Franstalige provocatie gaat verder

garfield · 15 november 2007, 15:19

Op de site van hln verscheen volgend artikel

Citaat:

UF gaat Franstalige motie lezen op gemeenteraad DrogenbosTijdens de zitting van de gemeenteraad in Drogenbos van vanavond zullen de leden van de Franstalige lijst Union des Francophones (UF) een motie in het Frans voorlezen. Dat kondigt het FDF aan. In die motie zullen de raadsleden verwijzen naar een arrest van het Grondwettelijk Hof van 10 maart 1998 dat hen zou toelaten Frans te spreken tijdens gemeenteraden in de faciliteitengemeenten.

Het initiatief volgt daags na de beslissing van minister van Binnenlands Bestuur Marino Keulen (Open Vld) om drie Franstalige FDF-burgemeesters niet te benoemen in de faciliteitengemeenten Wezembeek-Oppem, Linkebeek en Kraainem. Volgens de woordvoerder van het FDF was de actie echter al langer gepland

Met deze provocatie bewijst het FDF nogmaals dat de grondwet en de regels van dit land voor hun onbelangrijk zijn.
Waarom roept de MR en Reynders dit zooitje ongeregeld niet tot de orde.
Eerst slaan en dan staan roepen als Minister Keulen een gepaste sanctie neemt.
Als aanhanger van de oppositie in het Vlaams parlement steun ik elke sanctie tegen dit zooitje ongeregeld.

Jan van den Berghe · 15 november 2007, 16:31

Citaat:

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door garfield

Met deze provocatie bewijst het FDF nogmaals dat de grondwet en de regels van dit land voor hun onbelangrijk zijn.
Waarom roept de MR en Reynders dit zooitje ongeregeld niet tot de orde.
Eerst slaan en dan staan roepen als Minister Keulen een gepaste sanctie neemt.
Als aanhanger van de oppositie in het Vlaams parlement steun ik elke sanctie tegen dit zooitje ongeregeld.

Dat ze maar amok maken... Geen betere zaak om de ogen van nog zovele slapende Vlamingen wakker te maken!

Ovidius · 15 november 2007, 16:51

Citaat:

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Jan van den Berghe

Dat ze maar amok maken... Geen betere zaak om de ogen van nog zovele slapende Vlamingen wakker te maken!

Springprocessie van Echternach

Online · 16 november 2007, 20:10

Belgium divided as Flanders pushes for a messy divorce

[FONT=Geneva,Arial,sans-serif][SIZE=2]Alex Duval Smith in Rhode Saint Genese, Flanders
Sunday September 16, 2007
The Observer

[/SIZE][/FONT]The mayor is a little uncomfortable. 'Could we go somewhere more private to talk?' begs Myriam Delacroix-Rolin. 'This cafe is Flemish-owned. These days things have become so sensitive. I should not be heard speaking French in there.'
On Tuesday, Belgium marks its first 100 days without a government. There is every reason to believe that the Belgians, and the rest of us, will have to get used to it. The questions now are how will the divorce of Flanders and Wallonia be consummated, and what will become of Brussels, home to the EU and Nato? More worryingly, the demise of Belgium - a sticking plaster over the faultline between Europe's Protestant north and Catholic south - could make Europe a more dangerous place.
'Flanders has systematically organised its independence over 35 years,' said Delacroix-Rolin, a French-speaker fighting to save her village of Rhode Saint Genese, nine miles south of Brussels, from becoming Flemish. 'If they succeed here, they will move on to Brussels. We're like the moat around the castle.'

French-speaking Brussels - whose cultural and linguistic affinity is with Wallonia to the south - sits like an island in Flemish-speaking Flanders. So do the 18,000 souls of Rhode. Delacroix-Rolin said of the French-speaking half of her village: 'We are bilingual

, and that is our right. No one held a referendum to ask whether we wanted to be part of Flanders. We just woke up one day [in 1962] and the linguistic frontier had been drawn south of us.'
In the 45 years since, Belgium as a state, steered by the economically and numerically superior Flemish, has effectively devolved itself out of existence. 'Now Flanders with six million people makes the rules and four million French-speakers adapt,'

said Delacroix-Rolin, who is banned from speaking French at council meetings or official functions. 'They are very clever. My council does not use language criteria to allocate housing, but the region does. In this way Flanders is ensuring that more Flemish-speakers settle in my municipality. The region also imposes a language test on teachers seeking to work here or parents wishing to adopt children. One way or another, your route is barred unless you have Dutch language diplomas.'
It used to be the opposite. During centuries of Walloon prosperity - including 200 years as Europe's most productive mining and steel basin - the Flemish were looked down on and their language banned. Recently they have gained the economic upper hand, and now see post-industrial Wallonia as a costly passenger. This centuries-old distrust is at the heart of the crisis that has seen the Flemish Christian Democrat, Yves Leterme, fail to form a government since the 10 June elections. The constitution demands a coalition, but French-speaking politicians are refusing to join in his plans to dismantle Belgium. Among Leterme's allies, Flemish nationalist Bart de Wever denies that Wallonia will be cast adrift. 'You can co-operate better as good neighbours than as an unhappily married couple. I'm not a Flemish Milosevic.'
He adds that an independent Flanders would want Brussels as its capital. 'Ten years ago Belgium had its football team, its monarchy, the Belgian franc and Brussels. Now it only has Brussels. For us, it's just the last obstacle.' Increasingly, Flemish politicians speak of the 'Czechoslovakia option' and point to the fact that the 'velvet' break-up in 1993 was a success for both sides. But economically it is hard to imagine what the wastelands of Wallonia would stand to gain. An opinion poll last month found 45 per cent of Flemish people in favour of the disintegration of Belgium against 20 per cent of Walloons.
Most observers believe the break-up is just a matter of time; Flemish nationalist support will grow every time there is a local or national election. But nothing will happen without the EU, to which an independent Flanders, with Brussels as its capital, would have to apply for membership. To Delacroix-Rolin, the options on the table amount to real threats to her identity and that of her villagers. 'Rhode is like a frontline state. We're in a battle for survival.'
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/world...170156,00.html

Een staaltje Franstalige demagogie ...

