Aanslagen London: de smoking gun

[exodus]

Het is net ontdenkt dat er op de dag van de aanslagen oefeningen gehouden werden van bomaanslagen. Meer bepaald op hetzelfde moment en op voor dezelfde plaatsen waar de echte aanslagen zijn geweest. Van toeval kan je hier niet meer spreken. De persoon die hiermee naar buiten komt zegt dat ze in het begin niet wisten of het echt was of niet.... Net zoals bij 9/11.

Op 9/11 waren er wargames en nu dit. Dit is weer een duidelijk teken voor inside job.

Onderstaand artikel geeft meer uitleg + de te veriefieren bron.

[size=4]London Underground Bombing 'Exercises' Took Place at Same Time as Real Attack[/size]

Culpability cover scenario echoes 9/11 wargames

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet | July 9 2005

A consultancy agency with government and police connections was running an exercise for an unnamed company that revolved around the London Underground being bombed at the exact same times and locations as happened in real life on the morning of July 7th.

On a BBC Radio 5 interview that aired on the evening of the 7th, the host interviewed Peter Power, Managing Director of Visor Consultants, which bills itself as a 'crisis management' advice company, better known to you and I as a PR firm.

Peter Power was a former Scotland Yard official, working at one time with the Anti Terrorist Branch.

Power told the host that at the exact same time that the London bombings were taking place, his company was running a 1,000 person strong exercise which drilled the London Underground being bombed at the exact same locations, at the exact same times, as happened in real life.

The transcript is as follows.

POWER: At half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up right now.

HOST: To get this quite straight, you were running an exercise to see how you would cope with this and it happened while you were running the exercise?

POWER: Precisely, and it was about half past nine this morning, we planned this for a company and for obvious reasons I don't want to reveal their name but they're listening and they'll know it. And we had a room full of crisis managers for the first time they'd met and so within five minutes we made a pretty rapid decision that this is the real one and so we went through the correct drills of activating crisis management procedures to jump from slow time to quick time thinking and so on.

Click here for a clip of this dialogue. Click here for a longer clip where the comments can be heard in their full context.

The fact that the exercise mirrored the exact locations and times of the bombings is light years beyond a coincidence. Power said the drill focused around 'simultaneous bombings'. At first the bombings were thought to have been spread over an hour, but the BBC reports just today that the bombings were in fact simultaneous.

Mr. Power (pictured above) and Visor Consultants need not have been 'in on the bombing' or anything of that nature for this to be of importance. The British government or one of their private company offshoots could have hired Visor to run the exercise for a number of purposes.

The exercise fulfils several different goals. It acts as a cover for the small compartamentalized government terrorists to carry out their operation without the larger security services becoming aware of what they're doing, and, more importantly, if they get caught during the attack or after with any incriminating evidence they can just claim that they were just taking part in the exercise.

This is precisely what happened on the morning of 9/11/2001. The CIA was conducting drills of flying hijacked planes into the WTC and Pentagon at 8:30 in the morning.

It is clear that at least five if not six training exercises were in operation in the days leading up to and on the morning of 9/11. This meant that NORAD radar screens showed as many as 22 hijacked airliners at the same time. NORAD had been briefed that this was part of the exercise drill and therefore normal reactive procedure was forestalled and delayed.

The large numbers of 'blips' on NORAD screens that displayed both real and 'drill' hijacked planes explain why confused press reports emerged hours after the attack stating that up to eight planes had been hijacked.

The Anglo-American establishment that controls the military-industrial complex of the West has been caught over a hundred times carrying out bombings and other terrorist attacks around the world to further their corporate aims and to blame their enemies.

The US government has been caught planning to carry out attacks and carrying out attacks. The British government has been caught red-handed as well. Members of Vladimir Putin's FSB were caught planting bombs in a Russian apartment building in 1999 by the Moscow police.

This is not speculation. Kermit Roosevelt admited on NPR radio that in 1953 the CIA and British intelligence carried out a wave of bombings and shootings in Iran. He then went on to brag about how they subsequently blamed the bombings on Iran's President, Mossadegh. Do you understand, these people brag about what they do 40 years later?

The London bombings have the same signature as the Madrild bombings of 3/11. Both of these bombings are almost indistinguishable from the Bolognia bombing in 1980 that killed over 80 people.

The bombing in Bolognia was part of a CIA operation code named Gladio, where the US government would pay right-wing terrorists to carry out bombings to be blamed on leftists in Europe. All of this was blown wide open when two of the Bolognia bombers were convited in an Italian court, forcing them to spill their guts admitting that they were neo-fascists contracted by the CIA. Operation Gladio documents have since been declassified.

The London terror alert level was lowered before the bombings took place. This gave the purpotrators extra cover to plan and execute the attack without having to evade the most stringent security.

In any crime you look at history and motive, The British government has been caught in multiple examples of carrying out bombings in London which were then blamed on the IRA. They even had one of their own MI5 agents wihin the Omagh bomb squad. Click here for an archive of this evidence.

The wider agenda will become clearer when Blair firmly points the finger at the selected patsies designated to take the fall. But for the moment he's happy to grandstand as the courageous leader who immedately returned to London to take control of the chaos.

BBC polls that were showing 80 per cent plus opposed the ID card will now likely flip back in the opposite direction. Support for the European Union and increased globalization through the G8 will rise. Who stands to gain from all this? Who has the motive?

From Putin blowing up his own apartment buildings to Israel being behind Hamas, the evidence is consistently clear that large scale terrorism is always state sponsored.

The Madrid train bombing is another example. The bombers were found to be police informants with close links to the Spanish security services. They had access to the most secure areas of the Madrid train system. The Spanish government initially tried to blaim the Basque group ETA for the blast in the hope that the people would rally behind the government and get them re-elected. After ETA denied involvement and the people started saying the government was involved, the Spanish government had to blame Al-Qaeda and kill some patsies by claiming they blew themselves up during a raid.

The London Underground exercises were used as the fallback cover to carry out the attack. This is the biggest smoking gun yet pointing directly to the most secretive levels of the British establishment itself being behind the attack.

More on this story as and when it develops.

[edit]
[size=1]Edit:[/size]

[size=1]After edit by exodus on 10-07-2005 at 16:56
Reason:
--------------------------------

Het is net ontdenkt dat er op de dag van de aanslagen oefeningen gehouden werden van bomaanslagen. Meer bepaald op hetzelfde moment en op voor dezelfde plaatsen waar de echte aanslagen zijn geweest. Van toeval kan je hier niet meer spreken. De persoon die hiermee naar buiten komt zegt dat ze in het begin niet wisten of het echt was of niet.... Net zoals bij 9/11.

Op 9/11 waren er wargames en nu dit. Dit is weer een duidelijk teken voor inside job.

Onderstaand artikel geeft meer uitleg + de te veriefieren bron.

[size=4]London Underground Bombing 'Exercises' Took Place at Same Time as Real Attack[/size]

Culpability cover scenario echoes 9/11 wargames

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet | July 9 2005

A consultancy agency with government and police connections was running an exercise for an unnamed company that revolved around the London Underground being bombed at the exact same times and locations as happened in real life on the morning of July 7th.

On a BBC Radio 5 interview that aired on the evening of the 7th, the host interviewed Peter Power, Managing Director of Visor Consultants, which bills itself as a 'crisis management' advice company, better known to you and I as a PR firm.

Peter Power was a former Scotland Yard official, working at one time with the Anti Terrorist Branch.

Power told the host that at the exact same time that the London bombings were taking place, his company was running a 1,000 person strong exercise which drilled the London Underground being bombed at the exact same locations, at the exact same times, as happened in real life.

The transcript is as follows.

POWER: At half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up right now.

HOST: To get this quite straight, you were running an exercise to see how you would cope with this and it happened while you were running the exercise?

POWER: Precisely, and it was about half past nine this morning, we planned this for a company and for obvious reasons I don't want to reveal their name but they're listening and they'll know it. And we had a room full of crisis managers for the first time they'd met and so within five minutes we made a pretty rapid decision that this is the real one and so we went through the correct drills of activating crisis management procedures to jump from slow time to quick time thinking and so on.

Click here for a clip of this dialogue. Click here for a longer clip where the comments can be heard in their full context.

The fact that the exercise mirrored the exact locations and times of the bombings is light years beyond a coincidence. Power said the drill focused around 'simultaneous bombings'. At first the bombings were thought to have been spread over an hour, but the BBC reports just today that the bombings were in fact simultaneous.

Mr. Power (pictured above) and Visor Consultants need not have been 'in on the bombing' or anything of that nature for this to be of importance. The British government or one of their private company offshoots could have hired Visor to run the exercise for a number of purposes.

The exercise fulfils several different goals. It acts as a cover for the small compartamentalized government terrorists to carry out their operation without the larger security services becoming aware of what they're doing, and, more importantly, if they get caught during the attack or after with any incriminating evidence they can just claim that they were just taking part in the exercise.

This is precisely what happened on the morning of 9/11/2001. The CIA was conducting drills of flying hijacked planes into the WTC and Pentagon at 8:30 in the morning.

