One-World Socialistische Globalisten smachten naar Absolute Werelddominatie

[zonbron]

In deze topic is alles in verband met de One-World Socialistische Globalisten, de VN, ziekelijke dictatortjes in spe en ander divers onkruid welke reeds lang smachten naar Absolute Werelddominatie van harte welkom.


We vliegen er keihard in met een email van Rand Paul...

[zonbron]

Rand Paul : De One-World socialistische Globalisten, zielige dictatortjes en de VN willen de macht in de ganse wereld grijpen

Dear fellow American,

If we’re going to defeat the UN Gun Ban, you and I have to turn the heat up now before it’s too late!

Please sign your Firearms Sovereignty Survey and put yourself squarely on the record AGAINST the UN Gun Ban.

For Freedom,

Rand Paul

U.S. Senator (R-KY)

Oproep tot verzet tegen het VN-verdrag inzake kleine vuurwapens

Senator Rand Paul, zoon van de welbekende moedige libertariër Ron Paul, roept de Amerikaanse burger mbv. een email op zich NU te verzetten tegen de 'gungrabbers' en het wereldwijde VN-verdrag inzake kleine vuurwapens, genaamd de VN-"Small Arms Treaty".

Rand Paul gaat verder; "de huidige president van de Verenigde Staten, Barack Obama, werkt samen met de anti-Amerikaanse globalisten om de Amerikaanse grondwet te vernietigen".

Nog schrijft hij :

"Ik ben er zeker van dat ik U niet hoef te vertellen dat dit een strijd is welke we niet mogen verliezen. Sinds de creatie van de Verenigde Naties, nu reeds 65 jaar geleden, hebben ze al het mogelijke gedaan om de Verenigde Staten op de knieën te krijgen.

Voor de zielige dictatortjes en One-World socialisten welke de Verenigde Naties besturen zijn de Verenigde Staten geen “shining city on a hill” (geen op te volgen voorbeeld voor de rest van de wereld) - integendeel, het is een belediging voor hun grootse plannen voor de wereldbol.

Deze anti-vuurwapen globalisten weten maar al te goed dat zolang de Amerikanen vrij hun eigen beslissingen kunnen nemen zonder dat 'big government', de superstaat bureaucraten, hun willetje kunnnen opdringen, dat ze NOOIT in staat zullen zijn de wereldwijde macht, waar ze naar snakken, te grijpen.

Deze VN-apologeten weten dan ook dat de meest effective manier om uiteindelijk U en mij AL onze vrijheden te ontnemen het VERNIETIGEN van ons recht op vuurwapens is.

Ik weet niet hoe het met U zit, maar het bekijken van deze anti-Amerikaanse samenzwering van de Globalisten tegen de grondwet maakt me ronduit ziek...


We mogen geen tijd meer verliezen. "



Hier kan U zelf de email van Rand Paul raadplegen :

<sub>Dear fellow Patriot,

Gun-grabbers around the globe believe they have it made.

You see, only hours after re-election, Barack Obama immediately made a move for gun control…

On November 7th, his administration gleefully voted at the UN for a renewed effort to pass the “Small Arms Treaty.”

But after the tragedy in Newtown, Connecticut — and anti-gun hysteria in the national media reaching a fever pitch — there’s no doubt President Obama and his anti-gun pals believe the timing has never been better to ram through the U.N.’s global gun control crown jewel.

I don’t know about you, but watching anti-American globalists plot against our Constitution makes me sick.

This Spring, the United Nations went back into session to finalize their radical so-called “Small Arms Treaty.”

With the treaty finalized, a full U.S. Senate ratification showdown could come any time President Obama chooses and there will be very little time to fight back.

If we’re to succeed, we must fight back now.

That’s why I’m helping lead the fight to defeat the UN “Small Arms Treaty” in the United States Senate.

And it’s why I need your help today.

Will you join me by taking a public stand against the UN “Small Arms Treaty” and sign the Official Firearms Sovereignty Survey right away?

Ultimately, UN bureaucrats will stop at nothing to register, ban and CONFISCATE firearms owned by private citizens like YOU.

So far, the gun-grabbers have successfully kept many of their schemes under wraps.

But looking at previous attempts by the UN to pass global gun control, you and I can get a good idea of what’s likely in the works.

