Piek olie is een totale leugen.

[exodus]

Er is door verschillende personen op dit forum al geopperd dat er een desastreuze oliepiek aankomt, omdat de olie op aan het raken is. Dit binnen een zeer korte tijd.

Feiten wijzen uit dat dit niet zo is en dat er nog voldoende olie is. Peak oil wordt gebruikt om de elite rijker de maken, de armen armer en de middenklasse uit te hollen. Onderstaande artikel is goed onberbouwd en toont aan dat peak oil een totale leugen is.

[size=4]Peak Oil is a Corrupt Globalist Scam[/size]

Steve Watson, Alex Jones & Paul Watson | October 04 2005

They make the profits on creating artificial scarcity.

"Peak oil" is pure military-industrial-complex propaganda.

Publicly available CFR and Club of Rome strategy manuals from 30 years ago say that a global government needs to control the world population through neo-feudalism by creating artificial scarcity. Now that the social architects have de-industrialized the United States, they are going to blame our economic disintegration on lack of energy supplies.

Globalization is all about consolidation. Now that the world economy has become so centralized through the Globalists operations, they are going to continue to consolidate and blame it on the West's "evil" overconsumption of fossil fuels, while at the same time blocking the development and integration of renewable clean technologies.


In other words, Peak oil is a scam to create artificial scarcity and drive prices up. Meanwhile, alternative fuel technologies which have been around for decades are intentionally suppressed.

This year in particular we have seen a strong hike in oil prices and are being told to simply get used to it because this is the way it is going to be. In the wake of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita gas prices have shot up amid claims of vast energy shortages. Americans are being asked to turn off lights, change thermostat settings, drive slower, insulate homes and take other steps. Meanwhile the oil companies continue to make record profits.

Even The New York Times pointed out that the recent "energy crisis" seems to be purely tactical:

"To Mr. Bush's critics, the call for conservation smacked of showmanship, or of shutting the garage door after the S.U.V. had been stolen. After all, the president has spent the past weeks dropping into the hurricane region from the fuel-guzzling Air Force One, which the Air Force estimates costs $40,000 an hour to fly."

Flying in the face of the so called peak oil crisis are the facts. If we are running out of oil so quickly then why are reserves being continually increased and production skyrocketing?

in the 1980s OPEC decided to switch to a quota production system based on the size of reserves. The larger the reserves a country said it had the more it could pump.


Earlier this year Saudi Arabia reportedly increased its crude reserves by around 200 billion barrels. Saudi Oil Is Secure and Plentiful, Say Officials.



“These huge reserves enable the Kingdom to remain a major oil producer for between 70 and 100 years, even if it raises its production capacity to 15 million barrels per day, which may well happen during the next 15 years,”

Is this the normal course of behaviour if we are currently at the peak for oil production? The answer is no, it's the normal course of action for increasing production.

There have also been reports that Russia has vastly increased its reserves even beyond those of Saudi Arabia. Why would they do this if they believed there would be no more oil to get hold of? It seems clear that Russia is ready for unlimited future production of oil.

There is a clear contradiction between the peak oil theory and the continual increase in oil reserves and production.

New untapped oil sources are being discovered everywhere on earth. The notion that there are somehow only a few sources that the West is trying to monopolize is a complete myth, promulgated by those raking in the massive profits. After all how do you make huge profits from something available in abundance?



A Wall Street Journal Article by Peter Huber and Mark Mills describes how the price of oil remains high because the cost of oil remains so low. We are not dependent on the middle east for oil because the world's supplies are diminishing, it is because it is more profitable to tap middle east supplies. Thus the myth of peak oil is needed in order to silence the call for tapping the planet's other plentiful reserves.

Richard Branson has even stated his intention to set up his own refinery because the price of oil is artificially being kept high whilst new sources are not being explored and new refineries not being built.

"Opec is effectively an illegal cartel that can meet happily, nobody takes them to court," Branson has said. "They collude to keep prices high."

So if more refineries were built and different resources tapped, the oil prices would come down and the illegal cartel OPEC would see profits diminish. It is no wonder then that the argument for peak oil is so appealing to OPEC. If no one invests to build refineries because they don't believe there is enough oil, then who benefits? OPEC and the oil elites of course.



It seems that every time there is some kind of energy crisis, OPEC INCREASES production. The remarkable thing about this is that they always state that they are doing it to ease prices, yet prices always shoot up because they promulgate the myth that they are putting some of their last reserves into the market. Analysts seem confused and always state that they don't believe upping production will cut prices.


In a recent report the International Monetary Fund projected that global demand for oil by 2030 would reach 139 million barrels a day, a 65 percent increase.

"We should expect to live with high and volatile oil prices," said Raghuram Rajan, the IMF's chief economist. "In short, it's going to be a rocky road going forward."

Yet independent analysts and even some within OPEC seem to believe that the demand for oil is diminishing. Why the contradiction?

The peak oil and demand myth is peddled by the establishment-run fake left activist groups, OPEC and globalist arms such as the IMF.

Rolling Stone magazine even carried an article in its April issue heavily biased towards making people believe the peak oil lie.

The Scientific evidence also flies in the face of the peak oil theory. Scientific research dating back over a hundred years, more recently updated in a Scientific Paper Published In 'Energia' suggests that oil is abiotic, not the product of long decayed biological matter. Oil, for better or for worse, is not a non-renewable resource. It, like coal, and natural gas, replenishes from sources within the mantle of earth.

No coincidence then that the Russians, who pioneered this research have pumped expenditure into deep underground oil excavation.

We have previously scientifically exposed the scam behind peak oil. Here is a 1 hour+ audio clip featuring Alex Jones' comments on peak oil and then the analysis of respected scientific commentator Dr. Nick Begich who presents evidence to suggest the idea of Peak oil is artificial.



A dangerous fallout precedent being set is that people on both the left and right believe wars are being fought in order to tap the last reserves of oil on the planet. The "coalition of the willing", whoever they may be for any given war, will not pay particular attention to refuting this claim because it allows them a reason to start and continue said war.

Even though many will see it as immoral, many will subconsciously attach it as a reason for the war. In reality the war is purely for profit, power and control, oil can be a part of that, but only if the peak oil claim is upheld.

If we continue to let the corrupt elite tell us we are wholly dependent on oil, we may reach a twisted situation whereby they can justify starvation and mass global poverty, perhaps even depopulation, even within the western world due to the fact that our energy supplies are finished.

Peak oil is just another weapon the globalists have in their arsenal to move towards a new world order where the elite get richer and everyone else falls into line.

[Apocalyps]

President Bush calls on Americans to limit driving as part of energy initiative.

Bron: ABC

[/\|cazar]

Flutartikel.

Abiotische olie ? Komaan he zeg.

