VN: Mahmoud doet het weer...

[zonbron]

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad doet het weer.

Westerse delegaties verlaten de misnoegd de vergadering.

Full speech by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at UN General Assembly 2011

Events at the UN gathering in New York have once again been heated up by the speech of the Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. U.S., France and other western delegations walked out of the assembly as a sign of protest at his claims.

Video RT

[D'ARTOIS]

Laat hij eerst maar eens het geschreven mandaat van God zien. Ik had hem meteen het woord ontnomen. Niemand kan spreken uit naam van datgene dat niet aanwezig is (of kan zijn).

Als jij uit naam van God spreekt ben je een leugenaar. Bewijs anders het tegendeel.

[Johan Bollen]

Wat zijn dan die 'claims' dat die landen die wegliepen niet willen horen? Wat is er niet waar aan?

Meer mensen vragen zich dat af:

So what did he say that wasn't correct? I can understand why the Western Powers would walk out because they can't stand the truth. It is true that Britain were colonizers and had an Empire into the 20th century. It is true that Israel was imposed on the Arab nations by the US and the UK when they had no right to do so except that they had might behind them. Slavery, world wars etc. etc. is all true. Not being able to hear the truth illustrates the total arrogance of the West. I am English.

En ook. Wie geeft ons uiteindelijk toegang tot de speech van Ahmadinejad zelf? Welke media wel en welke niet? Mogen we onze eigen mening nog vormen van de grote westerse mediakanalen of dienen we hun interpretatie kritiekloos voor waar aan te nemen?

[D'ARTOIS]

Ieder feit op zich is een bekende en onmiskenbare waarheid.

Zowel Engeland als de VS wilden de ontheemde Joden uit de kampen niet hebben. De 'Exodus' naar Israel verschafte ze het zo noodzakelijke argument om tot de vorming van een Israelische staat te komen. En die mondiaal af te dwingen met bijna evenveel voorstemmers als tegenstemmers.

Maar waarom de veroverde gebieden van WWI niet aan de Turken teruggegeven?

Begon toen het oliepotje al te borrelen?

Kortom, wie positieve daden van de Politiek verwacht zal altijd bedrogen uitkomen.

[Tempest]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Johan Bollen

Wat zijn dan die 'claims' dat die landen die wegliepen niet willen horen?

Twee zaken:

1. H0locaust (vond hij een industrie)
2. 9/11 (vond hij "mysterieus")

In vergelijking met vroeger was hij eigenlijk wat mild... maar alleen al het feit dat hij die onderwerpen aanhaalde was teveel naar de smaak van de VS, Europa en consorten. De "walkout" leek spontaan maar was duidelijk gechoreografeerd: eerst ging de VS delegatie alleen weg, dan na een minuut of twee de prominente "allies" (de VK delegatie en daarna Frankrijk) en dan pas als laatste gingen de overgebleven bobo's van de mickymouse landen (NL, Bel... etc) naar buiten.

[Dixie]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door zonbron

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad doet het weer.

Westerse delegaties verlaten de misnoegd de vergadering.

ze zullen wel wat anders te doen hebben dan naar zo'n gek te luisteren...

[kelt]

In plaats van gezamelijk een eigen VN-toespraak voor te bereiden omtrent de kuiperijen van Iran in de Aghaanse grensgebieden(waar sji'a's wonen),in Irak,in Syrie,in Libanon....verkozen de "Westerse vertegenwoordigers" (die BETAALD worden om VN-zittingen bij te wonen) om weg te lopen....weeral.

Wat een moedige houding van de "ridders van het grote gelijk",het "geweten van de vrije wereld"...

In de ogen van de rest van de wereld scoren de Iraanse vertegenwoordigers dus al jaren op rij punten....

o ja,inderdaad,het palmares van de "Westerse" landen in de Midden-Oosten politiek is niet schitterend(het zijn enorme hopen stinkende lijken),maar we hebben niet eens een Iraanse president nodig om dat te komen zeggen....

[Max van Dietschland]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Dixie

ze zullen wel wat anders te doen hebben dan naar zo'n gek te luisteren...

