44% van de Europese moslims zijn fundamentalisten

[Pieke]

het verwondert me dat hierover nog geen topic is gemaakt

Een nieuwe studie van Ruud Koopman toont aan dat religieus fundamentalisme geen marginaal fenomeen is binnen de Europese moslimgemeenschap.

almost 60 per cent agree that Muslims should return to the roots of Islam, 75 per cent think there is only one interpretation of the Quran
possible , which is binding for every Muslim, and 65 per cent say that religious rules are more important to them than the laws of the country in which they live.

Levels are somewhat lower among the second generation.

fundamentalist attitudes are slightly less prevalent among Sunni
Muslims with a Turkish (45% agreement to all three statements) compared to a Moroccan (50%) background. Turkish Alevites display much lower levels of fundamentalism (15%)

The socio-economic variables are all significant and confirm that fundamentalist attitudes are associated with socio-economic arginalization: those who are not employed, have a lower job status, have lower levels of education and live in rented housing display significantly higher levels of fundamentalism. The effect sizes are however not very large. The most important of the socio-economic variables is education, for which the regression estimates imply that the level of fundamentalism among persons with only primary school is .72 higher than among those with a university education. There are also some significant country differences: German and Swedish, and to a lesser extent Dutch respondents are less fundamentalist than those from Austria, the reference category.

Belgische moslims zijn iets fundamentalistischer dan de Oostenrijkse

Is een gevoel van discriminatie een mogelijke reden?
Nee

In line with earlier research, we find little support for it. Perceived discrimination is only marginally (at the .10 level) significant as a predictor of religious fundamentalism among Muslims and the effect size is very small (an increase of .03 on the scale of fundamentalism for a one standard deviation increase in perceived discrimination). Moreover, the pattern of country differences defies interpretation in terms of reactive religiosity, as Germany, together with France the country that offers Muslims the least rights, has the lowest level of Muslim religious fundamentalism. Conversely, Belgium has a comparatively high level of fundamentalism in spite of relatively generous policies regarding both Muslim rights and immigrant rights more general.

en nu voer voor de anti-moslims:

Muslims of Turkish and Moroccan origin show much higher levels of out-group hostility: 57 percent reject homosexual friends, 45 percent do not trust Jews, and 54 percent see the West as an enemy out to destroy Islam. Hostility towards all three out-groups is present among 26 percent of the Muslim respondents.

1 op 4...

Among fundamentalist Muslims, however, levels of hostility towards all three groups rise above 70 percent.

...even better

dat komt ervan als ge immigranten recruiteert van rurale, achterlijke, arme gebieden in moslimlanden, en dat ze socio-economisch niet ingeburgerd geraken.

Hier in de US zijn christelijke en moslimfundamentalisten aan elkaar gewaagd (een kwart volgens een recente studie van het PEW), en denkt ongeveer de helft van beide geloofsgemeenschappen dat de bijbel resp de koran het letterlijke woord van god is. US moslims, meestal gerecruiteerd uit de middenklasse/geëduceerde bevolkinsgroep, zijn pluralistischer dan hun Europese tegenstanders.

Hostile attitudes towards other groups should not be equated with the willingness to employ physical violence. But the combination of a fundamentalist belief in the absolute truth and righteousness of the own cause, hostility and mistrust towards other groups, and a sense of threat based in the belief that others are out to destroy one’s own group may motivate a minority to act upon such beliefs.

he statement that “suicide bombing or other violence against civilians is justified to defend Islam from its enemies” is affirmed by eight percent of US Muslims (Pew Research 2011: 65), while in France, the United Kingdom, and Germany respectively 16, 15 and 7 percent say that “violence against civilian targets can sometimes be justified” (Pew Research Center 2006: 4). A Dutch study indicates that similar responses are obtained when
respondents are explicitly asked about their personal willingness to employ violence: 11 percent of Dutch Muslims say that “there are situations in which it is for me from the point of view of my religion acceptable that
I use violence” (Roex, van Stiphout, and Tillie 2010). Obviously,
even from such hypothetical statements of the willingness to use violence
it is still a long way to its actual employment. Nevertheless, religious fundamentalism, intertwined with out-group hostility seems to be a crucial component in the brew that leads some down that path

wat zal het zijn? Met harde hand terugsturen? Iets doen aan de socio-economische situatie? Voer voor discussie (al betwijfel ik dat het een pluralistische discussie gaat worden hier op politics.be)

link naar het originele artikel: http://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/104.../780155416.pdf

[Pieke]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Rodent

http://forum.politics.be/showthread.php?t=207314
http://forum.politics.be/showthread.php?t=207330

Wat stel jij voor dat nog NIET is geprobeerd?

lol, immigratie en integratie is niet mijn normale biotoop...

deze draad kan op slot, hoewel ik tenminste link naar de originele studie...