You can bet the UN is working to FORCE the U.S. to implement every single one of these anti-gun policies:*** Enact tougher licensing requirements, making law-abiding Americans cut through even more bureaucratic red tape just to own a firearm legally;

*** CONFISCATE and DESTROY ALL “unauthorized” civilian firearms (all firearms owned by the government are excluded, of course);

*** BAN the trade, sale and private ownership of ALL semi-automatic weapons;

*** Create an INTERNATIONAL gun registry, setting the stage for full-scale gun CONFISCATION.

I’m sure I don’t have to tell you this is NOT a fight we can afford to lose.

Ever since its founding 65 years ago, the United Nations has been hell-bent on bringing the United States to its knees.

To the petty dictators and one-world socialists who control the UN, the United States of America isn’t a “shining city on a hill” — it’s an affront to their grand designs for the globe.

These anti-gun globalists know that as long as Americans remain free to make our own decisions without being bossed around by big government bureaucrats, they’ll NEVER be able to seize the worldwide power they crave.

And the UN’s apologists also know the most effective way to finally strip you and me of ALL our freedoms would be to DESTROY our gun rights.

That’s why I was so excited to see the National Association for Gun Rights leading the fight to stop the UN “Small Arms Treaty!”

Will you join them by going on record AGAINST global gun control and sign the Official Firearms Sovereignty Survey today?

The truth is there’s no time to waste.

You and I have to be prepared for this fight to move FAST.

The fact is the last thing the gun-grabbers at the UN and in Washington, D.C. want is for you and me to have time to mobilize gun owners to defeat this radical agenda.

They’ve made that mistake before, and we’ve made them pay, defeating EVERY attempt to ram the UN Small Arms Treaty into law since the mid-1990s.

But now time may not be on our side.

And worse… the UN Small Arms Treaty is no longer the only UN scheme threatening our gun rights.

More and more of the UN’s radical agenda is slipping through covertly, under the cover of domestic legislation.

Not long ago, Obama told Sarah Brady from the anti-gun Brady Campaign, “I just want you to know that we are working on [gun control]. We have to go through a few processes, but under the radar.”

In fact, Hillary Clinton’s State Department recently bragged that Project Gunrunner and Operation Fast and Furious are implementations of the UN’s anti-gun agenda!

And I’d place a wager that Obama’s M1 Rifle Re-importation Ban was also the UN’s agenda dutifully executed by his administration.

Anti-gun UN policy that NEVER received a single vote in the United States Congress!

The UN met recently to pass a final version of the “Small Arms Treaty” to be sent for ratification by the Senate.

So if you and I are going to defeat them, we have to turn the heat up on Washington now before it’s too late!

1. Do you believe the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the Second Amendment are the supreme law of the land?

2. Do you believe any attempt by the United Nations to subvert or supersede your Constitutional rights must be opposed?

If you said “Yes!” to these questions, please sign the survey the National Association for Gun Rights has prepared for you.

But I hope you’ll do more than just sign your survey today.

With your help, the National Association for Gun Rights will continue to turn up the heat on targeted Senators who are working to implement the UN “Small Arms Treaty.”

Direct mail. Phones. E-mail. Blogs. Guest editorials. Press conferences. Hard-hitting internet, newspaper, radio and even TV ads if funding permits. The whole nine yards.

Of course, a program of this scale is only possible if the National Association for Gun Rights can raise the money.

But that’s not easy, and we may not have much time.

In fact, if gun owners are going to defeat the UN’s schemes, pro-gun Americans like you and me have to get involved NOW!

So please put yourself on record AGAINST the UN Gun Ban by signing NAGR’s Firearms Sovereignty Survey.

But along with your survey, please agree to make a generous contribution of $250, $100, $50 or even just $35.

And every dollar counts in this fight so even if you can only chip in $10 or $20, it will make a difference.

Thank you in advance for your time and money devoted to defending our Second Amendment rights.

For Freedom,

Rand Paul
United States Senator
P.S. Only hours after re-election Barack Obama immediately made a move for gun control…

On November 7th, his administration gleefully voted at the UN for a renewed effort to pass the “Small Arms Treaty.”

What’s worse, the UN met in March to pass the final version of the treaty that will be sent to the Senate for ratification.