Saudi Arabie dat zijn oliereserves uit het niets optrekt, terwijl de vorige minister van oliezaken van dat land, vanuit de vrijheid dat hij die functie niet meer bekleedt, onlangs liet ontvallen dat de Saudische voorraad sterk overschat wordt ...

Er is een dalende trend in ontdekking van nieuwe bronnen, heel sterk dalend.

Er is de enorme vraag uit China/India.

Veel oliemaatschappijen spelen met hun voorraden om hun bedrijven te opwaarderen. Terwijl in de realiteit er quasi alleen maar mergers plaatsvinden. Moesten bedrijven het rendabel vinden om nieuwe raffinage installaties bij te bouwen, dan hadden ze dat al lang gedaan.

Enz..

Piekolie wordt trouwens niet gedragen door het mainstream gegeven, 99 % van de investment bankers, economen, industrielen gelooft er niet in, men denkt dat de prijs volgend jaar terug zal zakken naar 35 us dollar...

[Groentje-18]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door /\|cazar

Flutartikel.

Abiotische olie ? Komaan he zeg.

Saudi Arabie dat zijn oliereserves uit het niets optrekt, terwijl de vorige minister van oliezaken van dat land, vanuit de vrijheid dat hij die functie niet meer bekleedt, onlangs liet ontvallen dat de Saudische voorraad sterk overschat wordt ...

Er is een dalende trend in ontdekking van nieuwe bronnen, heel sterk dalend.

Er is de enorme vraag uit China/India.

Veel oliemaatschappijen spelen met hun voorraden om hun bedrijven te opwaarderen. Terwijl in de realiteit er quasi alleen maar mergers plaatsvinden. Moesten bedrijven het rendabel vinden om nieuwe raffinage installaties bij te bouwen, dan hadden ze dat al lang gedaan.

Enz..

Piekolie wordt trouwens niet gedragen door het mainstream gegeven, 99 % van de investment bankers, economen, industrielen gelooft er niet in, .men denkt dat de prijs volgend jaar terug zal zakken naar 35 us dollar..

Die zijn van een andere planeet ofzo?

Laat die prijsjes van de olie maar eens lekker stijgen. Financiële voordelen is voorlopig blijkbaar toch de enige manier om mensen zover te krijgen dat ze beter doen voor het milieu. Zoals onze prof destijds al zei: 'één van de enige manieren om de mensen zich te laten inzetten voor het milieu is de keuze voor dat alternatief het voordeligst maken. Dan nog is de motivatie natuurlijk financiëel ... maar als we tot meer niet in staat zijn dan moet dat maar.

[Geertje]

De olie raakt ooit op. Dit is een feit. Of er op tijd alternatieve energiebronnen zullen zijn is een andere zaak.

Het is trouwens niet alleen de olie die opgeraakt, dit is zo met vele grondstoffen. Misschien moeten we in het jaar 2300 de maatschappij eerder zien op zijn 18de eeuws, terug met paard en kar.

[Avondland]

Als er tegen dan nog bomen en paarden bestaan ... De olie is een grondstof waarvan de voorraad zienderogen aan het dalen is, zoals Geertje zegt: we moeten er voor zorgen dat er tegen de tijd dat de olie op is, een waardig alternatief gevonden is. Kernfusie is waarschijnlijk de beste oplossing, maar men is nog steeds bezig te ontraadselen om het in de praktijk om te zetten en dit zal niet voor morgen zijn. Als het op autobrandstof aankomt zou ik gokken op waterstof, deze is nu alreeds getest en werkt behoorlijk goed. Het enige nadeel is dat het voorlopig nog aan de dure kant is en dat het nog niet in productie is genomen.[edit]
[size=1]Edit:[/size]

[size=1]After edit by Avondland on 05-10-2005 at 08:54
Reason:
--------------------------------

Als er tegen dan nog bomen en paarden bestaan ... De olie is een grondstof waarvan de voorraad zienderogen aan het dalen is, zoals Geertje zegt: we moeten er voor zorgen dat er tegen de tijd dat de olie op is, een waardig alternatief gevonden is. Kernfusie is waarschijnlijk de beste oplossing, maar men is nog steeds bezig te ontraadselen om het in de praktijk om te zetten en dit zal niet voor morgen zijn. Als het op autobrandstof aankomt zou ik gokken op waterstof, deze is nu alreeds getest en werkt behoorlijk goed. Het enige nadeel is dat het voorlopig nog aan de dure kant is en dat het nog niet in productie is genomen.[/size]

[size=1]Before any edits, post was:
--------------------------------

Als er tegen dan nog bomen en paarden bestaan ... De olie is een grondstof waarvan de voorraad zienderogen aan het dalen is, zoals Geertje zegt: we moeten er voor zorgen dat er tegen de tijd dat de olie op is, een waardig alternatief gevonden is. Kernfusie is waarschijnlijk de beste oplossing, maar men is nog steeds bezig te ontraadselen om het in de praktijk om te zetten en dit zal niet voor morgen zijn.[/size]

[/edit]

[Turkje]

Alex Jones zet zichzelf serieus te kakken door dit artikel te schrijven. Hoe kunt ge nu in godsnaam iets schrijven over de stijgende olieprijs, zonder ook maar één keer te verwijzen naar de stijgende vraag o.a. uit China???!!! Onderstaand artikel vind ik in elk geval een pak genuanceerder (en geloofwaardiger):

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/3708951.stm

En olie als abiotisch en niet-schaars product? Please, give me a break...

[Pindar]

BBC? jaaaaa da's een keurige betrouwbare stabiele mainstream zender!
laten we daar ons geld op zetten!

Ahum!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! dus niet!

Nu nog effe een echt goed artikel:

This is an article that confirms what Brian has always said: oil does not come from dinosaurs and that it is an infinite resource (a secret the energy cartel doesn't want us to know). Oil comes from microorganisms in the earth that transmute magnesium, calcium and hydrogen to produce oil and this is why old wells are flowing again. Brian also says that there is a sewage technique that was patented in the 1930's where raw sewage can be pumped into old wells and 10 years later there will be oil. Here is another great article from Joe Vialls on

[SIZE=4]Sustainable Oil?[/SIZE]

By Chris Bennett
©2004 WorldNetDaily.com
7-10-4

About 80 miles off of the coast of Louisiana lies a mostly submerged mountain, the top of which is known as Eugene Island. The portion underwater is an eerie-looking, sloping tower jutting up from the depths of the Gulf of Mexico, with deep fissures and perpendicular faults which spontaneously spew natural gas. A significant reservoir of crude oil was discovered nearby in the late '60s, and by 1970, a platform named Eugene 330 was busily producing about 15,000 barrels a day of high-quality crude oil.