Alvader · 16 november 2007, 20:35

Ik ben nu geen fan van Mia Doornaert maar vandaag in de sTandaard haalt ze hard uit naar de Franstalige politici die net als in dit artikel steeds van Brussel HUN Franstalige stad maken. Brussel is de hoofdstad van België, is dus tweetalig en zowel van Walen als Vlamingen.

16 november 2007, 20:35	#5
Alvader Staatssecretaris Geregistreerd: 30 mei 2003 Berichten: 2.694	Ik ben nu geen fan van Mia Doornaert maar vandaag in de sTandaard haalt ze hard uit naar de Franstalige politici die net als in dit artikel steeds van Brussel HUN Franstalige stad maken. Brussel is de hoofdstad van België, is dus tweetalig en zowel van Walen als Vlamingen. __________________ Geef toe dat het toch wel vreemd is dat er een éénmalige som van 10 miljard volstaat om de gevolgen van een uitzonderlijk zware natuurramp te verhelpen, terwijl met een jarenlange donatie van dezelfde som, nog geen bal vooruitgegaan werd geboekt in een streekje dat, vergeleken bij de rampgebieden in Azië, maar een speldekopje groot is....

16 november 2007, 20:10	#4
Online Banneling Geregistreerd: 25 augustus 2006 Berichten: 8.192	Belgium divided as Flanders pushes for a messy divorce [FONT=Geneva,Arial,sans-serif][SIZE=2]Alex Duval Smith in Rhode Saint Genese, Flanders Sunday September 16, 2007 The Observer [/SIZE][/FONT]The mayor is a little uncomfortable. 'Could we go somewhere more private to talk?' begs Myriam Delacroix-Rolin. 'This cafe is Flemish-owned. These days things have become so sensitive. I should not be heard speaking French in there.' On Tuesday, Belgium marks its first 100 days without a government. There is every reason to believe that the Belgians, and the rest of us, will have to get used to it. The questions now are how will the divorce of Flanders and Wallonia be consummated, and what will become of Brussels, home to the EU and Nato? More worryingly, the demise of Belgium - a sticking plaster over the faultline between Europe's Protestant north and Catholic south - could make Europe a more dangerous place. 'Flanders has systematically organised its independence over 35 years,' said Delacroix-Rolin, a French-speaker fighting to save her village of Rhode Saint Genese, nine miles south of Brussels, from becoming Flemish. 'If they succeed here, they will move on to Brussels. We're like the moat around the castle.' French-speaking Brussels - whose cultural and linguistic affinity is with Wallonia to the south - sits like an island in Flemish-speaking Flanders. So do the 18,000 souls of Rhode. Delacroix-Rolin said of the French-speaking half of her village: 'We are bilingual , and that is our right. No one held a referendum to ask whether we wanted to be part of Flanders. We just woke up one day [in 1962] and the linguistic frontier had been drawn south of us.' In the 45 years since, Belgium as a state, steered by the economically and numerically superior Flemish, has effectively devolved itself out of existence. 'Now Flanders with six million people makes the rules and four million French-speakers adapt,' said Delacroix-Rolin, who is banned from speaking French at council meetings or official functions. 'They are very clever. My council does not use language criteria to allocate housing, but the region does. In this way Flanders is ensuring that more Flemish-speakers settle in my municipality. The region also imposes a language test on teachers seeking to work here or parents wishing to adopt children. One way or another, your route is barred unless you have Dutch language diplomas.' It used to be the opposite. During centuries of Walloon prosperity - including 200 years as Europe's most productive mining and steel basin - the Flemish were looked down on and their language banned. Recently they have gained the economic upper hand, and now see post-industrial Wallonia as a costly passenger. This centuries-old distrust is at the heart of the crisis that has seen the Flemish Christian Democrat, Yves Leterme, fail to form a government since the 10 June elections. The constitution demands a coalition, but French-speaking politicians are refusing to join in his plans to dismantle Belgium. Among Leterme's allies, Flemish nationalist Bart de Wever denies that Wallonia will be cast adrift. 'You can co-operate better as good neighbours than as an unhappily married couple. I'm not a Flemish Milosevic.' He adds that an independent Flanders would want Brussels as its capital. 'Ten years ago Belgium had its football team, its monarchy, the Belgian franc and Brussels. Now it only has Brussels. For us, it's just the last obstacle.' Increasingly, Flemish politicians speak of the 'Czechoslovakia option' and point to the fact that the 'velvet' break-up in 1993 was a success for both sides. But economically it is hard to imagine what the wastelands of Wallonia would stand to gain. An opinion poll last month found 45 per cent of Flemish people in favour of the disintegration of Belgium against 20 per cent of Walloons. Most observers believe the break-up is just a matter of time; Flemish nationalist support will grow every time there is a local or national election. But nothing will happen without the EU, to which an independent Flanders, with Brussels as its capital, would have to apply for membership. To Delacroix-Rolin, the options on the table amount to real threats to her identity and that of her villagers. 'Rhode is like a frontline state. We're in a battle for survival.' http://observer.guardian.co.uk/world...170156,00.html Een staaltje Franstalige demagogie ...