Gek ? Onze politiekers uitgezonderd Bart Dewever dan komen nog niet aan de enkels van deze grote meneer !

[Pietje]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Max van Dietschland

Gek ? Onze politiekers uitgezonderd Bart Dewever dan komen nog niet aan de enkels van deze grote meneer !

wel een "grote meneer" die zijn "beleid" laat bepalen door een bende ultra-religieuze gekken.

[Max van Dietschland]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Pietje

wel een "grote meneer" die zijn "beleid" laat bepalen door een bende ultra-religieuze gekken.

Er is niets mis mee met een theocratie. Een fascistisch-theocratische Vlaamse staat is een droom van mij.

[Pietje]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Max van Dietschland

Er is niets mis mee met een theocratie. Een fascistisch-theocratische Vlaamse staat is een droom van mij.

Dat zal hier in Vlaanderen/België nog moeilijk gaan Max, er zijn nog maar weinig religieuzen.

[freelancer]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Max van Dietschland

Gek ? Onze politiekers uitgezonderd Bart Dewever dan komen nog niet aan de enkels van deze grote meneer !

[Another Jack]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Max van Dietschland

Er is niets mis mee met een theocratie. Een fascistisch-theocratische Vlaamse staat is een droom van mij.

Was het niet Christus die ooit zei dat het koninkrijk van zijn vader niet van deze wereld was?

Dit willen realiseren tegen de wil in van Christus getuigt van een immense hovaardigheid, me dunkt.

[Pietje]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Max van Dietschland

Er is niets mis mee met een theocratie. Een fascistisch-theocratische Vlaamse staat is een droom van mij.

Wat is er zo leuk aan een fascistische theocratie, Max ??

[straddle]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Tempest

Twee zaken:

1. H0locaust (vond hij een industrie)
2. 9/11 (vond hij "mysterieus")

In vergelijking met vroeger was hij eigenlijk wat mild... maar alleen al het feit dat hij die onderwerpen aanhaalde was teveel naar de smaak van de VS, Europa en consorten. De "walkout" leek spontaan maar was duidelijk gechoreografeerd: eerst ging de VS delegatie alleen weg, dan na een minuut of twee de prominente "allies" (de VK delegatie en daarna Frankrijk) en dan pas als laatste gingen de overgebleven bobo's van de mickymouse landen (NL, Bel... etc) naar buiten.

Allemaal gatlekkers van de VS en Israel dus die de vergadering verlieten tijdens de toespraak van Ahmadinejad.

Dat weglopen was niet omwille van de inhoud van Ahmadinejad's speech, wel om maximaal effect te veroorzaken in de PR strijd en propaganda tegen Iran. Het ligt er vingerdik op dat men op voorhand gepland heeft de zaal te verlaten, de VS op kop, met de schoothondjes erachter.

Dat weglopen is ronduit belachelijk en bijzonder hypocriet en ik wens zelfs niet eens meer vertegenwoordigd te worden door personen die weglopen. Waarom aanvaarden we dat van onze eigen delegatie eigenlijk?????


Hier is wat er mis is met dat weglopen:


1. Wat Ahmadinejad te vertellen heeft wordt nochtans gedeeld door zeer veel mensen op de aardbol. Het kan zeker niet ontkend worden dat er pijnlijke waarheden over de VS en het westen gezegd worden. Waarheden waar het westen liever niet op gewezen wordt.

2. De VN is een vergadering van alle naties waar alle meningen gehoord moeten kunnen worden. Het is zeker geen platform voor enkel het Westen en/of de VS.

3. Het meest belangrijke is wellicht Artikel 19 van de VN:

''Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers. ''

http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml#a19


.

[zonbron]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Tempest

Twee zaken:

1. H0locaust (vond hij een industrie)
2. 9/11 (vond hij "mysterieus")

In vergelijking met vroeger was hij eigenlijk wat mild... maar alleen al het feit dat hij die onderwerpen aanhaalde was teveel naar de smaak van de VS, Europa en consorten. De "walkout" leek spontaan maar was duidelijk gechoreografeerd: eerst ging de VS delegatie alleen weg, dan na een minuut of twee de prominente "allies" (de VK delegatie en daarna Frankrijk) en dan pas als laatste gingen de overgebleven bobo's van de mickymouse landen (NL, Bel... etc) naar buiten.

