nObama brengt geen verandering: Privatisatie Irakoorlog gaat verder

[Polityfus]

With U.S. Forces in Iraq Beginning to Leave, Need for Private Guards Grows

Het artikel van 08/09/09 in de Washington Post:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...702242_pf.html

the government is hiring more private guards to protect U.S. installations at a cost that could near $1 billion, according to the special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction.

...

On Sept. 1, the Multi-National Force-Iraq (MNF-I) awarded contracts expected to be worth $485 million over the next two years to five firms to provide security and patrol services to U.S. bases in Iraq.

Under this contract, the firms will bid against one another for individual orders at specific bases or locations. These "task orders" in the past have ranged from supplying one specialist to providing as many as 1,000 people to handle security for a major base.

...

The Central Command's June quarterly report on contracting showed a 19 percent increase from the three previous months in the number of security guards in Iraq hired by the Defense Department. The Central Command attributed the increase, from 10,743 at the end of March to 13,232 at the end of June, mainly to "an increased need for PSCs [private security companies] to provide security as the military begins to draw down forces."

... (the shit goes on)

Dyncorp, Tripple Canopy, Black Water... Een gepatenteerde naam voor gepatenteerde moordenaars en huurlingen.

Amerika gaat weg uit Irak? Neenee, correctie, Amerika gaat private contractors betalen voor zijn operaties. Mmm, lekker legale blackops, no silly convention of Geneva strings attached. Obama is daadwerkelijk een handpop van dezelfde kliek überzotten. Nice posterboy met Denzel Washingtonallures, maar daarmee is ook alles gezegd blijkbaar.

[Zeikstraal]

Zoals in de blueprint staat die we sinds 2000 leven

http://www.informationclearinghouse....asDefenses.pdf

Further, the process of transformation,
even if it brings revolutionary change, is
likely to be a long one, absent some
catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a
new Pearl Harbor.


HOMELAND DEFENSE. America must defend its homeland. During the Cold War,
nuclear deterrence was the key element in homeland defense; it remains essential. But the
new century has brought with it new challenges. While reconfiguring its nuclear force, the
United States also must counteract the effects of the proliferation of ballistic missiles and
weapons of mass destruction that may soon allow lesser states to deter U.S. military action
by threatening U.S. allies and the American homeland itself. Of all the new and current
missions for U.S. armed forces, this must have priority.

9/11 zou goed van pas komen


LARGE WARS. Second, the United States must retain sufficient forces able to rapidly
deploy and win multiple simultaneous large-scale wars and also to be able to respond to
unanticipated contingencies in regions where it does not maintain forward-based forces.
This resembles the “two-war” standard that has been the basis of U.S. force planning over
the past decade. Yet this standard needs to be updated to account for new realities and
potential new conflicts.

Sounds familiar


Thus,
this report advocates a two-stage process of
change – transition and transformation –
over the coming decades.
In general, to maintain American
military preeminence that is consistent with
the requirements of a strategy of American
global leadership, tomorrow’s U.S. armed
forces must meet three new missions:

• Global missile defenses. A network
against limited strikes, capable of
protecting the United States, its allies
and forward-deployed forces, must be
constructed. This must be a layered
system of land, sea, air and spacebased
components.
• Control of space and cyberspace.
Much as control of the high seas – and
the protection of international
commerce – defined global powers in
the past, so will control of the new
“international commons” be a key to
world power in the future. An
America incapable of protecting its
interests or that of its allies in space
or the “infosphere” will find it
difficult to exert global political
leadership.

Space and Cyberspace
No system of missile defenses can be
fully effective without placing sensors and
weapons in space. Although this would
appear to be creating a potential new theater
of warfare, in fact space has been militarized
for the better part of four decades. Weather,
communications, navigation and
reconnaissance satellites are increasingly
essential elements in American military
power. Indeed, U.S. armed forces are
uniquely dependent upon space. As the
1996 Joint Strategy Review, a precursor to
the 1997 Quadrennial Defense Review,
concluded, “Space is already inextricably
linked to military operations on land, on the
sea, and in the air.” The report of the
National Defense Panel agreed:
“Unrestricted use of space has become a
major strategic interest of the United
States.”

[illwill]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Polityfus

Dyncorp, Tripple Canopy, Black Water... Een gepatenteerde naam voor gepatenteerde moordenaars en huurlingen.

Amerika gaat weg uit Irak? Neenee, correctie, Amerika gaat private contractors betalen voor zijn operaties. Mmm, lekker legale blackops, no silly convention of Geneva strings attached. Obama is daadwerkelijk een handpop van dezelfde kliek überzotten. Nice posterboy met Denzel Washingtonallures, maar daarmee is ook alles gezegd blijkbaar.