It is clear that at least five if not six training exercises were in operation in the days leading up to and on the morning of 9/11. This meant that NORAD radar screens showed as many as 22 hijacked airliners at the same time. NORAD had been briefed that this was part of the exercise drill and therefore normal reactive procedure was forestalled and delayed.

The large numbers of 'blips' on NORAD screens that displayed both real and 'drill' hijacked planes explain why confused press reports emerged hours after the attack stating that up to eight planes had been hijacked.

The Anglo-American establishment that controls the military-industrial complex of the West has been caught over a hundred times carrying out bombings and other terrorist attacks around the world to further their corporate aims and to blame their enemies.

The US government has been caught planning to carry out attacks and carrying out attacks. The British government has been caught red-handed as well. Members of Vladimir Putin's FSB were caught planting bombs in a Russian apartment building in 1999 by the Moscow police.

This is not speculation. Kermit Roosevelt admited on NPR radio that in 1953 the CIA and British intelligence carried out a wave of bombings and shootings in Iran. He then went on to brag about how they subsequently blamed the bombings on Iran's President, Mossadegh. Do you understand, these people brag about what they do 40 years later?

The London bombings have the same signature as the Madrild bombings of 3/11. Both of these bombings are almost indistinguishable from the Bolognia bombing in 1980 that killed over 80 people.

The bombing in Bolognia was part of a CIA operation code named Gladio, where the US government would pay right-wing terrorists to carry out bombings to be blamed on leftists in Europe. All of this was blown wide open when two of the Bolognia bombers were convited in an Italian court, forcing them to spill their guts admitting that they were neo-fascists contracted by the CIA. Operation Gladio documents have since been declassified.

The London terror alert level was lowered before the bombings took place. This gave the purpotrators extra cover to plan and execute the attack without having to evade the most stringent security.

In any crime you look at history and motive, The British government has been caught in multiple examples of carrying out bombings in London which were then blamed on the IRA. They even had one of their own MI5 agents wihin the Omagh bomb squad. Click here for an archive of this evidence.

The wider agenda will become clearer when Blair firmly points the finger at the selected patsies designated to take the fall. But for the moment he's happy to grandstand as the courageous leader who immedately returned to London to take control of the chaos.

BBC polls that were showing 80 per cent plus opposed the ID card will now likely flip back in the opposite direction. Support for the European Union and increased globalization through the G8 will rise. Who stands to gain from all this? Who has the motive?

From Putin blowing up his own apartment buildings to Israel being behind Hamas, the evidence is consistently clear that large scale terrorism is always state sponsored.

The Madrid train bombing is another example. The bombers were found to be police informants with close links to the Spanish security services. They had access to the most secure areas of the Madrid train system. The Spanish government initially tried to blaim the Basque group ETA for the blast in the hope that the people would rally behind the government and get them re-elected. After ETA denied involvement and the people started saying the government was involved, the Spanish government had to blame Al-Qaeda and kill some patsies by claiming they blew themselves up during a raid.

The London Underground exercises were used as the fallback cover to carry out the attack. This is the biggest smoking gun yet pointing directly to the most secretive levels of the British establishment itself being behind the attack.

More on this story as and when it develops.

[/size]

[size=1]Edit:[/size]

[size=1]After edit by exodus on 10-07-2005 at 16:55
Reason:
--------------------------------

Het is net ontdenkt dat er op de dag van de aanslagen oefeningen gehouden werden van bomaanslagen. Meer bepaald op hetzelfde moment en op voor dezelfde plaatsen waar de echte aanslagen zijn geweest. Van toeval kan je hier niet meer spreken. De persoon die hiermee naar buiten komt zegt dat ze in het begin niet wisten of het echt was of niet.... Net zoals bij 9/11.

Op 9/11 waren en wargames en nu dit. Dit is weer een duidelijk teken voor inside job.

Onderstaand artikel geeft meer uitleg + de te veriefieren bron.

[size=4]London Underground Bombing 'Exercises' Took Place at Same Time as Real Attack[/size]

Culpability cover scenario echoes 9/11 wargames

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet | July 9 2005

A consultancy agency with government and police connections was running an exercise for an unnamed company that revolved around the London Underground being bombed at the exact same times and locations as happened in real life on the morning of July 7th.

On a BBC Radio 5 interview that aired on the evening of the 7th, the host interviewed Peter Power, Managing Director of Visor Consultants, which bills itself as a 'crisis management' advice company, better known to you and I as a PR firm.

Peter Power was a former Scotland Yard official, working at one time with the Anti Terrorist Branch.

Power told the host that at the exact same time that the London bombings were taking place, his company was running a 1,000 person strong exercise which drilled the London Underground being bombed at the exact same locations, at the exact same times, as happened in real life.

The transcript is as follows.

POWER: At half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up right now.

HOST: To get this quite straight, you were running an exercise to see how you would cope with this and it happened while you were running the exercise?

POWER: Precisely, and it was about half past nine this morning, we planned this for a company and for obvious reasons I don't want to reveal their name but they're listening and they'll know it. And we had a room full of crisis managers for the first time they'd met and so within five minutes we made a pretty rapid decision that this is the real one and so we went through the correct drills of activating crisis management procedures to jump from slow time to quick time thinking and so on.

Click here for a clip of this dialogue. Click here for a longer clip where the comments can be heard in their full context.

The fact that the exercise mirrored the exact locations and times of the bombings is light years beyond a coincidence. Power said the drill focused around 'simultaneous bombings'. At first the bombings were thought to have been spread over an hour, but the BBC reports just today that the bombings were in fact simultaneous.

Mr. Power (pictured above) and Visor Consultants need not have been 'in on the bombing' or anything of that nature for this to be of importance. The British government or one of their private company offshoots could have hired Visor to run the exercise for a number of purposes.

The exercise fulfils several different goals. It acts as a cover for the small compartamentalized government terrorists to carry out their operation without the larger security services becoming aware of what they're doing, and, more importantly, if they get caught during the attack or after with any incriminating evidence they can just claim that they were just taking part in the exercise.

This is precisely what happened on the morning of 9/11/2001. The CIA was conducting drills of flying hijacked planes into the WTC and Pentagon at 8:30 in the morning.

It is clear that at least five if not six training exercises were in operation in the days leading up to and on the morning of 9/11. This meant that NORAD radar screens showed as many as 22 hijacked airliners at the same time. NORAD had been briefed that this was part of the exercise drill and therefore normal reactive procedure was forestalled and delayed.

The large numbers of 'blips' on NORAD screens that displayed both real and 'drill' hijacked planes explain why confused press reports emerged hours after the attack stating that up to eight planes had been hijacked.

The Anglo-American establishment that controls the military-industrial complex of the West has been caught over a hundred times carrying out bombings and other terrorist attacks around the world to further their corporate aims and to blame their enemies.

The US government has been caught planning to carry out attacks and carrying out attacks. The British government has been caught red-handed as well. Members of Vladimir Putin's FSB were caught planting bombs in a Russian apartment building in 1999 by the Moscow police.

This is not speculation. Kermit Roosevelt admited on NPR radio that in 1953 the CIA and British intelligence carried out a wave of bombings and shootings in Iran. He then went on to brag about how they subsequently blamed the bombings on Iran's President, Mossadegh. Do you understand, these people brag about what they do 40 years later?

The London bombings have the same signature as the Madrild bombings of 3/11. Both of these bombings are almost indistinguishable from the Bolognia bombing in 1980 that killed over 80 people.

The bombing in Bolognia was part of a CIA operation code named Gladio, where the US government would pay right-wing terrorists to carry out bombings to be blamed on leftists in Europe. All of this was blown wide open when two of the Bolognia bombers were convited in an Italian court, forcing them to spill their guts admitting that they were neo-fascists contracted by the CIA. Operation Gladio documents have since been declassified.

The London terror alert level was lowered before the bombings took place. This gave the purpotrators extra cover to plan and execute the attack without having to evade the most stringent security.

In any crime you look at history and motive, The British government has been caught in multiple examples of carrying out bombings in London which were then blamed on the IRA. They even had one of their own MI5 agents wihin the Omagh bomb squad. Click here for an archive of this evidence.

The wider agenda will become clearer when Blair firmly points the finger at the selected patsies designated to take the fall. But for the moment he's happy to grandstand as the courageous leader who immedately returned to London to take control of the chaos.

BBC polls that were showing 80 per cent plus opposed the ID card will now likely flip back in the opposite direction. Support for the European Union and increased globalization through the G8 will rise. Who stands to gain from all this? Who has the motive?

From Putin blowing up his own apartment buildings to Israel being behind Hamas, the evidence is consistently clear that large scale terrorism is always state sponsored.

The Madrid train bombing is another example. The bombers were found to be police informants with close links to the Spanish security services. They had access to the most secure areas of the Madrid train system. The Spanish government initially tried to blaim the Basque group ETA for the blast in the hope that the people would rally behind the government and get them re-elected. After ETA denied involvement and the people started saying the government was involved, the Spanish government had to blame Al-Qaeda and kill some patsies by claiming they blew themselves up during a raid.