By the late '80s, the platform's production had slipped to less than 4,000 barrels per day, and was considered pumped out. Done. Suddenly, in 1990, production soared back to 15,000 barrels a day, and the reserves which had been estimated at 60 million barrels in the '70s, were recalculated at 400 million barrels. Interestingly, the measured geological age of the new oil was quantifiably different than the oil pumped in the '70s.

Analysis of seismic recordings revealed the presence of a "deep fault" at the base of the Eugene Island reservoir which was gushing up a river of oil from some deeper and previously unknown source.

Similar results were seen at other Gulf of Mexico oil wells. Similar results were found in the Cook Inlet oil fields in Alaska. Similar results were found in oil fields in Uzbekistan. Similarly in the Middle East, where oil exploration and extraction have been underway for at least the last 20 years, known reserves have doubled. Currently there are somewhere in the neighborhood of 680 billion barrels of Middle East reserve oil.

Creating that much oil would take a big pile of dead dinosaurs and fermenting prehistoric plants. Could there be another source for crude oil?

An intriguing theory now permeating oil company research staffs suggests that crude oil may actually be a natural inorganic product, not a stepchild of unfathomable time and organic degradation. The theory suggests there may be huge, yet-to-be-discovered reserves of oil at depths that dwarf current world estimates.

The theory is simple: Crude oil forms as a natural inorganic process which occurs between the mantle and the crust, somewhere between 5 and 20 miles deep. The proposed mechanism is as follows:

Methane (CH4) is a common molecule found in quantity throughout our solar system - huge concentrations exist at great depth in the Earth.

At the mantle-crust interface, roughly 20,000 feet beneath the surface, rapidly rising streams of compressed methane-based gasses hit pockets of high temperature causing the condensation of heavier hydrocarbons. The product of this condensation is commonly known as crude oil.

Some compressed methane-based gasses migrate into pockets and reservoirs we extract as "natural gas."

In the geologically "cooler," more tectonically stable regions around the globe, the crude oil pools into reservoirs.

In the "hotter," more volcanic and tectonically active areas, the oil and natural gas continue to condense and eventually to oxidize, producing carbon dioxide and steam, which exits from active volcanoes.

Periodically, depending on variations of geology and Earth movement, oil seeps to the surface in quantity, creating the vast oil-sand deposits of Canada and Venezuela, or the continual seeps found beneath the Gulf of Mexico and Uzbekistan.

Periodically, depending on variations of geology, the vast, deep pools of oil break free and replenish existing known reserves of oil.

There are a number of observations across the oil-producing regions of the globe that support this theory, and the list of proponents begins with Mendelev (who created the periodic table of elements) and includes Dr.Thomas Gold (founding director of Cornell University Center for Radiophysics and Space Research) and Dr. J.F. Kenney of Gas Resources Corporations, Houston, Texas.

In his 1999 book, "The Deep Hot Biosphere," Dr. Gold presents compelling evidence for inorganic oil formation. He notes that geologic structures where oil is found all correspond to "deep earth" formations, not the haphazard depositions we find with sedimentary rock, associated fossils or even current surface life.

He also notes that oil extracted from varying depths from the same oil field have the same chemistry - oil chemistry does not vary as fossils vary with increasing depth. Also interesting is the fact that oil is found in huge quantities among geographic formations where assays of prehistoric life are not sufficient to produce the existing reservoirs of oil. Where then did it come from?

Another interesting fact is that every oil field throughout the world has outgassing helium. Helium is so often present in oil fields that helium detectors are used as oil-prospecting tools. Helium is an inert gas known to be a fundamental product of the radiological decay or uranium and thorium, identified in quantity at great depths below the surface of the earth, 200 and more miles below. It is not found in meaningful quantities in areas that are not producing methane, oil or natural gas. It is not a member of the dozen or so common elements associated with life. It is found throughout the solar system as a thoroughly inorganic product.

Even more intriguing is evidence that several oil reservoirs around the globe are refilling themselves, such as the Eugene Island reservoir - not from the sides, as would be expected from cocurrent organic reservoirs, but from the bottom up.

Dr. Gold strongly believes that oil is a "renewable, primordial soup continually manufactured by the Earth under ultrahot conditions and tremendous pressures. As this substance migrates toward the surface, it is attached by bacteria, making it appear to have an organic origin dating back to the dinosaurs."

Smaller oil companies and innovative teams are using this theory to justify deep oil drilling in Alaska and the Gulf of Mexico, among other locations, with some success. Dr. Kenney is on record predicting that parts of Siberia contain a deep reservoir of oil equal to or exceeding that already discovered in the Middle East.

Could this be true?

In August 2002, in the "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (US)," Dr. Kenney published a paper, which had a partial title of "The genesis of hydrocarbons and the origin of petroleum." Dr. Kenney and three Russian coauthors conclude:

The Hydrogen-Carbon system does not spontaneously evolve hydrocarbons at pressures less than 30 Kbar, even in the most favorable environment. The H-C system evolves hydrocarbons under pressures found in the mantle of the Earth and at temperatures consistent with that environment.

He was quoted as stating that "competent physicists, chemists, chemical engineers and men knowledgeable of thermodynamics have known that natural petroleum does not evolve from biological materials since the last quarter of the 19th century."

Deeply entrenched in our culture is the belief that at some point in the relatively near future we will see the last working pump on the last functioning oil well screech and rattle, and that will be that. The end of the Age of Oil. And unless we find another source of cheap energy, the world will rapidly become a much darker and dangerous place.

If Dr. Gold and Dr. Kenney are correct, this "the end of the world as we know it" scenario simply won't happen. Think about it ... while not inexhaustible, deep Earth reserves of inorganic crude oil and commercially feasible extraction would provide the world with generations of low-cost fuel. Dr. Gold has been quoted saying that current worldwide reserves of crude oil could be off by a factor of over 100.

A Hedberg Conference, sponsored by the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, was scheduled to discuss and publicly debate this issue. Papers were solicited from interested academics and professionals. The conference was scheduled to begin June 9, 2003, but was canceled at the last minute. A new date has yet to be set.


Chris Bennett manages an environmental engineering division for a West Coast technology firm. He and his wife of 26 years make their home on the San Francisco Bay.

© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com, Inc.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...TICLE_ID=38645



Comment
From Ted Twietmeyer
7-11-4

Sustainable oil ? Say it isn't so !

I just can't imagine our government would lie to us and create an oil shortage to raise prices. No...just can't be so ! They love us. They have built POW camps for Americans, hundreds of them.

Even though I've seen one personally, I know it can't exist because the government hasn't told me about it. It will flash into existence the moment they tell me about- the same with oil. Therefore, I know that sustainable oil doesn't exist until uncle sam says so.

Hasn't the author heard of Houdini, Copperfield and others ? The US government trained them all in the art of prestidigitation. How else could oil appear, or prices go up and down ?