Inderdaad, dat hebt U goed opgemerkt...

De walkout was een mise-en-scène van de door de belastingbetalende wereldburger gefinancierde volksvertegenwoordigers.

No representation without taxation.

David Cameron attacks Mahmoud Ahmadinejad after UN walkout
David Cameron launched a scathing attack on Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad just minutes after the Iranian leader sparked a mass walkout.

By Alex Spillius, New York7:56PM BST 22 Sep 2011
Mr Cameron derided Mr Ahmadinejad from the United Nations podium minutes after the Iranian leader's ferocious attack on Western powers and Israel.

All 27 European delegations left the chamber midway through his speech, a few minutes after the Americans had vacated their seats. The protest was planned in the expectation that Mr Ahmadinejad would prove controversial.

David Cameron, who addressed the assembly shortly after Mr Ahmadinejad, said: "He didn't remind us that he runs a country where they may have elections of a sort but they also repress freedom of speech, do everything they can to avoid the accountability of a free media, violently prevent demonstrations and detain and torture those who argue for a better future."
Mark Kornblau, a spokesman for the US mission to the UN, said: "Mr Ahmadinejad had a chance to address his own people's aspirations for freedom and dignity, but instead he again turned to abhorrent anti-Semitic slurs and despicable conspiracy theories."
The Iranian leader surpassed even his own outspoken standards as he accused the US of using the "mysterious" September 11 attacks as a pretext to launch wars on Iraq and Afghanistan.

"By using their imperialistic media network which is under the influence of colonialism they threaten anyone who questions the Holocaust and the September 11 event with sanctions and military actions," he said.
"They view Zionism as a sacred notion and any question regarding its history is condemned as an unforgivable sin," he continued, as Mr Cameron waited in the wings to speak, looking appalled.
Without naming any country, Mr Ahmadinejad went on to denounce the West for the slave trade, colonialism, two World Wars, the Korean and Vietnam wars, dropping atom bombs and causing the global financial crisis.

...

After diverting from his script to respond to Mr Ahmadinejad, the Prime Minister urged the UN to be more prepared to take action against oppressive regimes.
In a strong defence of interventionism, he said the Arab Spring uprisings and conflict in Libya demonstrated that the UN needed "a new way of working".
"To fail to act is to fail those who need our help," he said.
He called for reforms in Yemen and a "credible resolution" against Syria, where protesters continue to be gunned down.

telegraph

[zonbron]

Een samenvatting

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's UN speech prompts diplomatic walkouts
Fury as Iranian president refers to 'mysterious September 11 incident' and accuses Nato of sanctioning drug trafficking

Chris McGreal in New York
guardian.co.uk, Thursday 22 September 2011 20.05 BST
Article history

Ahmadinejad's verbal assault on the west and Israel promoted walkouts by diplomatic delegations. US diplomats were the first to leave, when Ahmadinejad referred to the "mysterious September 11 incident" as a pretext to attack Afghanistan and Iraq.

Later, he criticised the US for killing Osama bin Laden and burying his body at sea, saying the al-Qaida leader should have been brought to trial.

Other delegations, including those from the UK and France, walked out later when the Iranian leader said that if European countries were still paying a "fine or ransom to the Zionists" because of the Holocaust, they should also pay reparations for slavery.

In other parts of his speech he spoke of Zionists being responsible for "mass murder and terror against the Palestinians", and said the US and west "view Zionism as a sacred notion and ideology". The Israeli delegation had decided not to attend.

Ahmadinejad, apparently in an attempt to strengthen his political position in Iran, dedicated much of what is likely to be judged as one of his most controversial speeches to asking rhetorical questions about who was responsible for slavery, colonialism and wars over the generations.