The London Underground exercises were used as the fallback cover to carry out the attack. This is the biggest smoking gun yet pointing directly to the most secretive levels of the British establishment itself being behind the attack.

More on this story as and when it develops.

[/size]

[size=1]Edit:[/size]

[size=1]After edit by exodus on 10-07-2005 at 16:55
Reason:
--------------------------------

Het is net ontdenkt dat er op de dag van de aanslagen oefeningen gehouden werden van bomaanslagen. Meer bepaald op hetzelfde moment en op voor dezelfde plaatsen waar de echte aanslagen zijn geweest. Van toeval kan je hier niet meer spreken. De persoon die hiermee naar buiten komt zegt dat ze in het begin niet wisten of het echt was of niet.... Net zoals bij 9/11.

Op 9/11 waren en wargames en nu dit. Dit is weer een duidelijk teken voor inside job.

Onderstaand artikel geeft meer uitleg + de te veriefieren bron.

London Underground Bombing 'Exercises' Took Place at Same Time as Real Attack

Culpability cover scenario echoes 9/11 wargames

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet | July 9 2005

A consultancy agency with government and police connections was running an exercise for an unnamed company that revolved around the London Underground being bombed at the exact same times and locations as happened in real life on the morning of July 7th.

On a BBC Radio 5 interview that aired on the evening of the 7th, the host interviewed Peter Power, Managing Director of Visor Consultants, which bills itself as a 'crisis management' advice company, better known to you and I as a PR firm.

Peter Power was a former Scotland Yard official, working at one time with the Anti Terrorist Branch.

Power told the host that at the exact same time that the London bombings were taking place, his company was running a 1,000 person strong exercise which drilled the London Underground being bombed at the exact same locations, at the exact same times, as happened in real life.

The transcript is as follows.

POWER: At half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up right now.

HOST: To get this quite straight, you were running an exercise to see how you would cope with this and it happened while you were running the exercise?

POWER: Precisely, and it was about half past nine this morning, we planned this for a company and for obvious reasons I don't want to reveal their name but they're listening and they'll know it. And we had a room full of crisis managers for the first time they'd met and so within five minutes we made a pretty rapid decision that this is the real one and so we went through the correct drills of activating crisis management procedures to jump from slow time to quick time thinking and so on.

Click here for a clip of this dialogue. Click here for a longer clip where the comments can be heard in their full context.

The fact that the exercise mirrored the exact locations and times of the bombings is light years beyond a coincidence. Power said the drill focused around 'simultaneous bombings'. At first the bombings were thought to have been spread over an hour, but the BBC reports just today that the bombings were in fact simultaneous.

Mr. Power (pictured above) and Visor Consultants need not have been 'in on the bombing' or anything of that nature for this to be of importance. The British government or one of their private company offshoots could have hired Visor to run the exercise for a number of purposes.

The exercise fulfils several different goals. It acts as a cover for the small compartamentalized government terrorists to carry out their operation without the larger security services becoming aware of what they're doing, and, more importantly, if they get caught during the attack or after with any incriminating evidence they can just claim that they were just taking part in the exercise.

This is precisely what happened on the morning of 9/11/2001. The CIA was conducting drills of flying hijacked planes into the WTC and Pentagon at 8:30 in the morning.

It is clear that at least five if not six training exercises were in operation in the days leading up to and on the morning of 9/11. This meant that NORAD radar screens showed as many as 22 hijacked airliners at the same time. NORAD had been briefed that this was part of the exercise drill and therefore normal reactive procedure was forestalled and delayed.

The large numbers of 'blips' on NORAD screens that displayed both real and 'drill' hijacked planes explain why confused press reports emerged hours after the attack stating that up to eight planes had been hijacked.

The Anglo-American establishment that controls the military-industrial complex of the West has been caught over a hundred times carrying out bombings and other terrorist attacks around the world to further their corporate aims and to blame their enemies.

The US government has been caught planning to carry out attacks and carrying out attacks. The British government has been caught red-handed as well. Members of Vladimir Putin's FSB were caught planting bombs in a Russian apartment building in 1999 by the Moscow police.

This is not speculation. Kermit Roosevelt admited on NPR radio that in 1953 the CIA and British intelligence carried out a wave of bombings and shootings in Iran. He then went on to brag about how they subsequently blamed the bombings on Iran's President, Mossadegh. Do you understand, these people brag about what they do 40 years later?

The London bombings have the same signature as the Madrild bombings of 3/11. Both of these bombings are almost indistinguishable from the Bolognia bombing in 1980 that killed over 80 people.

The bombing in Bolognia was part of a CIA operation code named Gladio, where the US government would pay right-wing terrorists to carry out bombings to be blamed on leftists in Europe. All of this was blown wide open when two of the Bolognia bombers were convited in an Italian court, forcing them to spill their guts admitting that they were neo-fascists contracted by the CIA. Operation Gladio documents have since been declassified.

The London terror alert level was lowered before the bombings took place. This gave the purpotrators extra cover to plan and execute the attack without having to evade the most stringent security.

In any crime you look at history and motive, The British government has been caught in multiple examples of carrying out bombings in London which were then blamed on the IRA. They even had one of their own MI5 agents wihin the Omagh bomb squad. Click here for an archive of this evidence.

The wider agenda will become clearer when Blair firmly points the finger at the selected patsies designated to take the fall. But for the moment he's happy to grandstand as the courageous leader who immedately returned to London to take control of the chaos.

BBC polls that were showing 80 per cent plus opposed the ID card will now likely flip back in the opposite direction. Support for the European Union and increased globalization through the G8 will rise. Who stands to gain from all this? Who has the motive?

From Putin blowing up his own apartment buildings to Israel being behind Hamas, the evidence is consistently clear that large scale terrorism is always state sponsored.

The Madrid train bombing is another example. The bombers were found to be police informants with close links to the Spanish security services. They had access to the most secure areas of the Madrid train system. The Spanish government initially tried to blaim the Basque group ETA for the blast in the hope that the people would rally behind the government and get them re-elected. After ETA denied involvement and the people started saying the government was involved, the Spanish government had to blame Al-Qaeda and kill some patsies by claiming they blew themselves up during a raid.

The London Underground exercises were used as the fallback cover to carry out the attack. This is the biggest smoking gun yet pointing directly to the most secretive levels of the British establishment itself being behind the attack.

More on this story as and when it develops.

[/size]

[size=1]Before any edits, post was:
--------------------------------

Het is net ontdenkt dat er op de dag van de aanslagen oefeningen gehouden werden van bomaanslagen. Meer bepaald op hetzelfde moment en op voor dezelfde plaatsen waar de echte aanslagen zijn geweest. Van toeval kan je hier niet meer spreken. De persoon die hiermee naar buiten komt zegt dat ze in het begin niet wisten of het echt was of niet.... Net zoals bij 9/11.

Op 9/11 waren en wargames en nu dit. Dit is weer een duidelijk teken voor inside job.

Onderstaand artikel geeft meer uitleg + de te veriefieren bron.

London Underground Bombing 'Exercises' Took Place at Same Time as Real Attack
Culpability cover scenario echoes 9/11 wargames

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet | July 9 2005

A consultancy agency with government and police connections was running an exercise for an unnamed company that revolved around the London Underground being bombed at the exact same times and locations as happened in real life on the morning of July 7th.

On a BBC Radio 5 interview that aired on the evening of the 7th, the host interviewed Peter Power, Managing Director of Visor Consultants, which bills itself as a 'crisis management' advice company, better known to you and I as a PR firm.

Peter Power was a former Scotland Yard official, working at one time with the Anti Terrorist Branch.

Power told the host that at the exact same time that the London bombings were taking place, his company was running a 1,000 person strong exercise which drilled the London Underground being bombed at the exact same locations, at the exact same times, as happened in real life.

The transcript is as follows.

POWER: At half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up right now.

HOST: To get this quite straight, you were running an exercise to see how you would cope with this and it happened while you were running the exercise?

POWER: Precisely, and it was about half past nine this morning, we planned this for a company and for obvious reasons I don't want to reveal their name but they're listening and they'll know it. And we had a room full of crisis managers for the first time they'd met and so within five minutes we made a pretty rapid decision that this is the real one and so we went through the correct drills of activating crisis management procedures to jump from slow time to quick time thinking and so on.

Click here for a clip of this dialogue. Click here for a longer clip where the comments can be heard in their full context.

The fact that the exercise mirrored the exact locations and times of the bombings is light years beyond a coincidence. Power said the drill focused around 'simultaneous bombings'. At first the bombings were thought to have been spread over an hour, but the BBC reports just today that the bombings were in fact simultaneous.

Mr. Power (pictured above) and Visor Consultants need not have been 'in on the bombing' or anything of that nature for this to be of importance. The British government or one of their private company offshoots could have hired Visor to run the exercise for a number of purposes.

The exercise fulfils several different goals. It acts as a cover for the small compartamentalized government terrorists to carry out their operation without the larger security services becoming aware of what they're doing, and, more importantly, if they get caught during the attack or after with any incriminating evidence they can just claim that they were just taking part in the exercise.

