou, Bobke, Griffin, Spetsnaz, oriana, C uit W, Seba, ingenious, Zeno!, zorroaster, alpina, dejohan, circe, Kotsmos, S., luc broes, Aangebrande, solidarnosc, maddox,Tzuvar Raemborr, Spelev, Mieke 79, DaBlacky, numarx,Vlaanderen Boven, bartje, Turkje, ossaert, Fribre, de Vexille, Groot Bakkes, Jos Verhulst, Bece, Babeth, Nynorsk, driewerf, wb, cuboidz, sancho, Dimitri, e.a.

15 december 2003, 18:49	#2
The Paulus Experience Secretaris-Generaal VN Geregistreerd: 21 oktober 2003 Locatie: Jem Enfous Berichten: 23.206	ik heb de indruk dat dit voor kinderen geschreven is.. __________________ De oorzaken van liberalisme staan uitgebreid beschreven in de DSM-5 Een dag niet gelachen is een dag dichter bij uw N-VA lidmaatschap. De motivatie van een N-VA kiezer: https://forum.politics.be/showpost.p...7&postcount=54

15 december 2003, 19:00	#3
Dies Europees Commissaris Geregistreerd: 17 april 2003 Berichten: 6.621	Waarom denk je dat ik dat dit hier zet? 8) __________________ Met dank aan: TomB, Supe®Staaf, Brabo, Sato, boer_bavo, @lpha, Knuppel, Raf, Antoon, Tantist, Distel, Pelgrim, Paulus, nou nou, Bobke, Griffin, Spetsnaz, oriana, C uit W, Seba, ingenious, Zeno!, zorroaster, alpina, dejohan, circe, Kotsmos, S., luc broes, Aangebrande, solidarnosc, maddox,Tzuvar Raemborr, Spelev, Mieke 79, DaBlacky, numarx,Vlaanderen Boven, bartje, Turkje, ossaert, Fribre, de Vexille, Groot Bakkes, Jos Verhulst, Bece, Babeth, Nynorsk, driewerf, wb, cuboidz, sancho, Dimitri, e.a.

15 december 2003, 20:54	#4
dejohan Minister-President Geregistreerd: 18 juni 2003 Locatie: Een hol in de grond Berichten: 5.222	Eigenlijk wel ne te gekke site. Die gast is lachen. Vooral het lijstje 'uitvindingen'. Hij heeft een oplossing tegen ontvoeringen gevonden: Hij merkt op dat, als er nooit iemand losgeld zou betalen, kidnappers minder geneigd zouden zijn om te ontvoeren, en stelt de volgende oplossing voor: "Perhaps this public good problem can be solved as follows. A company could offer rich individuals the following contract. They pay a monthly subscription fee to the company. In exchange the company promises to kill the individual if anybody pays ransom to a kidnapper in exchange for the release of the individual. This contract should be a good deterrent to a family to pay ransom if their loved one, who has such a contract, is kidnapped. For if they pay the ransom they can be sure their loved one will be killed, while they still have a chance if they don't. The company providing this service, or the individual using this service, must make this contract public beforehand. Perhaps someone could create a special website where people can publish the fact they've bought such a contract. The info can link to the website of the company they've enlisted with, whose site will confirm that that individual is a client of theirs. If it is a reputable company, this should be believable information. Kidnappers will then be able to first check the internet to make sure their potential victim doesn't have such a contract. This way, individuals determined not to have ransom money paid if they're kidnapped will reap the benefits of this decision by decreasing the chances of being kidnapped, thus solving the public good problem. Also, even if you are kidnapped despite the contract, because your kidnappers didn't bother to check for such a contract, you would still be protected. If your family explains to the kidnappers why they cannot pay ransom, the kidnappers might understand their kidnapping won't profit them and decide to release you. The best companies offering said service will take precautions to ensure that families do not pay ransom without their knowledge. Presumably competition and profit motive will drive them to perform this service better than the Italian government. They might arrange for periodic checks of the family's bank account to detect any large cash withdrawals. Or they might ask their client to call them regularly to make sure he isn't kidnapped, or whatever. And they must be adamant about actually following their contract. They must ensure that almost all their kidnapped clients whose family has paid ransom are actually tracked down and killed. Otherwise the protection of their clients against kidnapping will fail. "