Yeah!!!!!! Knallen daar!!! ZO moet het! Maaien!
Kill them all! Laat het oorlogsapparaat op vollle toeren draaien!
Yeah!!!!

Kan het trouwens nog duidelijker gephotoshop'd zijn?

[exodus]

Het zal wel zijn dat Obama geen verandering brengt. We zeiden het al maanden vanop voorhand in de NWO draad. Hij is gewoon een puppet voor de echte elite achter de schermen die aan de touwtjes trekt. Presidenten zijn gewoon bliksem afleiders om de echte macht achter de schermen te verbergen.

[illwill]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door exodus

Het zal wel zijn dat Obama geen verandering brengt. We zeiden het al maanden vanop voorhand in de NWO draad. Hij is gewoon een puppet voor de echte elite achter de schermen die aan de touwtjes trekt. Presidenten zijn gewoon bliksem afleiders om de echte macht achter de schermen te verbergen.

Yeah! Dit afleiden werkt wel goed precies
Gelijk hebben ze, zo krijgen ze tenminste gedaan wat ze willen doen.
In Europa moet men eerst maanden lullen en dan staan ze nog te wachten op wat de VS doet.
Achter de schermen word ginds bepaald wat er moet gebeuren en een president poppetje moet mooi ja knikken en het doen. Werkt ideaal.

Kortom, hun systeem hun zaak hun land, daar moeten wij ons niet mee moeien.

[illwill]

Wisten jullie dat de krisis ook hun idee was om snel veel geld te verdienen?
Ja, echt waar. Ze hebben afgesproken om al hun aandelen op zeer korte termijn te verkopen en dan negatieve berichten de media in te sturen zodat alles spaak begint te lopen. Nu hebben ze al hun aandelen weer terug aangekochtwaardoor ze alles nog eens kunnen verdubbelen en meer.
Echt waar. Dit is het echte groepje met macht achter de schermen! Obama niet, Bush niet. Er is nooit een president geweest met macht. Dit groepje bepaald wat er in de wereld gebeurt.

[Zeikstraal]

Europe's Complicity in Evil

There is a widespread supposition that Obama, being black and a member of an oppressed race, will imbue US foreign policy with a higher morality than the world experienced from Bush and Clinton. This is a delusion.

Obama represents the same ideology of American "exceptionalism" as other recent presidents. This ideology designates the United States as The Virtuous Nation and supplies the basis for the belief that America has the right, indeed the responsibility, to impose its hegemony upon the world by bribery or by force. The claim of American exceptionalism produces a form of patriotism that blinds the US population to the immorality of America's wars of aggression.

Nothing is any different under Obama. Obama has escalated war in Afghanistan; started a new war in Pakistan; tolerated or supported a military coup that overthrew the elected president of Honduras; is constructing 7 new US military bases in Colombia, South America; is going forward with various military projects designed to secure US global military hegemony, such as the Prompt Global Strike initiative that intends to provide the US with the capability to strike anywhere on earth within 60 minutes; is working to destabilize the government in Iran, with military attack still on the table as an option; supports America's new military African Command; intends to encircle Russia with US bases in former constituent parts of the Soviet Union; has suborned NATO troops as mercenaries in US wars of aggression.

How should Europe react? Europe should disassociate from the United States and go into active opposition to US foreign policy. Europeans should demand that their governments withdraw from NATO as it serves no European interest. The two aggressive militarist powers, the US and Israel, should be sanctioned by the UN and embargoed. Instead, Europe is complicit in US and Israeli war crimes.

Because of the cold war, Europe is accustomed to following US leadership. The financial convenience of the shelter provided by US military power negated independent European foreign policies. In effect, Western European countries became US puppet states.

How does Europe escape from a subservient relationship of many decades? Not easily. The US is accustomed to calling the shots and reacts harshly when it meets opposition. For example, French opposition to Bush's invasion of Iraq brought about instant demonization of France by the US media and members of Congress.

The US government uses financial sanctions and threatened leaks of sensitive personal information gathered by its worldwide spy networks to discipline any independent-minded European leader.

Europe is essentially captive and forced to put US interests ahead of its own. Consequently, unless Europeans find their courage and discard their servile status, Europe will be badgered into more wars and eventually led into a devastating war with Russia. One European country can do little, but concerted action would be effective. For example, why do not Europeans protest that the war criminal Tony Blair was given a post in the EU?