This is precisely what happened on the morning of 9/11/2001. The CIA was conducting drills of flying hijacked planes into the WTC and Pentagon at 8:30 in the morning.

It is clear that at least five if not six training exercises were in operation in the days leading up to and on the morning of 9/11. This meant that NORAD radar screens showed as many as 22 hijacked airliners at the same time. NORAD had been briefed that this was part of the exercise drill and therefore normal reactive procedure was forestalled and delayed.

The large numbers of 'blips' on NORAD screens that displayed both real and 'drill' hijacked planes explain why confused press reports emerged hours after the attack stating that up to eight planes had been hijacked.

The Anglo-American establishment that controls the military-industrial complex of the West has been caught over a hundred times carrying out bombings and other terrorist attacks around the world to further their corporate aims and to blame their enemies.

The US government has been caught planning to carry out attacks and carrying out attacks. The British government has been caught red-handed as well. Members of Vladimir Putin's FSB were caught planting bombs in a Russian apartment building in 1999 by the Moscow police.

This is not speculation. Kermit Roosevelt admited on NPR radio that in 1953 the CIA and British intelligence carried out a wave of bombings and shootings in Iran. He then went on to brag about how they subsequently blamed the bombings on Iran's President, Mossadegh. Do you understand, these people brag about what they do 40 years later?

The London bombings have the same signature as the Madrild bombings of 3/11. Both of these bombings are almost indistinguishable from the Bolognia bombing in 1980 that killed over 80 people.

The bombing in Bolognia was part of a CIA operation code named Gladio, where the US government would pay right-wing terrorists to carry out bombings to be blamed on leftists in Europe. All of this was blown wide open when two of the Bolognia bombers were convited in an Italian court, forcing them to spill their guts admitting that they were neo-fascists contracted by the CIA. Operation Gladio documents have since been declassified.

The London terror alert level was lowered before the bombings took place. This gave the purpotrators extra cover to plan and execute the attack without having to evade the most stringent security.

In any crime you look at history and motive, The British government has been caught in multiple examples of carrying out bombings in London which were then blamed on the IRA. They even had one of their own MI5 agents wihin the Omagh bomb squad. Click here for an archive of this evidence.

The wider agenda will become clearer when Blair firmly points the finger at the selected patsies designated to take the fall. But for the moment he's happy to grandstand as the courageous leader who immedately returned to London to take control of the chaos.

BBC polls that were showing 80 per cent plus opposed the ID card will now likely flip back in the opposite direction. Support for the European Union and increased globalization through the G8 will rise. Who stands to gain from all this? Who has the motive?

From Putin blowing up his own apartment buildings to Israel being behind Hamas, the evidence is consistently clear that large scale terrorism is always state sponsored.

The Madrid train bombing is another example. The bombers were found to be police informants with close links to the Spanish security services. They had access to the most secure areas of the Madrid train system. The Spanish government initially tried to blaim the Basque group ETA for the blast in the hope that the people would rally behind the government and get them re-elected. After ETA denied involvement and the people started saying the government was involved, the Spanish government had to blame Al-Qaeda and kill some patsies by claiming they blew themselves up during a raid.

The London Underground exercises were used as the fallback cover to carry out the attack. This is the biggest smoking gun yet pointing directly to the most secretive levels of the British establishment itself being behind the attack.

More on this story as and when it develops.

[/size]

[/edit]

[Chipie]

Ik denk dat men weeral voor een tijdje vertrokken is...

[maddox]

Hier ga ik zelfs geen moeite voor doen. De technische kant is overduidelijk. En de samenzweerders hebben weer een kluif.

[Kayo]

Over dit topic gesproken : de smoking gun
Hier een detail :

onbevestigde verklaringen uit de media hebben gesproken over mannen met witte pakken die binnen enkele minuten na de explosie aanwezig waren, alleen waren ze hier donkerblauw ...

[Firestone]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Chipie

Ik denk dat men weeral voor een tijdje vertrokken is...

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door maddox

Hier ga ik zelfs geen moeite voor doen. De technische kant is overduidelijk. En de samenzweerders hebben weer een kluif.

Inderdaad, daar gaan ze weer.

[exodus]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Firestone

Inderdaad, daar gaan ze weer.

Het is duidelijk dat jullie niet geinteresseerd zijn in de waarheid. Wat zijn de kansen dat er op exact hetzelfde moment en exact dezelfde plaats , oefeningen gaan plaatsvinden. Net als bij 9/11. En net voor de aanslagen was het "terror alert" verminderd.

Allemaal weer aanwijzingen dat het een inside job is.

[maddox]

welke waarheid? de believers die weer eens uit de bol gaan.
Of de waarheid die ik zie. Een stel idioten die met mensenlevens spelen.

[Bhairav]

Moest dat waar zijn, dan zouden ze dit doen om een eenheidsworst te creëren onder de individualiserende westerse bevolking.

[Firestone]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door exodus

Het is duidelijk dat jullie niet geinteresseerd zijn in de waarheid. Wat zijn de kansen dat er op exact hetzelfde moment en exact dezelfde plaats , oefeningen gaan plaatsvinden. Net als bij 9/11. En net voor de aanslagen was het "terror alert" verminderd.

Allemaal weer aanwijzingen dat het een inside job is.

Zucht.

Op 9/11 was er één wargame en geen 5 of zes.

Deze oefening was niet op de locatie van de aanslagen en de firma in kwestie had met de reactie op de aanslagen niets te maken.

Ga eens na hoe vaak in het verleden deze firma al gelijkaardige oefeningen heeft gedaan.

Samengevat: een totaal irrelevant verhaal.

Als jij echt geïnteresseerd was in de waarheid, dan zat je hier niet op 7/7 al te beweren dat het zeker een inside-job was.
Jij bent niet geïnteresseerd in de waarheid, alléén maar in de nep-verhalen rond illuminati en NWO. Daarom neem je verhalen als hierboven kritiekloos aan als "bewijs" van een inside-job, terwijl ze absoluut niets bewijzen.

En speel nu verder met wie er zin in heeft.

[exodus]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Firestone

Zucht.

Op 9/11 was er één wargame en geen 5 of zes.

Deze oefening was niet op de locatie van de aanslagen en de firma in kwestie had met de reactie op de aanslagen niets te maken.

Ga eens na hoe vaak in het verleden deze firma al gelijkaardige oefeningen heeft gedaan.

Samengevat: een totaal irrelevant verhaal.

Totaal onwaar wat je schrijft. De firma had er wel mee te maken en het was wel op dezelfde plaatsen. Hier wordt het uitgelegd:

Was aanslag Londen false flag operation?
Oefening op 7/7 identiek
aan aanslag Londen


In Londen werden op dezelfde tijden en plaatsen van de aanslagen oefeningen gehouden die nabootsten wat ineens werkelijkheid werd. Op de dag zelf van de aanslagen was het waarschuwingsniveau verlaagd. Beide elementen kunnen hebben bijgedragen aan het macabere succes van de aanslagen.

De oefeningen op 7 juli werden uitgevoerd door Visor Consultants, een bureau dat adviseert over beveiliging en wordt geleid door Peter Power, voormalig anti-terrorisme-expert van Scotland Yard. Hij vertelt op de dag van de aanslag in een radio5interview met de BBC [kort - lang MP3, en op ITV News, WMV] hoe de oefeningen die ochtend opeens overgingen in de realiteit: '[...] within five minutes we made a pretty rapid decision that this is the real one and so we went through the correct drills of activating crisis management procedures to jump from slow time to quick time thinking and so on.' Eerder op de dag 'the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre (JTAC) [lowered] its alert level, which is shared by police and large businesses. [...] Blair can expect concerted questioning over why the risk level was lowered at such a time', schrijft The Scotsman.

Oefening voormalig anti-terrorisme-expert overheid wordt werkelijkheid
'POWER: At half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up right now.
HOST: To get this quite straight, you were running an exercise to see how you would cope with this and it happened while you were running the exercise?
POWER: Precisely [...]', aldus een deel van het transcript van de uitzending, zoals geciteerd in een artikel van Paul Joseph Watson en Alex Jones.

Patronen aanslagen op Westen beginnen duidelijk te worden
Gelijkenissen met 11 september 2001 zijn onvermijdelijk. DaanSpeak rapporteerde in 2002 al over de enorme wargames die op 911 het verdedigingssysteem van de VS platlegden. Zonder deze oefeningen had 11 september niet kunnen plaatsvinden. De oefeningen in Londen werden uitgevoerd in opdracht van een niet-nadergenoemd bedrijf. Toch heeft de oefening mogelijk voor verwarring gezorgd bij de autoriteiten. Watson en Jones schrijven: 'The exercise fulfils several different goals. It acts as a cover for the small compartamentalized government terrorists to carry out their operation without the larger security services becoming aware of what they're doing, and, more importantly, if they get caught during the attack or after with any incriminating evidence they can just claim that they were just taking part in the exercise.' Eerder schreef DaanSpeak over de aanslagen in Moskou in 1999 waar agenten van de geheime dienst FSB werden betrapt bij het leggen van (nep?)bommen die zouden dienen in een oefening. De smoes die de FSB gebruikte, zou Visor Consultants ook achter de hand hebben kunnen gehouden. Uiteraard is dit speculatie, maar bij dit soort aanslagen, is enige achterdocht geboden omdat ze in het verleden vaak werden uitgevoerd in opdracht van het Westen (zie de laatste alinea van dit artikel).

