Illuminati fake? Read on !

[DonQuiSjot]

En jij dacht dat het allemaal maar een hersenspinsel was van een paar conspiracy fantasten:

This goes a lot deeper than some of you imagine.


Illuminati Online. An Austin, Texas web-server. The official server host of George Bush, Jr.'s first Presidential campain website. See:

http://web.archive.org/web/200008070...://www.io.com/

The below Wired article mentions Illuminati Online being the server host of George Bush, Jr.'s official Presidential campain website:

"George W. Bush the Red?," Declan McCullagh, Wired News, October 19, 1999 http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/1999/10/31986

Illuminati Online was owned by Steve Jackson of Steve Jackson Games at the time that it was the server host of George Bush, Jr.'s official Presidential campain website. Steve Jackson only recently sold Illuminati Online (soon after called Iocom) to PrismNet in September 2004. See:

"#25: What is Illuminati Online?" from "Steve Jackson Games: Frequently Asked Questions," Last updated December 21, 2004 http://www.sjgames.com/general/faq.html#25

"PrismNet buys IOCOM assets," American City Business Journals Inc., September 21, 2004 http://www.bizjournals.com/austin/st...0/daily12.html

The below cards are from the 1995 card game deck "Illuminati: New World Order" which is part of the "Illuminati" card game series by Steve Jackson Games (see http://www.sjgames.com/inwo ):

http://www.propagandamatrix.com/2212...inaticards.jpg

If you would like to confirm that the above cards actually come from the 1995 "Illuminati: New World Order" deck and not some new version, you can see a listing of the 1995 "Illuminati: New World Order" cards below:

http://www.sjgames.com/inwo/lists/il_html2.html

or:

http://web.archive.org/web/200103020..._cardlist.html

and:

http://www.crystalkeep.com/tcg/inwo/lists/list-inwo.txt

##########

Ever so interestingly, before the U.S. government's love affair with Steve Jackson's business ventures, the U.S. Secret Service raided the Austin, Texas headquarters of Steve Jackson Games on March 1, 1990:

"Steve Jackson Games, Inc. v. United States Secret Service," Wikipedia, September 8, 2007 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?...ldid=156516954

My thoughts on this seemingly unbelievable turn of events (i.e., Steve Jackson being raided by the U.S. Secret Service, and then Steve Jackson going to work in serving U.S. government interests, i.e., the Bushes--keep in mind that Steve Jackson's company was raided by the U.S. Secret Service [which is part of the Executive Branch under the U.S. President] during George Bush, Sr.'s term) is that the U.S. government pulled a "Bill Gates" on Steve Jackson.

Let me explain that. The actual reason the U.S. government went after Bill Gates is because he wasn't "playing the game" right. That is, his company, Microsoft, wasn't giving "contributions" (i.e., bribes) to influential politicians in near the amounts that other big businesses were. That was a nearly unforgivable affront and sin against the U.S. government. So the U.S. government proceeded to show Bill Gates what happens when you neglect your superiors (with, e.g., United States v. Microsoft, filed on May 18, 1998 by the United States Department of Justice [DOJ] and twenty U.S. states).

Since that time, Bill Gates's Microsoft has been a dutiful servant of the U.S. government, with such niceties as the _NSAKEY:

"How NSA access was built into Windows: Careless mistake reveals subversion of Windows by NSA," Duncan Campbell, September 4, 1999 http://www.heise.de/tp/r4/artikel/5/5263/1.html

"Transcript of Internet Caucus Panel Discussion. Re: Administration's new encryption policy.," Tech Law Journal, September 28, 1999 http://www.techlawjournal.com/cong10...8a.htm#weldon1

""
Rep. Curt Weldon: But the point is that when John Hamre briefed me, and gave me the three key points of this change, there are a lot of unanswered questions. He assured me that in discussions that he had had with people like Bill Gates and Gerstner from IBM that there would be, kind of a, I don't know whether it's a, unstated ability to get access to systems if we needed it. Now, I want to know if that is part of the policy, or is that just something that we are being assured of, that needs to be spoke. Because, if there is some kind of a tacit understanding, I would like to know what it is.
""

##########

The reason why the U.S. government would put out such imagery before the 9/11 attacks is to induce in the masses cognitive dissonance in order to drive them further into denial. It's basically a form of mind-rape whereby they break-down people's resistance to more tyrannical measures and make them unable to think for themselves based upon the gamble that most people won't face up to the disturbing truth and will instead choose to deny reality, thereby inducing in said masses a schizoid-type personality who will let their government masters do their thinking for them. We are now in a phase of psychological warfare upon the masses whereby the ruling elite reveal what they are doing to us but in an underhanded or duplicitous way; a phase which is absolutely necessary before they can take absolute control over society and reduce us to the level of cattle (i.e., in the move from covert tyranny to overt tyranny).