Oh GOD, how I love that mental conditioning !

Give me some more !



Comment
From Viking Concrete
7-11-4

Sustainable Oil??

Check this out! Sounds feasable to me, a neverending (virtual) supply of greenhouse gasses, that, countless more wars can be fought over, well that is, for as long as we can breathe, or stand the ever increasing temperatures, or the rising sea levels as the poles melt, aka "Waterworld", or the superstorms, snap freezes, la,la,la,la,............!!

Ahhhhhh! But think of the $$$ Trillions, Gazillions even! that we can make selling massive climate controllers to third world countries,( that we control) that convert sea water to fresh food and run on oil, (also sold by us) that keeps the whole process going ad infinitum! or at least until the Earth implodes!

Hey! dont worry, we reckon we will be able to get to Mars by then, what a funky place to live!
Hey! We could export greenhouse gasses to Mars thereby changing the climate to what we used to have here before we screwed it up! All weve got to figure out is who we send the bill to???
Freakin' Lunatics!

Bron: http://www.rense.com/general54/ssust.htm


met vriendelijke groeten


Pindar

[Confucius]

Men maakte ons reeds in de jaren zestig bang voor olieschaarste. Volgens mij alleen maar om de prijzen hoog te houden. Net zoals diamant eigenlijk niet zo zeldzaam is maar waarvan de voorraden gecontroleerd op de markt worden gebracht om de prijzen op peil te houden.

[/\|cazar]

transmute magnesium, calcium and hydrogen to produce oil and this is why old wells are flowing again

Dat moeten dan wel heel exotische metabole pathways zijn, zomaar eventjes metaal-ionen omzetten in aromatische kws !

Ware alchemie in de aardkorst dus !

[/\|cazar]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Turkje

Alex Jones zet zichzelf serieus te kakken door dit artikel te schrijven. Hoe kunt ge nu in godsnaam iets schrijven over de stijgende olieprijs, zonder ook maar één keer te verwijzen naar de stijgende vraag o.a. uit China???!!! Onderstaand artikel vind ik in elk geval een pak genuanceerder (en geloofwaardiger):

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/3708951.stm

En olie als abiotisch en niet-schaars product? Please, give me a break...

yup, hier gaat a j serieus uit de bocht, heel serieus he.

[/\|cazar]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Groentje-18

Die zijn van een andere planeet ofzo?

Laat die prijsjes van de olie maar eens lekker stijgen. Financiële voordelen is voorlopig blijkbaar toch de enige manier om mensen zover te krijgen dat ze beter doen voor het milieu. Zoals onze prof destijds al zei: 'één van de enige manieren om de mensen zich te laten inzetten voor het milieu is de keuze voor dat alternatief het voordeligst maken. Dan nog is de motivatie natuurlijk financiëel ... maar als we tot meer niet in staat zijn dan moet dat maar.

zo is dat.


maar euh, uit preliminaire onderzoeken via lca betreffende waterstof als energiebron ... ik weet het niet hoor, 'k zie dat eerlijk gezegd niet zitten.

waterstof is slechts een energiedrager, geproduceerd vooral door energie opgewekt via verbranding van fossiele brandstoffen ...

heel triestig qua energie-efficientie.

je kan dan nog beter 's morgens extra veel spek met eieren eten ...

[Pindar]

deze is ook leuk!:


[SIZE=4]Russia Proves 'Peak Oil' is a Misleading Zionist Scam [/SIZE]

While Moscow invests heavily in unlimited oil production for the future, New
York squanders America's dwindling oil profits on fast cars and fast women


Copyright Joe Vialls, 25 August 2004


In 1970 the Russians started drilling Kola SG-3, an exploration well which finally reached a staggering world record depth of 40,230 feet. Since then, Russian oil majors including Yukos have quietly drilled more than 310 successful super-deep oil wells, and put them into production. Last Year Russia overtook Saudi Arabia as the world's biggest single oil producer, and is now set to completely dominate global oil production and sales for the next century. We gratefully accept credit cards here: If the opening paragraph of this report started by claiming that completely unlimited crude oil reserves exist inside planet earth, readers might be tempted to regard the entire text as preposterous ghostwriting for a novelist like Frederick Forsyth. If the report then went on to claim that the Russians have exploited this stunning reality for nearly thirty years, right under the largely unwitting noses of western intelligence, readers could be excused for mistaking the author for a lunatic, or perhaps as a front for spy novelist John le Carré. The problem here is that unlimited oil reserves do exist inside planet earth, and the Russians long ago developed the advanced technology necessary to recover these unlimited oil reserves in an efficient and timely manner.
Profoundly disturbing hard intelligence like this does not sit well with the frantic cries of western academic shills and lobbyists, determined to convince you all that the end of the oil world is nigh, or, more accurately, that America faces an imminent catastrophe when global production capacity "Peaks", i.e. when world demand for crude oil finally exceeds the rate at which we can physically pump the required product out of the ground. The gist of these false claims are outlined in a speech given at the at the University of Clausthal, by lobbyist Doctor Colin Campbell during December 2000:
"In summary, these are the main points that we have to grasp: Conventional [Free flowing] oil provides most of the oil produced today, and is responsible for about 95% of all oil that has been produced so far. It will continue to dominate supply for a long time to come. It is what matters most. Its discovery peaked in the 1960s. We now find one barrel for every four we consume. Middle East share of production is set to rise. The rest of the world peaked in 1997, and is therefore in terminal decline. World peak comes within about five years" [circa 12/2005]
Campbell is just the tip of a giant iceberg of academic Peak Oil 'experts' who suddenly appeared en-masse to give you this frightening news, right after President Saddam Hussein suddenly started trading his oil in Euros rather than in US Dollars, a devastating switch with the easy capacity to destroy the US Dollar in less than five years if it was left unchallenged and unchecked.
So these shills [decoys] were carefully positioned to deflect your attention away from the obvious greed and incompetence of the United States Government and its Wall Street masters, and focus it elsewhere instead. Then, hopefully, a few years later down the track when prices start to bounce through the roof, and America has no Euros to buy crude oil, you will blame gasoline prices of $5.00+ per gallon at the pumps on an 'inevitable decline' in world oil production, rather than march furiously on Washington DC with locked and loaded firearms.
Though attacking Campbell and his ilk is not the purpose of this report, his idiot claims can be debunked readily enough. While it is true that nowadays we only officially find one barrel of oil for every four barrels we consume, this is primarily because we temporarily stopped the incredibly expensive process of looking for crude oil when we had already physically established more than two trillion barrels of reserves in known reservoir locations around the world. When those known reserves drop to [say] one trillion barrels we may be tempted to go and find more, but not until then. And while it is true that the production rate from each individual oil well ever drilled has slowly declined over the years, there is a perfectly valid technical reason for this predictable reduced flow rate, which will be explained later.
In order to understand how Russia has left the rest of the world standing in its wake, it is essential to know a little bit about where oil is located, and how it is extracted from the ground for refining and commercial use. It is an enormously complex subject, especially when considering the ultra-deep wells, which should really have a separate category all of their own. Many years ago I was personally involved at the sharp end of two ultra-deep drilling operations [one of them in direct liaison with Russian experts from the Moscow Drilling Institute], and will try to keep this drilling lesson as simple as I can. Thankfully perhaps, the underlying principle of how and where oil is recovered from is not difficult to comprehend, as illustrated by the diagram below.