Scotland Yard waarschuwt Israëlische ambassade vóór aanslag
'Just before the blasts, Scotland Yard called the security officer at the Israeli Embassy to say they had received warnings of possible attacks', schrijft Associated Press. Gevolg was dat de voormalige Israëlische premier Netanyahu -die op het punt stond te vetrekken naar een economie-conferentie in een hotel net boven een van de later getroffen metrostations- bleef zitten waar hij zat. Israël ontkent later dat het een waarschuwing heeft ontvangen van Scotland Yard. Voorkennis bij de aanslag in Londen is opmerkelijk, maar niet heel eigenaardig. Bij dit soort aanslagen, denk maar aan Oklahoma, 11 september en Bali is wel vaker sprake van voorkennis.

'Al Qaida-terrorist' droomcrimineel Westerse regeringen
Bij ervaren DaanSpeak-lezers begonnen direct de alarmbellen te rinkelen toen de berichten verschenen dat Al Qaida weer eens had toegeslagen; allerlei emails werden naar de DaanSpeak-redactie gezonden. De eerste aanleiding daarvan was mogelijk ons artikel met de titel Al Qaida bestaat niet - Bin-Ladenvideo's zijn nep - Osama bin Laden is dood. Een tweede reden was mogelijk onze berichtgeving over de aanslagen op de VS op 11 september 2001. Inmiddels blijkt meer en meer dat dit een door de VS zelf uitgevoerde aanslag betreft. Gevolg is dat zowel christenen als moslims (en iedereen ertussen) zich een loer laten draaien door de VS en met beide benen in de valkuil stappen die voor hen is gelegd. Het is onderdeel van een tactiek die begon na het instorten van het communisme en concreet werd bij de aanslag in Oklahoma, zoals we al eerder schreven: een zaak die riekt aan alle kanten. Vanaf toen werd de Amerikaanse burger duidelijk dat er een nog groter gevaar bestond dan het communisme, namelijk het terrorisme. Waren de commies al een goede vijand, de terrorist is de ultieme tegenstander: onaanwijsbaar, onuitroeibaar en in staat op ieder moment toe te slaan. Het is de basis voor de huidige Westerse politiek die regeert door de angst.

De claim dat Al Qaida achter de aanslag in Londen zit, rammelt volgens 'MSNBC TV translator Jacob Keryakes, who said that a copy of the message was later posted on a secular Web site, noted that the claim of responsibility contained an error in one of the Quranic verses it cited. That suggests that the claim may be phony, he said. "This is not something al-Qaida would do," he said.' Dit doet direct denken aan de auto die na de aanslagen van 11 september werd aangetroffen met een koran erin en een in het Arabisch geschreven handleiding hoe je een vliegtuig moet besturen, en de brief [PDF] van hoofdkaper Mohammed Atta, waarover journalist Robert Fisk schrijft: 'What Muslim Would Write: 'The Time of Fun and Waste is Gone'?'. Omdat het altijd gekker kan, schrijft The Guardian in een artikel getiteld Uncle Sam's lucky finds: ' In less than a week came another find, two blocks away from the twin towers, in the shape of Atta's passport. We had all seen the blizzard of paper rain down from the towers, but the idea that Atta's passport had escaped from that inferno unsinged would have tested the credulity of the staunchest supporter of the FBI's crackdown on terrorism.'

Aanslagen op Westen vaak false flag operations
Een groot deel van de aanslagen op het Westen bestaan uit zogenoemde false flag operations: operaties van Westerse geheime diensten die de schuld van de aanslag in de schoenen schuiven van hun vermeende vijanden. Als je dit soort operaties (denk aan Gladio) aftrekt van de optelsom aan aanslagen, dan houd je niet veel over. DaanSpeak staat vol met voorbeelden van dit soort aanslagen, waaronder de aanslag op Pearl Harbour en de aanslagen op 11 september. Maar denk ook aan ons artikel waarin we uitleggen hoe de Mossad van plan was aanslagen te gaan plegen op Israeli's en die vervolgens te laten claimen door palestijnen uit naam van Al Qaida. In hetzelfde artikel ook informatie onder de kop 'Experts: Israël steunde Hamas om vredesproces te saboteren'. Het eerste wat je bij dit soort aanslagen moet afvragen is Cui bono, wie profiteert ervan? Het antwoord is dan vaak Cui prodest scelus, est fecit; vrij vertaald: Hij die voordeel behaalt uit de misdaad is de pleger ervan, een uitspraak die we aanhaalden in een artikel geschreven op 11 september 2001.[edit]
[size=1]Edit:[/size]

[size=1]After edit by exodus on 11-07-2005 at 18:01
Reason:
--------------------------------

Totaal onwaar wat je schrijft. De firma had er wel mee te maken en het was wel op dezelfde plaatsen. Hier wordt het uitgelegd:

Was aanslag Londen false flag operation?
Oefening op 7/7 identiek
aan aanslag Londen


In Londen werden op dezelfde tijden en plaatsen van de aanslagen oefeningen gehouden die nabootsten wat ineens werkelijkheid werd. Op de dag zelf van de aanslagen was het waarschuwingsniveau verlaagd. Beide elementen kunnen hebben bijgedragen aan het macabere succes van de aanslagen.

De oefeningen op 7 juli werden uitgevoerd door Visor Consultants, een bureau dat adviseert over beveiliging en wordt geleid door Peter Power, voormalig anti-terrorisme-expert van Scotland Yard. Hij vertelt op de dag van de aanslag in een radio5interview met de BBC [kort - lang MP3, en op ITV News, WMV] hoe de oefeningen die ochtend opeens overgingen in de realiteit: '[...] within five minutes we made a pretty rapid decision that this is the real one and so we went through the correct drills of activating crisis management procedures to jump from slow time to quick time thinking and so on.' Eerder op de dag 'the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre (JTAC) [lowered] its alert level, which is shared by police and large businesses. [...] Blair can expect concerted questioning over why the risk level was lowered at such a time', schrijft The Scotsman.

Oefening voormalig anti-terrorisme-expert overheid wordt werkelijkheid
'POWER: At half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up right now.
HOST: To get this quite straight, you were running an exercise to see how you would cope with this and it happened while you were running the exercise?
POWER: Precisely [...]', aldus een deel van het transcript van de uitzending, zoals geciteerd in een artikel van Paul Joseph Watson en Alex Jones.

Patronen aanslagen op Westen beginnen duidelijk te worden
Gelijkenissen met 11 september 2001 zijn onvermijdelijk. DaanSpeak rapporteerde in 2002 al over de enorme wargames die op 911 het verdedigingssysteem van de VS platlegden. Zonder deze oefeningen had 11 september niet kunnen plaatsvinden. De oefeningen in Londen werden uitgevoerd in opdracht van een niet-nadergenoemd bedrijf. Toch heeft de oefening mogelijk voor verwarring gezorgd bij de autoriteiten. Watson en Jones schrijven: 'The exercise fulfils several different goals. It acts as a cover for the small compartamentalized government terrorists to carry out their operation without the larger security services becoming aware of what they're doing, and, more importantly, if they get caught during the attack or after with any incriminating evidence they can just claim that they were just taking part in the exercise.' Eerder schreef DaanSpeak over de aanslagen in Moskou in 1999 waar agenten van de geheime dienst FSB werden betrapt bij het leggen van (nep?)bommen die zouden dienen in een oefening. De smoes die de FSB gebruikte, zou Visor Consultants ook achter de hand hebben kunnen gehouden. Uiteraard is dit speculatie, maar bij dit soort aanslagen, is enige achterdocht geboden omdat ze in het verleden vaak werden uitgevoerd in opdracht van het Westen (zie de laatste alinea van dit artikel).

Scotland Yard waarschuwt Israëlische ambassade vóór aanslag
'Just before the blasts, Scotland Yard called the security officer at the Israeli Embassy to say they had received warnings of possible attacks', schrijft Associated Press. Gevolg was dat de voormalige Israëlische premier Netanyahu -die op het punt stond te vetrekken naar een economie-conferentie in een hotel net boven een van de later getroffen metrostations- bleef zitten waar hij zat. Israël ontkent later dat het een waarschuwing heeft ontvangen van Scotland Yard. Voorkennis bij de aanslag in Londen is opmerkelijk, maar niet heel eigenaardig. Bij dit soort aanslagen, denk maar aan Oklahoma, 11 september en Bali is wel vaker sprake van voorkennis.