If we’re going to defeat the UN “Small Arms Treaty,” gun owners have to turn the heat up now before it’s too late!

Please return your Firearms Sovereignty Survey and put yourself squarely on the record AGAINST the UN “Small Arms Treaty.”

And if you can, please make a generous contribution to the National Association for Gun Rights of $250, $150, $100 or even just $35 right away!

And every dollar counts in this fight so even if you can only chip in $10 or $20, it will make a difference.</sub>

Bron :

Washington Post - Rand Paul: Obama is working with ‘anti-American globalists plot[ting] against our Constitution.’
11 mei 2013

En natuurlijk was de 'enige inhoudelijke' commentaar van de reguliere media opnieuw zeer 'verrijkend' :

By the way: This treaty, at least as described here, is total fantasy. The hoax-busters at Snopes.com will catch you up, and just for good measure, PolitiFact gave similar claims the old pants-on-fire. This is black helicopter stuff from Paul.

Zoals steeds, de MSM zum kotzen...

[zonbron]

Wie is er zoals tegen vrij wapenbezit aka 2nd amendment van de Amerikaanse grondwet?


Bvb. de zionistische idioot Bill Maher : "Het 2de amendement is stierenstront!"

Real Clear Politics - Video - Bill Maher: "The Second Amendment Is Bullshit"


Bill Maher, de niet zo Amerikaanse noch patriotische handige tool van de globalisten en hun MSM.

[quercus]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door zonbron

Wie is er zoals tegen vrij wapenbezit aka 2nd amendment van de Amerikaanse grondwet?


Bvb. de zionistische idioot Bill Maher : "Het 2de amendement is stierenstront!"

Real Clear Politics - Video - Bill Maher: "The Second Amendment Is Bullshit"


Bill Maher, de niet zo Amerikaanse noch patriotische handige tool van de globalisten en hun MSM.

Begrijp ik u goed? U bent vóór vrij wapenbezit?

[zonbron]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door quercus

Begrijp ik u goed? U bent vóór vrij wapenbezit?

Ik ben inderdaad 100% pro-2nd amendment en vrij wapenbezit, mijn standpunt is zeer liberaal op dat gebied.

Begrijp ik het goed, meent U dat ik daarmee een misdaad bega?

[Sjaax]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door zonbron

Ik ben inderdaad 100% pro-2nd amendment en vrij wapenbezit, mijn standpunt is zeer liberaal op dat gebied.

Begrijp ik het goed, meent U dat ik daarmee een misdaad bega?

Zolang u de wapens niet gebruikt, begaat u geen misdaad. Anderen gebruikten de wapens wel om ernstige misdaden te plegen.

[zonbron]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Sjaax

Zolang u de wapens niet gebruikt, begaat u geen misdaad. Anderen gebruikten de wapens wel om ernstige misdaden te plegen.

Dus bega ik een misdaad indien ik een inbreker in mijn woning neerschiet uit zelfverdediging? Begrijp ik dat goed?

[zonbron]

Rand Paul : De One-World socialistische Globalisten, zielige dictatortjes en de VN willen de macht in de ganse wereld grijpen

Rand Paul : "To the petty dictators and one-world socialists who control the UN, the United States of America isn’t a “shining city on a hill” — it’s an affront to their grand designs for the globe."

HUMANUM GENUS
ENCYCLICAL OF POPE LEO XIII ON FREEMASONRY - April 20, 1884

8. For these reasons We no sooner came to the helm of the Church than We clearly saw and felt it to be Our duty to use Our authority to the very utmost against so vast an evil. We have several times already, as occasion served, attacked certain chief points of teaching which showed in a special manner the perverse influence of Masonic opinions. Thus, in Our encyclical letter, Quod Apostolici Muneris, We endeavoured to refute the monstrous doctrines of the socialists and communists;

With the greatest unanimity the sect of the Freemasons also endeavours to take to itself the education of youth. They think that they can easily mold to their opinions that soft and pliant age, and bend it whither they will; and that nothing can be more fitted than this to enable them to bring up the youth of the State after their own plan....

23. That these doctrines are equally acceptable to the Freemasons, and that they would wish to constitute States according to this example and model, is too well known to require proof. For some time past they have openly endeavoured to bring this about with all their strength and resources; and in this they prepare the way for not a few bolder men who are hurrying on even to worse things, in their endeavor to obtain equality and community of all goods by the destruction of every distinction of rank and property.

