De vredesindex

[Johan Bollen]

De vredesindex toont de vreedzaamheid van de verschillende landen van de wereld. 23 verschillende indicatoren (zowel kwalitatief als kwantitatief) in 144 landen worden geevalueerd, waaronder: niveau van democratie, criminaliteit en respect voor de mensenrechten.

http://www.visionofhumanity.org/gpi/...s/rankings.php

Het bijhorend rapport werd gepresenteerd in Londen door het 'instituut voor Economie en vrede'. Een van de conclusies is dat de economische crisis de gewelddadige conflicten verergerd heeft, voor meer politieke instabiliteit heeft gezorgd en de mensenrechtenschendingen heeft verhoogd in de meeste landen.

Op 5 juni 2009 werd het rapport (2009) aan de Verenigde naties in New York gepresenteerd.

De top 5 meest vreedzame landen

1. Nieuw Zeeland
2. Denemarken
3. Noorwegen
3. Ijsland
4. Oostenrijk

De 5 minst vreedzame landen

140. sudan
141. Israel
142. Somalië
143. Afghanistan
144. Irak

enkele andere landen:


België: 15 de
Nederland 22 ste
Cuba: 68 ste
China: 74ste
Bolivia: 81 ste
Verenigde staten: 83ste
Iran: 99ste
Venezuela: 120ste
Colombië: 130ste
Rusland: 133 ste

[roger verhiest]

Een communautair akkoord zou ons land allicht tiental plaatsjes doen stijgen.

[roger verhiest]

Eerlijkheidshalve moet we eerst het gansche resultaat van ons land bekijken :

Belgium
Global Peace Index 2009

* 2007
* 2008
* 2009

Overall peace index

Rank
15
Score
1.359
Peace Index scores from 1 to 5 where 1 = most peaceful.
Ranked out of 144 countries where rank 1 = most peaceful country.
Click on an indicator or driver title for more detailed information
Indicator information

Number of external and internal conflicts fought: 2002-2007
1.5
Number of external and internal conflicts fought: 2002-2007
UCDP defines conflict as: "a contested incompatibility that concerns government and/or
territory where the use of armed force between two parties, of which at least one is the government of a state, results in at least 25 battle-related deaths in a year"
Close | More information
Close Window
Number of external and internal conflicts fought: 2002-2007

Source: the Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP), Uppsala University, Sweden

The separate elements of the definition are as follows:
(1) Use of armed force: use of arms in order to promote the parties' general position in the conflict, resulting in deaths.
(1.1) Arms: any material means, e.g. manufactured weapons but also sticks, stones, fire, water, etc.
(2) 25 deaths: a minimum of 25 battle-related deaths per year and per incompatibility.
(3) Party: a government of a state or any opposition organization or alliance of opposition organizations.
(3.1) Government: the party controlling the capital of the state.
(3.2) Opposition organization: any non-governmental group of people having announced a name for their group and using armed force.
(4) State: a state is
(4.1) an internationally recognized sovereign government controlling a specified territory, or
(4.2) an internationally unrecognized government controlling a specified territory whose sovereignty is not disputed by another internationally recognized sovereign government previously controlling the same territory.
(5) Incompatibility concerning government and/or territory the incompatibility, as stated by the parties, must concern government and/or territory.
(5.1) Incompatibility: the stated generally incompatible positions.
(5.2) Incompatibility concerning government: incompatibility concerning type of political system, the replacement of the central government or the change of its composition.
Incompatibility concerning territory: incompatibility concerning the status of a territory, e.g. the change of the state in control of a certain territory (interstate conflict), secession or autonomy (intrastate conflict).
Close Window
Estimated number of deaths from organised conflict (external)
1
Estimated number of deaths from organised conflict (external)
UCDP defines conflict as: "a contested incompatibility that concerns government and/or territory where the use of armed force between two parties, of which at least one is the government of a state, results in at least 25 battle-related deaths in a year"
Close | More information
Close Window
Estimated number of deaths from organised conflict (external)

Source: the Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP), Uppsala University, Sweden