'Al Qaida-terrorist' droomcrimineel Westerse regeringen
Bij ervaren DaanSpeak-lezers begonnen direct de alarmbellen te rinkelen toen de berichten verschenen dat Al Qaida weer eens had toegeslagen; allerlei emails werden naar de DaanSpeak-redactie gezonden. De eerste aanleiding daarvan was mogelijk ons artikel met de titel Al Qaida bestaat niet - Bin-Ladenvideo's zijn nep - Osama bin Laden is dood. Een tweede reden was mogelijk onze berichtgeving over de aanslagen op de VS op 11 september 2001. Inmiddels blijkt meer en meer dat dit een door de VS zelf uitgevoerde aanslag betreft. Gevolg is dat zowel christenen als moslims (en iedereen ertussen) zich een loer laten draaien door de VS en met beide benen in de valkuil stappen die voor hen is gelegd. Het is onderdeel van een tactiek die begon na het instorten van het communisme en concreet werd bij de aanslag in Oklahoma, zoals we al eerder schreven: een zaak die riekt aan alle kanten. Vanaf toen werd de Amerikaanse burger duidelijk dat er een nog groter gevaar bestond dan het communisme, namelijk het terrorisme. Waren de commies al een goede vijand, de terrorist is de ultieme tegenstander: onaanwijsbaar, onuitroeibaar en in staat op ieder moment toe te slaan. Het is de basis voor de huidige Westerse politiek die regeert door de angst.

De claim dat Al Qaida achter de aanslag in Londen zit, rammelt volgens 'MSNBC TV translator Jacob Keryakes, who said that a copy of the message was later posted on a secular Web site, noted that the claim of responsibility contained an error in one of the Quranic verses it cited. That suggests that the claim may be phony, he said. "This is not something al-Qaida would do," he said.' Dit doet direct denken aan de auto die na de aanslagen van 11 september werd aangetroffen met een koran erin en een in het Arabisch geschreven handleiding hoe je een vliegtuig moet besturen, en de brief [PDF] van hoofdkaper Mohammed Atta, waarover journalist Robert Fisk schrijft: 'What Muslim Would Write: 'The Time of Fun and Waste is Gone'?'. Omdat het altijd gekker kan, schrijft The Guardian in een artikel getiteld Uncle Sam's lucky finds: ' In less than a week came another find, two blocks away from the twin towers, in the shape of Atta's passport. We had all seen the blizzard of paper rain down from the towers, but the idea that Atta's passport had escaped from that inferno unsinged would have tested the credulity of the staunchest supporter of the FBI's crackdown on terrorism.'

Aanslagen op Westen vaak false flag operations
Een groot deel van de aanslagen op het Westen bestaan uit zogenoemde false flag operations: operaties van Westerse geheime diensten die de schuld van de aanslag in de schoenen schuiven van hun vermeende vijanden. Als je dit soort operaties (denk aan Gladio) aftrekt van de optelsom aan aanslagen, dan houd je niet veel over. DaanSpeak staat vol met voorbeelden van dit soort aanslagen, waaronder de aanslag op Pearl Harbour en de aanslagen op 11 september. Maar denk ook aan ons artikel waarin we uitleggen hoe de Mossad van plan was aanslagen te gaan plegen op Israeli's en die vervolgens te laten claimen door palestijnen uit naam van Al Qaida. In hetzelfde artikel ook informatie onder de kop 'Experts: Israël steunde Hamas om vredesproces te saboteren'. Het eerste wat je bij dit soort aanslagen moet afvragen is Cui bono, wie profiteert ervan? Het antwoord is dan vaak Cui prodest scelus, est fecit; vrij vertaald: Hij die voordeel behaalt uit de misdaad is de pleger ervan, een uitspraak die we aanhaalden in een artikel geschreven op 11 september 2001.[/size]

[size=1]Before any edits, post was:
--------------------------------

Totaal onwaar wat je schrijft. De firma had er wel mee te maken. Hier wordt het uitgelegd:

Was aanslag Londen false flag operation?
Oefening op 7/7 identiek
aan aanslag Londen


In Londen werden op dezelfde tijden en plaatsen van de aanslagen oefeningen gehouden die nabootsten wat ineens werkelijkheid werd. Op de dag zelf van de aanslagen was het waarschuwingsniveau verlaagd. Beide elementen kunnen hebben bijgedragen aan het macabere succes van de aanslagen.

De oefeningen op 7 juli werden uitgevoerd door Visor Consultants, een bureau dat adviseert over beveiliging en wordt geleid door Peter Power, voormalig anti-terrorisme-expert van Scotland Yard. Hij vertelt op de dag van de aanslag in een radio5interview met de BBC [kort - lang MP3, en op ITV News, WMV] hoe de oefeningen die ochtend opeens overgingen in de realiteit: '[...] within five minutes we made a pretty rapid decision that this is the real one and so we went through the correct drills of activating crisis management procedures to jump from slow time to quick time thinking and so on.' Eerder op de dag 'the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre (JTAC) [lowered] its alert level, which is shared by police and large businesses. [...] Blair can expect concerted questioning over why the risk level was lowered at such a time', schrijft The Scotsman.

Oefening voormalig anti-terrorisme-expert overheid wordt werkelijkheid
'POWER: At half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up right now.
HOST: To get this quite straight, you were running an exercise to see how you would cope with this and it happened while you were running the exercise?
POWER: Precisely [...]', aldus een deel van het transcript van de uitzending, zoals geciteerd in een artikel van Paul Joseph Watson en Alex Jones.

Patronen aanslagen op Westen beginnen duidelijk te worden
Gelijkenissen met 11 september 2001 zijn onvermijdelijk. DaanSpeak rapporteerde in 2002 al over de enorme wargames die op 911 het verdedigingssysteem van de VS platlegden. Zonder deze oefeningen had 11 september niet kunnen plaatsvinden. De oefeningen in Londen werden uitgevoerd in opdracht van een niet-nadergenoemd bedrijf. Toch heeft de oefening mogelijk voor verwarring gezorgd bij de autoriteiten. Watson en Jones schrijven: 'The exercise fulfils several different goals. It acts as a cover for the small compartamentalized government terrorists to carry out their operation without the larger security services becoming aware of what they're doing, and, more importantly, if they get caught during the attack or after with any incriminating evidence they can just claim that they were just taking part in the exercise.' Eerder schreef DaanSpeak over de aanslagen in Moskou in 1999 waar agenten van de geheime dienst FSB werden betrapt bij het leggen van (nep?)bommen die zouden dienen in een oefening. De smoes die de FSB gebruikte, zou Visor Consultants ook achter de hand hebben kunnen gehouden. Uiteraard is dit speculatie, maar bij dit soort aanslagen, is enige achterdocht geboden omdat ze in het verleden vaak werden uitgevoerd in opdracht van het Westen (zie de laatste alinea van dit artikel).

Scotland Yard waarschuwt Israëlische ambassade vóór aanslag
'Just before the blasts, Scotland Yard called the security officer at the Israeli Embassy to say they had received warnings of possible attacks', schrijft Associated Press. Gevolg was dat de voormalige Israëlische premier Netanyahu -die op het punt stond te vetrekken naar een economie-conferentie in een hotel net boven een van de later getroffen metrostations- bleef zitten waar hij zat. Israël ontkent later dat het een waarschuwing heeft ontvangen van Scotland Yard. Voorkennis bij de aanslag in Londen is opmerkelijk, maar niet heel eigenaardig. Bij dit soort aanslagen, denk maar aan Oklahoma, 11 september en Bali is wel vaker sprake van voorkennis.

'Al Qaida-terrorist' droomcrimineel Westerse regeringen
Bij ervaren DaanSpeak-lezers begonnen direct de alarmbellen te rinkelen toen de berichten verschenen dat Al Qaida weer eens had toegeslagen; allerlei emails werden naar de DaanSpeak-redactie gezonden. De eerste aanleiding daarvan was mogelijk ons artikel met de titel Al Qaida bestaat niet - Bin-Ladenvideo's zijn nep - Osama bin Laden is dood. Een tweede reden was mogelijk onze berichtgeving over de aanslagen op de VS op 11 september 2001. Inmiddels blijkt meer en meer dat dit een door de VS zelf uitgevoerde aanslag betreft. Gevolg is dat zowel christenen als moslims (en iedereen ertussen) zich een loer laten draaien door de VS en met beide benen in de valkuil stappen die voor hen is gelegd. Het is onderdeel van een tactiek die begon na het instorten van het communisme en concreet werd bij de aanslag in Oklahoma, zoals we al eerder schreven: een zaak die riekt aan alle kanten. Vanaf toen werd de Amerikaanse burger duidelijk dat er een nog groter gevaar bestond dan het communisme, namelijk het terrorisme. Waren de commies al een goede vijand, de terrorist is de ultieme tegenstander: onaanwijsbaar, onuitroeibaar en in staat op ieder moment toe te slaan. Het is de basis voor de huidige Westerse politiek die regeert door de angst.

