Takkewijf Clinton had Taiwan aan China verkocht

[Frankenstein]

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails...EhAHiAIYANlAOG

uit Wikileaks:

INTERESTING ARTICLE


From: Hillary Clinton
To: Jake Sullivan
Date: 2011-11-11 11:46
Subject: INTERESTING ARTICLE





UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05787353 Date: 10/30/2015

RELEASE IN FULL

From: H <[email protected]>

Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 6:46 PM
To: '[email protected]'

Subject: Re: Interesting article


I saw it and thought it was so clever. Let's discuss.

Also, we only have 15 minutes left in here.

Original Message ---

From: Sullivan, Jacob J [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 06:19 PM .

To: H
Subject: Interesting article


For your reading pleasure while you endure open governance and try to steal glances at your blackberry:

OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR

To Save Our Economy, Ditch Taiwan

By PAUL V. KANE

Published: November 11, 2011

Washington

WITH a single bold act, President Obama could correct the country's course, help assure his re-election, and preserve
our children's future.

He needs to redefine America's mindset about national security away from the old defense mentality that American

power derives predominantly from our military might, rather than from the strength, agility and competitiveness of our
economy. He should make it clear that today American jobs and wealth matter more than military prowess.

As Adm. Mike Mullen, then chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, declared last year, "The most significant threat to our

national security is our debt."

There are dozens of initiatives President Obama could undertake to strengthen our economic security. Here is one: He
should enter into closed-door negotiations with Chinese leaders to write off the $1.14 trillion of American debt currently

held by China in exchange for a deal to end American military assistance and arms sales to Taiwan and terminate the
current United States-Taiwan defense arrangement by 2015.

This would be a most precious prize to the cautious men in Beijing, one they would give dearly to achieve. After all, our

relationship with Taiwan, as revised in 1979, is a vestige of the cold war.

Today, America has little strategic interest in Taiwan, which is gradually integrating with China economically by investing
in and forming joint ventures with mainland Chinese firms. The island's absorption into mainland China is inevitable.

UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05787353 Date: 10/30/2015

But the status quo is dangerous; if Taiwanese nationalist politicians decided to declare independence or if Beijing's

hawks tired of waiting for integration and moved to take Taiwan by force, America could suddenly be drawn into a
multitrillion-dollar war.

There will be "China hawks" who denounce any deal on Taiwan as American capitulation, but their fear of a Red China

menacing Asia is anachronistic. Portraying the United States as a democratic Athens threatened by China's autocratic
Sparta makes for sensational imagery, but nothing could be further from reality.

The battle today is between competing balance sheets, and it is fought in board rooms; it is not a geopolitical struggle to
militarily or ideologically "dominate" the Pacific.

In fact, China and the United States have interlocking economic interests. China's greatest military asset is actually the

United States Navy, which keeps the sea lanes safe for China's resources and products to flow freely.

China would want a deal on Taiwan for several reasons. First, Taiwan is Beijing's unspoken but hard-to-hide top priority
for symbolic and strategic reasons; only access to water and energy mean more to Chinese leaders.

Second, a deal would open a clearer path for the gradual, orderly integration of Taiwan into China.

Third, it would undermine hard-line militarists who use the Taiwan issue to stoke nationalist flames, sideline pro-

Western technocrats and extract larger military budgets. And finally, it would save China the considerable sums it has
been spending on a vast military buildup.

Jeffrey Lewis, an East Asia expert at the Monterey Institute of International Studies, estimated that one-fourth to one-

third of China's defense spending goes to forces in the vicinity of Taiwan - at a cost of $30 billion to $50 billion a year. A
deal for the resolution of Taiwan's status could save China $500 billion in defense spending by 2020 and allow Beijing to

break even by 2030, while reducing America's debt and serving our broader economic interests.

The Chinese leadership would be startled - for a change - if the United States were to adopt such a savvy negotiating
posture. Beyond reducing our debt, a Taiwan deal could pressure Beijing to end its political and economic support for

pariah states like Iran, North Korea and Syria and to exert a moderating influence over an unstable Pakistan. It would be
a game changer.

The deal would eliminate almost 10 percent of our national debt without raising taxes or cutting spending; it would

redirect American foreign policy away from dated cold-war-era entanglements and toward our contemporary economic
and strategic interests; and it would eliminate the risk of involvement in a costly war with China.

Critics will call this proposal impractical, even absurd. They will say it doesn't have a prayer of passing Congress, and

doesn't acknowledge political realities. They might be right - today.

But by pursuing this agenda, Mr. Obama would change the calculus and political reality. And Congress should see a deal
with China as an opportunity to make itself credible again.

Debt is not in itself bad, when managed, but today's unsustainable debt will suffocate our economy,,our democracy and

our children's futures.

By tackling the issue of Taiwan, Mr. Obama could address much of what ails him today, sending a message of bold
foreign policy thinking and fiscal responsibility that would benefit every citizen and be understood by every voter.

Paul V. Kane, a former international security fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School, is a Marine who served in Iraq.

[Frankenstein]

Titel weliswaar ongepast.

Het zegt wel alles dat Clinton handjeklap wil spelen voor de belangen van de VS.

De vluchtelingencrisis in Europa kan dus ook een handjeklap politiek zijn geweest ter faveure VS..

[morte-vivante]

interessante piste

[Nr.10]

Takkenwijf dacht ik eerst. Omdat het meervoud van tak met een -n achteraan geschreven wordt. Maar het is toch correct geschreven. Takkewijf. Takkenbos is wel met een -n ertussen.

[Sukkelaar]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Nr.10

Takkenwijf dacht ik eerst. Omdat het meervoud van tak met een -n achteraan geschreven wordt. Maar het is toch correct geschreven. Takkewijf. Takkenbos is wel met een -n ertussen.

Wat is een takkewijf?