The separate elements of the definition are as follows:
(1) Use of armed force: use of arms in order to promote the parties' general position in the conflict, resulting in deaths.
(1.1) Arms: any material means, e.g. manufactured weapons but also sticks, stones, fire, water, etc.
(2) 25 deaths: a minimum of 25 battle-related deaths per year and per incompatibility.
(3) Party: a government of a state or any opposition organization or alliance of opposition organizations.
(3.1) Government: the party controlling the capital of the state.
(3.2) Opposition organization: any non-governmental group of people having announced a name for their group and using armed force.
(4) State: a state is
(4.1) an internationally recognized sovereign government controlling a specified territory, or
(4.2) an internationally unrecognized government controlling a specified territory whose sovereignty is not disputed by another internationally recognized sovereign government previously controlling the same territory.
(5) Incompatibility concerning government and/or territory the incompatibility, as stated by the parties, must concern government and/or territory.
(5.1) Incompatibility: the stated generally incompatible positions.
(5.2) Incompatibility concerning government: incompatibility concerning type of political system, the replacement of the central government or the change of its composition.
Incompatibility concerning territory: incompatibility concerning the status of a territory, e.g. the change of the state in control of a certain territory (interstate conflict), secession or autonomy (intrastate conflict).
Close Window
Number of deaths from organised conflict (internal)
1
Number of deaths from organised conflict (internal)
UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset records the number of battle deaths per conflict, defined as: "a contested incompatibility that concerns government and/or territory where the use of armed force between two parties, of which at least one is the government of a state, results in at least 25 battle-related deaths in a year"
Close | More information
Close Window
Number of deaths from organised conflict (internal)

UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset records the number of battle deaths per conflict, defined as: "a contested incompatibility that concerns government and/or territory where the use of armed force between two parties, of which at least one is the government of a state, results in at least 25 battle-related deaths in a year". EIU analysts, then, have clustered the figures available for 2005 and 2006 in bands:

1=0-24, 2=25-999, 3=1000-4999, 4=5000-9999, 5=> 10000

The separate elements of the definition are as follows:
(1) Use of armed force: use of arms in order to promote the parties' general position in the conflict, resulting in deaths.
(1.1) Arms: any material means, e.g. manufactured weapons but also sticks, stones, fire, water, etc.
(2) 25 deaths: a minimum of 25 battle-related deaths per year and per incompatibility.
(3) Party: a government of a state or any opposition organization or alliance of opposition organizations.
(3.1) Government: the party controlling the capital of the state.
(3.2) Opposition organization: any non-governmental group of people having announced a name for their group and using armed force.
(4) State: a state is
(4.1) an internationally recognized sovereign government controlling a specified territory, or
(4.2) an internationally unrecognized government controlling a specified territory whose sovereignty is not disputed by another internationally recognized sovereign government previously controlling the same territory.
(5) Incompatibility concerning government and/or territory the incompatibility, as stated by the parties, must concern government and/or territory.
(5.1) Incompatibility: the stated generally incompatible positions.
(5.2) Incompatibility concerning government: incompatibility concerning type of political system, the replacement of the central government or the change of its composition.
Incompatibility concerning territory: incompatibility concerning the status of a territory, e.g. the change of the state in control of a certain territory (interstate conflict), secession or autonomy (intrastate conflict).
Close Window
Level of organised conflict (internal)
1
Level of organised conflict (internal)
Qualitative assessment of the intensity of conflicts within the country. Ranked 1-5 (very low-very high) by EIU analysts. 2008 Data.
Close
Relations with neighbouring countries
1
Relations with neighbouring countries
Qualitative assessment of relations with neighbouring countries. Ranked 1-5 (very low-very high) by EIU analysts. 2008 Data.
Close
Perceptions of criminality in society
2
Perceptions of criminality in society
Qualitative assessment of level of distrust in other citizens. Ranked 1-5 (very low-very high) by EIU analysts
Close | More information
Close Window
Perceptions of criminality in society

A qualitative assessment of the level of distrust in other citizens, ranked from 1-5 (very low to very high) by the Economist Intelligence Unit's Country Analysis team. The lowest score (1) records that the majority of other people can be trusted and that there is an overall positive climate of trust in the country. The highest score (5) indicates that people are extremely cautious in dealing with others.
Close Window
Number of displaced people as a percentage of the population
1
Number of displaced people as a percentage of the population
Refugee population by country or territory of origin, as a percentage of the country's total population. UNHCR Statistical Yearbook 2007.
Close
Political instability
1.25
Political instability
Qualitative assessment of level of political instability. Ranked 1-5 (very low-very high) by EIU analysts
Close | More information
Close Window
Political instability