De claim dat Al Qaida achter de aanslag in Londen zit, rammelt volgens 'MSNBC TV translator Jacob Keryakes, who said that a copy of the message was later posted on a secular Web site, noted that the claim of responsibility contained an error in one of the Quranic verses it cited. That suggests that the claim may be phony, he said. "This is not something al-Qaida would do," he said.' Dit doet direct denken aan de auto die na de aanslagen van 11 september werd aangetroffen met een koran erin en een in het Arabisch geschreven handleiding hoe je een vliegtuig moet besturen, en de brief [PDF] van hoofdkaper Mohammed Atta, waarover journalist Robert Fisk schrijft: 'What Muslim Would Write: 'The Time of Fun and Waste is Gone'?'. Omdat het altijd gekker kan, schrijft The Guardian in een artikel getiteld Uncle Sam's lucky finds: ' In less than a week came another find, two blocks away from the twin towers, in the shape of Atta's passport. We had all seen the blizzard of paper rain down from the towers, but the idea that Atta's passport had escaped from that inferno unsinged would have tested the credulity of the staunchest supporter of the FBI's crackdown on terrorism.'

Aanslagen op Westen vaak false flag operations
Een groot deel van de aanslagen op het Westen bestaan uit zogenoemde false flag operations: operaties van Westerse geheime diensten die de schuld van de aanslag in de schoenen schuiven van hun vermeende vijanden. Als je dit soort operaties (denk aan Gladio) aftrekt van de optelsom aan aanslagen, dan houd je niet veel over. DaanSpeak staat vol met voorbeelden van dit soort aanslagen, waaronder de aanslag op Pearl Harbour en de aanslagen op 11 september. Maar denk ook aan ons artikel waarin we uitleggen hoe de Mossad van plan was aanslagen te gaan plegen op Israeli's en die vervolgens te laten claimen door palestijnen uit naam van Al Qaida. In hetzelfde artikel ook informatie onder de kop 'Experts: Israël steunde Hamas om vredesproces te saboteren'. Het eerste wat je bij dit soort aanslagen moet afvragen is Cui bono, wie profiteert ervan? Het antwoord is dan vaak Cui prodest scelus, est fecit; vrij vertaald: Hij die voordeel behaalt uit de misdaad is de pleger ervan, een uitspraak die we aanhaalden in een artikel geschreven op 11 september 2001.[/size]

[/edit]

[Firestone]

Leer begrijpend lezen, Exodus.
De mensen van de oefening zaten niet in de metro.

En jouw leugen over Netanyahu ben ik kotsbeu.

Meer energie steek hier niet in.

[exodus]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Firestone

Leer begrijpend lezen, Exodus.
De mensen van de oefening zaten niet in de metro.

En jouw leugen over Netanyahu ben ik kotsbeu.

Meer energie steek hier niet in.

Dat bedrijf adiviseert in beveilinging en wordt geleid door een voormalig anti-terrorisme-expert van Scotland Yard. DAt bedrijf dat er wel iets mee te maken dat kan je alleen al zien aan de uitleg van de persoon in het artikel. Bovendien doet het er niet toe of dat bedrijf er iets mee te maken had of niet. Er kan extra verwarring onstaan zijn. Bovendien is de kans te klein om aan eht toeval toe te schrijven dat er zoiets op het exact dezelfde tijdsplits op exact dezelfde plaats ( dezelfde metro's dus), zo'n simulaties zijn. Dan heb je nog eens de terror alert die verlaagd werd.

Je zit altijd te zagen dat we geen bewijsen hebben, maar nu dit. WEER oefeiningen , net zoals bij 9/11. Dit zijn argumenten voor het verhaal van de believers. Jij bent in denial.

[Firestone]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door exodus

Dat bedrijf adiviseert in beveilinging en wordt geleid door een voormalig anti-terrorisme-expert van Scotland Yard. DAt bedrijf dat er wel iets mee te maken dat kan je alleen al zien aan de uitleg van de persoon in het artikel. Bovendien doet het er niet toe of dat bedrijf er iets mee te maken had of niet. Er kan extra verwarring onstaan zijn. Bovendien is de kans te klein om aan eht toeval toe te schrijven dat er zoiets op het exact dezelfde tijdsplits op exact dezelfde plaats ( dezelfde metro's dus), zo'n simulaties zijn. Dan heb je nog eens de terror alert die verlaagd werd.

Je zit altijd te zagen dat we geen bewijsen hebben, maar nu dit. WEER oefeiningen , net zoals bij 9/11. Dit zijn argumenten voor het verhaal van de believers. Jij bent in denial.

Lees het volledig verhaal dat je zelf gepost hebt (post 1).
De oefening was niet in de metro, maar simuleerde een aanslag op de metro.

Ik zaag trouwens niet om bewijzen, ik vraag er naar. Jij hoeft geen bewijzen, jij WEET al van 7/7 dat het een inside-job is.
Daarom dat je niet eens in staat bent te zien wat een irrelevant verhaal de conspiracy-sites nu weer brengen.[edit]
[size=1]Edit:[/size]

[size=1]After edit by Firestone on 11-07-2005 at 18:22
Reason:
--------------------------------

Lees het volledig verhaal dat je zelf gepost hebt (post 1).
De oefening was niet in de metro, maar simuleerde een aanslag op de metro.

Ik zaag trouwens niet om bewijzen, ik vraag er naar. Jij hoeft geen bewijzen, jij WEET al van 7/7 dat het een inside-job is.
Daarom dat je niet eens in staat bent te zien wat een irrelevant verhaal de conspiracy-sites nu weer brengen.[/size]

[size=1]Before any edits, post was:
--------------------------------

Lees het volledig verhaal dat je zelf gepost hebt (post 1).
De oefening was niet in de metro, maar simuleerde een aanslag op de metro.

Ik zaag trouwens niet om bewijzen, ik vraag er naar. Jij hoeft geen bewijzen, jij WEET al van 7/7 dat het een inside-jon is.
Daarom dat je niet eens in staat bent te zien wat een irrelevant verhaal de conspiracy-sites nu weer brengen.[/size]

[/edit]

[Kayo]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door exodus

Je zit altijd te zagen dat we geen bewijsen hebben, maar nu dit. WEER oefeiningen , net zoals bij 9/11. Dit zijn argumenten voor het verhaal van de believers. Jij bent in denial.

Het is gewoon ongelooflijk ,ze hebben niet alleen de oefeningen gerund, maar de former Scotland official sprak zelfs over dezelfde type bommen die op dezelfde locaties werden geplaats, dat is een beetje verdacht volgens mij ...
Bovendien was er zoals bij 9/11 ook een voorkennis geweest van de financiële markten.

[Kayo]

Hier ga ik een interessante artikel copy pasten uit de Financial Times van gisteren, over een geplande onderzoek dat in de loop van volgende week zal gedwarsdoomd worden door de regering Blair ...
Deze zaak lijkt een parallel te zijn wat dat er na 9/11 heeft plaatsgevonden ...



[size=4]Blair rejects calls for probe into bombings [/size]


Tony Blair will on Monday reject Conservative demands for a government inquiry into last week's London bomb attacks, insisting such a move would distract from the task of catching the perpetrators.


As police and security services on Sunday continued searching for the bombers - thought to be Islamist terrorists - Downing Street said the prime minister believed an inquiry now into the outrage which killed at least 49 people would be a "ludicrous diversion."

Instead, in a statement to the Commons on Monday following last week's Group of Eight summit, Mr Blair is expected to focus on the direction the government must take to ensure future terrorism is defeated.

In particular, the prime minister believes there must be far greater co-operation among European Union governments in the fight against terrorism - a view Charles Clarke, the home secretary, is expected to drive home at an emergency meeting of EU interior ministers this week.

He is expected to tell his counterparts governments must ensure operators keep data on telephone and internet exchanges for up to a year.

He also indicated on Sunday that he would consider granting further "control orders" if he thought they were necessary.

Mr Clarke said he was "very optimistic indeed" that last Thursday's bombers would be tracked down. But he feared further attacks could take place until that happened. "That is why the number one priority has to be the catching of the perpetrators."

Police continued to sift through the debris from Thursday's four explosions - three in the London Underground and one on a bus - and to examine witness accounts and intelligence as part of their hunt for the bombers.

But police chiefs indicated that had yet to establish the identity or the whereabouts of the terrorists they suspect belong to an extremist Islamist cell in sympathy with the aims of Al-Qaeda.

Tension several cities remained high over the weekend. Police said they had arrested, under prevention of terrorism laws, three British nationals on an inward flight at Heathrow early on Sunday but insisted that any link with last Thursday's bombings was speculative. The three were expected to be released later on Sunday night, according to police sources.

But the arrests, the dozens of bomb alerts in the English capital and an evacuation in the Birmingam city centre over the weekend reflect the nervousness of both police and the general public at the prospect that the bombers were still at large and capable of striking again.

The police also revealed that there had been a few cases of attacks on British Muslims in the wake of the bombings - including one in which an individual was "seriously injured."

The revelation came as some government officials expressed irritation that an article in a Sunday newspaper by Sir John Stevens, the former Metropolitan Police commissioner, might stir up racial tensions. He said the bombers were "almost certainly" British - with many more born and bred here willing to attack.

Bron : http://news.ft.com/cms/s/8186face-f1...00e2511c8.html[edit]
[size=1]Edit:[/size]

[size=1]After edit by Kayo on 11-07-2005 at 20:55
Reason:
--------------------------------

Hier ga ik een interessante artikel copy pasten uit de Financial Times van gisteren, over een geplande onderzoek dat in de loop van volgende week zal gedwarsdoomd worden door de regering Blair ...
Deze zaak lijkt een parallel te zijn wat dat er na 9/11 heeft plaatsgevonden ...