27. Now, from the disturbing errors which We have described the greatest dangers to States are to be feared. For, the fear of God and reverence for divine laws being taken away, the authority of rulers despised, sedition permitted and approved, and the popular passions urged on to lawlessness, with no restraint save that of punishment, a change and overthrow of all things will necessarily follow. Yea, this change and overthrow is deliberately planned and put forward by many associations of communists and socialists; and to their undertakings the sect of Freemasons is not hostile, but greatly favours their designs, and holds in common with them their chief opinions. And if these men do not at once and everywhere endeavour to carry out their extreme views, it is not to be attributed to their teaching and their will, but to the virtue of that divine religion which cannot be destroyed; and also because the sounder part of men, refusing to be enslaved to secret societies, vigorously resist their insane attempts.

8. For these reasons We no sooner came to the helm of the Church than We clearly saw and felt it to be Our duty to use Our authority to the very utmost against so vast an evil. We have several times already, as occasion served, attacked certain chief points of teaching which showed in a special manner the perverse influence of Masonic opinions. Thus, in Our encyclical letter, Quod Apostolici Muneris, We endeavoured to refute the monstrous doctrines of the socialists and communists;

With the greatest unanimity the sect of the Freemasons also endeavours to take to itself the education of youth. They think that they can easily mold to their opinions that soft and pliant age, and bend it whither they will; and that nothing can be more fitted than this to enable them to bring up the youth of the State after their own plan....

23. That these doctrines are equally acceptable to the Freemasons, and that they would wish to constitute States according to this example and model, is too well known to require proof. For some time past they have openly endeavoured to bring this about with all their strength and resources; and in this they prepare the way for not a few bolder men who are hurrying on even to worse things, in their endeavor to obtain equality and community of all goods by the destruction of every distinction of rank and property.

27. Now, from the disturbing errors which We have described the greatest dangers to States are to be feared. For, the fear of God and reverence for divine laws being taken away, the authority of rulers despised, sedition permitted and approved, and the popular passions urged on to lawlessness, with no restraint save that of punishment, a change and overthrow of all things will necessarily follow. Yea, this change and overthrow is deliberately planned and put forward by many associations of communists and socialists; and to their undertakings the sect of Freemasons is not hostile, but greatly favours their designs, and holds in common with them their chief opinions. And if these men do not at once and everywhere endeavour to carry out their extreme views, it is not to be attributed to their teaching and their will, but to the virtue of that divine religion which cannot be destroyed; and also because the sounder part of men, refusing to be enslaved to secret societies, vigorously resist their insane attempts.

[Sjaax]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door zonbron

Dus bega ik een misdaad indien ik een inbreker in mijn woning neerschiet uit zelfverdediging? Begrijp ik dat goed?

Op hoeveel inbrekers wordt geschoten? Voor die doodenkele keer dat het gebeurt, moeten kinderen in scholen vrezen dat er een of andere gek ze komt afknallen?

[D'ARTOIS]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Sjaax

Op hoeveel inbrekers wordt geschoten? Voor die doodenkele keer dat het gebeurt, moeten kinderen in scholen vrezen dat er een of andere gek ze komt afknallen?

Op hoeveel? Wou je ze nog gaan tellen?

[zonbron]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Sjaax

Op hoeveel inbrekers wordt geschoten? Voor die doodenkele keer dat het gebeurt, moeten kinderen in scholen vrezen dat er een of andere gek ze komt afknallen?

Als het niet veel voorvalt, dan zal dat wegens het vuurwapenbezit zijn, zoals de statistieken aanduiden.

Maar ik ben het wel eens met U hoor, die drones moeten dringend internationaal verboden worden. Al die onschuldige kinderen en hun naasten op begravenissen, trouwfeesten... families en familiegedoe enzo... als een dief in de nacht slaan ze toe.

[Bolleke Wol]

Socialistische?

[zonbron]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Bolleke Wol

Socialistische?