This indicator addresses the degree to which political institutions are sufficiently stable to support the needs of its citizens, businesses and overseas investors. It is a composite indicator based on the scores, 1 to 5 for each of the following issues: What is the risk of significant social unrest during the next two years? How clear, established, and accepted are constitutional mechanisms for the orderly transfer of power from one government to another? How likely is it that an opposition party or group will come to power and cause a significant deterioration in business operating conditions? Is excessive power concentrated or likely to be concentrated, in the executive so that executive authority lacks accountability and possesses excessive discretion? Is there a risk that international disputes/tensions will negatively affect the economy and/or polity?
Close Window
Respect for human rights
1.5
Respect for human rights
A qualitative measure of the level of political terror through an analysis of Amnesty International's Yearbook.
Close | More information
Close Window
Respect for human rights

Mark Gibney and Matthew Dalton, from the University of North Carolina, have coded countries on a 1 to 5 scale according to their level of terror the previous year, based on the description provided in the Amnesty International Yearbook (in this case the 2007 Yearbook, referring to 2006 data). There is an additional index coded on a 1 to 5 scale based on a close analysis of Country Reports from the US State Department. Amnesty International scores have been used where available, with US State Department scores used to fill missing data.

- Level 1 is scored if the country operates under a secure rule of law. People are not imprisoned for their views and torture is rare or exceptional. Politically-motivated murders are extremely rare;
- Level 2 points that there is a limited amount of imprisonment for non-violent political activity. However, few persons are affected and torture and beatings are exceptional. Politically-motivated murder is rare;
- Level 3. Imprisonment for political activity is more extensive. Politically-motivated executions or other political murders and brutality are common. Unlimited detention, with or without a trial, for political views is also commonplace;
- Level 4. The practices of level 3 affect a larger portion of the population and murders, disappearances and torture are a common part of life. In spite of its pervasiveness, on this level political terror affects those who interest themselves in politics;
- Level 5. The terrors characteristic of level 4 countries encompass the whole population at level 5. The leaders of these societies place no limits on the means or thoroughness with which they pursue personal or ideological goals.
Close Window
Potential for terriorist acts
2
Potential for terriorist acts
Qualitative assessment of the potential for terrorist acts. Ranked 1-5 (very low-very high) by EIU analysts
Close
Number of homicides per 100,000 people
1
Number of homicides per 100,000 people
Intentional homicide refers to death deliberately inflicted on a person by another person, including infanticide.
Close | More information
Close Window
Number of homicides per 100,000 people

Number of homicides per 100,000 people

This indicator has been compiled using UNODC figures (10th, 9th and 8th Survey of Criminal Trends) rather than Interpol data. The figures refer to the total number of penal code offences or their equivalent, but excluding minor road traffic and other petty offences, brought to the attention of the police or other law enforcement agencies and recorded by one of those agencies. The latest Interpol figures used are for 1998/99 and the consensus among experts on the analysis of criminal justice is that the UNODC figures are more reliable - they are compiled from a standard questionnaire sent to national officials via the UN statistical office. However, the UN acknowledges that international comparisons of crime statistics are beset by methodological difficulties:

* Different definitions for specific crime types: The category in which any incident of victimization is recorded relies on the legal definition of crime in any country. Should that definition be different, which is often the case, comparisons will not be made of exactly the same crime type. This is particularly the case in crimes that require some discretion from a police officer or relevant authority when they are identified. For example, the definitional difference between serious or common assault in different legal jurisdictions may be different, and this will be reflected in the total number of incidents recorded.

* Different levels of reporting and traditions of policing: This relates closely to levels of development in a society, most clearly reflected in accessibility to the police. Factors such as the number of police stations or telephones impact upon reporting levels. The level of insurance coverage in a community is also a key indicator of the likelihood of citizens approaching the police as their claim for compensation may require such notification. In addition, in societies where the police are or have been mistrusted by the population, most specifically during periods of authoritarian rule, reporting levels are likely to be lower than in cases where the police are regarded as important members of the community.

* Different social, economic and political contexts: Comparing crime data from societies that are fundamentally different may ignore key issues present in the society that impact upon levels of reporting. For example, different social norms in some countries may make it difficult for women to report cases of rape or sexual abuse, while in others, women are encouraged to come forward. The level of insurance coverage in a community is also a key indicator of the likelihood of citizens approaching the police as their claim for compensation may require such notification. In addition, in societies where the police are or have been mistrusted by the population, most specifically during periods of authoritarian rule, reporting levels are likely to be lower than in cases where the police are regarded as important members of the community.

The International Crime Victim Survey (ICVS) is perhaps a more sensitive and accurate measure of crime - and arguably offers a picture of how the public views the criminal justice system - but is currently limited to a few, mainly industrialised, countries so these data are not included.