He also asked which countries' economies relied on military spending;who provoked Saddam Hussein to attack Iran; and "who used the atomic bomb against defenceless people?"

Ahmadinejad accused Nato of occupying Afghanistan and of sanctioning drug trafficking, claiming that narcotics production has risen since the US-led invasion a decade ago.

Later, he accused the US and its allies of targeting Iran, which is under sanction over its nuclear programme, because it has challenged orthodoxy. "By using their imperialistic media network which is under the influence of colonialism, they threaten anyone who questions the Holocaust and the September 11 event with sanctions and military actions," he said.

The Iranian leader said this made the US and its allies unfit to dominate the international system, and called for change to the structure of the UN security council.
...

Guardian

[evilbu]

Wel, Al Qaeda zou intussen hebben laten weten ook niet tevreden zijn met de speech:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-15097317

[Johan Bollen]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door evilbu

Wel, Al Qaeda zou intussen hebben laten weten ook niet tevreden zijn met de speech:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-15097317

De BBC schrijft

The Iranian leader said he believed the World Trade Center towers could not have been brought down by aircraft.

Dat heeft Ahmadinejad niet gezegd in zijn UN speech voor zover ik gehoord heb. Hij stelde een vraag en in die vraag noemde hij 9/11 'mysterieus'. (Tenzij iemand iets anders gelezen of gehoord heeft?)

Schiet al Qaeda de VS hier nu te hulp? Er zijn zovele oppositiebewegingen tegen de VS politiek die geen stem krijgen in de westerse media. Waarom deze opmerking die van Al Qaeda zou komen wel publiceren? Welk doel dient dit artikel met andere woorden?

In dit BBC artikel wordt gezegd dat hij die woorden NA zijn speech gezegd zou hebben.

Iran president makes 9/11 claims after UN walkout

Het staat vol eenzijdigheden zoals we kunnen verwachten van de BBC.

Blijkbaar heeft ook niet iedereen dezelfde speech gehoord

The foreign ministry of Israel, which boycotted the speech, said in a statement: "Once again the Iranian president delivered a message of hostility to the family of nations, threatening world peace and security."

Er is hier maar een oplossing. De speech zelf beluisteren of lezen.

[Johan Bollen]

Info van de VN. Is de Speech een agressie naar de naties van de wereld?

United Nations
http://gadebate.un.org/sites/default...s/66/IR_en.pdf
Sept. 22, 2011

Mr. President,
Excellencies,
Ladies and Gentlemen,

I am grateful to the Almighty Allah who granted me, once more, the opportunity to appear before this world assembly. I have the pleasure to express my sincere thanks to H.E. Joseph Deiss, president of the sixty-fifth session for his tremendous efforts during his tenure. I also would like to congratulate H.E Nassir Abdulaziz AI-Nasser on his election as the president of sixty-sixth session of the General Assembly and wish him all success.

Let me seize the moment to pay tribute to all those who lost their lives in the past year, particularly to the victims of the tragic famine in Somalia and the devastating flood in Pakistan and especially the earthquake and the ensuing explosions in the nuclear power plant in Japan. I urge everyone to intensify their assistance and aid to the affected populations in these countries.

Over the past years, I spoke about different global issues, and the need to introduce fundamental changes in the current international order.

Today, considering the international developments, I will try to analyze the present situation from a different angle. As you all know the dominance and superiority of human beings over other creatures, lie in the very nature and the truth of humankind which is a divine gift and a manifestation of the divine spirit including: faith in God, who is the ever-lasting creator and planner of the entire universe.

Showing compassion to others, generosity, justice-seeking, and having integrity both in words and in deeds.

The quest for dignity to reach the pinnacles of perfection, the aspiration to elevate one’s material and spiritual status, and the longing to realize liberty; Defying oppression, corruption, and discrimination in trying to support the oppressed; Seeking happiness, and lasting prosperity and security for all.

These are some of the manifestations of common divine and human attributes which can clearly be seen in the historical aspirations of human beings as reflected in the heritage of our search for art and literary works both in prose and poetry, and in the socio-cultural and political movements of human beings in the course of history.