The theory underlying how oil is formed at such enormous depths in the mantle of the earth is not central to this report, because the Russians have already proved its point of origin in absolute drilling terms more than 300 times. Those interested in the exact process should research the archives, where there are more than two hundred Russian papers on the subject. Probably a good place to start would be "The Role of Methane in the Formation of Mineral Fuels", written by by A.D. Bondar in 1967. What is central to this report is the massive advantage that Russia's ultra-deep drilling discoveries and technical achievements give it over the western nations.
The first advantage I intend to explain is nowhere near as important in global terms as the second, because it is the second advantage that finally drove the Zionist Cabal to illegally invade sovereign Iraq, and thereby bring us all to the very brink of thermonuclear war. However, from where I sit, the first advantage is much more important in simple humanitarian terms, although "humanitarian" is not an acceptable trading process on Wall Street.
As we have already discovered, oil can be produced virtually anywhere on earth, provided the host country can afford the expensive [and sometimes classified] technology, and the massive cost of drilling a well to extreme depth through extremely hard rock formations. But just think what even 20 or 30 deep producing oil wells can mean for the people of a country that has no natural resources of its own, or worse still, for people who have been told by glib western lobbyists that they have no natural resources of their own. Anyone who can prove that the western nations were lying or simply wrong, will become a trusted friend forever. Vietnam is a classic example.
After more than 60 years of being enslaved, pillaged, and raped by the French and then by the Americans, the poor Vietnamese were told officially by American oil multinationals that their country was barren; that western 'cutting edge' technology had failed to find anything to help them recover financially from the mess left behind by American bombs, Agent Orange, and a host of other delightful gifts from Uncle Sam. This of course was exactly where America wanted the Vietnamese to be: desperately poor and unable to take action against their former invaders.
The Russians had other ideas and a very different approach. After telling the Vietnamese that the Americans had lied to them, oil experts were flown in from Moscow to prove this startling claim in a no-risk joint venture, meaning the Russians would provide all of the equipment and expertise free of charge, and only then take a percentage of the profits if oil was actually found and put into production. Vietnam had absolutely nothing to lose, and swiftly gave Russia the green light.
The Vietnamese White Tiger oil field was and is a raging success, currently producing high quality crude oil from basalt rock more than 17,000 feet below the surface of the earth, at 6,000 barrels per day per well. Through White Tiger, the Russians have assisted the Vietnamese to regain part of their self respect, while at the same time making them far less dependent on brutal western nations for food-aid handouts.
All of a sudden in a very small way, Vietnam has joined the exclusive club of oil producing nations, and a stream of cynical U.S. Senators and Congressmen have started making the long pilgrimage to Ho Chi Minh City in order to 'mend fences'. Predictably perhaps, the Vietnamese are very cool, and try hard to ignore their new American admirers.