[size=4]Blair rejects calls for probe into bombings [/size]


Tony Blair will on Monday reject Conservative demands for a government inquiry into last week's London bomb attacks, insisting such a move would distract from the task of catching the perpetrators.


As police and security services on Sunday continued searching for the bombers - thought to be Islamist terrorists - Downing Street said the prime minister believed an inquiry now into the outrage which killed at least 49 people would be a "ludicrous diversion."

Instead, in a statement to the Commons on Monday following last week's Group of Eight summit, Mr Blair is expected to focus on the direction the government must take to ensure future terrorism is defeated.

In particular, the prime minister believes there must be far greater co-operation among European Union governments in the fight against terrorism - a view Charles Clarke, the home secretary, is expected to drive home at an emergency meeting of EU interior ministers this week.

He is expected to tell his counterparts governments must ensure operators keep data on telephone and internet exchanges for up to a year.

He also indicated on Sunday that he would consider granting further "control orders" if he thought they were necessary.

Mr Clarke said he was "very optimistic indeed" that last Thursday's bombers would be tracked down. But he feared further attacks could take place until that happened. "That is why the number one priority has to be the catching of the perpetrators."

Police continued to sift through the debris from Thursday's four explosions - three in the London Underground and one on a bus - and to examine witness accounts and intelligence as part of their hunt for the bombers.

But police chiefs indicated that had yet to establish the identity or the whereabouts of the terrorists they suspect belong to an extremist Islamist cell in sympathy with the aims of Al-Qaeda.

Tension several cities remained high over the weekend. Police said they had arrested, under prevention of terrorism laws, three British nationals on an inward flight at Heathrow early on Sunday but insisted that any link with last Thursday's bombings was speculative. The three were expected to be released later on Sunday night, according to police sources.

But the arrests, the dozens of bomb alerts in the English capital and an evacuation in the Birmingam city centre over the weekend reflect the nervousness of both police and the general public at the prospect that the bombers were still at large and capable of striking again.

The police also revealed that there had been a few cases of attacks on British Muslims in the wake of the bombings - including one in which an individual was "seriously injured."

The revelation came as some government officials expressed irritation that an article in a Sunday newspaper by Sir John Stevens, the former Metropolitan Police commissioner, might stir up racial tensions. He said the bombers were "almost certainly" British - with many more born and bred here willing to attack.

Bron : http://news.ft.com/cms/s/8186face-f1...00e2511c8.html[/size]

[size=1]Before any edits, post was:
--------------------------------

Hier ga ik een interessante artikel copy pasten uit de Financial Times van vandaag over een geplande onderzoek dat in de loop van volgende week zal gedwarsdoomd worden door de regering Blair ...
Deze zaak lijkt een parallel te zijn wat dat er na 9/11 heeft plaatsgevonden ...




[size=4]Blair rejects calls for probe into bombings [/size]


Tony Blair will on Monday reject Conservative demands for a government inquiry into last week's London bomb attacks, insisting such a move would distract from the task of catching the perpetrators.

//
As police and security services on Sunday continued searching for the bombers - thought to be Islamist terrorists - Downing Street said the prime minister believed an inquiry now into the outrage which killed at least 49 people would be a "ludicrous diversion."

Instead, in a statement to the Commons on Monday following last week's Group of Eight summit, Mr Blair is expected to focus on the direction the government must take to ensure future terrorism is defeated.

In particular, the prime minister believes there must be far greater co-operation among European Union governments in the fight against terrorism - a view Charles Clarke, the home secretary, is expected to drive home at an emergency meeting of EU interior ministers this week.

He is expected to tell his counterparts governments must ensure operators keep data on telephone and internet exchanges for up to a year.

He also indicated on Sunday that he would consider granting further "control orders" if he thought they were necessary.

Mr Clarke said he was "very optimistic indeed" that last Thursday's bombers would be tracked down. But he feared further attacks could take place until that happened. "That is why the number one priority has to be the catching of the perpetrators."

Police continued to sift through the debris from Thursday's four explosions - three in the London Underground and one on a bus - and to examine witness accounts and intelligence as part of their hunt for the bombers.

But police chiefs indicated that had yet to establish the identity or the whereabouts of the terrorists they suspect belong to an extremist Islamist cell in sympathy with the aims of Al-Qaeda.

Tension several cities remained high over the weekend. Police said they had arrested, under prevention of terrorism laws, three British nationals on an inward flight at Heathrow early on Sunday but insisted that any link with last Thursday's bombings was speculative. The three were expected to be released later on Sunday night, according to police sources.

But the arrests, the dozens of bomb alerts in the English capital and an evacuation in the Birmingam city centre over the weekend reflect the nervousness of both police and the general public at the prospect that the bombers were still at large and capable of striking again.

The police also revealed that there had been a few cases of attacks on British Muslims in the wake of the bombings - including one in which an individual was "seriously injured."

The revelation came as some government officials expressed irritation that an article in a Sunday newspaper by Sir John Stevens, the former Metropolitan Police commissioner, might stir up racial tensions. He said the bombers were "almost certainly" British - with many more born and bred here willing to attack.

Bron : http://news.ft.com/cms/s/8186face-f1...00e2511c8.html[/size]

[/edit]

[Antoon]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door exodus

Dit is weer een duidelijk teken voor inside job.

Daar gaat ie weer, de ongevaarlijke gek .





Maar het meest moest ik toch lachen met de volgende zin:

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door exodus

More on this story as and when it develops.

Afijn, ik ben toch dankbaar voor het lachen tussen al de miserie veroorzaakt door een aantal laffe en vulgaire islamisten. Zoveel onschuldige mensen vermoorden. Wat een laffaards.[edit]
[size=1]Edit:[/size]

[size=1]After edit by Antoon on 12-07-2005 at 00:02
Reason:
--------------------------------

Daar gaat ie weer, de ongevaarlijke gek .





Maar het meest moest ik toch lachen met de volgende zin:

Afijn, ik ben toch dankbaar voor het lachen tussen al de miserie veroorzaakt door een aantal laffe en vulgaire islamisten. Zoveel onschuldige mensen vermoorden. Wat een laffaards.[/size]

[size=1]Before any edits, post was:
--------------------------------

Daar gaat ie weer, de ongevaarlijke gek .





Maar het meest moest ik toch lachen met de volgende zin:

Afijn, ik ben toch dankbaar voor het lachen tussen al de miserie veroorzaakt door een aantal laffe en vulgaire islamisten. Zoveel onschuldige mensen vermoorden. Wat een laffaards.[/size]

[/edit]

[Herr Flick]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door maddox

Hier ga ik zelfs geen moeite voor doen. De technische kant is overduidelijk. En de samenzweerders hebben weer een kluif.

Jezus christus zeg...


Da meent m nu toch zelf nie, ...


Maar nee, ge hebt gelijk het is allemaal een groot complot om de getuigen van de moord op Diana, Kennedy, Mailyn Monroe en Lord Mountbatten uit de weg te ruimen, want die waren allemaal gepland door de Queen herself, die eigenlijk een gin-tonic zuipende lustmoordenares is...

[Herr Flick]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door exodus

Het is duidelijk dat jullie niet geinteresseerd zijn in de waarheid. Wat zijn de kansen dat er op exact hetzelfde moment en exact dezelfde plaats , oefeningen gaan plaatsvinden. Net als bij 9/11. En net voor de aanslagen was het "terror alert" verminderd.

Allemaal weer aanwijzingen dat het een inside job is.

Exodus, als het zo zou zijn, en het zou ooit uitkomen, (net zoals alle dingen overigens ooit aan het licht komen ... )

Dan zouden de britten hun leiders niet lynchen, maar hun levend hun organen eruit rukken en ze te drogen hangen aan de muren van de Tower, tot de kraaien ze zouden hebben weggepikt.

Maar ja, al die treinen staken vol springstof, en zijn met een GSM vanuit Whitehall ter ontploffing gebracht, ...

Pittig detail in de Tube marcheert uwe GSM niet, trust me , ik heb het zelf al geprobeerd...

[Antoon]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Herr Flick

...., al die treinen staken vol springstof, en zijn met een GSM vanuit Whitehall ter ontploffing gebracht, ...

Pittig detail in de Tube marcheert uwe GSM niet, trust me , ik heb het zelf al geprobeerd...

[parcifal]

Exodus,
even voor de duidelijkheid :

Alex Jones en Prisonplanet.com en andere conspiracy theory websites voldoen NIET als bron voor het soort beweringen dat jij maakt. (en die je trouwens in 99% van de gevallen van ginds gaat copy/pasten).

Op die manier ga je mij niet overtuigen en bijna zeker ook niemand anders.

Wat je nodig hebt is een consistent verhaal : dader/motief/modus operandi
én daarnaast objectieve en onafhankelijke getuigen.

Jij lijkt mij eerder het type dat een puzzel probeert op te lossen met
behulp van een schaar : als het stukje niet past, knippen we het toch lekker even bij....