![]() |
Registreren kan je hier. Problemen met registreren of reageren op de berichten? Een verloren wachtwoord? Gelieve een mail te zenden naar [email protected] met vermelding van je gebruikersnaam. |
|
Registreer | FAQ | Forumreglement | Ledenlijst |
soc.culture.belgium Via dit forum kun je alle berichten lezen die worden gepost op de nieuwsgroep soc.culture.belgium. Je kunt hier ook reageren op deze berichten, reacties worden dan ook in deze nieuwsgroep gepost. Vergeet niet om dit te lezen. |
|
Discussietools |
![]() |
#1 |
Berichten: n/a
|
![]() p2p news / p2pnet:- Bands and solo artists are being “unfairly squeezed” in the digital era, says a recent UK news report, talking about mainstream performers and completely ignoring the fact that Big Music's machinations aren't all that's impacting and altering the world of digital music. Because it's not just about market share, 'product' and who gets what as the korporate music klans divvy up the money. "A cartel is a group of producers whose goal it is to fix prices, to limit supply and to limit competition," says Wikipedia. "Cartels are prohibited by antitrust laws in most countries; however, they continue to exist nationally and internationally, formally and informally." The infamous drug cartels are possibly the most insidious and powerful, but close behind them are the cartels run by the international software and entertainment industries which together control, almost absolutely, the traditional print and electronic news media. The Net and blogs and independent news sites are slowly but surely changing that and in the same way, indie music labels are now making their presence known and felt, although EMI, Sony BMG, Warner and Universal, who together comprise the Big Music cartel, and the people who rely on them, are doing their best to pretend this new, vital form of competition doesn't even exist. In the meanwhile, through the Net, for the first time, indie musicians are showing the public there's more available than merely Oasis, Radiohead and Jamelia, say. And there's nothing unfair about it. “I lived through the first punk revolution in '76,” posts Julian Bond. in a comment to IFPI reports booming business. “And I worked in a studio in the early 80s. I well remember the explosion of creativity as people discovered they could self publish. For a brief while there were hundreds of indy labels and thousands of people doing short run pressings in the UK. “Of course, most of those bands sank without trace and the indy labels got swallowed up. It really is time to do this again and disintermediate the big cartel. “This time around the small labels can keep going and make a real run at it with pure internet pr, marketing and distribution. What's needed is for the middle aggregators like Amazon to support them along with the search engines and information aggregators like last.fm.” Bond was responding to an earlier post. Read on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RIAA has already lost No one ever mentions the fact that independent musicians / labels sales have exploded over the last three years and more than make up for any (perceived) losses the RIAA are claiming. (Christian Science Monitor, 2004). That should also tell the courts that there are valid LEGAL reasons for free downloading! I doubt if Amazon would continue to offer free downloads if they hadn't discovered it also fueled sales. The RIAA even cried when BBC offered Beethoven for free downloads - who owns the copyrights for Beethoven now? That's the real crime, they are stealing culture and history. People exploring musical tastes are just what the RIAA fears the most. One of the first observations made by original Napster shortly after starting, was the majority of songs being traded were not songs the music industry (RIAA) had any interest in. Times have changed and people want choices even if they have to pay for radio (Sirius) to get it. How many kids would really buy what they download, ie have the extra $5k to fill up their iPods with purchased music? The mp3 player has the p2p network to thank for it's success - another shot in the arm for creativity and innovation. That's also why music stores the RIAA develop haven't got a chance as long as they promote a very narrow, limited musical range - and it's highly doubtful that they will voluntarily change. I doubt if RIAA will ever offer the musician much more than $0.10 on the dollar. I can't think of an industry that works so hard against giving the customer what they want. P2p is only one part of the growing "music underground". The RIAA has already lost. The numbers tell the story. The more aggressive RIAA becomes, the more downloading becomes symbolic. http://p2pnet.net/story/6473 |