It is truly amazing how quickly good news travels [outside of CNN], and in a very short space of time China was also engaged in a joint super deep venture with Russia. Nor did it end there. As I write this report, intelligence reports that the Russians have already moved three deep-drilling rigs into impoverished North Korea, where they intend to repeat the Vietnamese production cycle by drilling thought solid granite and basalt, with not a single trace of the 'decaying marine life' so essential to blinkered western geologists for the 'accepted' production of crude oil. It may take a while, but ultimately the North Koreans will be able to go about their sovereign business without the Zionist Cabal in New York being able to blackmail them over a few ship loads of food-aid rice. Yes indeed, Korea will eventually have an oil surplus of its own, allowing it to tell the latest in a long line of terminally insane "New World Orders" to go to hell.
The White Tiger project was the first outside Russia to openly exploit and showcase this ultra-deep technology and oil production from basalt rock to the world, though the original intent was to do so much earlier in India during 1983. During that year a large drilling rig in the Ganges Delta was scheduled to drill down to below 22,000 feet into basalt, and then dramatically flare "impossible" ultra deep oil. Oil well Bodra #3 was directly supervised by teams of experienced Russian drillers and scientists from the Moscow Institute of Drilling, with the author the only westerner on site, contracted to control one of the critical advanced systems needed to reach target depth smoothly and efficiently.
If Bodra #3 had been allowed to drill ahead unhindered, there is no doubt the resulting impact would have sent shock waves around the oil world, and gained enormous international prestige for the Russians. Even more importantly perhaps, the desperately poor people of West Bengal would have gained access to their own energy reserves. Unfortunately, Bodra #3 was not allowed to drill ahead unhindered. The Americans were determined to stop the project one way or the other, and played on New Delhi's obvious fear of the Communist State Government in West Bengal. After bribing a handful of corrupt central government officials, US intelligence sent in professional American saboteurs, who managed to wreck the drilling project while the author was away on a visit to Sydney in Australia.
Before we continue to the second massive advantage derived from ultra deep oil, and thus the primary reason why Wall Street decided to illegally invade Iraq, it is essential to look briefly at the way in which America devours a massive portion of global oil supply. You see, the 'Peak Oil' scam is not really about the world running out of oil reserves or being incapable of producing sufficient quantities to provide for its various national users. Instead, Peak Oil was fabricated to disguise America's individual increasing greed for crude oil, and its imminent inability to pay hard cash for the product. Put simply, America is going broke fast, and Wall Street wishes to blame someone else before the angry Militias appear with their locked and loaded weapons.
This sorry situation is best summarized by Professor Victor Poleo of Venezuela's Central University, who told IPS in April that, "The mechanism by which global oil prices are set is intact, but the normal behaviour of supply and demand is not." According to Poleo, the root of the problem is that the United States ''is a terminal victim of its energetic metastasis. It has neither the oil nor the natural gas needed to feed its style of development. With just six percent of the world population, it consumes nearly 25 percent of the oil and gas produced worldwide.''
Professor Poleo went on to explain that there were expectations that demand for gasoline in the United States would stabilize at around 7.2 million barrels a day by the mid-1990s, ''but that didn't happen,'' he said. ''The United States' voracity for gasoline rose to nine million barrels by 2003, one of every two liters burnt in the world.'' And domestic demand for crude oil will continue to grow. The United States imports today six of every 10 barrels of oil and two of every 10 cubic meters of gas that it consumes, and by 2020 it will import eight of every 10 barrels of oil and four of every 10 cubic meters of gas, according to U.S. government reports.
Despite the fact that American intelligence already knew of Russia's achievements with ultra deep oil production from the mantle of the earth back in the early eighties, it was obvious that this slow and expensive method of adding to national oil reserves could never keep up with America's voracious appetite for gasoline. So ultimately when domestic demand grew too fast, or cash reserves were finally depleted, America would either be obliged to halve its own use of gasoline, or steal it from someone else by force. Halving gasoline usage was out of the question, so instead of building hundreds of ultra-deep drilling rigs, Wall Street squandered the cash building more aircraft carriers, with the desperate objective of attacking and permanently occupying the Middle East.
This is the point at which the second massive advantage derived from ultra-deep oil comes into play. Do you remember how puzzled the reservoir engineers were when they discovered that their existing reserves were being "topped up" from below? They later discovered that what they were really observing were naturally occurring ultra-deep oil wells, leaking vast quantities of oil from the mantle of the earth upwards through fractures into what we nowadays refer to as "sedimentary oilfields", located relatively close to the surface. As the production companies draw oil out of these known reservoirs through oil wells, field pressure is slightly reduced, thereby allowing more ultra-deep oil to migrate up from the mantle and restock the reservoir from below.
Russian studies of their own ultra-deep wells and those in the White Tiger field in Vietnam, indicate in very rough terms that migration from the mantle is probably 20-30% less than production at Middle East wellheads, meaning in turn that if the flow rates of existing Iraqi and Saudi wells are reduced by about 30%, oil supply and production can and will continue forever, constantly replenished by ultra-deep oil from the mantle itself. It goes almost without saying that even with production reduced by 30%, there is more than enough oil in the Middle East to provide for America's increasing usage for at least the next century. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is why your sons and daughters have died and will continue to die in Iraq and elsewhere in the Middle East. Now we come to the completely false [or deliberately misleading] claim by Peak Oil shills that production from existing oil wells is "slowing down", thereby proving that the oil fields are "running dry". This is so wrong that it is almost breathtaking. Think of this slowing down process in the same way you might think of the engine oil in your automobile. The longer you run the engine, the higher the level of contaminates that get into the oil. The higher the level of contaminates, the higher the level of friction. Sooner or later you have something closely akin to glue coating your piston rings, and the performance of your engine declines accordingly. This is an inevitable mechanical process well known to all automobile owners.
Henry Ford and others managed to slow down the rate of contamination in engine oils by inventing the oil filter, through which the oil has to circulate each time it passes around inside the engine. A high percentage of the contaminates stick to the filter element, thereby allowing extra miles between oil changes, though heaven help the careless motorist who thinks he can get away without ever changing his clogged oil filter when recommended.
When oil is extracted from a producing formation underground, it flows out through pores in the reservoir rock, and then into the open borehole, from where it is transported to surface by the production tubing string. So by the very nature of the beast, the bottom section of the well is "open hole" which allows the oil to flow out in the first place, but because it is comprised of exposed and sometimes unstable rock, this open hole section is also continually subject to all manner of turbulence and various contaminates. For example, tiny quantities of super fine silt may exit through the pores but not continue to the surface with the oil, tumbling around in the turbulence instead, until the silt very slowly starts to block off the oil-producing pore throats. Yes, of course there are a variety of liners that can be used to slow down the contamination, but there is no such thing as a Henry Ford oil filter 10,000 feet underground.
The inevitable result of this is that over time, the initial production rate of the well will slowly decline, a hard fact known to every exploration oilman in the business. However, this is certainly not an indication that the oil field itself is becoming depleted, proved thousands of times by offset wells drilled later into the same reservoir. Any new well comes on stream at the original production rate of its older cousins, because it has not yet had time to build up a thin layer of contaminates across the open hole. Though as we shall see it is possible to "do an oil change" on a producing well and bring it back to full production, this is extremely expensive, and rarely used in the west.
Look at a simple example: Say we have a small oil field in Iraq with ten wells that each started out in life producing 10,000 barrels of oil per day. Fine, for a known investment we are producing 100,000 barrels of oil per day from our small field, at least for a while. Five years later contamination may have slowed our overall production down by ten percent to 90,000 barrels per day. So we are now faced with a choice: either "do an oil change" on all ten existing wells at vast expense and down time, or simply drill one additional well into the same reservoir, thereby restoring our daily production to 100,000 barrels with the minimum of fuss. Take my word for it, ninety-nine percent of onshore producers will simply drill the extra well.
Naturally there are times and places where this simple process is not an option, for example on a huge and very expensive offshore platform, which may have only 24 drilling 'slots', all of which have been used up. To restore your overall production after five years you can either build another giant platform next door for two billion dollars, or "do an oil change" on each of your existing 24 wells, one at a time. Clearly this time you are forced to carry out the time consuming business of restoring the open hole section at the bottom of the well to its old pristine condition, before various contaminates started to slow down your production rate.
For this task you first pull the production tubing out of the hole, and then run back in with a drill string, to which is attached an underreamer as shown in the pictures above. When the reamer is directly opposite the top of the open hole producing section, the drill string is rotated to the right and the blades fly out under centrifugal force to a distance preset by you before lowering the tool into the hole. The objective is to cut away the contaminated face of the well to a depth you consider will once again expose pristine producing pores. As the spinning underreamer is slowly lowered, it enlarges the size of the hole, with the contaminated debris cut away and flushed back to surface by the drilling fluid. Hey presto, you have a new oil well, and it only cost one or two million dollars to restore…
Remember I said this process is rarely used in the west, which is true, but it is not true of Russia, where the objective for many years has been to dominate global oil supply by continual investment. With no shareholders holding out their grubby little hands for a wad of pocket money every month, the Russian oil industry managed to surge ahead, underreaming thousands of its older existing onshore wells in less than ten years. Then along came Wall Street asset Mikhail Khodorkovsky, who fraudulently got his hands on Yukos oil for a mere fraction of its value, and was on the point of selling the entire outfit to the American multinationals when Vladimir Putin had him hauled off his private jet somewhere in Siberia. So Wall Street was finally 'cheated' of its very own 'free' Russian oil, and poor old Mikhail had better get used to the taste of prison food.
To recap, 'Peak Oil' claims that because today we only find one barrel of oil for every four that we use, world oil reserves are running out. Completely misleading propaganda. as the Russians [and the CIA] know perfectly well, reserves of oil in the mantle of the earth are infinite. 'Peak Oil' also claims that we will shortly be unable to pump sufficient oil out of the ground to keep up with demand. Completely misleading propaganda again. We could drill more wells, but Wall Street cannot afford to pay for them, and never intended to, at least not while it still believed conquest and eternal occupation of the Middle East was a realistic possibility.
Professor Poleo makes it quite clear which direction the west needs to go in if it is to survive in the long term, and that is to follow Russia's example by sharply reducing domestic consumption. Back in 1990 America was using around 6 million barrels per day compared to Russia's 8.4 million, but how things have changed since then. Thirteen years later in 2003, American consumption was up to 9 million, while Russian consumption had been reduced to a mere 3.2 million. A few billion folk over there in America might like to walk around their houses and switch off any electrical appliances they don't actually need. Believe me, I can almost hear the oil surging through the pipelines in New York, and I live more than 12,000 miles away in Australia.
In closing I would like to pass on my greetings and thanks to the cheerful Russian drillers and scientists I had the pleasure of working with at Bodra #3 in West Bengal, without whose expertise we might all be dead today, as a direct consequence of repeated American sabotage attempts on the high pressure well. My thanks also to the Moscow Drilling Institute for the unrestricted flow of information and documents on ultra deep oil production technology, without which I could not have written this report.