All divine prophets and social reformers invited human beings to tread on this righteous path. God has given dignity to humankind to elevate his status to assume his successor role on Earth.

It is vividly clear that despite all historical achievements, including creation of the United-Nations, which was a product of untiring struggles and efforts of free-minded and justice-seeking individuals as well as the international cooperation, human societies are yet far from fulfilling their noble desires and aspirations.

Most nations of the world are unhappy with the current international circumstances. And despite the general longing and aspiration to promote peace, progress, and fraternity, wars, mass-murder, widespread poverty, and socioeconomic and political crises continue to infringe upon the rights and sovereignty of nations, leaving behind irreparable damage worldwide.

Approximately, three billion people of the world live on less than 2.5 dollars a day, and over a billion people live without having even one sufficient meal on a daily basis. Forty-percent of the poorest world populations only share five percent of the global income, while twenty percent of the richest people share seventy-five percent of the total global income.

More than twenty thousand innocent and destitute children die every day in the world because of poverty. In the United States, eighty percent of financial resources are controlled by ten percent of its population, while only twenty percent of these resources belong to the ninety percent of the population.

What are the causes and reasons behind these inequalities? How can bone remedy such injustice?

The rulers of the global management circles divide the social life from ethics and spirituality while claiming the situation is the outcome of the pursuit of the path of divine prophets or the vulnerability of nations or the ill performance of a few groups or individuals. They claim that only their views and approaches can save the human society.

Wouldn’t you think that the root cause of the problems must be sought in the prevailing international order, or the way the world is governed? I would like to draw your kind attention to the following questions:

Who abducted forcefully tens of millions of people from their homes in Africa and other regions of the world during the dark period of slavery, making them a victim of their materialistic greed?

Who imposed colonialism for over four centuries upon this world?

Who occupied lands and massively plundered resources of other nations, destroyed talents, and alienated languages, cultures and identities of nations?

Who triggered the first and second world wars, that left seventy millions killed and hundreds of millions injured or homeless. Who created the wars in Korean peninsula and in Vietnam?

Who imposed, through deceits and hypocrisy, the Zionism and over sixty years of war, homelessness, terror and mass murder on the Palestinian people and on countries of the region?

Who imposed and supported for decades military dictatorship and totalitarian regimes on Asian, African, and Latin American nations?

Who used nuclear bomb against defenseless people, and stockpiled thousands of warheads in their arsenals?

Whose economies rely on waging wars and selling arms?

Who provoked and encouraged Saddam Hussein to invade and impose an eight-year war on Iran, and who assisted and equipped him to deploy chemical weapons against our cities and our people?

Who used the mysterious September 11 incident as a pretext to attack Afghanistan and Iraq , killing, injuring, and displacing millions in two countries with the ultimate goal of bringing into its domination the Middle East and its oil resources?

Who nullified the Breton Woods system by printing trillions of dollars without the backing of gold reserves or equivalent currency? A move that triggered inflation worldwide and was intended to prey on the economic gains of other nations?

Which country’s military spending exceeds annually a thousand billion dollars, more than the military budgets of all countries of the world combined?

Which governments are the most indebted ones in the world?

Who dominates the policy-making establishments of the world economy?

Who are responsible for the world economic recession, and are imposing the consequences on America, Europe and the world in general?

Which governments are always ready to drop thousands of bombs on other countries, but ponder and hesitate to provide aid to famine-stricken people in Somalia or in other places?

Who are the ones dominating the Security Council which is ostensibly responsible for safeguarding the international security?

There exist tens of other similar questions. Of course, the answers are clear.

The majority of nations and governments of the world have had no role in the creation of the current global crises, and as a matter of fact, they were themselves the victims of such policies.

It is as lucid as daylight that the same slave masters and colonial powers that once instigated the two world wars have caused widespread misery and disorder with far-reaching effects across the globe since then.

Dear Colleagues and Friends;

Do these arrogant powers really have the competence and ability to run or govern the world. Is it acceptable that they call themselves the sole defender of freedom, democracy, and human rights, while they militarily attack and occupy other countries?