@Bolleke Wol, een paper ivm globaal neo-liberaal kapitalisme en socialisme

Socialism and Global Neoliberal Capitalism
by David M. Kotz
Economics Department and Politic
al Economy Research Institute
Thompson Hall
University of Massachusetts
Amherst, MA 01003
U.S.A.
Telephone 413-545-0739
Fax 413-545-2921
E-mail [email protected]
March, 2003
This paper was written for the International
Conference: The Works of Karl Marx and
Challenges for the XXI Century, Havana, Cuba, May 5-8, 2003.

The theory of socialism and the socialist movement in Marx’s time arose in the context of nineteenth century capitalism. Since that time capitalism has evolved, through a series of stages, of which the latest is the global neoliberal order whose construction began some twenty-five years ago. The theory and practice of socialism have also evolved since Marx wrote, as the first attempts to build socialist systems rose and then ebbed over the past century. The development of socialist theory and the socialist movement in the twenty-first century must take account both of the lessons of the past century of socialist experience and the character of contemporary global neoliberal capitalism. This paper will propose a vision of socialism that draws on the lessons from past socialist experience. It also examines some features of global neoliberal capitalism. Finally, it considers the requirements for the emergence of a new, powerful socialist movement in opposition to contemporary global neoliberal capitalism, including the role of a vision of socialism in the emergence of a new socialist movement.

...

The Global Neoliberal Order

Capitalism today has predominantly assumed the form of global neoliberalism. This form of capitalism differs in various ways from the regulated, welfare-state capitalism of the post-World War II decades.
The main features of the global neoliberal order include the following: 1)a high degree of global economic integration including in trade, production, and finance; 2) deregulation and privatization of large transnational corporations andbanks; 3) strengthened enforcement of the “rights” of large transnational corporations and banks, such as in the area of so-called “intellectual property rights”; 4) reductions in, or elimination of, state social programs that benefit the working class and other popular groups. A set of international institutions administers the global neoliberal order, particularly the IMF, the World Bank, and the WTO. The US and British governments have been the main promoters and designers of the global neoliberal order. The US Government acts as the supreme enforcer of the new order, based on its overwhelming military power. While some states have been reluctant to fully adopt the neoliberal model, the US and the international economic institutions exert relentless pressure on such holdouts to conform to the requirements of this system. In contrast to the earlier system of regulated, welfare-state capitalism, the current global neoliberal order has offered little in the way of benefits for the working class or other non-privileged sectors. On the contrary, ordinary people have experienced worsening conditions in practically every aspect of their lives. These include the following: 1. Growing inequality within countries, with a small minority of the rich becoming rapidly richer while middle layers barely maintain their living standard and the majority experience a decline in living standard. 2. Growing inequality between countries, with a significant number of countries experiencing gradual or rapid economic decline. 3. Increasing insecurity among workers, small farmers, and small business. 4. Increasing instability in the economic and financial system. 5. Growing penetration of commercial values in every sphere of society. 6. Increasing direct and indirect domination by transnational corporations and wealthy individuals over states. 7. Mounting threats to the environmental sustainability of the economy and human society. 8. An increasingly open policy of aggressive imperialism by the leading capitalist powers, specifically the US and Britain, with the likelihood of increasing armed conflict in the world. The global neoliberal order has not just brought worsening conditions for ordinary people. It has also systematically disempowered them. Capitalism in every stage grants the major power in society to the capitalist class and its representatives. However, popular groups have historically fought for and exercised some power, though trade unions, political parties, representatives in national and local governments, and various non-governmental organizations. Neoliberalism tends to weaken and marginalize all of the institutions through which popular groups have previously had some voice, concentrating power in the giant transnational corporations and banks and the international institutions which represent them. The unfavorable conditions faced by ordinary people under global neoliberal capitalism highlight the growing gap between the advanced level of technological development that has been attained and the inability of the system to satisfy individual and collective human needs. This system is remarkably difficult to promote to a general audience, which explains the typical claim that neoliberal transformation, although painful, is “necessary” or “inevitable” or “unavoidable.” What this means is that any alternative economic relations will be destroyed by neoliberal forms on the battlefield of competition, or if necessary, be removed by military force. 4 The unfavorable conditions for ordinary people, and the loss of power which they have experienced, have given rise to opposition movements throughout the world.


...