In direct conflict with the 'Peak Oil' myth, the underreamer shown in these photos can restore an oil well's original production rate, using basically the same principle as changing the oil filter in your automobile engine



[SIZE=4]Now we come to the completely false [or deliberately misleading] claim by Peak Oil shills that production from existing oil wells is "slowing down", thereby proving that the oil fields are "running dry". [/SIZE] This is so wrong that it is almost breathtaking. Think of this slowing down process in the same way you might think of the engine oil in your automobile. The longer you run the engine, the higher the level of contaminates that get into the oil. The higher the level of contaminates, the higher the level of friction. Sooner or later you have something closely akin to glue coating your piston rings, and the performance of your engine declines accordingly. This is an inevitable mechanical process well known to all automobile owners.
Henry Ford and others managed to slow down the rate of contamination in engine oils by inventing the oil filter, through which the oil has to circulate each time it passes around inside the engine. A high percentage of the contaminates stick to the filter element, thereby allowing extra miles between oil changes, though heaven help the careless motorist who thinks he can get away without ever changing his clogged oil filter when recommended.
When oil is extracted from a producing formation underground, it flows out through pores in the reservoir rock, and then into the open borehole, from where it is transported to surface by the production tubing string. So by the very nature of the beast, the bottom section of the well is "open hole" which allows the oil to flow out in the first place, but because it is comprised of exposed and sometimes unstable rock, this open hole section is also continually subject to all manner of turbulence and various contaminates. For example, tiny quantities of super fine silt may exit through the pores but not continue to the surface with the oil, tumbling around in the turbulence instead, until the silt very slowly starts to block off the oil-producing pore throats. Yes, of course there are a variety of liners that can be used to slow down the contamination, but there is no such thing as a Henry Ford oil filter 10,000 feet underground.
The inevitable result of this is that over time, the initial production rate of the well will slowly decline, a hard fact known to every exploration oilman in the business. However, this is certainly not an indication that the oil field itself is becoming depleted, proved thousands of times by offset wells drilled later into the same reservoir. Any new well comes on stream at the original production rate of its older cousins, because it has not yet had time to build up a thin layer of contaminates across the open hole. Though as we shall see it is possible to "do an oil change" on a producing well and bring it back to full production, this is extremely expensive, and rarely used in the west.
Look at a simple example: Say we have a small oil field in Iraq with ten wells that each started out in life producing 10,000 barrels of oil per day. Fine, for a known investment we are producing 100,000 barrels of oil per day from our small field, at least for a while. Five years later contamination may have slowed our overall production down by ten percent to 90,000 barrels per day. So we are now faced with a choice: either "do an oil change" on all ten existing wells at vast expense and down time, or simply drill one additional well into the same reservoir, thereby restoring our daily production to 100,000 barrels with the minimum of fuss. Take my word for it, ninety-nine percent of onshore producers will simply drill the extra well.
Naturally there are times and places where this simple process is not an option, for example on a huge and very expensive offshore platform, which may have only 24 drilling 'slots', all of which have been used up. To restore your overall production after five years you can either build another giant platform next door for two billion dollars, or "do an oil change" on each of your existing 24 wells, one at a time. Clearly this time you are forced to carry out the time consuming business of restoring the open hole section at the bottom of the well to its old pristine condition, before various contaminates started to slow down your production rate.
For this task you first pull the production tubing out of the hole, and then run back in with a drill string, to which is attached an underreamer as shown in the pictures above. When the reamer is directly opposite the top of the open hole producing section, the drill string is rotated to the right and the blades fly out under centrifugal force to a distance preset by you before lowering the tool into the hole. The objective is to cut away the contaminated face of the well to a depth you consider will once again expose pristine producing pores. As the spinning underreamer is slowly lowered, it enlarges the size of the hole, with the contaminated debris cut away and flushed back to surface by the drilling fluid. Hey presto, you have a new oil well, and it only cost one or two million dollars to restore…
Remember I said this process is rarely used in the west, which is true, but it is not true of Russia, where the objective for many years has been to dominate global oil supply by continual investment. With no shareholders holding out their grubby little hands for a wad of pocket money every month, the Russian oil industry managed to surge ahead, underreaming thousands of its older existing onshore wells in less than ten years. Then along came Wall Street asset Mikhail Khodorkovsky, who fraudulently got his hands on Yukos oil for a mere fraction of its value, and was on the point of selling the entire outfit to the American multinationals when Vladimir Putin had him hauled off his private jet somewhere in Siberia. So Wall Street was finally 'cheated' of its very own 'free' Russian oil, and poor old Mikhail had better get used to the taste of prison food.
To recap, 'Peak Oil' claims that because today we only find one barrel of oil for every four that we use, world oil reserves are running out. Completely misleading propaganda. as the Russians [and the CIA] know perfectly well, reserves of oil in the mantle of the earth are infinite. 'Peak Oil' also claims that we will shortly be unable to pump sufficient oil out of the ground to keep up with demand. Completely misleading propaganda again. We could drill more wells, but Wall Street cannot afford to pay for them, and never intended to, at least not while it still believed conquest and eternal occupation of the Middle East was a realistic possibility.
Professor Poleo makes it quite clear which direction the west needs to go in if it is to survive in the long term, and that is to follow Russia's example by sharply reducing domestic consumption. Back in 1990 America was using around 6 million barrels per day compared to Russia's 8.4 million, but how things have changed since then. Thirteen years later in 2003, American consumption was up to 9 million, while Russian consumption had been reduced to a mere 3.2 million. A few billion folk over there in America might like to walk around their houses and switch off any electrical appliances they don't actually need. Believe me, I can almost hear the oil surging through the pipelines in New York, and I live more than 12,000 miles away in Australia.
In closing I would like to pass on my greetings and thanks to the cheerful Russian drillers and scientists I had the pleasure of working with at Bodra #3 in West Bengal, without whose expertise we might all be dead today, as a direct consequence of repeated American sabotage attempts on the high pressure well. My thanks also to the Moscow Drilling Institute for the unrestricted flow of information and documents on ultra deep oil production technology, without which I could not have written this report.