The Obama administration's attitude towards self-determination and the sovereignty of the people is that these grand-sounding concepts are useful platitudes with which to mask the hegemonic interests of the US government. US money and propaganda foment "velvet" or "color" revolutions that turn more countries into American puppet states.

The platitudes are useful also to disguise the overthrow of US civil liberties, such as habeas corpus, due process, and prohibitions against torture and preemptive arrest.

During the cold war era, one of the mainstays of US propaganda against the Soviet Union was the inability of Soviet citizens to travel within their country without the government's permission. This indignity has now been inflicted upon US citizens. As of September, 2009, US citizens can no longer travel within their country by air without the permission of the Transport Security Administration.

The Obama administration has adopted the Bush administration's search procedures. Under these rules travelers' computers, cell phones, and other devices can be seized for searches that can take up to 30 days. If you are on your way to a meeting and your presentation is on your computer and your contacts' numbers are on your cell phone, you are out of luck.

"Terrorist threat" is the excuse for these Gestapo practices. However, there have been no domestic acts of terrorism in 8 years. The few "plots" that led to arrests were all instigated by FBI agents in order to keep the nonexistent threat alive in the public's mind. Yet, despite any real terrorist threat the police state continues to gain ground. Considering the extent of America's oppression of peoples abroad, one would expect much more blowback than has occurred, assuming that 9/11 was not itself an inside job designed to provide an excuse for America's wars of aggression in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan.

Europe must look beyond the empty American political rhetoric about "freedom and democracy" and recognize the emerging Brownshirt American State. Democracy is slipping away from America. Its place is being taken by an oligarchy of powerful interest groups, such as the financial sector, the military/security complex about which President Eisenhower warned, and AIPAC. Political campaign contributions from interest groups determine the content of US domestic and foreign policy. A country in which political elites are above the law and can violate with impunity both laws against torture and constitutional protections of civil liberties is not a free country.

American political leaders and the American people need Europe's help in order to avoid the degeneration of the American political entity. American freedom, as well as sovereign independence elsewhere in the world, require criticisms of US foreign and domestic policies. The US media, which was concentrated into a few hands during the Clinton administration, functions as a Ministry of Propaganda for the government. It was the New York Times that gave credibility to the neoconservative propaganda and forged documents that were used to sell the invasion of Iraq to the public. It was the New York Times that sat for one year on the evidence that the Bush administration was committing felonies by violating the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. It was not until after Bush was re-elected that the reporter was able to force his story through editorial opposition. Americans need criticism from Europe to compensate for the absence of an independent American media. Americans need outside help in order to reach an understanding of the immorality of their government's policies, because they receive no such help from their own media. Without Europe's help, Americans cannot regain the spirit of liberty and tolerance bequeathed to them by their Founding Fathers. America herself is a victim of the neoconservative and liberal internationalist pursuit of US hegemony.

We in America need to hear many voices telling us that it is self-defeating to become like an enemy in order to defeat an enemy. As Germans learned under Hitler and Russians learned under Stalin, it is the internal enemy--the unaccountable elite that controls a country's government--that is the worst and most dangerous enemy.

If America has enemies who are against "freedom and democracy," then America herself must make certain not to sacrifice her own civil liberties, and the sovereignty of other peoples, to a "war on terror." Acts of terror are a small cost compared to the cost of the erosion of civil liberties that took centuries to achieve. Far more people died to achieve liberty than have died in terrorist attacks.

The United States cannot pretend to be a guarantor of liberty when the US government takes away liberty from its own citizens.

The United States cannot pretend to be a guarantor of peace and democracy when the US government uses deception to attack other lands on false pretenses.

Europe, whose culture was wrecked by 20th century wars, Europe, which has experienced tyranny from the left-wing and from the right-wing, has a right to its own voice.

America needs to hear this voice.

[illwill]

America needs to do nothing! Why? Because they got the bombs okay!

[KaliYuga]

De enige "change" is dat de FED meer prerogatieven heeft verkregen.
Nogal wiedes, als de helft van je kabinet uit Wallstreet komt.

Voor de rest kunnen we met zijn allen nog 3 jaar ( of meer ? ) naar de charismatische demagoog luisteren en aan zijn lippen hangen.. Zoals het een 'representatieve' democratie betaamt.

[Zeikstraal]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door KaliYuga

De enige "change" is dat de FED meer prerogatieven heeft verkregen.
Nogal wiedes, als de helft van je kabinet uit Wallstreet komt.

Voor de rest kunnen we met zijn allen nog 3 jaar ( of meer ? ) naar de charismatische demagoog luisteren en aan zijn lippen hangen.. Zoals het een 'representatieve' democratie betaamt.

