Citaat:
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door MIS
Vervolgens gaan we maar wat nieuwe strekkingen en termen verzinnen waardoor we er nog minder van begrijpen. Gekkenwerk natuurlijk.
|
Ik zou het niet beter kunnen verwoorden!
Rudolf Z. la Fournier (misschien ken je'm?) zei ooit, in dezeflde context:
Citaat:
Marxist socialism and dialectic structuralism
“Truth is part of the defining characteristic of culture,” says Debord; however, according to la Fournier[4] , it is not so much truth that is part of the defining characteristic of culture, but rather the dialectic, and subsequent stasis, of truth. Many theories concerning a self-falsifying paradox may be found. But Lyotard suggests the use of surrealism to challenge and analyse society.
Baudrillard uses the term ‘dialectic structuralism’ to denote not sublimation, as Lacan would have it, but neosublimation. It could be said that an abundance of theories concerning posttextual narrative exist.
The figure/ground distinction which is a central theme of Eco’s Foucault’s Pendulum is also evident in The Island of the Day Before, although in a more mythopoetical sense. However, Marx promotes the use of dialectic structuralism to attack hierarchy.
In The Name of the Rose, Eco affirms subcapitalist theory; in Foucault’s Pendulum, however, he denies dialectic structuralism. In a sense, the subject is contextualised into a surrealism that includes language as a reality.
|
Zijn stelling is zó zuiver!