Can the flower of democracy blossom from NATO’s missiles, bombs and guns?

Ladies and Gentlemen;

If some European countries still use the Holocaust, after six decades, as the excuse to pay fine or ransom to the Zionists, should it not be an obligation upon the slave masters or colonial powers to pay reparations to the affected nations?

If the damage and losses of the period of slavery and colonialism were indeed compensated, what would happen to the manipulators and behind-the-scene political powers in the United States and in Europe? Would there remain any gaps between the North and the South?

If only half of military expenditures of the United States and its allies in NATO was shifted to help solve the economic problems in their own countries, would they be witnessing any symptom of the economic crisis?

What would happen, if the same amount was allocated to poor nations?

What is the justification for the presence of hundreds of US military and intelligence bases in different parts of the world, including 268 bases in Germany, 124 in Japan, 87 in South Korea, 83 in Italy, 45 in the United Kingdom, and 21 in Portugal? Does this mean anything other than military occupation?

Don’t the bombs deployed in the said bases undermine the security of other nations?

The main question is the quest for the root cause of such attitudes. The prime reason should be sought in the beliefs and tendencies of the establishment. An assembly of people in contradiction with the inner human instincts and disposition who also have no faith in God and in the path of the divine prophets, replace their lust for power and materialistic ends with heavenly values.

To them, only power and wealth prevail, and every attempt must bring into focus these sinister goals.

Oppressed nations have no hope to restore or protect their legitimate rights against these powers. These powers seek their progress, prosperity and dignity through imposing poverty, humiliation and annihilation to others.

They consider themselves superior to others, enjoying special privileges and concessions. They have no respect for others and easily violate the rights of all nations and governments.

They proclaim themselves as the indisputable custodians of all governments and nations through intimidation, recourse to threat and force, and abuse the international mechanisms. They simply break all the internationally recognized regulations.

They insist on imposing their lifestyle and beliefs on others. They officially support racism. They weaken countries through military intervention, and destroy their infrastructures, in order to plunder their resources by making them all the more dependent.

They sow the seeds of hate and hostility among nations and people of different pursuits, in order to prevent them from fulfilling their goals of development and progress.

All cultures, identities, lives, values and wealth of nations, women, youth, families as well as the wealth of nations are sacrificed to their imperialistic tendencies and their inclination to enslave and captivate others.

Hypocrisy and deceit are allowed in order to secure their interests and imperialistic goals. Drug- trafficking and killing of innocent human beings are also allowed in pursuit of such diabolic goals. Despite NATO’s presence in the occupied Afghanistan, there has been a dramatic increase in the production of illicit drugs there.

They tolerate no question or criticism, and instead of presenting a reason for their violations, they always put themselves in the position of a claimant. By using their imperialistic media network which is under the influence of colonialism they threaten anyone who questions the Holocaust and the September 11 event with sanctions and military action.

Last year, when the need to form a fact-finding team to undertake a thorough investigation concerning the hidden elements involved in September 11 incident was brought up; an idea also endorsed by all independent governments and nations as well as by the majority in the United States, my country and myself came under pressure and threat by the government of the United States.

Instead of assigning a fact-finding team, they killed the main perpetrator and threw his body into the sea.

Would it not have been reasonable to bring to justice and openly bring to trial the main perpetrator of the incident in order to identify the elements behind the safe space provided for the invading aircraft to attack the twin world trade towers?

Why should it not have been allowed to bring him to trial to help recognize those who launched terrorist groups and brought wars and other miseries into the region?

Is there any classified information that must be kept secret?

They view Zionism as a sacred notion and ideology. Any question concerning its very foundation and history is condemned by them as an unforgivable sin.

However they endorse and allow sacrileges and insult against beliefs of other divine religions.

Dear Colleagues and Friends;

Real freedom, justice” dignity, well being, and lasting security are the rights of all nations. These values can neither be achieved by reliance on the current inefficient system of world governance, nor through the invasion of the world by arrogant powers and the gun barrels of NATO forces.