Yeah, heb zen health speech gezien, wat een circus klucht brainwasherij. Was er zo'n minister trut ontroerd toen hij over een meiske dat ziek was begon tranen in haar ogen kreeg en gepassioneerd naar de redder keek. Man, man, werd daar op dat gefaked gedoe gretig op gefocust met de camera in de hoop dat het op de mensen thuis hun gevoelens zou spelen. En die debielen achter hem schijnheilig staan smilen terwijl ze bijna in slaap vielen tot ze werden wakkergeschud en een moedig man de waarheid riep: LEUGENAAR. Triestigen boel daar

[illwill]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Zeikstraal

Yeah, heb zen health speech gezien, wat een circus klucht brainwasherij. Was er zo'n minister trut ontroerd toen hij over een meiske dat ziek was begon tranen in haar ogen kreeg en gepassioneerd naar de redder keek. Man, man, werd daar op dat gefaked gedoe gretig op gefocust met de camera in de hoop dat het op de mensen thuis hun gevoelens zou spelen. En die debielen achter hem schijnheilig staan smilen terwijl ze bijna in slaap vielen tot ze werden wakkergeschud en een moedig man de waarheid riep: LEUGENAAR. Triestigen boel daar

Anti-vs propaganda kerel! Dat is triestige boel. We weten het onderrand wel hoor, je moet de VS niet.

[Flanelcondoom]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door illwill

Anti-vs propaganda kerel! Dat is triestige boel. We weten het onderrand wel hoor, je moet de VS niet.

Waarom zou hij (of ik) de VS moeten?

[illwill]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Flanelcondoom

Waarom zou hij (of ik) de VS moeten?

Weet ik veel, dat maak je zelf uit.

[Zeikstraal]

NEW YORK (CNN) -- President Obama spoke at the Pentagon on Friday to those who lost loved ones on September 11, 2001, telling them no words would heal their pain yet calling for a renewed resolve against the ones who attacked the country eight years ago.

Whatever.

Pentagon: More troops expected to be sent to Afghanistan

http://cnnwire.blogs.cnn.com/2009/09...to-afghanistan


Powell said he believes the United States is safer since the attacks.

He pointed to improvements in the visa system, which gives officials a better idea of who is coming into the country; creation of the U.S. Homeland Security Department and beefed-up security at airports. Powell said there also have been improvements in law enforcement and intelligence-gathering. Engaging the terrorists in Afghanistan also is a solid move, he told CNN.

"But you can't rest on that. You have to keep studying the problem. You have to keep trying to get into their mind. And so it may be a long and continuous fight that may never end."

Om hen te doen geloven dat er terreur zou zijn zeker en het nog "veiliger" maken door vrijheid weg te nemen. Binnenkort mogen we ons weer aan een aanval verwachten of gefabriceerde propaganda. Net nu je dacht wat veiliger te zijn.. Voorspelbaar

[Zeikstraal]

Tijd om uw bazen te exposen, Obama

[illwill]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Zeikstraal

NEW YORK (CNN) -- President Obama spoke at the Pentagon on Friday to those who lost loved ones on September 11, 2001, telling them no words would heal their pain yet calling for a renewed resolve against the ones who attacked the country eight years ago.

Whatever.

Pentagon: More troops expected to be sent to Afghanistan

http://cnnwire.blogs.cnn.com/2009/09...to-afghanistan


Powell said he believes the United States is safer since the attacks.

He pointed to improvements in the visa system, which gives officials a better idea of who is coming into the country; creation of the U.S. Homeland Security Department and beefed-up security at airports. Powell said there also have been improvements in law enforcement and intelligence-gathering. Engaging the terrorists in Afghanistan also is a solid move, he told CNN.

"But you can't rest on that. You have to keep studying the problem. You have to keep trying to get into their mind. And so it may be a long and continuous fight that may never end."

Om hen te doen geloven dat er terreur zou zijn zeker en het nog "veiliger" maken door vrijheid weg te nemen. Binnenkort mogen we ons weer aan een aanval verwachten of gefabriceerde propaganda. Net nu je dacht wat veiliger te zijn.. Voorspelbaar

Kortom, ze hebben dus weer een inside job klaarstaan.

[illwill]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Zeikstraal

Tijd om uw bazen te exposen, Obama

Wie zijn zijn bazen, zeg het ons.

[Zeikstraal]

De zionists

[illwill]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Zeikstraal

De zionists

Maar wie zijn dat precies?
Je kan even goed zeggen een goep mensen, daar heeft niemand wat aan.
Kan je nu eens 1 keer duidelijk zijn?