Where data are not present, The Economist Intelligence Unit's analysts have estimated figures based on their deep knowledge of each country. All the figures for homicides per 100,000 people have been banded as:

1=0-1.9, 2=2-5.9, 3=6-9.9, 4=10-19.9, 5= >20
Close Window
Level of violent crime
2
Level of violent crime
Qualitative assessment of the level of violent crime. Ranked 1-5 (very low-very high) by EIU analysts
Close
Likelihood of violent demonstrations
2
Likelihood of violent demonstrations
Qualitative assessment of the level of violent demonstrations. Ranked 1-5 (very low-very high) by EIU analysts
Close
Number of jailed population per 100,000 people
1
Number of jailed population per 100,000 people
Source: International Centre for Prison Studies, King's College London, World Prison Population List
Close | More information
Close Window
Number of jailed population per 100,000 people

Figures are from the International Centre for Prison Studies, King's College, University of London and are compiled from a variety of sources. In almost all cases the original source is the national prison administration of the country concerned, or else the Ministry responsible for the prison administration. The International Centre for Prison Studies warns that because prison population rates (per 100,000 of the national population) are based on estimates of the national population they should not be regarded as precise. Comparability is compromised by different practice in different countries, for example with regard to whether all pre-trial detainees and juveniles are held under the authority of the prison administration, and also whether the prison administration is responsible for psychiatrically ill offenders and offenders being detained for treatment for alcoholism and drug addiction. People held in custody are usually omitted from national totals if they are not under the authority of the prison administration.

The data have been banded:

1=0-69, 2=70-139, 3=140-209, 4=210-279, 5=> 280
Close Window
Number of internal security officers and police 100,000 people
2
Number of internal security officers and police 100,000 people
Refers to the civil police force as distinct from national guards or local militia
Close | More information
Close Window
Number of internal security officers and police 100,000 people

The original figures have been taken from UNODC, 10th, 9th and 8th UN Survey of Criminal Trends and Operations of Criminal Justice Systems (UNCJS) and refer to the civil police force as distinct from national guards or local militia. Where there are gaps, EIU analysts have filled the gaps and clustered data in bands:

1 = 0-199, 2 = 200-399, 3 = 400-599, 4 = 600-799, 5 = > 800
Close Window
Military expenditure as a percentage of GDP
1
Military expenditure as a percentage of GDP
Cash outlays of central or federal government to meet the costs of national armed forces - including strategic, land, naval, air, command, administration and support forces as well as paramilitary forces, customs forces and border guards if these are trained and equipped as a military force.
Close
Number of armed services personnel per 100,000 people
1
Number of armed services personnel per 100,000 people
Active armed services personnel comprises all servicemen and women on full-time duty in the army, navy, air force and joint forces (including conscripts and long-term assignments from the Reserves)
Close
Volume of transfers of major conventional weapons as supplier (exports) per 100,000 people
1
Volume of transfers of major conventional weapons as supplier (exports) per 100,000 people
The SIPRI Arms Transfers Database covers all international sales and gifts of major conventional weapons and the technology necessary for the production of them. The transfer equipment or technology is from one country, rebel force or international organisation to another country, rebel force or international organisation. Major conventional weapons include: aircraft, armoured vehicles, artillery, radar systems, missiles, ships, engines.
Close
Volume of transfers of major conventional weapons, as recipient (Imports) per 100,000 people
1
Volume of transfers of major conventional weapons, as recipient (Imports) per 100,000 people
The SIPRI Arms Transfers Database covers all international sales and gifts of major conventional weapons and the technology necessary for the production of them. The transfer equipment or technology is from one country, rebel force or international organisation to another country, rebel force or international organisation. Major conventional weapons include: aircraft, armoured vehicles, artillery, radar systems, missiles, ships, engines.
Close
Funding for UN peacekeeping missions (percentage of assessed contribution)
1
Funding for UN peacekeeping missions (percentage of assessed contribution)
Calculation of percentage of countries’ outstanding contributions versus annual assessment to the budget of the current peacekeeping missions. Source: United Nations.
Close
Aggregate number of heavy weapons per 100,000 people
1
Aggregate number of heavy weapons per 100,000 people
Source: Bonn International Centre for Conversion (BICC)
Close | More information
Close Window
Aggregate number of heavy weapons per 100,000 people

The BICC Weapon Holdings Database contains figures for four weapon categories: armoured vehicles, artillery, combat aircraft, major fighting ships. The numbers of weapons in these categories have been indexed, with 1996 as the fixed base year. Holdings are those of government forces and do not include holdings of armed opposition groups. Weapon systems in storage are also not included. Indices for groups are directly calculated from the aggregated numbers of holdings of heavy weapons, as follows:

1=0-199, 2=200-999, 3=1000-2999, 4=3000-6999, 5=> 7000
Close Window
Ease of access to weapons of minor destruction
2
Ease of access to weapons of minor destruction
Qualitative assessment of the ease of access to small arms and light weapons. Ranked 1-5 (very low-very high) by EIU analysts.
Close | More information
Close Window
Ease of access to weapons of minor destruction

A qualitative assessment of the accessibility of small arms and light weapons (SALW) is ranked 1-5 (very low–very high) by EIU analysts. Very limited access is scored if the country has developed policy instruments and best practices, such as firearm licences, strengthening of export controls, codes of conduct, firearms or ammunition marking. Very easy access, on the contrary, is characterized by the lack of regulation of civilian possession, ownership, storage, carriage and use of firearms.
Close Window
Military capability/sophistication
3
Military capability/sophistication
Qualitative assessment of the grade of sophistication and the extent of military research and development (R&D) Ranked 1-5 (very low-very high) by EIU analysts
Close
Driver information

democracy and transparency

Electoral process
9.58
Electoral process
Qualitative assessment of whether elections are competitive in that electors are free to vote and are offered a range of choices. Ranked 1- 10 (very low to very high)

Source: EIU Democracy Index; Year: 2008
Close
Functioning of government
8.21
Functioning of government
Qualitative assessment of whether freely elected representatives determine government policy. Is there an effective system of checks and balances on the exercise of government authority? Ranked 1- 10 (very low to very high). Source: EIU Democracy Index; Year: 2008
Close
Political participation
6.67
Political participation
Qualitative assessment of voter participation/turn-out for national elections, citizens' engagement with politics. Ranked 1- 10 (very low to very high)

Source: EIU Democracy Index; Year: 2008
Close
Political culture
7.5
Political culture
Qualitative assessment of the degree of societal consensus and cohesion to underpin a stable, functioning democracy; score the level of separation of church and state. Ranked 1- 10 (very low to very high)

Source: EIU Democracy Index; Year: 2008
Close
Civil liberties
9.41
Civil liberties
Qualitative assessment of the prevalence of civil liberties. Is there a free electronic media? Is there a free print media? Is there freedom of expression and protest? Are citizens free to form professional organisations and trade unions? Ranked 1- 10 (very low to very high)

Source: EIU Democracy Index; Year: 2008
Close
Corruption perceptions (CPI score: 10 = highly clean, 0 = highly corrupt)
7.3
Corruption perceptions (CPI score: 10 = highly clean, 0 = highly corrupt)
The Index draws on multiple expert opinion surveys that poll perceptions of public sector corruption scoring countries on a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating high levels of perceived corruption and 10 indicating low levels of perceived corruption. Source: Transparency International, Corruption Perception Index; Year: 2008
Close
Women in parliament (as a percentage of the total number of representatives in the lower house)
35.3
Women in parliament (as a percentage of the total number of representatives in the lower house)
Figures are based on information provided by national parliaments by 31st December 2007. Source: Inter-Parliamentary Union; Year: 2008
Close
Political Democracy Index
8.28
Political Democracy Index
Source: EIU Analysts; Year: 2008
Close
Gender Inequality
0.72
Gender Inequality
A composite index that assesses countries on how well they are dividing their resources and opportunities among their male and female populations, regardless of the overall levels of these resources and opportunities.

Source: Gender Gap Index, World Economic Forum. Year: 2007
Close
Freedom of the press
3
Freedom of the press
The index measures the state of press freedom in the world, reflecting the degree of freedom journalists and news organisations enjoy in each country, and the efforts made by the state to respect and ensure respect for this freedom

Source: Reporter Without Borders; Year: 2007-2008
Close
international openness

Exports + Imports % of GDP
139.4
Exports + Imports % of GDP
Source: EIU; Year: 2008
Close
Foreign Direct Investment (flow) % of GDP
14.5%
Foreign Direct Investment (flow) % of GDP
Source: EIU; Year: 2008
Close
Number of visitors as % of domestic population
66.1%
Number of visitors as % of domestic population
Arrivals data correspond to international visitors to the economic territory of the country and include both tourists and same-day non residents visitors.

Source: UNWTO Compendium of Tourism Statistics; Year: 2006
Close
Net Migration (% of total population)
1.7%
Net Migration (% of total population)
Net migration is the net average annual number of migrants during the period 1995-2000, that is the number of immigrants less the number of emigrants, including both citizen and non citizens.