These values could only be realized through independence and recognition of others’ rights and through harmony and cooperation.
Is there any way to address the problems and challenges besetting the world by using the prevailing international mechanisms and tools to help humanity achieve the long-standing aspiration of peace, security and equality?

All those who tried to introduce reforms whilst preserving the existing norms and tendencies have failed. The valuable efforts made by the Non-Aligned movement and Group 77 and GrouplS as well as by some prominent individuals have failed to bring fundamental changes.
Governance and management of the world require fundamental reforms.

What should be done now?

Dear Colleagnes and Friends;

Efforts must be made with a firm resolve and through collective cooperation to map out a new plan, on the basis of principles and the very foundation of universal human values such as Monotheism, justice, freedom, love and the quest for happiness.

The idea of creation of the United Nations remains a great and historical achievement of mankind. Its importance must be appreciated and its capacities must be used to the extent possible for our noble goals.

We should not allow this organization which is the reflection of the collective will and shared aspiration of the community of nations, to deviate from its main course and play into the hands of the world powers.

Conducive ground must be prepared to ensure collective participation and involvement of nations in an effort to promote lasting peace and security.

Shared and collective management of the world must be achieved in its true sense, and based on the underlying principles enshrined in the international law. Justice must serve as the criterion and the basis for all international decisions and actions.

All of us should acknowledge the fact that there is no other way than the shared and collective management of the world in order to put an end to the present disorders, tyranny, and discriminations worldwide.
This is indeed the sole way to prosperity and welfare of human society which is an established and vivid truth.

While acknowledging the above truth, one should note that acknowledgement alone is not enough. We must believe in it and spare no effort toward its realization.

Dear Colleagues and Friends;

Shared and collective management of the world is the legitimate right of all nations, and we as their representatives, have an obligation to defend their rights. Although some powers continuously try to frustrate all international efforts aimed at promoting collective cooperation, we must, however, strengthen our belief in achieving the perceived goal of establishing a shared and collective cooperation to run the world.

The United Nations was created to make effective participation of all nations in international decision-making processes, possible. We all know that this goal has not yet been fulfilled because of the absence of justice in the current management structures and mechanisms of the UN.

The composition of the Security Council is unjust and inequitable. Therefore, changes including the restructuring of the United Nations are considered the basic demands of the nations that must be addressed by the General Assembly.

During last year session, I emphasized the importance of this issue and called for the designation of the current decade as the decade of shared and collective Global Management.

I would like to reiterate again my proposal. I am sure that through international cooperation, diligence and efforts by committed world leaders and governments and through insisting on the realization of justice and the support of all other nations, we can expedite the building of a common bright future.

This movement is certainly on its rightful path of creation, ensuring a promising future for humanity. A future that will be built when humanity initiates to trend the path of the divine prophets and the righteous under the leadership of Imam al-Mahdi, the Ultimate Savior of mankind and the inheritor to all divine messengers and leaders and to the pure generation of our great Prophet.

The creation of a supreme and ideal society with the arrival of a perfect human being who is a true and sincere lover of all human beings, is the guaranteed promise of Allah.

He will come alongside with Jesus Christ to lead the freedom and justice lovers to eradicate tyranny and discrimination, and promote knowledge, peace, justice freedom and love across the world. He will present to every single individual all the beauties of the world and all good things which bring happiness for humankind.

Today nations have been awakened. With the increase in public awareness,they no longer succumb to oppressions and discriminations.

The world is now witnessing more than ever, the widespread awakening in Islamic lands, in Asia, Europe, and America. These movements are ever expanding their spirit everyday and influence the pursuit of the realization of justice, freedom and the creation of a better tomorrow.

Our great nation stands ready to join hands with other nations to march on this beautiful path in harmony and in line with the shared aspirations of mankind.

Let us salute love, freedom, justice, wisdom, and the bright future that awaits humankind.

Thank you.

Hij herhaalt zich verschillende malen. Maar dit is alles behalve een oorlogsspeech zo als men ons wil doen geloven. Dat lijkt me duidelijk.

De stukken over 9/11 staan in het rood.