Most people will not easily pass beyond the fight for social reform to adopt a position in favor of the radical step of replacing capitalism entirely. After all, a fundamental social transformation inevitably entails high costs and many sacrifices. Masses of people will consider such change only if they become convinced that the existing system cannot be reformed so as to make it tolerable. There is no way to be certain that capitalism, if confronted with growing socialist movement, will not switch over to a more benign, regulated form once again. However, it appears to be a feature of global neoliberal capitalism that it doggedly resists any effort to soften or modify its hard edges. The tenacity and determination of the current rulers of world capitalism in their effort to impose the inhuman global neoliberal form of capitalism on the world may turn out to be their undoing. If the resistance to reform on the part of global neoliberal capitalism persists, Karl Marx’s vision of a socialist future for humankind may again be placed on the world’s political agenda.

Dat laatste zien we dan ook gebeuren. Neo-liberalisme maakt duidelijk een weg open naar globaal socialisme, communisme en Marxisme. Denkt U dat onze rode neo-liberalen dat niet weten? U onderschat deze rakkers. Kijk maar eens naar Soros, Buffett etc..., ze wachten gewoonweg op de volgende logische stap. Spread the wealth... Denkt U grote organisaties zoals het IMF, de wereldbank, zelfs de VN ect... daar niet op voorbereid zijn?

Het inhumane globale neoliberaal kapitalisme kan uiteindelijk vervangen worden door het inhumane globale socialisme, daar zien we reeds de eerste verschijnselen van. Ik kan mij niet van de indruk ontdoen dat deze zogenaamde neoliberalen en bepaalde socialisten in het Westen hand in hand gaan. In Zuid-Amerika is dat bvb. lang niet zo duidelijk, maar in de VS & Europa wel.

Denkt U dat de huidige machtsgroepen hun macht zullen opgeven vanwege deze transformatie welke in mijn ogen reeds zichtbaar is. NEE. Ze zijn daar klaar voor. In mijn ogen is het globaal neo-liberaal kapitalisme simpelweg een nodige stap naar het globaal socialisme. Denkt U daar maar eens over na, dat klinkt mss eigenaardig maar hoeft toch niet per se onmogelijk te zijn? Vergeet niet, ik bekijk al deze zaken als een libertair.


Just my 2cents @Bolleke Wol, wat is Uw standpunt?


Ik geef nog even de bron : http://people.umass.edu/dmkotz/Soc_a...Kism_03_03.pdf

[Buitenwipper]

De wereld gaat smeken naar een nieuw rechtvaardig systeem.

Ik zie communisme overal gepromoot worden. En er word veel geld tegenaan gesmeten.

Soros en Occupy Wallstreet bvb.

[Bolleke Wol]

If the resistance to reform on the part of global neoliberal capitalism persists, Karl Marx’s vision of a socialist future for humankind may again be placed on the world’s political agenda.

Jij hebt daar een rare interpretatie van. Ik lees hier vooral in dat de wereld uiteindelijk in opstand zal komen tegen de globalistische neoliberale imperialisten. En terecht.

[Bolleke Wol]

Ik zie vooral een complot van libertaire maffioso. Met hun neoliberaal beleid en hun rechtse Thatcheriaanse propaganda proberen ze de mensen te doen geloven dat collectief handelen de bron van alle ellende is. Zodat libertairen vrij spel krijgen om alle sociale structuren af te breken. Teneinde hun libertair utopia naar Somalisch model te kunnen opdringen.

[D'ARTOIS]

Soros is een pure pragmaticus en opportunist.

Die zegt (en kan zeggen) wat hem al zo uitkomt. Uiteraard volgt hij z'n eigen richting en dat is idem plus ster voor Warren Buffett.
Beiden hebben de transparantie van de pantsergordel van een slagkruiser dus wat zij beweren en zeggen te doen zal met zekerheid niet de werkelijkheid zijn.

Wat we nu mondiaal zien voltrekken is de kartelvorming en monopolisatie van een aantal groepen die internationale belangen als olievlekken opkopen en verspreiden.

Hoe schrijnend dat kan werken laat een simpele zaak als Nutricia zien. Niks EU wetgeving niks regulering - Nutricia (haar agenten) krijgen 5 x meer voor de hoge kwaliteit baby melkpoeder in groeigebieden als China, Taiwan en andere Aziatische landen waar de levenstandaard stelselmatig stijgt en men geld heeft voor kwalitatief goede voeding.