Bron: http://www.vialls.com/wecontrolamerica/peakoil.html


met vriendelijke groeten

Pindar

[/\|cazar]

vandaar dat de olieproductie in Rusland dit jaar minder is dan vorig jaar ...[edit]
[size=1]Edit:[/size]

[size=1]After edit by /\|cazar on 05-10-2005 at 14:56
Reason:
--------------------------------

vandaar dat de olieproductie in Rusland dit jaar minder is dan vorig jaar ...[/size]

[size=1]Before any edits, post was:
--------------------------------

vandaar dat de olieproductie is Rusland dit jaar minder is dan vorig jaar ...[/size]

[/edit]

[Pindar]

Alcazar, heb je het wel gelezen?

post Pindar: 14:55

post Alcazar 14:56

?????????????


met vriendelijke groeten

Pindar

[/\|cazar]

Dat artikel is toch niet ernstig te nemen, pindar ?

To recap, 'Peak Oil' claims that because today we only find one barrel of oil for every four that we use, world oil reserves are running out. Completely misleading propaganda. as the Russians [and the CIA] know perfectly well, reserves of oil in the mantle of the earth are infinite.

Geen enkele natuurlijke bron is 'oneindig' aanwezig.

Wat is uw verklaring dan voor het feit dat er zo weinig olie gevonden wordt, als het dan toch zo veelvuldig aanwezig is.

Trouwens, hoe is die olie dan in die mantel van de aarde geraakt ? Uit wat is die olie dan ontstaan ? Zoals je weet is olie vooral een verzameling van aromatische koolwaterstoffen, hoe zijn die complexe structuren dan onstaan ? Uit Mg ? Zeg dat niet tegen een hoogleraar chemie hoor !

Trouwens, via isotopenanalyse op aardolie kan men perfect de biologische oorsprong ervan bepalen, voor zover dat al moest nodig zijn.

'Peak Oil' also claims that we will shortly be unable to pump sufficient oil out of the ground to keep up with demand. Completely misleading propaganda again. We could drill more wells, but Wall Street cannot afford to pay for them, and never intended to, at least not while it still believed conquest and eternal occupation of the Middle East was a realistic possibility.

Als er geld mee te verdienen valt, hadden ze die putten al lang geboord. En er is heden heel veel geld mee te verdienen. Waarom spreken onafhankelijke geologen eigenlijk de Wall Street bankers tegen ? Deze laatste geloven zelfs niet in peak-oil, omdat dat tegelijk het einde van de financiële economie zou inluiden.

De gewone jan met de pet econoom heeft nog nooit van peak oil gehoord zelfs.

Professor Poleo makes it quite clear which direction the west needs to go in if it is to survive in the long term, and that is to follow Russia's example by sharply reducing domestic consumption. Back in 1990 America was using around 6 million barrels per day compared to Russia's 8.4 million, but how things have changed since then. Thirteen years later in 2003, American consumption was up to 9 million, while Russian consumption had been reduced to a mere 3.2 million. A few billion folk over there in America might like to walk around their houses and switch off any electrical appliances they don't actually need. Believe me, I can almost hear the oil surging through the pipelines in New York, and I live more than 12,000 miles away in Australia.

Even terzijde: de consumptie van aardolie in Rusland is zo sterk gedaald omdat de economie er in elkaar gezakt is ...

Bovendien zijn er geen miljarden mensen in de States.

Maar in die zin heeft de auteur wel gelijk: energie-efficiëntie zou al een heel pak kunnen oplossen, op dat gebied scoort Vlaanderen ook alweer bijna het slechts in Europa.

[Pindar]

Geen enkele natuurlijke bron is 'oneindig' aanwezig.

verdiep U eens in "vrije energie"


met vriendelijke groeten

Pindar

[/\|cazar]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Pindar

verdiep U eens in "vrije energie"


met vriendelijke groeten

Pindar

ZPE 'energie' is iets anders dan een natuurlijke hulpbron, het is zelfs geen materie ...

We hebben het overigens over de besloten aarde, niet over het heelal als materiaalbron, daar zijn we nog niet direct aan toe.


Nochtans is het energieprobleem deftig op te lossen: door de natuur te mimiceren, hoe zonne-energie in planten tot chemische energie wordt omgezet, dat proces industrialiseren, er zijn daar Duitse onderzoeksgroepen op bezig, in den belziek artuurlijk nog niet.


Trouwens pindar, die ZPE is niet bepaald hanteerbaar. Zeker niet door materie rechtstreeks.

[exodus]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Confucius

Men maakte ons reeds in de jaren zestig bang voor olieschaarste. Volgens mij alleen maar om de prijzen hoog te houden. Net zoals diamant eigenlijk niet zo zeldzaam is maar waarvan de voorraden gecontroleerd op de markt worden gebracht om de prijzen op peil te houden.

Inderdaad. De olieschaarste is ook een van die enorme leugens die door NWO-denktanks zoals de clob of rome op ons afgestuurd worden.Mass deception.

[exodus]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door /\|cazar

Als er geld mee te verdienen valt, hadden ze die putten al lang geboord. En er is heden heel veel geld mee te verdienen. Waarom spreken onafhankelijke geologen eigenlijk de Wall Street bankers tegen ? Deze laatste geloven zelfs niet in peak-oil, omdat dat tegelijk het einde van de financiële economie zou inluiden.

Het is niet omdat er geld mee te verdienen valt dat ze ze gaan boren. Ze kunnen er misschien meer voordeel uit halen door de kraan dicht te draaien en profijt te halen uit de schaarste en het past in hun plan.

Wie zegt er dat de Wall-Street bankers niet in Peak Oil geloven. Die mannen zijn ook geen uilen hé. Als er echt een peak oil zou aankomen dan gaan ze dat wel weten en de noodzakelijk stappen al lang geleden genomen hebben. Het idee van Peak Oil als totale crash is zodanig belachelijk. Het veronderstelt dat al die hoge pieten gewoon wachten tot hun systeem instort, al fluitend het ravijn ingaan. Integendeel, peak oil is een leugen en een instrument van de NWO.
De wall-street bankers zijn illuminati en het banksysteem is niet zozeer hun middel om te overleven maar wel om het economsche systeem te controleren en onder de knoet te houden. Zij volgen nog altijd hun NWO plan op. Zij kijken niet achter hun financiële economie als bestaansfactor maar wel als instrument.