The U.S. government knew at least since 1995 of plans to hijack planes and fly them into buildings:

"U.S. warned in 1995 of plot to hijack planes, attack buildings," CNN, September 18, 2001 http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/1...nes/index.html

"'95 Philippine plot had echoes of September 11," CNN, March 14, 2002 http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/a...lot/index.html

Keep in mind that 1995 is the year that these cards were published. As well, the new 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 dollar bills, which chronologically (in order) show almost exactly how the twin towers would collapse and the the way the smoke would look when all of them are folded exactly the same way, were desinged after the Bojinka plot was known to the U.S. government:

"The New (1995) 5, 10, 20, 50 and 100 U.S. Dollar Bills Tell the Story of the 9/11 Attacks," PsyOp911 http://www.geocities.com/psyop911/ne...lar-bills.html

[parcifal]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door DonQuiSjot

En jij dacht dat het allemaal maar een hersenspinsel was van een paar conspiracy fantasten:

Dit is zo ontstellend zwak, zelfs voor DonkeySjot, bij wie de lat nog steeds lager ligt dan de meeste grassprietjes hoog zijn. En dan nog struikelen.

Komaan Don, je kan toch echt wel beter he?

[Cdude]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door parcifal

Dit is zo ontstellend zwak, zelfs voor DonkeySjot, bij wie de lat nog steeds lager ligt dan de meeste grassprietjes hoog zijn. En dan nog struikelen.

Komaan Don, je kan toch echt wel beter he?

Don Qui completely insane Zot?

http://www.geocities.com/psyop911/ne...lar-bills.html
Sorry, the GeoCities web site you were trying to reach is no longer available.

[DonQuiSjot]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door parcifal

Dit is zo ontstellend zwak, zelfs voor DonkeySjot, bij wie de lat nog steeds lager ligt dan de meeste grassprietjes hoog zijn. En dan nog struikelen.

Komaan Don, je kan toch echt wel beter he?

I take that as a compliment. Thx dude !
Ik hoef geen kudos van jouw soort...

[Dixie]

die fabeltjes blijven terugkomen over de Illuminati lachwekkend gewoon!

[Khwajagan]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Dixie

die fabeltjes blijven terugkomen over de Illuminati lachwekkend gewoon!

Heb je er eigenlijk ooit maar IETS van onderzocht? eerlijk zeggen!

[DonQuiSjot]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Dixie

die fabeltjes blijven terugkomen over de Illuminati lachwekkend gewoon!

Snuggere reactie nr 2

[Khwajagan]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door DonQuiSjot

Snuggere reactie nr 2

LOL

[Raven]

beetje te veel Dan Brown films gezien?

[Another Jack]

Wij bestaan wel degelijk.

[Dixie]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Another Jack

Wij bestaan wel degelijk.

schitterend!

[Dixie]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Khwajagan

Heb je er eigenlijk ooit maar IETS van onderzocht? eerlijk zeggen!

yep zoals jij 9/11 hebt onderzocht

[Another Jack]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Dixie

schitterend!

Wil jij ook lid worden?

[liberalist_NL]

Ik zou wel vrijmetselaar willen worden. Ben alleen nog niet gevraagd.

[Khwajagan]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door liberalist_NL

Ik zou wel vrijmetselaar willen worden. Ben alleen nog niet gevraagd.

waarom zou je dat in godsnaam willen?

[liberalist_NL]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Khwajagan

waarom zou je dat in godsnaam willen?

Politieke invloed, leuke tradities, lekker intellectueel.

[Khwajagan]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door liberalist_NL

Politieke invloed, leuke tradities, lekker intellectueel.

wel het is wel iets meer hoor, maar dan in erg negatieve zin, hoewel ik het dan over de hogere graden heb! Vanaf 32 33 is de laatst officiele maar daarboven loopt ie nog door tot boven de 40
en meen je nu echt wat je er over zegt?of loop je een beetje te stangen?

[liberalist_NL]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Khwajagan

wel het is wel iets meer hoor, maar dan in erg negatieve zin, hoewel ik het dan over de hogere graden heb! Vanaf 32 33 is de laatst officiele maar daarboven loopt ie nog door tot boven de 40
en meen je nu echt wat je er over zegt?of loop je een beetje te stangen?

Ik heb geen idee waar je het over hebt.

[Cdude]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door liberalist_NL

Politieke invloed, leuke tradities, lekker intellectueel.

Unlimited free sex , niet vergeten

[Khwajagan]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door liberalist_NL

Ik heb geen idee waar je het over hebt.

Houen zo dan en niet doen lijkt me oprecht het beste.