Source: World Bank, World Development Indicators, data refers to 2000-2005; Year: 2007
Close
demographics

15-34 year old males as a % of total population
12.4%
15-34 year old males as a % of total population
Source: UN World Population Prospects; Year: 2008
Close
Gender ratio of population: women/men
0.96
Gender ratio of population: women/men
Ratio Women/Men.

Source: UN Statistics, Social Indicators; Year: 2008
Close
regional & international framework/conditions

The extent of regional integration
1
The extent of regional integration
Qualitative assessment of the level of membership of trade alliances, as NAFTA, ANSEAN, etc. Ranked 1-5 (Very low-very high) by EIU analysts.

Source: EIU Analysts; Year: 2008
Close
education

Current education spending (% of GDP)
6%
Current education spending (% of GDP)
Public spending on education, total (% of GDP)
Source: UNESCO; Year: 2005-2006, dependent on availability
Close
Primary school enrolment ratio (% Net)
97.6%
Primary school enrolment ratio (% Net)
Net enrollment ratio is the ratio of the number of children of official school age (as defined by the national education system) who are enrolled in school to the population of the corresponding official school age.

Source: World Bank, World Development Indicators; Year: 2005-2006 dependent on availability
Close
Secondary school enrolment ratio (% Net)
96.7%
Secondary school enrolment ratio (% Net)
Net enrollment ratio is the ratio of the number of children of official school age (as defined by the national education system) who are enrolled in school to the population of the corresponding official school age

Source: World Bank, World Development Indicators; Year: 2005-2006 dependent on availability
Close
Higher education enrolment (% Gross)
62.4%
Higher education enrolment (% Gross)
Gross enrollment ratio is the ratio of total enrollment, regardless of age, to the population of the age group that officially corresponds to the level of education shown.

Source: World Bank, World Development Indicators; Year: 2005-2006 dependent on availability
Close
Mean years of schooling
16
Mean years of schooling
School life expectancy (years), Primary to tertiary.

Source: UNESCO; Year: 2005 and earlier years depending on availability
Close
Adult literacy rate (% of pop over 15)
99%
Adult literacy rate (% of pop over 15)
Data refers to the UNESCO Institute for Statistics national literacy estimates from censuses or surveys.

Source: UNESCO, Year: 2007
Close
culture

Hostility to foreigners/private property
1
Hostility to foreigners/private property
Scored 0-4 by EIU analysts.

Source: EIU Risk Briefing; Year: 2008
Close
Importance of religion in national life
2
Importance of religion in national life
Qualitative assessment of the level of importance of religion in politics and social life. Ranked 1-5 (very low to very high) by EIU analysts.

Source: EIU Analysts; Year: 2008
Close
Willingness to fight
1
Willingness to fight
Qualitative assessment of the willingness of citizens to fight in wars. Ranked 1- 5 (very low to very high) by EIU analysts.

Source: EIU Analysts; Year: 2008
Close
material well-being

Nominal GDP (US$PPP bn)
388.381
Nominal GDP (US$PPP bn)
Nominal gross domestic product at 2008 US$ purchasing power parities.

Source: EIU; Year: 2008
Close
Nominal GDP (US$bn)
505.802
Nominal GDP (US$bn)
Nominal gross domestic product US$ market prices.

Source: EIU; Year: 2008
Close
GDP per capita
47670
GDP per capita
Nominal gross domestic product (US$) per capita.

Source: EIU; Year: 2008
Close
Gini-coefficient
33
Gini-coefficient
The Gini index measures the extent to which the distribution of income among individuals or households within an economy deviates from a perfectly equal distribution.

Source: UN Human Development Index 2007-2008 World Bank; EIU estimates; Year: Latest Available Year
Close
Unemployment %
7.1%
Unemployment %
ILO defines the unemployed as members of the economically active population who are without work but available for and seeking work, including people who have lost their jobs and those who have voluntary left work.

Source: EIU; Year: 2008
Close
Life expectancy
79.5
Life expectancy
Life expectancy at birth is the number of years a newborn infant would live if prevailing patterns of mortality at the time of its birth were to stay the same throughout its life.

Source: World Bank, World Development Indicators; Year: 2006
Close
Infant mortality per 1,000 live births
3.5
Infant mortality per 1,000 live births
Infant mortality rate is the number of infants dying before reaching one year of age, per 1,000 live births in a given year.

Source: World Bank, World Development Indicators; Year: 2008
Close