Aangezien ze een beperkte productiecapaciteit hebben met een zeer hoge kwaliteitscontrole leidt dat tot tekorten in de thuismarkt van het product.
Simpel voorbeeld. Niet van de laatste jaren maar van de laatste 30 jaar. Want 30 jaar geleden had Nutricia al een hoog exportvolume naar Taiwan en Hong Kong.

Andere kartels zijn die van koffie en cacao en uiteraard die van de fossilele brandstoffen.
De oliemaatschappijen bezitten gezamenlijk 80% van de wereld steenkoolproductie.
Dat is nog maar het microtopje van de economische ijsberg.

Globalisatie is niet de verdeling van welvaart maar van het samenklonteren der economische machten in een paar handen.

[zonbron]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Buitenwipper

De wereld gaat smeken naar een nieuw rechtvaardig systeem.

Ik zie communisme overal gepromoot worden. En er word veel geld tegenaan gesmeten.

Soros en Occupy Wallstreet bvb.

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door D'ARTOIS

Soros is een pure pragmaticus en opportunist.

Die zegt (en kan zeggen) wat hem al zo uitkomt. Uiteraard volgt hij z'n eigen richting en dat is idem plus ster voor Warren Buffett.
Beiden hebben de transparantie van de pantsergordel van een slagkruiser dus wat zij beweren en zeggen te doen zal met zekerheid niet de werkelijkheid zijn.

Wat we nu mondiaal zien voltrekken is de kartelvorming en monopolisatie van een aantal groepen die internationale belangen als olievlekken opkopen en verspreiden.

...


Globalisatie is niet de verdeling van welvaart maar van het samenklonteren der economische machten in een paar handen.

Inderdaad.


Global Research - The Anti-Globalization Movement and the World Social Forum. Is “Another World” Possible?
15 mei 2013

The World Social Forum operating under the banner of “Another World is Possible” was founded in 2001 at its inaugural venue of Porto Alegre. Brazil.

From the outset in 2001, the WSF has been upheld as an international umbrella representing grassroots people’s organizations, committed to reversing the tide of globalization. Its stated intent is to challenge corporate capitalism and its dominant neoliberal economic agenda.

The World Social Forum at its inaugural meeting defined itself as a counter-offensive to the World Economic Forum (WEF) of business leaders and politicians which meets annually in Davos, Switzerland. The 2001 Porto Alegre WSF was held simultaneously with that of the WEF in Davos.

Yet upon careful review, the WSF –rather than effectively confronting the economic and financial elites– actually serves their interests.

From the outset in 2001, the World Social Forum was funded by governments and corporate foundations, including the Ford Foundation which has ties to US intelligence.

The anti-globalization movement is opposed to Wall Street and the Texas oil giants controlled by Rockefeller, et al. Yet the foundations and charities of Ford, Rockefeller et al will generously fund progressive anti-capitalist networks as well as environmentalists (opposed to Wall Street and Big Oil) with a view to ultimately overseeing and shaping their various activities.

The mechanisms of “manufacturing dissent” require a manipulative environment, a process of arm-twisting and subtle co-optation of a small number of key individuals within “progressive organizations”, including anti-war coalitions, environmentalists and the anti-globalization movement. Many leaders of these organizations have in a sense betrayed their grassroots.

...

[driewerf]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door zonbron

Dat laatste zien we dan ook gebeuren. Neo-liberalisme maakt duidelijk een weg open naar globaal socialisme, communisme en Marxisme. Denkt U dat onze rode neo-liberalen dat niet weten? U onderschat deze rakkers. Kijk maar eens naar Soros, Buffett etc..., ze wachten gewoonweg op de volgende logische stap. Spread the wealth...

Dus George Soros gaat de welvaart spreiden door die eerst uiterst efficient bij zichzelf op te stapelen...

[zonbron]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door driewerf

Dus George Soros gaat de welvaart spreiden door die eerst uiterst efficient bij zichzelf op te stapelen...

Inderdaad, dat is dan ook zijn hobby. En welvaart verspreiden = alles eerlijk verdelen, iedereen evenveel, nl. 0,0 , lekker afhankelijk van hun 'welvaartstaat'.